Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 94

Reviews
Shared by: Tim Stanley
Stats
views:
16
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
4/9/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. Doc. 94 Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 94 Filed 08/22/2003 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 MICHAEL S. KWUN - #198945 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY INC., sued under its former name GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and Counter Defendant, v. GOOGLE INC., a California corporation, Defendant and Counter Claimant. Case No. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL) PROOF OF SERVICE 1 317494.01 Proof Of Service Case No. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL) Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW Document 94 Filed 08/22/2003 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jack C. Berenzweig, Esq. Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione NBC Tower - Suite 3600 455 N. Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, IL 60611 Facsimile No.: (312) 321-4299 Anthony I. Fenwick, Esq. Latham & Watkins 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Facsimile No.: (650) 463-2600 PROOF OF SERVICE I Lauren Hartz-Lewis, declare and state as follows: I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is Keker & Van Nest, LLP, 710 Sansome Street, San Francisco, California 94111. On August 22, 2003, I served the following document(s): GOOGLE’S RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (SEALED VERSION) DECLARATION OF CHRISTINE P. SUN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (SEALED) by MESSENGER, by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below, and dispatching a messenger with instructions to hand-carry the above and make delivery to the following during normal business hours, by leaving the package with the person whose name is shown or the person authorized to accept courier deliveries on behalf of the addressee. by FEDERAL EXPRESS, by placing a true and correct copy in a sealed envelope addressed as shown below. I am readily familiar with the practice of Keker & Van Nest, LLP for correspondence for delivery by FedEx Corporation. According to that practice, items are retrieved daily by a FedEx Corporation employee for overnight delivery Executed on August 22, 2003, at San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. /s/ Lauren Hartz-Lewis Lauren Hartz-Lewis 2 317494.01 Proof Of Service Case No. C 02-01991 JSW (EDL)

Shared by: Tim Stanley
Other docs by Tim Stanley
Related docs
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 197
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 183
Views: 36  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services v. Google Inc - 5
Views: 47  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 213
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 1
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 161
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 1
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 155
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 105
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 22
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 151
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 1
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc. - 69
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0