ANALISIS SITUASI MDR TB DI INDONESIA - PowerPoint

Document Sample
scope of work template
							ANALISIS SITUASI MDR TB
     DI INDONESIA


      NTP INDONESIA
       I Wayan Diantika
    INTRODUCTION (1)
Mono resistance
MDR
Poly resistance
X-DR
      INTRODUCTION (2)
Magnitude of the MDR-TB Problem
 WHO/IUATLD Global Projection Drug Resistance
 Surveillance, which surveyed fifty-eight different
 countries between 1996 and 1999, revealed the
 presence of new “hot spots” for MDR-TB in
 addition to those reported in the first phase of the
 WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Drug Resistance
 Surveillance.
 MDR-TB was shown to range from 0% to 14.1% among
 new TB cases. Another review (1999) compiled by
 Harvard Medical School has shown that drug-
 resistant TB exists in 104 countries in recent years.
Development of Drug Resistance
  from the perspective of the
            patient:
• The presence of drug resistant strains
  results from simple Darwinian
  pressures, brought out by the presence
  of antibiotics

• Multiple drug resistant strains result
  from the step-wise accumulation of
  individual resistance elements
  therefore MDR-TB is MAN-MADE
History Elements that place a patient at-risk for
MDR-TB or drug resistance
1. Previous TB treatment with multiple drugs

2. Failed TB Treatment that is documented

3. A known chronic TB case

4. Default from previous TB treatment or erratic use of TB drugs

5. Exposure to a known MDR case

6. Use of TB drugs of poor or unknown quality

7. Prior use of an inadequate regimen

8. Conditions associated with drug malabsorption or severe diarrhea
       Problem analysis MDR in
              Indonesia
• Only ± 30% of hospitals & < 5% of private
  providers are currently involved in DOTS
• No data on TB drug resistance, except for few
  small studies (West Java MDR: ± 5% !!!).
• Some second line drugs are free available on
  the market and currently used in first line
  regimens!
• Under detection of re-treatment cases (Cat2)
  Neglect to take treatment history causes ‘’miss-
  classification and ’’under-treatment’’..
          CASE NOTIFICATION_IND
310000
                                         279695
                         254601
260000                                                   EP-TB

         214658
210000
                                                  4809   NEW AFB (-)
                                  4446
160000
                  4429
                                                         RETREATMENT
110000

 60000
                                                         NEW AFB (+)

 10000

         2004            2005            2006
         CASE NOTIFICATION_IND

310000
                                        EP-TB
260000
210000                           4809   NEW AFB (-)

160000
110000
            4429
                       4446
                                            CASE NOTIFICATION_IND
                                        RETREATMENT


60000                                   NEW AFB (+)

10000
                   310000
         2004       2005      2006


                   260000                                                        EP-TB


                   210000
                                                                          4809   NEW AFB (-)
                                                                4446
                   160000
                                                      4429
                                                                                 RETREATMENT
                   110000

                    60000
                                                                                 NEW AFB (+)

                    10000

                                        2004                 2005      2006
         CASE NOTIFICATION_IND

310000
                                       EP-TB
260000
210000                          4809   NEW AFB (-)
                      4446
160000      4429
                                       RETREATMENT
110000
60000                                  NEW AFB (+)
10000                                                 TREATMENT OUT COME OF NEW AFB (+)
         2004      2005      2006



                                               100%                              TRANSFERRED
                                                                                 OUT
                                                     80%                         DEFAULT

                                                     60%                         FAILURE

                                                                                 DIED
                                                     40%
                                                                                 COMPLETED
                                                     20%
                                                                                 CURED
                                                     0%
                                                            2004       2005
         CASE NOTIFICATION_IND

310000
                                       EP-TB
260000
210000                          4809   NEW AFB (-)
                      4446
160000      4429
                                       RETREATMENT
110000
60000                                  NEW AFB (+)
10000
         2004      2005      2006                          TREATMENT OUTCOME FOR
                                                             RETREATMENT CASES

                                                100%
                                                                             TRANSFERRED OUT
                                                     80%                     DEFAULT

