Effect of Corn Particle Size and Pellet Texture on
Document Sample


2006 Poultry Science Association, Inc.
Effect of Corn Particle Size and Pellet Texture
on Broiler Performance in the Growing Phase
A. S. Parsons, N. P. Buchanan, K. P. Blemings, M. E. Wilson, and J. S. Moritz1
Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, West Virginia University,
Morgantown 26506
Primary Audience: Nutritionists, Feed Manufacturers, Broiler Producers, Researchers
SUMMARY
A review of past literature revealed inconsistencies in recommended grain particle size for
optimal broiler performance. Changing diet formulation and subsequent processing variables may
alter pellet texture and potentially affect broiler performance. In the current study, ground corn,
varying in size (781, 950, 1,042, 1,109, and 2,242 m), was added to a soybean-based premix to
create 5 different mash diets. Water and a commercial pellet binder were added separately to
corn-soybean-based diets before steam pelleting to create 2 pelleted diets differing in texture (soft
and hard, respectively). The objective was to evaluate corn particle size, pellet texture, and feed
form variation of compound diets on 3- to 6-wk broiler performance, nutrient retention, carcass
characteristics, TMEn, feed passage time, and particle size preference. Soft and hard pellets had
similar pellet durability (90.4 and 86.2%, respectively) and fines (44.5 and 40.3%, respectively).
Increasing particle size of mash diets improved nutrient retention. However, broiler performance
and energy metabolism were decreased when corn particle size exceeded 1,042 m. This observation
was due, in part, to increased size and maintenance requirement of the gastrointestinal tract.
Broilers fed hard pellets (1,856 g of pellet breaking force) had improved nutrient retention, TMEn,
and subsequent performance compared with broilers fed soft pellets (1,662 g of pellet breaking
force). Pellet texture may affect broilers in a manner similar to particle size.
Key words: particle size, pellet texture, feed form, particle size preference
2006 J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:245–255
DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM m and from 1,173 to 710 m, respectively.
Further decreases (900 to 300 m) have also
Preparing grain by grinding before incorpo-
resulted in improved performance [4]. In contrast,
rating it into a compound diet improves broiler
performance [1, 2]. However, studies focusing on Nir [5] has shown that increasing corn particle
optimal grain size, specifically corn particle size, size from 525 to 897 m increased broiler perfor-
have presented conflicting results. Smaller corn mance. Feeding large-particle corn may produce
particle size has a greater surface area to volume beneficial effects similar to reports of whole grain
ratio, increasing exposure to digestive enzymes feeding. Whole grain feeding has been associated
and presumably decreasing energy needed for with increased gut development and health; that
mastication [3]. Reece et al. [2] and Lott et al. is, a more muscular gizzard and less occurrence of
[1] reported improved broiler performance when proventricular dilatation [6]. Greater development
corn particle size decreased from 1,289 to 987 of the broiler gastrointestinal tract suggests that
1
Corresponding author: jsmoritz@mail.wvu.edu
246 JAPR: Research Report
Figure 1. Corn particle size distribution (% of a 100-g corn sample) for fine, small, medium, large, and coarse corn.
feed may be retained in the upper digestive tract Nearly 80% of all US poultry feed is pelleted
for a longer period allowing for increased enzy- [10]. Broiler performance benefits associated with
matic digestion [6, 7]. Concerning feed manufac- pelleting have been well documented [11, 12, 13,
ture, improved pellet quality has been associated 14]. However, benefits are only realized if pellet
with a smaller grain particle size [8, 9]; however, integrity is maintained to consumption. Zatari et
reducing grain particle size has been shown to al. [15] showed that pellets of poor quality, simu-
increase hammer mill energy consumption and lated by a 25:75 pellet to fines ratio, diminished
decrease production rate [4, 8]. A comprehensive predicted performance improvements associated
study exploring large corn particle size does with pelleting. Moritz and coauthors [16, 17, 18]
not exist. determined that incorporating water into feed for-
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE 247
Table 1. Ingredient percentages of diets formulated to NRC [19] specifications. All diets were adjusted in nutrient
density for the percentage of added moisture or commercial pellet binder
Grower Grower Grower
Ingredient mash hard pellet soft pellet
Yellow corn 62.813 62.405 59.286
Soybean meal (47.5%) 29.832 29.896 31.369
Soybean oil 4.395 4.540 6.314
Defluorinated phosphate 1.578 1.579 1.631
Limestone 0.793 0.792 0.799
Poultry premix1 NB3000 0.250 0.250 0.250
Salt 0.138 0.138 0.142
Methionine 0.067 0.067 0.073
Coban 602 0.075 0.075 0.077
BMD 503 0.050 0.050 0.051
Thiamine premix 0.005 0.005 0.005
Vitamin D3 premix 0.003 0.003 0.003
Water — — 2.5
Maxibond4 — 0.200 —
Calculated composition
ME (kcal/kg) 3,200 3,200 3,200
CP (%) 19.875 19.871 20.326
CF (%) 7.036 7.165 8.818
Analyzed composition Fine Small Medium Large Coarse
CP (%) 22.2 22.3 21.6 21.7 22.7 20.0 21.0
CF (%) 8.4 8.7 7.6 7.9 8.6 5.2 7.7
DM (%) 88.3 88.3 88.3 88.6 89.1 86.0 83.8
1
Supplied per kilogram of diet: manganese, 0.02%; zinc, 0.02%; iron, 0.01%; copper, 0.0025%; iodine, 0.0003%; selenium,
0.00003%; folic acid, 0.69 mg; choline, 386 mg; riboflavin, 6.61 mg; biotin, 0.03 mg; vitamin B6, 1.38 mg; niacin, 27.56
mg; pantothenic acid, 6.61 mg; thiamine, 2.20 mg; menadione, 0.83 mg; vitamin B12, 0.01 mg; vitamin E, 16.53 IU; vitamin
D3, 2,133 ICU; vitamin A, 7,716 IU.
