Effect of Corn Particle Size and Pellet Texture on

Document Sample
scope of work template
							2006 Poultry Science Association, Inc.




     Effect of Corn Particle Size and Pellet Texture
     on Broiler Performance in the Growing Phase

    A. S. Parsons, N. P. Buchanan, K. P. Blemings, M. E. Wilson, and J. S. Moritz1

              Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, West Virginia University,
                                      Morgantown 26506


Primary Audience: Nutritionists, Feed Manufacturers, Broiler Producers, Researchers

                                              SUMMARY
        A review of past literature revealed inconsistencies in recommended grain particle size for
    optimal broiler performance. Changing diet formulation and subsequent processing variables may
    alter pellet texture and potentially affect broiler performance. In the current study, ground corn,
    varying in size (781, 950, 1,042, 1,109, and 2,242 m), was added to a soybean-based premix to
    create 5 different mash diets. Water and a commercial pellet binder were added separately to
    corn-soybean-based diets before steam pelleting to create 2 pelleted diets differing in texture (soft
    and hard, respectively). The objective was to evaluate corn particle size, pellet texture, and feed
    form variation of compound diets on 3- to 6-wk broiler performance, nutrient retention, carcass
    characteristics, TMEn, feed passage time, and particle size preference. Soft and hard pellets had
    similar pellet durability (90.4 and 86.2%, respectively) and fines (44.5 and 40.3%, respectively).
    Increasing particle size of mash diets improved nutrient retention. However, broiler performance
    and energy metabolism were decreased when corn particle size exceeded 1,042 m. This observation
    was due, in part, to increased size and maintenance requirement of the gastrointestinal tract.
    Broilers fed hard pellets (1,856 g of pellet breaking force) had improved nutrient retention, TMEn,
    and subsequent performance compared with broilers fed soft pellets (1,662 g of pellet breaking
    force). Pellet texture may affect broilers in a manner similar to particle size.

    Key words: particle size, pellet texture, feed form, particle size preference
                                                                   2006 J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:245–255



      DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM                              m and from 1,173 to 710 m, respectively.
                                                        Further decreases (900 to 300 m) have also
    Preparing grain by grinding before incorpo-
                                                        resulted in improved performance [4]. In contrast,
rating it into a compound diet improves broiler
performance [1, 2]. However, studies focusing on        Nir [5] has shown that increasing corn particle
optimal grain size, specifically corn particle size,     size from 525 to 897 m increased broiler perfor-
have presented conflicting results. Smaller corn         mance. Feeding large-particle corn may produce
particle size has a greater surface area to volume      beneficial effects similar to reports of whole grain
ratio, increasing exposure to digestive enzymes         feeding. Whole grain feeding has been associated
and presumably decreasing energy needed for             with increased gut development and health; that
mastication [3]. Reece et al. [2] and Lott et al.       is, a more muscular gizzard and less occurrence of
[1] reported improved broiler performance when          proventricular dilatation [6]. Greater development
corn particle size decreased from 1,289 to 987          of the broiler gastrointestinal tract suggests that

1
Corresponding author: jsmoritz@mail.wvu.edu
246                                                                               JAPR: Research Report




Figure 1. Corn particle size distribution (% of a 100-g corn sample) for fine, small, medium, large, and coarse corn.




feed may be retained in the upper digestive tract                Nearly 80% of all US poultry feed is pelleted
for a longer period allowing for increased enzy-            [10]. Broiler performance benefits associated with
matic digestion [6, 7]. Concerning feed manufac-            pelleting have been well documented [11, 12, 13,
ture, improved pellet quality has been associated           14]. However, benefits are only realized if pellet
with a smaller grain particle size [8, 9]; however,         integrity is maintained to consumption. Zatari et
reducing grain particle size has been shown to              al. [15] showed that pellets of poor quality, simu-
increase hammer mill energy consumption and                 lated by a 25:75 pellet to fines ratio, diminished
decrease production rate [4, 8]. A comprehensive            predicted performance improvements associated
study exploring large corn particle size does               with pelleting. Moritz and coauthors [16, 17, 18]
not exist.                                                  determined that incorporating water into feed for-
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE                                                                            247