                                                     60%                     FAILURED

                                                                             DIED
                                                     40%
                                                                             COMPLETED TR
                                                     20%
                                                                             CURED
                                                     0%
                                                              2004    2005
       TREATMENT OUTCOME FOR
         RETREATMENT CASES
4500
        180
                  139
        294
4000    143
                  319
                         TRANSFERRED OUT
                  187
                         DEFAULT
3500
                         FAILURED
                         DIED
3000
                         COMPLETED TR
2500                     CURED


2000

       2004      2005
      Risk factors for increase
      of MDR in Indonesia (1)

   Therapeutic ‘’chaos’’ : prescription of
    inadequate doses / combinations of drugs
   unsupervised treatment, no monitoring
   no registration, no reporting
   high costs to the patients (fees)
   inadequate drug supplies and distribution
        Risk factors for increased
           MDR in Indonesia (2)
•   Many TB patients are treated by private providers
    (not following DOTS).
•   Un-controlled use of second-line drugs in hospitals
    and private sector (quinolones, kanamycin etc)
•   Poor treatment performance in most hospitals:
    - low conversion rate
    - low cure rate
    because many patients drop-out from treatment.
    Risk factors for increased
      MDR in Indonesia (3) :
•   Currently the chronic TB cases cannot
    be treated (no DOTS plus available)
    These chronic cases continue to
    transmit drug resistant TB


•   TB- HIV is looming…
     Reason MDR-TB as an Alarm
     Multi-Drug Resistant TB prevalence*
        6                     5.5 %

        5

        4

        3

        2       1.6 %

        1

        0
            With good TB With Poor TB
               Control      Control

*The WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-TB Drug Resistance Surveillance
  (1994-1997). Countries with good TB control = >33% DOTS coverage.
       Conversion Results New Smear Positives,
                East Java, 2004 cohort

100%
 90%
 80%
 70%
                                             DO
 60%
                                             Not examined
 50%
                                             Still Positive
 40%
                                             Conversion
 30%
 20%
 10%
  0%
          Puskesmas         Hospitals/BP4
  Treatment Results E.Java, Hospitals 2004
                  cohort
100%
80%                                    Transfer
                                       DO
60%                                    Failure
40%                                    Died
                                       completed
20%                                    Cured
 0%
           All        Hospital/BP4
       Treatment Results Smear Negatives East Java,
                       2003 Cohort

100%
 90%
 80%
 70%                                             Transfer out
 60%                                             DO
 50%                                             Failure
 40%                                             Died
 30%                                             Completed
 20%
 10%
  0%
            Puskesmas           Hospital/BP4
The basis of anti-TB therapy and MDR-TB:
 HDL -- a comprehensive approach and
          unified system of care
                          Drugs
         Smear/Culture
                             Case management
          DST & QC

               Surgery




Government Health
Services
                         Private Physicians
                         and Hospitals
 THE NEW MDR-TB Guidelines
• a flexible framework approach combining both
  clinical and programmatic aspects of DOTS Plus
• based on essential programme conditions
• But encouraging programs to tailor their case-
  finding and treatment strategies to the local
  epidemiological and programme situation
• Reflect GLC expert consensus and evidence and
  experience from GLC projects thus far
         OBJECTIVES of DRS
           in Central Java

• To determine levels and pattern of resistance to
  first-line anti-TB drugs among new sputum
  smear positive cases and among previously
  treated TB cases in Central Java province

• To develop a survey model for routine
  surveillance of TB drug resistance in the country
EXPECTED OUTCOMES of DRS

• Level and pattern of resistance to first-line
  anti-TB drugs among new sputum smear
  positive cases and among previously
  treated TB cases in Central Java.
• The outcome of treatment of patients with
  different resistance patterns.
• A model protocol for surveillance of drug
  resistance in Indonesia
     DOTS-Plus
 A comprehensive strategy of the WHO Stop
TB Partnership, developed by the DOTS-Plus
    Working Group, for the diagnosis and
 management of MDR-TB and other forms of
             drug resistant TB
     THE DOTS-Plus Framework
1. Sustained Political commitment


2.Diagnosis of MDR-TB through quality-assured
culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST).