2
Active drug ingredient is monensin sodium, 60 g/lb (90 g/ton inclusion) as an aid in the prevention of coccidiosis caused
by Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria brunette, Eimeria mivati, and Eimeria maxima; Elanco
Animal Health, Indianapolis, IN.
3
Bacitracin methylene disalicylate, 50 g/lb (50 g/ton inclusion) to increase weight gain and improve feed efficiency; Alpharma,
Fort Lee, NJ.
4
Maxibond = urea-formalydehyde resin and calcium sulfate (4 lb/ton inclusion) as a pelleting aid used in animal feed; AG
Research Inc., Joliet, IL.
mulations increased pellet durability, decreased TMEn, nutrient retention, feed passage time, and
fines, and improved broiler performance when particle size preference.
compared with feeding pellets of lower moisture.
The authors observed that these high-moisture MATERIALS AND METHODS
pellets had a softer texture compared with more Feed Manufacture and Formulation
conventionally produced pellets. The effects of
pellet texture on broiler performance have not Starter and grower mash feeds were manufac-
been documented. tured at the West Virginia University pilot feed
An understanding of grain particle size and mill. All diets (Table 1) were corn-soybean-based
pellet texture is critical for development of feed and were formulated to meet or exceed 1994 NRC
manufacture strategies that optimize broiler per- recommendations [19]. Corn was ground to an
formance. The objectives of the current study average 1,042- m particle size for the starter feed
were 1) to evaluate the effects of corn particle utilizing a hammer mill with a 1/4-in. (6.35 mm)
size, feed form, and pellet texture on broiler per- screen. Five mash grower diets were manufac-
formance and carcass characteristics, and 2) to tured, differing only in corn particle size. The
attempt to understand these effects in relation to mean geometric particle size and log normal geo-
248 JAPR: Research Report
Table 2. Pellet characteristics and processing variables1
Pellet type
Variable Soft (water) Hard (binder)
Corn particle size ( m) 491 491
Mean PDI2 (%) 90.4 86.2
Mean modified PDI3 (%) 82.8 80.4
Mean fines (%) 44.52 40.37
Mean breaking force4 (g) 1,662.45 1,856.4
Water activity5 0.672 0.653
Bulk density (lb/ft3) [kg/m3] 40.73 [650.28] 42.49 [678.45]
P-rate6 (ton/h) [tonne/h] 5–7 [4.5–6.4] 5–6 [4.5–5.4]
1
Values are the average of triplicate determinations.
2
Pellet durability index [22].
3
Modified pellet durability index (utilizing 5, 13-mm hex nuts for added pressure on pellets).
4
Breaking force [24].
5
Water activity = ratio of vapor pressure generated by feed sample compared with that generated by pure water [25].
6
Production rate of the pellet mill.
metric standard deviation were calculated. Vary- cedures [22], fines [23], pellet breaking strength
ing corn particle sizes, categorized as fine (781 [24], bulk density [22], and water activity [25]
± 2.09 m), small (950 ± 2.08 m), medium (Table 2). All diets were analyzed for DM [26],
(1,042 ± 2.13 m), and large (1,109 ± 2.22 m) CP, and CF [27] after 1 wk of storage (Table 1).
were manufactured using hammer mill screens Pellets were stored for 1 wk before DM analysis
of 1/8 in. (3.18 mm), 3/16 in. (4.76 mm), 1/4 in. and water activity was performed to estimate
(6.35 mm), and 5/16 in. (7.94 mm), respectively. bound moisture [16, 17, 18].
A coarse (2,242 ± 2.11 m) corn particle size
was created by hammer-milling corn without a Performance and Nutrient Retention
screen. Particle size distribution is illustrated in Two thousand, two hundred eight 1-d-old,
Figure 1. straight-run 308 × 344 Ross broilers [40] were
Two additional grower diets were pelleted randomly allotted to 96 floor pens (0.69 × 2.44 m;
at a commercial feed mill using a 7800 series 23 broilers per pen) located in a cross-ventilated
California pellet mill capable of manufacturing negative pressure house. Pens contained fresh
50 ton (45.5 tonne) of feed/h. The corn used wood shavings, nipple drinkers, and feed pans
for pelleted diets had a particle size of 491 m. adapted to hoppers for ad libitum access to water
Particle size was determined using a Ro-Tap parti- and feed.
