Introduction to Academic Goal Setting - PowerPoint
Document Sample


Introduction to
Academic Goal Setting
Phase 1
Miami-Dade County Public Schools
What is the purpose
of our meeting today?
1. To learn about
IPEGS
2. To learn about IPEGS
academic goal
setting
3. To understand how Academic
academic goal Goal Setting
setting relates to
IPEGS
Goal Setting & Goal Attainment
FCAT NRT (norm-referenced test) in Reading
N=20 Students / 3rd Grade
20
# of Students
15
10 Spring 2005
5
0
1-25 26-50 51-75 76-100
Percentile Rank
Goal Statement: During the 2005-06 school year, the majority (> 50%) of
students in my 4th grade reading class will achieve the 50 th percentile or higher
on the Reading FCAT.
FCAT NRT (norm-referenced test) in Reading
N=20 Students / 4th Grade
20
# of Students
15
Spring 2005
10
Spring 2006
5
0
1-25 26-50 51-75 76-100
Percentile Rank
What is the purpose of
academic goal-setting?
Focus on student results
Explicitly connect teaching and learning
Improve instructional practices and teacher /
education specialist performance
Tool for school improvement
NOT a replacement for classroom observation
NOT the sole criterion for evaluation decisions
What does research say about
academic goal setting?
Linked to mastery learning
• 1 standard deviation higher on average compared with conventional instruction (Bloom,
1984)
• Includes formative assessments, frequent corrective feedback
Linked to enhancing pre-requisite cognitive skills
• .7 standard deviation higher on average compared with conventional instruction (Walberg,
1984)
• Includes initial skills assessment and teaching prerequisite skills that are lacking
Linked to assessment for learning
• Formative assessment in the classroom can result in increases in student learning up to two
grade levels (Assessment Reform Group, 2000)
Linked to standards-based performance assessment
• Schools in Loveland, CO, were among highest percentage increase in student performance
after implementing standards-based performance assessment (Stronge & Tucker, 2000)
Linked to standards-based instruction
• 18-41 percentage point gains when teachers set and communicate clear goals for learning
(Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001)
Linked to data-based decision-making
• School districts that show multiple (i.e., 3 or more) years of improvement use data to make
decisions and encourage teachers to use student learning data to make instructional
decision (Cawelti, 2004; Langer & Colton, 2005; Togneri & Anderson, 2003)
What is an academic goal?
Goal … a statement of an
intended outcome of your “SMART” Goals
work:
Specific
Student Learning
Measurable
Distinct from Strategies
Appropriate
Strategies = Means
Goal = End Realistic
“Are you going to New York Time-bound
or by train?”
Link to Decision Tree
Link to Completed Goal Form
Sample Elementary Teacher Goals
4th Grade Teacher
Baseline Data: Four (21%) of my students are Level 4 or higher; 10
(53%) students are Level 3; 3 (16%) students are at Level 2; and 2
(10%) students are at Level 1.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, at least 70% of my
students will demonstrate one year’s growth on the 4th grade
Reading FCAT. For Grade 4, that represents an increase in 230
developmental scale score points.
Kindergarten Teacher
Baseline Data: In September 2006, the DIBELS tests showed that 15
students met benchmarks on the DIBELS and are “at grade level.” Six
students require strategic intervention because they have not met the
benchmarks in all four areas. One student requires intensive
intervention as she is identified as at risk.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, the 6 students
who require strategic intervention will be at grade level by the
end of the year and the 1 student who is “at risk/emerging” will
move to the category of “low risk/established” on three of four
areas tested by DIBELS.
Sample Middle School Teacher Goals
8th Grade Math Teacher
Baseline Data: The baseline data shows that 22% scored at
Achievement Level 1; 21% at Achievement Level 2; 19% at
Achievement Level 3; 18% at Achievement Level 4; and 10% at
Achievement Level 5 on the 7th grade Mathematics FCAT.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, the percentage of
my students scoring at Level 3 or above will increase from 47%
to 60%.