3. Appropriate treatment strategies that utilize
second line drugs under proper management
conditions.


4. Uninterrupted supply of quality assured
second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs.


5. Recording and reporting system designed for
DOTS-Plus programs.
Mainstreaming DOTS-Plus into DOTS


•   Referral from DOTS-programme:
    failures, chronics

•   Same (reference) laboratory

•   Same treatment delivery system

•   Drug-procurement and R&R: adapted
    but integrated!
   Preliminary results of DOTS-Plus projects

• In Estonia and Latvia a large proportion of cases
  enrolled on MDR-TB treatment are new while in Peru,
  Philippines and Tomsk the majority are chronic
• Treatment success rates range from 61-82%
• Only 2% of patients have stopped treatment due to
  adverse events
• Future plans: Case-based data is being collected from
  these pilot sites to serve as evidence for MDR-TB
  policy development
 Supranational Laboratory Network 2005




                      Coordinating Centre
                      SRL
                      Under evaluation

3 New SRLs, 2 new candidates and 120 countries/settings linked to SRLN
Global Project coverage 2005




      Baseline achieved
      Ongoing/Finalizing
      Planned
Parameters to consider when designing a
          DOTS-Plus strategy
 Government and NTP commitment
 Well performing basic DOTS
 Program is able to implement the 5 components of
  DOTS-Plus
 Rational case-finding strategy using quality assured
  smear, culture and DST ( concordance with a SRL)
 Representative DRS data for rational country/area-
  specific treatment design and planning of
  procurement
 Reliable DOT throughout treatment
 Free effective side-effect management
 Regular supply of ALL drugs involved!
    Assessment national level (1)
            Strengths
• Impressive progress of NTP in recent years
  (expansion, quality and innovations)
• Strong internationally recognized NTP
  leadership; focal point for DOTS Plus/lab
• Establishment hospital/NTP linkages
• Increasing collaboration with Medical
  Associations
• Approval by the GFATM and extensive
  international support
• 4 types of SLDs not yet available (no DR)
    Assessment national level (2)
      Priority issues to address
• EQA laboratory capacity for DRS and
  selected pilot sites
• Expansion of DRS (for Cat 2 and 4)
• Technical DOTS-Plus development
• Protection of crucial second-line drugs
  (Kanamycine and Quinolones)
• SLD procurement
• HRD plan in the field of DOTS Plus
   Assessment of sites: Issues that
   need to be addressed in all sites

• Lack of EQA assured lab capacity
• Inadequate use of available second line
  drugs (inadequate regimens, financial
  barriers, no SL-DST)
• No experience with 4 types of SLD
• Alternative for family member DOT
• Funding of hospitalization, lab tests,
  human resources, incentives.
                 Next steps
•   To do an assessment on MDR situation in
    Indonesia,
•   assist in identifying potential pilot sites for
    implementation of DOTS plus
•   provide the necessary technical assistance to
    the NTP to starting the project
•   To draft a plan for the management of MDR-
    TB cases including the possible application to
    Green Light Committee
 Why should Indonesia consider to
   use the GLC mechanism ?

• Access to a complex market of quality
  assured second line drugs
• Preferential prices (pooled procurement)
• Technical assistance ; benefiting from
  GLC experiences worldwide
• Requirement of the GFATM grant /
  International quality label (donors)
      Expected output from the
            assessment
• Assessment report with recommendations
  to the NTP (next steps) concerning
  implementation of DOTS plus and
  requirements for GLC application.

• Draft work plan for implementation of
  DOTS plus


                                          35
                                 DOTS-Plus scale up of through the GLC


                     40


                     35                           September 2005 – 35 projects
Number of projects




                     30


                     25


                     20


                     15


                     10


                      5


                      0
                          2000     2001    2002     2003             2004        2005
                                   Abkhazia
                                   Azerbaijan
                                   Bolivia
GLC approved DOTS-Plus projects    Costa Rica
                                   Dominican
                                   Republic
                                   Egypt
                                   El Salvador
                                   Estonia
                                   Georgia
                                   Haiti
                                   Honduras
                                   India
                                   Jordan
                                   Kenya
                                   Kyrgyzstan
                                   Latvia
                                   Lebanon
                                   Malawi
                                   Mexico
                                   Moldova
                                   Nepal
                                   Nicaragua
                                   Peru
                                   Philippines
                                   Romania
                                   Russia
                                   Syria
                                   Tunisia
                                   Uzbekistan


 GLC-approved DOTS-Plus projects

						
Related docs