cle size analyzer [20]. One pelleted diet, desig- Broilers were fed a starter mash pretest con-
nated soft, contained added tap water at 2.5% of taining medium-sized corn for 3 wk. At the con-
dietary inclusion and was manufactured at 5 to clusion of the third week a representative sample
7 ton/h (4.5 to 6.4 tonne/h) as observed in the of birds was killed by CO2 (asphyxiation),
feed mill control room. The diet formulation was weighed, and analyzed for nitrogen [27] and ly-
adjusted to prevent nutrient dilution; for example, sine [28] to estimate the efficiency of lysine and
soybean oil inclusion was increased to prevent nitrogen retention by comparative slaughter. The
energy dilution. The other pelleted diet, desig- number of chicks per pen was reduced by remov-
nated hard, contained a commercial binder [21] ing any underdeveloped chicks as determined by
at 0.2% dietary inclusion, and was manufactured visual inspection so that each pen contained 21
at 5 to 6 ton/h (4.5 to 5.4 tonne/h). The source broilers (0.7 ft2/bird). Pen weight was then re-
of corn and soybean meal was different for pel- corded. A pen was designated as an experimental
leted diets compared with mash. unit. One bird from each pen was weighed and
Pelleted diets were transported 125 miles (201 leg-banded for later determination of nitrogen and
km) to West Virginia University and tested for lysine retention. Lysine levels of mash and pel-
pellet durability using standard and modified pro- leted grower diets had analyzed values above 1.5
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE 249
Table 3. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on 3- to 6-wk broiler performance and nutrient retention (mean
± SD)
Performance Nutrient retention2
Live weight Feed intake Feed efficiency1 Mortality ENR ELysR
gain (kg) (pen) (kg) (kg/kg) (%) (%) (%)
Mash treatments
Fine corn mash 1.568 ± 0.11 63.004 ± 3.84b 0.520 ± 0.03a 0.732 ± 1.78 4.752 ± 0.79bc 2.619 ± 1.51
Small corn mash 1.590 ± 0.05 66.027 ± 3.63b 0.514 ± 0.02a 0 ± 0 4.294 ± 1.06c 2.227 ± 1.01
Medium corn mash 1.619 ± 0.06 65.602 ± 4.97b 0.517 ± 0.02a 0 ± 0 5.292 ± 0.69ab 3.896 ± 2.42
Large corn mash 1.566 ± 0.03 64.642 ± 4.32b 0.507 ± 0.02ab 0.771 ± 1.89 5.126 ± 0.50ab 3.475 ± 1.88
Coarse corn mash 1.610 ± 0.06 71.831 ± 8.66a 0.481 ± 0.06b 0.366 ± 1.32 5.725 ± 0.98a 3.896 ± 1.57
LSD3 value — 4.4185 0.0273 — 0.6082 —
ANOVA 0.1362 0.0030 0.0444 0.2858 0.0003 0.0754
Pelleted treatments
Soft pellet 1.604 ± 0.05b 66.075 ± 2.81 0.506 ± 0.02b 1.815 ± 3.08 4.501 ± 0.43b 2.587 ± 0.81b
Hard pellet 1.711 ± 0.06a 67.785 ± 3.94 0.526 ± 0.02a 1.465 ± 3.00 5.367 ± 0.93a 4.785 ± 3.27a
LSD value 0.0433 — 0.0175 — 0.5614 1.1894
ANOVA 0.0002 0.0793 0.0283 0.7853 0.0057 0.0331
P-values generated for linear regression of mash diets
Linear regression 0.2415 0.0001 0.0013 0.9819 0.0009 0.0669
a–c
Means within a column without a common superscript differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1
Feed efficiency was calculated using mortality weight.
2
ENR = efficiency of nitrogen retention: (g of nitrogen gained/g of nitrogen consumed) × 100; ElysR = efficiency of lysine
retention = (g of Lys gained/g of Lys consumed) × 100.
3
Fisher’s least significant difference value.
and 1.8%, respectively. The 7 grower diets were dered. Carcass subsamples and feed were ana-
randomly assigned within each of 13 blocks con- lyzed for nitrogen [27] and lysine content using
sisting of 7 adjacent pens for a randomized com- reverse-phase HPLC after precolumn derivatiza-
plete block design. Lighting remained at 24 h for tion by phenylisothiocyanate as previously de-
wk 1 to 4 and decreased 1 h for each remaining scribed [28]. Remaining birds were transported
week. Temperature was regulated thermostati- to a commercial processing facility.
cally by beginning chicks at 90°F (32.2°C) for
the first week and decreasing the temperature by TMEn
5°F (2.8°C) each remaining week. Forty-eight broilers (3 wk of age) initially
Mortality was collected twice daily. Upon brooded with birds from the performance study
conclusion of the sixth week, feed consumption were randomly selected and transferred to a sepa-
and pen live weight were recorded and live weight rate room utilizing cross ventilation and negative
gain, feed efficiency, and percentage mortality pressure. Each bird was placed in a 12 × 20 in
were calculated for the wk 3 to 6 period. One (305 × 508 cm) raised wire cage containing nipple
male and 2 females were randomly selected from drinkers and an external feed trough for an adapta-
each pen, killed by CO2 (asphyxiation), and tion period of 1 wk. An individually caged bird
weighed. Boneless/skinless breast tissue, abdomi- was designated as the experimental unit and
nal fat pad, gizzard (sliced open, rinsed, and blot- blocks were comprised of 8 adjacent cages as-
ted dry), and intestine (from bottom of gizzard to signed by location in the room. The same 7 diets
ileo-cecal junction and stripped of digesta) were utilized in the performance study were randomly
weighed. Carcass characteristic weights were re- assigned to cages within each of 6 blocks. One
corded relative to bird BW. Leg-banded birds cage in each block was not assigned a diet and was
were weighed, terminated by CO2 (asphyxiation), used to determine endogenous excreta energy.