Table 1. Ingredient percentages of diets formulated to NRC [19] specifications. All diets were adjusted in nutrient
density for the percentage of added moisture or commercial pellet binder

                                                        Grower                                     Grower           Grower
Ingredient                                               mash                                     hard pellet      soft pellet

Yellow corn                                               62.813                                     62.405            59.286
Soybean meal (47.5%)                                      29.832                                     29.896            31.369
Soybean oil                                                4.395                                      4.540             6.314
Defluorinated phosphate                                     1.578                                      1.579             1.631
Limestone                                                  0.793                                      0.792             0.799
Poultry premix1 NB3000                                     0.250                                      0.250             0.250
Salt                                                       0.138                                      0.138             0.142
Methionine                                                 0.067                                      0.067             0.073
Coban 602                                                  0.075                                      0.075             0.077
BMD 503                                                    0.050                                      0.050             0.051
Thiamine premix                                            0.005                                      0.005             0.005
Vitamin D3 premix                                          0.003                                      0.003             0.003
Water                                                     —                                          —                  2.5
Maxibond4                                                 —                                           0.200            —
Calculated composition
 ME (kcal/kg)                                          3,200                                      3,200            3,200
 CP (%)                                                   19.875                                     19.871           20.326
 CF (%)                                                    7.036                                      7.165            8.818
Analyzed composition            Fine       Small        Medium          Large       Coarse

    CP (%)                      22.2       22.3           21.6           21.7        22.7            20.0              21.0
    CF (%)                       8.4        8.7            7.6            7.9         8.6             5.2               7.7
    DM (%)                      88.3       88.3           88.3           88.6        89.1            86.0              83.8
1
 Supplied per kilogram of diet: manganese, 0.02%; zinc, 0.02%; iron, 0.01%; copper, 0.0025%; iodine, 0.0003%; selenium,
0.00003%; folic acid, 0.69 mg; choline, 386 mg; riboflavin, 6.61 mg; biotin, 0.03 mg; vitamin B6, 1.38 mg; niacin, 27.56
mg; pantothenic acid, 6.61 mg; thiamine, 2.20 mg; menadione, 0.83 mg; vitamin B12, 0.01 mg; vitamin E, 16.53 IU; vitamin
D3, 2,133 ICU; vitamin A, 7,716 IU.
2
 Active drug ingredient is monensin sodium, 60 g/lb (90 g/ton inclusion) as an aid in the prevention of coccidiosis caused
by Eimeria necatrix, Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria brunette, Eimeria mivati, and Eimeria maxima; Elanco
Animal Health, Indianapolis, IN.
3
 Bacitracin methylene disalicylate, 50 g/lb (50 g/ton inclusion) to increase weight gain and improve feed efficiency; Alpharma,
Fort Lee, NJ.
4
 Maxibond = urea-formalydehyde resin and calcium sulfate (4 lb/ton inclusion) as a pelleting aid used in animal feed; AG
Research Inc., Joliet, IL.



mulations increased pellet durability, decreased                   TMEn, nutrient retention, feed passage time, and
fines, and improved broiler performance when                        particle size preference.
compared with feeding pellets of lower moisture.
The authors observed that these high-moisture                           MATERIALS AND METHODS
pellets had a softer texture compared with more                    Feed Manufacture and Formulation
conventionally produced pellets. The effects of
pellet texture on broiler performance have not                          Starter and grower mash feeds were manufac-
been documented.                                                   tured at the West Virginia University pilot feed
    An understanding of grain particle size and                    mill. All diets (Table 1) were corn-soybean-based
pellet texture is critical for development of feed                 and were formulated to meet or exceed 1994 NRC
manufacture strategies that optimize broiler per-                  recommendations [19]. Corn was ground to an
formance. The objectives of the current study                      average 1,042- m particle size for the starter feed
were 1) to evaluate the effects of corn particle                   utilizing a hammer mill with a 1/4-in. (6.35 mm)
size, feed form, and pellet texture on broiler per-                screen. Five mash grower diets were manufac-
formance and carcass characteristics, and 2) to                    tured, differing only in corn particle size. The
attempt to understand these effects in relation to                 mean geometric particle size and log normal geo-
248                                                                                  JAPR: Research Report

