Challenges and Opportunities for In Vivo Imaging In Oncology

Reviews
Shared by: sammyc2007
Categories
Stats
views:
20
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
3/30/2008
language:
pages:
0
Challenges and Opportunities for In Vivo Imaging In Oncology Presented by Dan Sullivan to the NCI Board of Scientific Advisors, June 2002 See the Duke SAIRP web site for images from Mouse MRI Atlas http://wwwcivm.mc.duke.edu/ This slide set is abridged for web presentation. In Vivo Imaging For Oncology Devices (Hardware &Software) Clinical Methodologies •Screening •Diagnosis •Staging •Prognosis •Therapy Monitoring •Image-guided Rx Molecular Probes; Contrast Agents Laboratory Methodologies Study biology or interventions in animal models or humans (e.g., functional, in vivo genomics/proteomics; drug development) Image Exploitation; Informatics Outline Overview Look back (portfolio review) Clinical and Laboratory imaging issues Molecular Imaging Image-guided interventions Conclusion BIP Portfolio 140,000,000 120,000,000 100,000,000 80,000,000 60,000,000 40,000,000 20,000,000 0 Total PA $ Funded Total RFA $ Funded Other($) P01($) SBIR/STTR($) R01($) 96 97 98 99 00 FY FY FY FY FY FY 01 BIP FY01 Portfolio 19 11 36 9 48 R01($) SBIR/STTR($) P01($) Other($) Total RFA $ Funded Total PA $ Funded 2 $ (M) 45 BIP FY01 RFA Funding ACRIN (U01) SAIRP (R24) ICMIC Planning (P20) ICMIC (P50) Prostate Ca (R01; R33) Molecular Probes (R01) LIDC (U01) 10,884,947 6,894,782 6,355,434 6,211,663 2,634,319 2,415,395 1,326,774 Imaging in Clinical Trials ACRIN – more later  Rigorous methodology Two U01’s will not be renewed Additional venues for diagnostic trials: e.g., ACOSOG; R01’s; R33’s Imaging in Clinical Trials More integration of imaging studies in CTEP trials – especially in the neoadjuvant setting Inter-group Imaging Council Imaging Cores in Cancer Centers Access to imaging resources is inadequate Monitoring Response to Therapy RECIST Criteria -- good start; volumetric would be better. Need Functional Response Indicators – “molecular imaging”. Generic, “downstream” indicator vs. specific, targeted probe? Chemotherapy Response by MRI & MRS 1 wk pre-Tx 76 cc Day 1 AC x1 79 cc Day 42 AC x3 26 cc Day 70 AC x4 25 cc Day 112 taxol x2 11 cc Day 178 taxol x4 6 cc 593 267 79 481 partial response to AC, regrowth on taxol final pathology - viable IDC and extensive DCIS 486 595 Univ. of Minnesota Molecular Imaging Targets/Probes MAb, Fragments Receptor Mapping Hormones Drugs and Ligands Peptides Accumulation via Phosphorylation [18F]FDG Internalization glut 4 Enzyme Activity: Inhibition, Conc., Synthesis Hexokinase DNA Accumulation via DNA-Synthesis Accumulation via AA Transport or Protein Synthesis AAT mRNA mRNA Oligonucleotides mRNA Binding Reporter Gene DNA Reporter Probe FDG-PET Monitoring Response to STI571 in GIST Baseline 24 hours 7 days 2 months 5.5 months Baseline 24 hrs 7 days 2 mos 5.5 mos Dana-Farber Cancer Institute In vivo imaging of protease (Cathepsin B) activity 2 mm Light image Human LX1 small cell lung tumor NIRF image Nature Biotech; 1999;17:375-378 Weissleder, Nature Biotech, 1999 10 nmole C-PGC, 24 hr A Nanoscale, Targeted Liposome Targeting MAb or ligand High affinity metal binding Gd encapsulation Stanford Univ. Phase 1, 2 Clinical Trials MMPI and Cancer: Trials and Tribulations, Coussens, Science 2002 Targeted Agent Trials: Problems:   Selecting patients Biologic endpoint assessment Examples:    Matrix metaloproteinase inhibitors Anti-angiogenesis therapies 17-AAG (HSP90 inhibitor) Construction of Multimeric Ligands PEG Image Therapy MSH CCK Enk. Gillies; U. AZ Multimeric Specificity Nano-engineered Optical Agents Emission spectra can be “tuned” [Nanotechnology: the creation of functional