and gastrointestinal contents removed. These car- During the adaptation period all birds received
casses were frozen and ground. Subsamples were ad libitum feed of assigned diets and water. At
taken, quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and pow- the conclusion of the adaptation period (fourth
250
Table 4. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on 6-wk broiler carcass characteristics (mean ± SD)
Carcass characteristics
Breast Breast Gizzard Gizzard Fat pad Fat pad Intestine Intestine2
(kg) (%LW)1 (kg) (%LW) (kg) (%LW) (kg) (%LW)
Mash treatments
Fine corn mash 0.401 ± 0.05 17.34 ± 1.33 0.035 ± 0.01b 1.51 ± 0.25b 0.040 ± 0.01 1.74 ± 0.47 0.057 ± 0.01 2.49 ± 0.31
Small corn mash 0.420 ± 0.07 17.17 ± 1.49 0.038 ± 0.01ab 1.54 ± 0.17b 0.042 ± 0.01 1.74 ± 0.50 0.059 ± 0.01 2.41 ± 0.34
Medium corn mash 0.383 ± 0.09 17.00 ± 2.30 0.036 ± 0.01b 1.60 ± 0.24b 0.040 ± 0.01 1.77 ± 0.35 0.056 ± 0.01 2.50 ± 0.43
Large corn mash 0.390 ± 0.07 17.29 ± 1.80 0.036 ± 0.01b 1.61 ± 0.28b 0.041 ± 0.01 1.86 ± 0.61 0.055 ± 0.01 2.42 ± 0.27
Coarse corn mash 0.362 ± 0.06 15.97 ± 1.80 0.041 ± 0.01a 1.81 ± 0.22a 0.046 ± 0.01 2.03 ± 0.48 0.057 ± 0.01 2.54 ± 0.29
LSD3 value — — 0.0054 0.1358 — — — —
ANOVA 0.0579 0.0535 0.0107 0.0002 0.3750 0.2221 0.7292 0.6322
Pelleted treatments
Soft pellet 0.410 ± 0.06 17.95 ± 1.23 0.027 ± 0.01 1.20 ± 0.18 0.038 ± 0.01 1.66 ± 0.33 0.057 ± 0.01 2.51 ± 0.37
Hard pellet 0.410 ± 0.07 17.34 ± 2.06 0.029 ± 0.01 1.28 ± 0.24 0.042 ± 0.02 1.84 ± 0.86 0.063 ± 0.01 2.66 ± 0.34
LSD value — — — — — — — —
ANOVA 0.9129 0.2283 0.0666 0.2079 0.2381 0.3520 0.1034 0.1900
P-values generated for linear regression of mash diets
Linear regression 0.0149 0.0250 0.0123 0.0001 0.1505 0.0289 0.5896 0.5848
a,b
Means within a column without a common superscript differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1
Boneless, skinless breast weight as a percentage of live weight.
2
Small intestine weight (from the gizzard to the ileo-cecal junction) as a percentage of live weight.
3
Fisher’s least significant difference value.
JAPR: Research Report
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE 251
Table 5. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on Feed Passage Time
4.5-wk broiler TMEn (mean ± SD)
One hundred forty-four, 1-d-old, straight-run
TMEn (kcal/kg)
308 × 344 Ross broilers were allotted to floor pens
Mash treatments (0.69 × 2.44 m) containing fresh wood shavings,
Fine corn mash 3,546 ± 67 nipple drinkers, and a feed pan adapted to a hop-
Small corn mash 3,625 ± 163
per for 0 to 3 wk. Each pen received a pretest
Medium corn mash 3,853 ± 286
Large corn mash 3,689 ± 225 mash starter diet (corn particle size of 870 m)
Coarse corn mash 3,476 ± 207 and water for ad libitum consumption. Upon con-
LSD1 value — clusion of the 3-wk period, birds were transferred
ANOVA 0.0713 to a similar room as that utilized in the metabolism
Pelleted treatments
Soft pellet 3,256 ± 150b
study and 3 birds per cage were placed in each
Hard pellet 3,419 ± 93a of 48 raised wire cages for a 10-d adaptation
LSD value 162 period. Eight groups of 6 adjacently caged birds
ANOVA 0.0492 comprised blocks for a randomized complete
P-value for quadratic
block design. Six mash diets were manufactured
regression of mash diets
Quadratic regression 0.0042 utilizing similar formulation and corn particle size
a,b
as those used in the performance study for each
Means within a column without a common superscript
differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05). of the 5 mash diets (fine, small, medium, large,
1
Fisher’s least significant difference value. and coarse) and the soft pelleted diet. The soft
pellet diet was tested to determine any effects of
high soybean oil inclusion on feed passage time
week), birds were restricted from feed for 24 h. and was fed in mash form using the fine corn
Following restriction, feed was provided for 45 particle size to exclude feed-form effects. Each
min, and then removed. Those birds not assigned of the 6 diets was randomly assigned to cages
a diet received no feed during this time. Total within each block. Diets were fed to birds during
excreta were collected for 48 h from the time the adaptation period and fecal samples were
of feeding, air-dried, weighed, and ground. All taken to determine percentage acid insoluble ash
samples were analyzed in duplicate for gross en- (AIA) from diets without added AIA. At the end
ergy [29] and nitrogen [27]. Retained nitrogen of the adaptation period, birds were feed restricted
was calculated and corrected for eventual uric for 24 h. Birds were fed 200 g/cage of the assigned
acid formation and oxidation [30]. Nitrogen-cor- experimental diets containing 0.5% AIA [31].