Table 2. Pellet characteristics and processing variables1

                                                                                   Pellet type

Variable                                                   Soft (water)                                 Hard (binder)

Corn particle size ( m)                                   491                                           491
Mean PDI2 (%)                                              90.4                                          86.2
Mean modified PDI3 (%)                                      82.8                                          80.4
Mean fines (%)                                              44.52                                         40.37
Mean breaking force4 (g)                                1,662.45                                      1,856.4
Water activity5                                             0.672                                         0.653
Bulk density (lb/ft3) [kg/m3]                              40.73 [650.28]                                42.49 [678.45]
P-rate6 (ton/h) [tonne/h]                                 5–7 [4.5–6.4]                                 5–6 [4.5–5.4]
1
 Values are the average of triplicate determinations.
2
 Pellet durability index [22].
3
 Modified pellet durability index (utilizing 5, 13-mm hex nuts for added pressure on pellets).
4
 Breaking force [24].
5
 Water activity = ratio of vapor pressure generated by feed sample compared with that generated by pure water [25].
6
 Production rate of the pellet mill.



metric standard deviation were calculated. Vary-              cedures [22], fines [23], pellet breaking strength
ing corn particle sizes, categorized as fine (781              [24], bulk density [22], and water activity [25]
± 2.09 m), small (950 ± 2.08 m), medium                       (Table 2). All diets were analyzed for DM [26],
(1,042 ± 2.13 m), and large (1,109 ± 2.22 m)                  CP, and CF [27] after 1 wk of storage (Table 1).
were manufactured using hammer mill screens                   Pellets were stored for 1 wk before DM analysis
of 1/8 in. (3.18 mm), 3/16 in. (4.76 mm), 1/4 in.             and water activity was performed to estimate
(6.35 mm), and 5/16 in. (7.94 mm), respectively.              bound moisture [16, 17, 18].
A coarse (2,242 ± 2.11 m) corn particle size
was created by hammer-milling corn without a                  Performance and Nutrient Retention
screen. Particle size distribution is illustrated in              Two thousand, two hundred eight 1-d-old,
Figure 1.                                                     straight-run 308 × 344 Ross broilers [40] were
    Two additional grower diets were pelleted                 randomly allotted to 96 floor pens (0.69 × 2.44 m;
at a commercial feed mill using a 7800 series                 23 broilers per pen) located in a cross-ventilated
California pellet mill capable of manufacturing               negative pressure house. Pens contained fresh
50 ton (45.5 tonne) of feed/h. The corn used                  wood shavings, nipple drinkers, and feed pans
for pelleted diets had a particle size of 491 m.              adapted to hoppers for ad libitum access to water
Particle size was determined using a Ro-Tap parti-            and feed.
cle size analyzer [20]. One pelleted diet, desig-                 Broilers were fed a starter mash pretest con-
nated soft, contained added tap water at 2.5% of              taining medium-sized corn for 3 wk. At the con-
dietary inclusion and was manufactured at 5 to                clusion of the third week a representative sample
7 ton/h (4.5 to 6.4 tonne/h) as observed in the               of birds was killed by CO2 (asphyxiation),
feed mill control room. The diet formulation was              weighed, and analyzed for nitrogen [27] and ly-
adjusted to prevent nutrient dilution; for example,           sine [28] to estimate the efficiency of lysine and
soybean oil inclusion was increased to prevent                nitrogen retention by comparative slaughter. The
energy dilution. The other pelleted diet, desig-              number of chicks per pen was reduced by remov-
nated hard, contained a commercial binder [21]                ing any underdeveloped chicks as determined by
at 0.2% dietary inclusion, and was manufactured               visual inspection so that each pen contained 21
at 5 to 6 ton/h (4.5 to 5.4 tonne/h). The source              broilers (0.7 ft2/bird). Pen weight was then re-
of corn and soybean meal was different for pel-               corded. A pen was designated as an experimental
leted diets compared with mash.                               unit. One bird from each pen was weighed and
    Pelleted diets were transported 125 miles (201            leg-banded for later determination of nitrogen and
km) to West Virginia University and tested for                lysine retention. Lysine levels of mash and pel-
pellet durability using standard and modified pro-             leted grower diets had analyzed values above 1.5
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE                                                                               249

