Richard Vitale Indictment Press Conference Transcript (RTF) by gwm21537


									    Attorney General Martha Coakley Announces 10 Grand Jury
   Indictments against Richard Vitale for Lobbying and Campaign
                         Finance Violations
                        Press Conference December 18, 2008

Attorney General Martha Coakley:
Good afternoon. Everybody all set? Attorney General Martha Coakley.
Today, a Suffolk Grand Jury returned ten indictments against Richard Vitale, 63-years-old of
Boston, and WN Advisors, a limited liability corporation, that’s owned and controlled by
Richard Vitale. There are seven charges against Mr. Vitale; there are three against WN Advisors,
and they are based as a result of an investigation beginning by the Attorney General’s Office
back in June of this year, when we received a referral from the Secretary of State, relating to
alleged lobbying activities by Richard Vitale on behalf of The Mass Association of Ticket
Let me just explain those seven charges against Mr. Vitale. He faces two counts of failure to
register as a legislative agent, also known as a lobbyist. That’s a violation of Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 3, Section 41. He is facing one count of an illegal agreement for
compensation contingent on passage of legislation; I can talk a little more about that later. He
faces four counts of making campaign contributions over $200; the law prohibits any lobbyist or
legislative agent from, in a given year, giving to any candidate or elected official over $200.
The three charges against WN Advisors follow those charges. Two are failure to register as a
legislative agent, and one count for entering into an illegal contingency agreement, that is asking
for or attempting to receive monies in the event of success of passage of legislation.
Let me just give you a quick background on this. The legislation in Massachusetts that regulates
the resale of tickets for sporting events, public events, or what are called public amusement, has
not kept pace with the ticket prices, with the technology, with the number of events, and type of
events. In fact the law was passed in 1924, and it requires, if there is to be a resale, that it can be
resold only for face value, plus $2. Again, outdated, unenforced, and relatively unenforceable.
Most in the Commonwealth had agreed that that legislation needed some updating to bring the
statute into the 21st Century. The Mass Association of Ticket Brokers was interested in
promoting a change in the law and they wanted to address legislation that would update that law,
and particularly, they had particular interest in how the legislation would look.
We allege in these indictments, that Richard Vitale and WN Advisors, after entering into a
contract with the Mass Association of Ticket Brokers, was paid a total of $60,000. The contract,
in fact, allowed up to $90,000, although $60,000 was paid.
We allege that Richard Vitale communicated on several occasions and in different ways, with
both the Speaker of the House Salvatore DiMasi and the Speaker Pro tempore Thomas Petrolletti
in order to both promote and shape this legislation around the resale of tickets in Massachusetts.
In October of 2007, that legislation passed the House. It did not however make progress in the
Senate and is currently stalled and in fact, will expire at the end of this session.
We allege that Richard Vitale and WN Advisors were required to and failed to publicly register
as an entity or an individual who is acting as lobbyist to the legislature. Why is this important?
Because, we require transparency both for the public as to how legislation is being influenced
and shaped, and also to legislators.
The law requires that those who are lobbyists are acting on behalf of others for payment, cannot
donate more than $200 per calendar year to candidates or to legislators, and most importantly, if
you are registered as a lobbyist, there are other consequent obligations; you have to for instance
file an itemized statement, twice a year, under oath that lists all of your contributions and all of
your expenditures that have been incurred or paid for on your behalf or on behalf of any
members of the general court, any members or officers or employees of the legislature.
And particularly in a state where we don’t require a legislature to follow the Open Meeting Law
or to be subject to public requests for information, or what is commonly called Freedom of
Information requests, it is particularly important that the public and the members of the
legislature understand who is attempting to conduct business before them and who is
compensating them, and in what manner they are being compensated.
Failure to register as a lobbyist can operate to influence budgets and legislation in a way that is
clearly not intended by the statutory oversight and it allows someone who fails to register to
operate behind closed doors and with no transparency or accountability.
Failure to comply with the lobbying laws can result in a corruption of the system, both to the
detriment to the public, as well as to those who are operating in good faith as members of the
legislature. They can not gauge who is trying to influence them or who is influencing them, and
on what those contributions are based. In fact, it is the same reason why we require all candidates
and all elected officials to comply with the stringent, but comprehensive, rules under the Office
of Campaign and Finance. We allow for contributions in Massachusetts. We encourage that. In
fact, we have not gone the route of public campaign finance, but we do require public disclosure,
and it is the only way we can ensure that there is some way to tell how legislation and budgets
are being influenced.
I want to emphasize that by these charges today; they are limited to Mr. Vitale, and to WN
Advisors. We have not implicated the Mass Association of Ticket Brokers or the three
representatives and one senator who were the recipients of contributions over $200. We do not
implicate, in any way, the firm of Vitale and Caturano and Company, who were cooperative with
this investigation. We also received cooperation from the Office of the Secretary of State, the
Inspector General, the Office of Campaign and Political Finance, as well as the State Ethics
I want to stress also that this is an ongoing investigation. We are announcing these indictments
today, and that Mr. Vitale and WN Advisors are facing penalties of up to $30,000, as well as up
to, for Mr. Vitale, two years in the house or a $2,000 fine. His arraignment on these charges is
scheduled for Suffolk Superior Court on January 5.
I would be happy to answer questions that I can, it is a pending indictment. I want to stress also
that these are charges only, that both defendants are innocent until proven guilty, and I will
answer any questions for clarification if I can.

To top