rected TME was calculated using the weight of Feed was provided for a 2-h period, then removed
feed consumed, total excreta, gross energy, and and weighed to determine feed intake. A diet
retained nitrogen oxidation values. without added AIA corresponding to diets as-
Table 6. Influence of particle size and fat inclusion level on passage time as determined by percentage of acid
insoluble ash (AIA)
Passage time (h)
1 2
Treatment FI (g) 0 6 8 10 12 14 16 24 30 36
Fine 74.13 0.1332 15.814 10.473 2.630 0.638 1.108 0.522 0.222 0.617 0.399
Small 78.93 0.0270 16.705 10.101 2.543 0.943 0.733 0.213 0.159 0.430 0.384
Medium 65.53 0.0174 13.865 10.466 2.176 0.750 0.965 0.248 0.130 0.428 0.432
Large 80.25 0.0196 15.193 10.704 2.094 1.068 0.738 0.151 0.040 0.669 0.394
Coarse 87.78 0.1872 13.030 7.350 1.795 0.891 0.701 0.249 0.070 0.383 0.339
Soft mash 72.73 0.2549 13.747 9.502 2.765 1.282 0.636 0.124 0.078 0.356 0.233
ANOVA P-values3 0.4682 0.5453 0.2100 0.4982 0.8054 0.6639 0.6731 0.2393 0.1035 0.4258 0.8352
1
Feed intake of diets containing 0.5% AIA per cage.
2
Percentage AIA of excreta resulting from unmarked diets.
3
There were no significant differences (P > 0.05).
252 JAPR: Research Report
signed to each cage was fed upon removal of diets preference. Fisher’s least significant difference
containing added AIA. Fecal collection began 6 test was used for multiple comparisons between
h after providing diets containing added AIA and mean values. Linear and quadratic regression was
continued every 2 h for the following 12 h, then performed with coefficients for unevenly spaced
at 24, 30, and 36 h post-AIA administration. Wa- treatments to determine trends among mash diet
ter was provided for ad libitum consumption variables. Nonsignificant quadratic terms were re-
throughout the experiment. Collected excreta moved from the model. Trends in particle size
were stored and analyzed for DM [26] and AIA preference were determined using a regression
[32]. Acid insoluble ash measurements were cor- model with block and treatment as categorical
rected for AIA contained in diets without values and time as a continuous variable. Con-
added AIA. trasts were used to compare 3, 6, 9, or 12 h to
time zero. In all analyses, α was 0.05.
Particle Size Preference
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
One hundred twenty 1-d-old, straight-run 308
× 344 Ross broilers were fed a starter mash pretest Particle Size
diet (1,042 m) from 0 to 3 wk of age. Birds Broiler feed intake (FI) increased (P =
were then transferred to a room similar to that 0.0001) and feed efficiency (FE) decreased (P =
used in the TMEn study and placed in 40 raised 0.0013) as dietary corn particle size increased
wire cages (3 birds/cage) for a 10-d adaptation (Table 3). Broilers fed diets containing coarse
period. Each cage of 3 birds constituted an experi- corn had significantly increased FI and decreased
mental unit. Eight groups of 5 adjacent cages FE compared with birds fed most other mash
provided blocks for a randomized complete block diets. Hetland et al. [7] reported increased FI
design. Upon conclusion of the adaptation period, when feeding diets with high inclusions of whole
birds (4.5 wk of age) were restricted from feed cereals. The authors remarked that excessive feed
for 24 h. The 5 experimental mash diets that wastage contributed to the increased FI. Exces-
differed in particle size (Table 1) were randomly sive feed wastage was not observed in the current
assigned to cages within each block. Experimen- study. Past literature has also suggested that broil-
tal diets were supplied in 1.0-kg aliquots. Water ers may not be able to efficiently utilize large corn
was provided ad libitum. A 100-g feed sample particles due to underdeveloped gastrointestinal
was taken from each cage to determine initial diet tracts [1, 34]. In the current study, linear regres-
particle size. Homogeneous feed samples (100 g) sion indicated that increased corn particle size
were taken following feed administration at 3-h significantly increased nitrogen retention. Simi-
intervals for a 12-h period. Homogeneity of feed larly, increased corn particle size showed trends
samples was created by 30 s of manual stirring. toward increased lysine retention (P = 0.0669).