Table 3. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on 3- to 6-wk broiler performance and nutrient retention (mean
± SD)

                                                  Performance                                         Nutrient retention2

                       Live weight      Feed intake       Feed efficiency1     Mortality           ENR               ELysR
                        gain (kg)        (pen) (kg)           (kg/kg)          (%)                (%)                (%)

Mash treatments
 Fine corn mash       1.568   ± 0.11   63.004   ± 3.84b   0.520   ± 0.03a    0.732   ± 1.78   4.752   ± 0.79bc   2.619   ± 1.51
 Small corn mash      1.590   ± 0.05   66.027   ± 3.63b   0.514   ± 0.02a        0   ± 0      4.294   ± 1.06c    2.227   ± 1.01
 Medium corn mash     1.619   ± 0.06   65.602   ± 4.97b   0.517   ± 0.02a        0   ± 0      5.292   ± 0.69ab   3.896   ± 2.42
 Large corn mash      1.566   ± 0.03   64.642   ± 4.32b   0.507   ± 0.02ab   0.771   ± 1.89   5.126   ± 0.50ab   3.475   ± 1.88
 Coarse corn mash     1.610   ± 0.06   71.831   ± 8.66a   0.481   ± 0.06b    0.366   ± 1.32   5.725   ± 0.98a    3.896   ± 1.57
LSD3 value                    —                 4.4185            0.0273             —                0.6082             —
ANOVA                         0.1362            0.0030            0.0444             0.2858           0.0003             0.0754
Pelleted treatments
 Soft pellet          1.604 ± 0.05b 66.075 ± 2.81         0.506 ± 0.02b      1.815 ± 3.08 4.501 ± 0.43b          2.587 ± 0.81b
 Hard pellet          1.711 ± 0.06a 67.785 ± 3.94         0.526 ± 0.02a      1.465 ± 3.00 5.367 ± 0.93a          4.785 ± 3.27a
LSD value                   0.0433        —                     0.0175            —             0.5614                 1.1894
ANOVA                       0.0002         0.0793               0.0283             0.7853       0.0057                 0.0331
                                            P-values generated for linear regression of mash diets
Linear regression             0.2415         0.0001          0.0013             0.9819         0.0009                    0.0669
a–c
   Means within a column without a common superscript differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1
 Feed efficiency was calculated using mortality weight.
2
 ENR = efficiency of nitrogen retention: (g of nitrogen gained/g of nitrogen consumed) × 100; ElysR = efficiency of lysine
retention = (g of Lys gained/g of Lys consumed) × 100.
3
 Fisher’s least significant difference value.



