Green Energy and Hydrogen from Coal
The draft of Integrated Project Proposals in Support for the HYPOGEN EU Initiative of Sustainable Energy Development
Jerzy Bednarczyk, Jan Kozubowski, Jan Rogut
Institute of Opencast Mining “Poltegor”, Wrocław, poltegor@igo.wroc.pl Warsaw Technical University, Warsaw, jankozu@inmat.pw.edu.pl Central Mining Institute, Katowice, rogutjan@yahoo.com
Main Targets and Points of Interests of Hydrogen Related Research in Poland:
• Fossil fuel based power plants as future energy and hydrogen producers the sustainable way - the Green Energy from Coal concept • Trans-border Czech - Slovak- Polish HyCom in Cieszyn/Tesin as an important tool for regional development - non fossil
• Establishment of the International R&D Centre of Separation Technologies for Hydrogen Economy Needs - EU Marie Curie Transfer of Knowledge (TOK) Fund - Coke oven gas as separation model fluid - low cost nanostructured metals for hydrogen separation, cleaning up, and storage
• Hydrogen as friendly (!), safe (!) and profitable (!) material and energy carrier
2
Sources of Natural Gas for Europe in Short Term Perspective
Long-term Security of Gas Supply in a Liberalized Market Jean-Paul PINON Director Gas Market, CREG Co-chairman of the Gas Working Group, CEER UNEC Round Table – Genève 20/01/2004
3
Hydrogen Production, Investment Costs
Investment Costs (1990 US$/kW) 4,000
Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) Partial Oxidation (POX)
3,000
Coal Gasification
Thermal Cracking Biomass Gasification
2,000
Electrolysis
1,000
0 0.001
0.01
0.1
3
1
10
Capacity (million Nm H2 /day)
4
Coal is of great interest because it is:
• Plentiful. Resource ~ 500 years (vs. gas/oil: ~100 years).
•
• •
Inexpensive. 1-1.5 $/GJ HHV
(vs. gas at 2.5+ $/GJ). Ubiquitous. Wide geographic distribution
(vs. middle east).
Clean?! Gasification, esp. with sequestration, produces little gaseous emissions and
a chemically stable, vitreous ash.
5
European Green Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal Technology Development Area
4 2
3
1
6
Locations and Specialisations
• Upper Silesia - bituminuous coal based demonstration plant for H&E production and CO2 sequestration „Black Triangle” - lignite based demonstration plant plant for H&E production and CO2 sequestration Belchatow lignite mine - large scale facility for basic sequestration research gfz Potsdam - facility for applied sequestration research Newcastle University - mineral sequestration, process water issues University of Stuttgart, SIU Carbondale, ISSEP Liege coal processing JRC (Petten, Ispra, Sevilla ) - foresight, regulations and policy aspects 7
•
•
• •
• •
Electricity Generation in EU
9% 12%
OWER
ECH
Gas Renew.
14%
Oil Coal Nuclear
35%
30%
Total production: 2.500 TWh p.a. on coal = 750 TWh p.a.
Average Efficiency Oil 2000: η 35 % Average Efficiency 2010/15: η 50 % Electricity Generation on same amount of coal means:
Production of 321 TWh electricity p.a. with zero CO2-Emission ! or
Coal input: Oil / 0,35 = 2143 TWh 750 2010/15: 2143 x 0,50 = 1071 TWh Difference: 1071 - 750 = 321 TWh
H.-J. Me ier, Dr. K. Th eis, Octob er .2 002
Saving of 30 % CO2 and coal for same electricity production !
8
Fig.: 13
„Green”
Electricity and Hydrogen from Coal
Clean Coal Technologies + CO2 Sequestration = Green Hydrogen and Energy from Coal
9
Vision of Technologically Viable and Economically Feasible Increase of Total Energy Efficiency of Electricity Production of Coal Based Power Plants from 30-35 % now to 60-70 % in 10-15 Year Long Perspective
10
HYPOGEN
FutureGen
11
USTDEV-1.2.7 - Capture and sequestration of CO2 associated with cleaner fossil fuel plants Global and EU energy supply will, for the foreseeable future (2015 - 2020), be dominated by fossil energy sources. However, their CO2 emissions are a major drawback in the context of global climate change. The challenge is therefore to be able to use these fossil fuels whilst eliminating CO2 through cost-effective capture and sequestration and at the same time maintaining EU industrial competitiveness in global markets. Targets: reduce the cost of CO2 capture from 50-60 € to 20-30 € per tonne of CO2 captured, whilst aiming at achieving capture rates above 90%, and assess the reliability and long term stability of sequestration.