Particle size analysis was performed on all test Hence, broilers fed larger particle corn did not
samples [20]. Preference was determined by com- seem to be affected by underdeveloped gastroin-
paring the average particle size at each time point testinal tracts. Broilers fed coarse corn had sig-
with the initial average particle size of the as- nificantly lower FE compared with broilers fed
signed diet. Increases in diet particle size over diets containing fine, small, or medium corn.
time indicate a preference for smaller particles Breast weight and breast weight as a percent-
and vice versa. age of live weight decreased (P = 0.0149 and
All experimental protocols were approved by 0.0250, respectively) as dietary corn particle size
the West Virginia University Animal Care and increased (Table 4). Conversely, gizzard weight
Use Committee (ACUC # 02-1002). and gizzard weight as a percentage of live weight
increased (P = 0.0123 and 0.0001, respectively).
Statistical Analysis
Fat pad weight per se was not significantly af-
The GLM procedure of SAS [33] was used fected; however, fat pad weight as a percentage
to determine effects of particle size and pellet of live weight increased (P = 0.0289) as dietary
texture on performance, carcass characteristics, corn particle size increased. Differences in fat pad
TMEn, nutrient retention, feed passage time, and weight as a percentage of live weight may have
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE 253
Table 7. Indication of preference determined by average particle size ( m) of diets as consumed over time
Time of collection (h)
Treatment Initial 3 6 9 12
Fine 863.875 885.875* 868.625 848.5 797.375*
Small 926.5 975.125* 934.125 907.5 857.625*
Medium 943.125 957 932.625 897* 832.75*
Large 1,065.25 1,073.25 1,034.625 997.125* 932.375*
Coarse 1,514.875 1,496* 1,495.5 1,556.875 1,405.25*
*Means differ significantly from the initial average particle size for that row (P < 0.05).
been confounded by larger changes in live weight, had numerically the highest AIA percentages at
breast weight, and gizzard weight. Nir et al. [35] 6 h, suggesting increased FPT. Conversely, the
reported a positive relationship between gizzard coarse particle diet had numerically the lowest
weight and dietary particle size. Similarly, Healy AIA percentage at 6, 8, and 10 h suggesting a
[4] reported increased gizzard, proventriculus, decreased FPT. Nir et al. [35] reported that con-
and intestinal weights for chicks fed corn ground tent weight of the gizzard was significantly less
to 900 m compared with that ground to 300 for diets containing small particles compared with
m. In the current study, increased grain particle large, suggesting a decreased particle retention
size seemed to increase the proportion of feed time. Larger corn particles may have been re-
energy utilized for gizzard growth and mainte- tained in the gastrointestinal tract for an increased
nance as opposed to breast growth. This specula- time that may contribute to increased nutrient
tion is also supported by changes in feed effi- digestion and energy metabolism.
ciency (Table 3). Consistent preference trends for feed particles
True metabolizable energy values were high among diets were not apparent (Table 7). How-
relative to the calculated diet ME of 3,200 kcal/ ever, any particle size preference from the initial
kg (Tables 1 and 5). Values might have been high diet particle size would indicate that birds are not
in general due to the fast-growing broiler model, consuming a homogeneous mix of ingredients
and, therefore, a nutrient profile different from the
timed feeding regimen, or high soybean oil inclu-
calculated formulation. The medium- and large-
sion of all diets. Increasing dietary corn particle
particle diets illustrated no particle size preference
size resulted in a quadratic effect on TMEn (P =
(P > 0.05) for collection times of 3 and 6 h. The
0.0042). Feeding diets containing medium corn
lack of particle preference may have contributed
particles resulted in the highest TMEn. Hetland et
to increased performance. However, all mash
al. [7] reported that starch digestibility increased
diets illustrated a significant preference for larger
when broilers were fed whole wheat compared particles for the 12-h collection period. Portella
with ground wheat. The authors attributed in- et al. [36] reported decreases in the concentration
creased starch digestibility to increased gizzard of larger particles in a crumbled diet over time.
activity that would increase ingredient grinding In summary, broilers obtained digestive bene-
and mixing. In the current study, the efficiency fits from consuming diets containing medium to
of nitrogen and lysine retention of broilers also coarse particle corn (i.e., 1,042 to 2,242 m). In
suggested benefits of large particle feeding (Ta- addition, broilers may consume a more balanced
ble 3). nutrient profile from medium and large particle
Feed passage time (FPT) data are illustrated corn (i.e., 1,042 and 1,109 m) due to lack of
at different collection times by the average per- particle size preference. However, feeding coarse
centage AIA of excreta in Table 6. Cage FI did not corn (i.e., 2,242 m) may increase gizzard growth
differ among diets (P = 0.4682). The maximum and maintenance to an extent that compromises
excretion of AIA for all diets occurred during the performance.
