Mental Health Financial Issues
Document Sample


Mental Health
Financial Issues
CMHDA Small Counties
Conference Call
November 16, 2009
Mental Health Financial Issues
Short Doyle II
Medi-Medi Update
Waiver and SPA
ARRA Reporting
Payments
Cost Report Delay
Cost Report Study
MHSA Audit Questions
MHSA FY10/11 Annual Update
MHP Contract Language
EPSDT Question
1
Short Doyle II
DHCS provided a status update
DHCS indicated MEDS is reason for 5,000 CLM limit
DHCS requested counties not change their
implementation wave
DHCS subsequently issued memo that modified the cutoff
for Wave 1 to be concurrent with Wave 2
Link under Breaking News on CMHDA website
Production data test period for Wave 2 is 12/10 – 12/23
2
Medi-Medi Update
DHCS stated the current policy of CMS is claim
must be denied from Medicare in order to bill Medi-
Cal for Medi-Medi services
CMHDA developed specific list of services that
should be exempt
DHCS requesting flexibility from CMS for
exemptions
Good cause should be automatically granted for
Medi-Medi claims that exceed 6 month timeframe
Request that DMH conform to CMS claim timelines
(12 months) and not 6 months
3
Waiver and SPA
Current 1915 Medi-Cal Specialty Mental Health Waiver was
renewed for one year pending resolution of coverage issues
DHCS hopes to submit documentation in the next couple of
weeks addressing CMS’s concerns
CMS wants comprehensive SPA that addresses all
reimbursement issues
Negotiated rates
Supplemental Payments
Description of payment process
SPA will be retroactive to 1/1/09
Supplemental payments for six months of FY 08/09 probably
won’t be distributed until FY11/12
4
ARRA Reporting
Governor Schwarzenegger issued a letter on
September 28, 2009 specifying that ARRA
recipients receiving ARRA funds from a state
agency should report to that state agency
DMH has verbally stated DHCS is responsible for
reporting on the use of Medi-Cal ARRA funds and
counties are not required to report to DMH or DHCS
on these funds
DMH indicated a letter was forthcoming from either
DMH or DHCS indicating counties are not required
to report on ARRA funds
5
Payments
DMH provided approach for allocating
FY09/10 AB3632 funds
Link under FSC Handouts on CMHDA website
DMH indicated managed care allocation not a
proportionate reduction for each county
DMH to provide calculations to CMHDA
6
Cost Report Delay
DMH Information Notice 09-18 informed counties of DMH’s
intention not to enforce the statutorily required due date of the
SD/MC cost report until February 26, 2010
DMH is hosting cost report webinar on November 30th from 9:00
– 2:00
Link under Breaking News on CMHDA website
CMHDA has requested DMH delay MHSA Revenue and
Expenditure Report to coincide with the cost report
Also requested 25% be released without submission of Revenue
and Expenditure Report
Counties still have to complete SB90 claims for AB3632 services
by February 15th or face a 10% penalty
7
Cost Report Study
Budget trailer bill language requires DMH to conduct
a cost report study of a sample of counties and
providers that exceed SMAs in FY 09/10
Selected counties would have to submit data by 10/31/10
DMH identified 12 counties selected for study
Link under FSC Handouts on CMHDA website
DMH methodology for selection has some flaws but
overall selection appears fine
CMHDA will request to change submission date to
correspond with normal cost report submission date
8
MHSA Audit Questions
CMHDA developed list of questions for DMH
auditors to respond in writing
Link under Breaking News on CMHDA website
DMH auditors to attend December FSC
meeting to discuss
9
MHSA FY10/11 Annual Update
DMH trying to issue FY10/11 Annual Update
Guidelines by end of November
DMH confirmed that counties will have
access to MHSA prudent reserve as part of
FY10/11 Annual Update
The 50% prudent reserve requirement will not
be applied in FY10/11
50% becomes a limit and not a requirement
10
MHP Contract Language
CMHDA working with DMH on MHP contract
language
CMHDA proposed several changes
EPSDT quarterly advances
No withhold of managed care allocation
Timeframe for FFP payments
Elimination of Auditor-Controller signature from
cost report
11
EPSDT Question
Counties still unsure of where Phase II amount is
derived
DMH Information Notices 98-03 and 98-12 describe
and provide amounts of Phase II baseline
Phase II amount represents share of managed care
allocation attributable to EPSDT services
DMH increases county baseline by this amount so DMH
doesn’t pay twice for services
Phase II amount should be modified based on changes to
the managed care allocation
12
Related docs
Get documents about "