materials, devices and systems through control of matter at the scale of 1 to 100 nanometers, and the exploitation of novel properties and phenomena at the same scale.] DCIDE Development of Clinical Imaging Drugs and Enhancers Purpose: Facilitate pre-clinical development of promising imaging agents by providing the resources needed for successful IND application. Small Animal Imaging for Drug Development (Demonstration Project: BIP, DTP, CTEP) anti-angiogenesis first model system; NCI will supply the animals, drugs, and imaging protocol, to contractors; tissues will be returned to NCI for standardized processing. Image-guided Interventions Future Potential Surgical Robots PET/CT •David Townsend, U Pitt. •NCI R01, 1993 •Now commercially available • ~ 150 expected to be sold by 2003 •Townsend has received R33 for second-generation •Higher-resolution, faster acquisition PET •Sub 4-minute scans Quantitative whole body imaging in 5 min …………or less PET/CT-Based IMRT: Cervical Cancer 14 mm increase in axial extent of para-aortic lymph nodes Imaging Modalities Anatomy CT US MRI PET Optical Physiology Molecular FMT imaging of CAB in 9L glioma White light a) 1cm g) Excitation light 1cm b) (nM) h) Emission light 1cm (cm) 1cm 0 1 2 i) Nature Med, 2002 Depth penetration in human tissues 108 Fluorescence strength (counts • sec-1 • mm-2) 106 104 30dB 20dB 102 10dB 100 10-2 10-4 Breast (40-70yrs) Breast (20-40yrs) Lung adult Muscle adult Brain adult 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Ntziachristos, Ripoll, Weissleder. Optics Letters, 2002; 27:333-335 Depth (cm) Whole-body Screening Now: US – CT Germany – MRI Japan – FDG PET Future (US): PET/CT? MRI? Skin Cancer Screening “Optical screening”; < 2% chance of AK4 Ca; Marked “Overdiagnosis” Rx is: “benign”, inexpensive, “Image-guided”. MRI-Guided, Focused Ultrasound System KHH99 MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapy Ductal invasive breast cancer Treatment plan 80 ultrasound foci MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapy 0 40°C T Temperature monitoring during therapy (SRTF, T1-w) MRI-guided, focused ultrasound therapy Summary, properties •Noninvasive through intact skin •No scar •No anesthesia •No hospitalisation •Immediate Effect •Repeatable Integrated Cancer Care Detection Diagnosis Treatment Detection Diagnosis Treatment data analysis sensing effector action judgment communication Unconventional Innovations Web Site: UIP Awardees FY 99 U of Michigan, James Baker, M.D. Nano-scale based dendrimer devices U of Penn, Britton Chance, Ph.D. Near-infrared detector and contrast agents for molecular targets U of Alabama at Birmingham, David Curiel, M.D. Genetic approaches to tumor detection and intervention U of Cal at Davis, N.C. Luhmann, Jr.Ph.D. Compton light source for high-contrast X-rays; NASA Ames Research Center, Meyya Meyyapan, Ph.D. Carbon nanotube-based biosensor and prototype biosensor catheter UIP Awardees FY 2000 U of Washington, Kirk W. Beach, M.D., Ph.D. Ultrasound detection of tissue pulsatility U of Pittsburgh, Daniel Farkas, Ph.D. Optical imaging platform for mesoscopic imaging U of Michigan, Raoul Kopelman, Ph.D. Dynamic nano-particles for detection and treatment Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Gregory M. Lanza, M.D., .Ph.D. Targeted Nanoparticle Emulsion for Molecular Imaging and Local Drug Delivery In Vivo Imaging For Oncology Go back and review slide 2 Acknowledgements Ellen Feigal John Hoffman Edward Staab Barbara Croft Barbara Galen Anne Menkens Johnnie Smith Manuel Torres And Many Investigators. Laurence Clarke Gary Kelloff Houston Baker Keyvan Farahani Guoying Liu Richard Reba James Tatum Michael Vannier

Related docs
premium docs
Other docs by sammyc2007