6- and 8-h collection periods. Jensen et al. [13]
reported maximum excretion of chromic oxide at Pellet Texture
similar times. Particle size did not significantly All physical characteristics of the pelleted
affect FPT. However, fine and small particle diets diets were similar with the exception of texture
254 JAPR: Research Report
as determined by breaking force (Table 2). Mean corn was assessed for feed passage time, due to
breaking force for pellets containing commercial its high soy oil inclusion (i.e., 6.3%). Feed pas-
binder was greater than that of pellets containing sage time did not indicate significant treatment
added water, 1,856.37 and 1,662.45 g respec- differences; however, the soft mash formulation
tively, producing a comparatively harder texture. illustrated numerically decreased feed passage
The high percentages of fines for both diets are time compared with the fine corn particle diet for
indicative of commercial pellet manufacture post 6- and 8-h collection periods (Table 6).
cooling and transport [37]. The current findings imply that a harder pellet
Broilers fed hard pellets had significantly texture may produce beneficial digestive and sub-
greater live weight gain and FE than those fed sequent performance effects compared with pel-
soft pellets (Table 3). Performance benefits of
lets of softer texture. The hard pellet texture
hard pellets compared with soft pellets may be
(1,856 g of breaking force) was not hard enough
derived by similar mechanisms as observed with
to produce carcass characteristic effects that were
increased corn particle size of mash diets. Nitro-
gen and lysine retention were significantly im- detrimental to performance but was able to pro-
proved for broilers fed hard pellets compared with duce favorable digestive effects despite being
broilers fed soft pellets. In addition, Table 5 illus- compared with the soft pelleted diet that had a
trates that hard pellets produced a significant in- higher inclusion of fat. Mateos et al. [38] suggest
crease in TMEn compared with soft pellets. Car- that supplemental fat may enhance the use of
cass characteristics were not affected by pellet dietary energy by slowing the rate of passage of
texture (P > 0.05; Table 4). Feed passage time diets, creating an extracaloric effect. The precise
was not performed on pelleted feed. However, mechanism of pellet texture effects on broiler
the soft pellet formulation made with fine particle performance remains unclear.
CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS
1. Feeding broilers medium to coarse particle corn (i.e., 1,042 to 2,242 m) improved nutrient
digestion; however, broilers fed coarse particle corn (i.e., 2,242 m) demonstrated increased
gizzard growth and perceived maintenance requirements that compromised performance. Digestive
benefits of feeding medium to coarse particle corn may have resulted due to lack of particle
preference during feeding and decreased feed passage time in the gastrointestinal tract.
2. Broilers fed pellets of hard texture demonstrated improved nutrient retention and subsequent
performance compared with broilers fed pellets of soft texture (1,856 and 1,662 g of pellet breaking
force, respectively). Pellet texture may affect broilers in a manner similar to particle size.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. Lott, B. D., E. J. Day, J. W. Deaton, and J. D. May. 1992. 6. Jones, G. P. D., and R. D. Taylor. 2001. The incorporation
The effect of temperature, dietary energy level, and corn particle size of whole grain into pelleted broiler chicken diets: Production and
on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 71:618–624. physiological responses. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:477–483.
2. Reece, F. N., B. D. Lott, and J. W. Deaton. 1986. The effects 7. Hetland, H., B. Svihus, and V. Olaisen. 2002. Effect of feeding
of hammer mill screen size on ground corn particle size, pellet durabil- whole cereals on performance, starch digestibility and duodenal parti-
ity, and broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 65:1257-1261. cle size distribution in broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:416–423.
8. Reece, F. N., B. D. Lott, and J. W. Deaton. 1986. Effects of
3. Jurgens, M. H. 1993. Methods of feedstuff preparation. Pages
environmental temperature and corn particle size on response of broil-
220–225 in Animal Feeding and Nutrition. 7th ed. Kendall/Hunt Publ.
ers to pelleted feed. Poult. Sci. 65:636–641.
Co., Dubuque, IA.
9. Wondra, K. J., J. D. Hancock, K. C. Behnke, R. H. Hines,
4. Healy, B. J. 1992. Nutritional value of selected sorghum grain and C. R. Stark. 1995. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth
for swine and poultry and effect of particle size on performance and performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finish-
intestinal morphology in young pigs and broiler chicks. M.S. Thesis. ing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 73:757–763.
Kansas State Univ., Manhattan.
10. Behnke, K. C. 1994. Factors affecting pellet quality. Pages
5. Nir, I. 1994. Effect of particle size on performance. 1. Corn. 44–54 in Proc. Maryland Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf., College Park, MD.
Poult. Sci. 73:45–49. Maryland Feed Ind. Counc. and Univ. Maryland, College Park.
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE 255
11. Runnels, T. D. 1976. The influence of feed texture on broiler sieving. Page 325 in: American Society of Agricultural Engineers
performance. Poult. Sci. 55:1958–1961. Standard S 319. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Yearbook
Standards, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
12. Heywang, B. W., and R. B. Morgan. 1944. A comparison of
a pelleted and unpelleted all-mash diet for growing chickens. Poult. 24. Pellet breaking strength was tested using a TA-HDi texture
Sci. 23:16–20. analyzer with a Warner-Bratzler blade.
13. Jensen, L. S., L. H. Merill, C. V. Reddy, and J. McGinnis. 25. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Associa-
1962. Observations on eating patterns and rate of food passage of tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA. Water activity
birds fed pelleted and unpelleted diets. Poult. Sci. 41:1414–1419. was analyzed using an AquaLab model CX2.
14. Nir, I., R. Hillel, I. Pitchi, and G. Shefet. 1995. Effect of 26. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 1995. Moisture
particle size on performance. 3. Grinding pelleting interaction. Poult. Air-Oven Method. AACC Method 44-15A. Approved Methods of the
Sci. 74:771–783. American Association of Analytical Chemists Vol II. St. Paul, MN.