6th Grade Health/PE Teacher
Baseline Data: A pre-test of each sub-area shows that a majority of my
sixth grade students failed to reach the benchmarks in the
Presidential Fitness Tests.
Goal Statement: In the 2006-07 school year, my sixth grade
students will improve on each of the Presidential Fitness sub-
tests by an average of 20%.
Sample High School Teacher Goals
English Teacher
Baseline Data: The baseline data show that my 10th grade students are
scoring at Level 3 or lower, with a majority in Levels 1 and 2. The class
averages for each key content area show that students lack knowledge
and skills to be successful in each one.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, my goal is to reduce
the percentage of students who are at Levels 1 or 2 by 29% so
that the majority of my students are at Level 3 or higher.
Social Studies Teacher
Baseline Data: The 8th grade FCAT Reading data for my students show
that on average the students in my World Geography class answered 5
of 11 (45%) of the Research/Reference questions correctly. In my
World History class, students on average answered 7 of 11 (64%) of
the Research/Reference questions correctly.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, the students in my
World Geography will answer an average of at least 60% of the
Research/Reference questions correctly. The students in my
World History classes will answer an average of at least 75% of
the Research/Reference questions correctly on the Spring 2007
administration of FCAT reading.
Sample Instructional Support Goals
Instructional Coach in an Elementary School
Baseline Data: The baseline data shows that 68% of 4th grade students scored
at achievement Level 3 or lower on the Mathematics FCAT, and 32% scored
at achievement Level 4 or 5.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, the number of 4th grade
students performing at Level 4 or 5 on the 2007 Mathematics FCAT
will increase by 25%, which will result in 40% of students achieving at
Level 4 or 5.
Special Education Teacher
Baseline Data: 23% of students in the schools I serve are minority, yet 50% of
all MR or ED identified students are minority. Data supports
disproportionality in eligibility decisions: Too many minority students are
being found to have MR or ED as compared to the overall population in the
school system.
Goal Statement: For the 2006-07 school year, decisions made at
eligibility meetings in which I participate will result in decisions based
upon data & observations, and will appropriately identify students with
disabilities, with the goal that disproportionality will decrease this year
compared to the current percentage. (This is really where I have
control as an Instructional Specialist and can help ensure that
decisions are made appropriately & are justified 100% of the time.)
Sample Student Services Goals
High School Guidance Counselor
Baseline Data: On the Spring 2006 9th and 10th grade FCAT NRT in reading
and math, 34% of 9th grade students and 46% of 10th grade students
scored between the 26th and 50th percentile on the FCAT NRT Reading,
and 42% of 9th grade students and 48% of 10th grade students scored
between the 26th and 50th percentile on the FCAT NRT Math.
Goal Statement: In the 2006-07 school year, a majority of students
scoring in the 26th to 50th percentile on the FCAT NRT in reading
and mathematics will improve on the FCAT NRT in reading and
mathematics by 10 percentile points.
Physical Therapist
Baseline Data: 46% of the time, students are observed to have a lack of proper
positioning during classroom instruction. When learners are inappropriately
positioned or moved, the student and teacher’s health may be at-risk. For staff,
the result can be an on-the-job injury and absence from work. When the
regular teacher or staff member is absent, learning is impacted. For the
student, being in a less-than-optimal position results in decreased attention,
difficulties controlling movement, and a lack of learning.
Goal Statement: In the 2006-07 school year, the percentage of students
positioned correctly will be 75% or higher in each classroom as
measured by observation.
When can I learn more about
the logistics of goal setting?
Phase II
August 15 – September 15
Agenda
Overview of goal setting
Decision making tree
Reviewing and analyzing data
Identifying needs
Establishing focus
Setting the goal
Determining goal attainment
What do I need to do next?
1) Review details of IPEGS and Goal
Setting at websites:
http://ipegs.dadeschools.net
http://www.teacherqualityresources.com/ipegs.htm
2) Participate in Phase II training which
will take place on [insert date] at [insert
time].
Related docs
Get documents about "