12
Major Research Partners
• • • • • • • Poland - GIG, Poltegor, PW, IChPW, IE, AGH, IGSMiE, EMAG Czech Republic: TU Ostrava, ICHP Praque, Germany: TU Stuttgart, gfz Potsdam, GGS Hannover, UK: University of Newcastle, BGS Belgium: ISSEP JRC ( Petten, Ispra, Sevilla) US: SIU Carbondale, US EPA NRMRL Cincinnati, Washington University • Greece: NTUA • Russia: Yukos R&D Centre, Boreskov Institute of Catalysis • Denmark : DTU Lyngby
13
Low emission coal gasification to hydrogen combined with sequestration ready CO2 production
14
ISCC - Innovative In Situ CO2 Capture Technology for Solid Fuel Gasification
15
Energy and Hydrogen Production
post-combustion capture Energy Conversion ASU Fossil Fuel Capture of CO2 Oxy-fuel combustion Capture of CO2 Storage/Use of CO2 Energy / Power
Energy Conversion
pre-combustion decarbonisation Partial oxidation or Reforming CO Shift Fuel gas extraction
Energy / Power or Hydrogen
16
Low emission coal gasification combined with CO2 sequestration in unmineable coal beds and CBM recovery
17
Underground coal gasification combined with geothermics and CO2 sequestration
18
CO2 + H2 + CO O2 + H2O
CO2 + H2 + CO
X
CO2
X
A
H2O HOT H2O COLD H2O HOT ToC 300
C
A
B
C
60
B
0
25
50
75 years
19
Distribution of Magnesium Silicate
Mineral Deposits Worldwide
xMgO.ySiO2.zH2O (s) => x MgO (s) + y SiO2 (s) + z H2O (R1) MgO (s) + CO2 => MgCO3 (s) (R2)
20
Mine Water The Existing
Problem
To be Solved
And we do not need the more in future
21
Final Targets
• Development of background for construction of distributed system of energy and hydrogen production from coal, combined with • European distributed system of carbon dioxide sequestration • using synergy with other methods of hydrogen production
22
Partners from non EU Countries have been invited for participation
US RF China Japan
23
TOK
24
R&D Centre of Separation Technologies for Hydrogen Economy Needs Sources of the funds: • Marie Curie Transfer of Knowledge Coordinated Action • US DOE and US EPA open solicitations • European Capital Venture • Private/Public Partnership
25
Production of Hydrogen and Electricity from Coal
Division of Component Costs
Conventional Gasification Technology Hydrogen Separation Membrane Reactor
5%
17% 27%
22% 39%
26% 11%
8%
4%
8% 11%
22%
Gas separation total
Compression total Gasification reactor
Purification & recovery GTCC or turbine
Gas separation total Coal preparation
Compression total Gasification reactor
Purification & recovery GTCC or turbine
Coal preparation
Data for diagrams taken from “Production of Hydrogen and Electricity from Coal with CO2 Capture” by T.G. Kreutz et al. .http://www.princeton.edu/~cmi/research/Kyoto02/Kreutz%20Kyoto%2002.pdf 26
Coke - oven gas as a model gas mixture for development of advanced, low cost separation - cleaning technologies
27
28
Hydrogen as FRIENDLY SAFE and PROFITABLE material and energy carrier
29
Innovative Concepts
• Hydrogen as a reagent for hazardous waste treatment - dioxin free alternative to incinerators ( EcoSteel )
• Bio-mimetic Process of Hydrogen Generation from Biomass • Hydrogen as energy source for biological methods of value recovery ( metal and clean water) from mine water drainage
30
EcoSteel
RESEARCH PROGRAMME OF THE RESEARCH FUND FOR COAL AND STEEL (CALL 2004)
31
Bio-mimetic Process of Hydrogen Generation from Biomass
A. Brune, TIBITECH January 1998 (VOL 16)
32
55.0
Hydrogen Production Cost ($/GJ) (February $US 2003)
45.0
Grid Electrolysis (Fossil Fuel Based) PV Electrolysis Solar Based Thermal Powered Electrolysis Solar Antenna Power Conversion Steam Reforming of Natural Gas Partial Oxidation Coal Gasification Ammonia Based Solar Powered Electrolysis Wind
35.0
25.0
15.0
5.0 2003
2008
2013
2018
2023
2028
2033
2038
2043
2048
Year
33
Welcome to Cooperation
Rogut Jan Central Mining Institute Plac Gwarkow 1 40-166 Katowice Poland
(+48) 506 184 865 (+48) 32 259 2455 sixjr@gig.katowice.pl rogutjan@yahoo.com
Thanks for Attention
34