15. Zatari, I. M., P. R. Ferket, and S. E. Scheideler. 1990. Effect 27. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Associa-
of pellet integrity, calcium lignosulfonate, and dietary energy on the tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
performance of summer-raised broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 69(Suppl.
1):198. (Abstr.) 28. Stinefelt, B. M., J. C. Eya, K. J. Semmens, and K. P. Blemings.
2004. Effect of diet and strain on growth and performance in hybrid
16. Moritz, J. S., R. S. Beyer, K. J. Wilson, K. R. Cramer, L. J.
Bluegill. North Am. J. Aquac. 66:312–318.
McKinney, and F. J. Fairchild. 2001. Effect of moisture addition at
the mixer to a corn-soybean-based diet on broiler performance. J. 29. Isoperibol oxygen bomb calorimeter model 1266, Parr Instru-
Appl. Poult. Res. 10:347–353. ment Company, Moline, IL.
17. Moritz, J. S., K. J. Wilson, K. R. Cramer, R. S. Beyer, L. J. 30. Hill, F. W., and D. L. Anderson. 1958. Comparison of ME
McKinney, W. B. Cavalcanti, and X. Mo. 2002. Effect of formulation and PE determinations with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64:587.
density, moisture and surfactant on feed manufacturing, pellet quality
and broiler performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:155–163. 31. Celite Corporation, Lompac, CA.
18. Moritz, J. S., K. R. Cramer, K. J. Wilson, and R. S. Beyer. 32. Vogtmann, H., P. Frirter, and A. L. Prabuck. 1975. A new
2003. Feed manufacture and feeding of rations with graded levels of method of determining metabolizability of energy and digestibility of
added moisture formulated to different energy densities. J. Appl. Poult. fatty acids in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 16:531–534.
Res. 12:371–381. 33. SAS Institute. 2000. The SAS System for Windows 2000.
19. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Release 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
34. Kilburn, J., and H. M. Edwards, Jr. 2001. The response of
20. Ro-Tap particle size analyzer model RX-29 type 110V 60H2, broiler to the feeding of mash or pelleted diets containing maize of
WS Tyler, Mentor, OH. One hundred grams of ground corn for each varying particle sizes. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:484–492.
diet was placed in a dust-tight enclosed series of stacked (No. 4, 6,
. . .) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) screens 35. Nir, I., R. Hillel, G. Shefet, and Z. Nitsan. 1994. Effect of
affixed to the Ro-Tap particle size analyzer and shaken for 10 min. particle size on performance. 2. Grain texture interactions. Poult. Sci.
The screens were then separated and weighed. Particle size was calcu- 73:781–791.
lated by subtracting the weight of the screen from the final weight of 36. Portella, F. J., L. J. Caston, and S. Leeson. 1988. Apparent
screen and sample after shaking. The mean geometric particle size feed particle size preference by broilers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:923–930.
and log normal geometric standard deviation were calculated as de-
scribed by McEllhiney [39]. 37. Scheideler, S. E. 1991. Pelleting is important for broilers.
Pages 1–7 in Proc. 18th Annu. Carolina Poult. Nutr. Conf., Charlotte,
21. Maxibond–urea-formaldehyde resin and calcium sulfate to aid NC. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
in pelleting animal feed and included in the diet at 4 lb/ton.
38. Mateos, G. G., J. L. Sell, and J. A. Eastwood. 1982. Rate of
22. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1997. ASAE
food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat.
S269.4, Cubes, pellets, and crumbles-Definitions and methods for
Poult. Sci. 61:94–100.
determining density, durability, and moisture. Standards 1997. Am.
Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI. Due to the use of a 5/32 × 1.25 in. 39. McEllhiney, R. R. 1994. Determining and expressing particle
die, pellets were sifted in a No. 6 American Society for Testing and size. Pages 545–547 in Feed Manufacture Technology IV. American
Materials (ASTM) screen. Five hundred grams of sifted pellets was Feed Industry Association, Inc., Arlington, VA.
placed in a dust-tight enclosure and tumbled for 10 min at 50 rpm.
The enclosure was of the dimensions 5 × 12 × 12 in., with a 2 × 9 40. Avaigen, Hunstville, AL.
in. plate affixed diagonally along 1 of the 12 × 12 in. sides. The
tumbled samples were then sifted again (No. 6 ASTM) and weighed.
The pellet durability index was calculated by dividing the weight of
Acknowledgments
pellets after tumbling by the weight of pellets before tumbling, then This study was financed by Hatch funds allocated to West Virginia
multiplying by 100. The modified pellet durability index was deter- University, Project No. H-435 and USDA-NRI 2002-35208-11580.
mined in a similar manner with the exception of adding 5, 13-mm The authors acknowledge Fred Roe, Bill Miller, and Bill Jones for
hex nuts to the pretumbled sample to obtain added pellet pressure. assistance with animal welfare. Mark Nazelrodt and Pilgrim’s Pride
23. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 1983. Corporation are appreciated for feed manufacture and broiler chick
Methods of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by support.
Related docs
Get documents about "