and 1.8%, respectively. The 7 grower diets were                   dered. Carcass subsamples and feed were ana-
randomly assigned within each of 13 blocks con-                   lyzed for nitrogen [27] and lysine content using
sisting of 7 adjacent pens for a randomized com-                  reverse-phase HPLC after precolumn derivatiza-
plete block design. Lighting remained at 24 h for                 tion by phenylisothiocyanate as previously de-
wk 1 to 4 and decreased 1 h for each remaining                    scribed [28]. Remaining birds were transported
week. Temperature was regulated thermostati-                      to a commercial processing facility.
cally by beginning chicks at 90°F (32.2°C) for
the first week and decreasing the temperature by                   TMEn
5°F (2.8°C) each remaining week.                                       Forty-eight broilers (3 wk of age) initially
     Mortality was collected twice daily. Upon                    brooded with birds from the performance study
conclusion of the sixth week, feed consumption                    were randomly selected and transferred to a sepa-
and pen live weight were recorded and live weight                 rate room utilizing cross ventilation and negative
gain, feed efficiency, and percentage mortality                    pressure. Each bird was placed in a 12 × 20 in
were calculated for the wk 3 to 6 period. One                     (305 × 508 cm) raised wire cage containing nipple
male and 2 females were randomly selected from                    drinkers and an external feed trough for an adapta-
each pen, killed by CO2 (asphyxiation), and                       tion period of 1 wk. An individually caged bird
weighed. Boneless/skinless breast tissue, abdomi-                 was designated as the experimental unit and
nal fat pad, gizzard (sliced open, rinsed, and blot-              blocks were comprised of 8 adjacent cages as-
ted dry), and intestine (from bottom of gizzard to                signed by location in the room. The same 7 diets
ileo-cecal junction and stripped of digesta) were                 utilized in the performance study were randomly
weighed. Carcass characteristic weights were re-                  assigned to cages within each of 6 blocks. One
corded relative to bird BW. Leg-banded birds                      cage in each block was not assigned a diet and was
were weighed, terminated by CO2 (asphyxiation),                   used to determine endogenous excreta energy.
and gastrointestinal contents removed. These car-                 During the adaptation period all birds received
casses were frozen and ground. Subsamples were                    ad libitum feed of assigned diets and water. At
taken, quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and pow-                  the conclusion of the adaptation period (fourth
                                                                                                                                                                                         250




Table 4. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on 6-wk broiler carcass characteristics (mean ± SD)

                                                                                                  Carcass characteristics

                                Breast               Breast               Gizzard                Gizzard              Fat pad               Fat pad       Intestine       Intestine2
                                 (kg)               (%LW)1                 (kg)                  (%LW)                 (kg)                 (%LW)           (kg)           (%LW)

Mash treatments
 Fine corn mash             0.401   ± 0.05       17.34   ± 1.33        0.035   ± 0.01b         1.51   ± 0.25b      0.040   ± 0.01       1.74   ± 0.47   0.057   ± 0.01   2.49   ± 0.31
 Small corn mash            0.420   ± 0.07       17.17   ± 1.49        0.038   ± 0.01ab        1.54   ± 0.17b      0.042   ± 0.01       1.74   ± 0.50   0.059   ± 0.01   2.41   ± 0.34
 Medium corn mash           0.383   ± 0.09       17.00   ± 2.30        0.036   ± 0.01b         1.60   ± 0.24b      0.040   ± 0.01       1.77   ± 0.35   0.056   ± 0.01   2.50   ± 0.43
 Large corn mash            0.390   ± 0.07       17.29   ± 1.80        0.036   ± 0.01b         1.61   ± 0.28b      0.041   ± 0.01       1.86   ± 0.61   0.055   ± 0.01   2.42   ± 0.27
 Coarse corn mash           0.362   ± 0.06       15.97   ± 1.80        0.041   ± 0.01a         1.81   ± 0.22a      0.046   ± 0.01       2.03   ± 0.48   0.057   ± 0.01   2.54   ± 0.29
LSD3 value                          —                    —                     0.0054                 0.1358               —                   —                —               —
ANOVA                               0.0579               0.0535                0.0107                 0.0002               0.3750              0.2221           0.7292          0.6322
Pelleted treatments
 Soft pellet                0.410 ± 0.06         17.95 ± 1.23          0.027 ± 0.01            1.20 ± 0.18         0.038 ± 0.01         1.66 ± 0.33     0.057 ± 0.01     2.51 ± 0.37
 Hard pellet                0.410 ± 0.07         17.34 ± 2.06          0.029 ± 0.01            1.28 ± 0.24         0.042 ± 0.02         1.84 ± 0.86     0.063 ± 0.01     2.66 ± 0.34
LSD value                        —                    —                      —                      —                   —                    —               —                —
ANOVA                             0.9129               0.2283                0.0666                 0.2079               0.2381              0.3520           0.1034          0.1900
                                                                                   P-values generated for linear regression of mash diets
Linear regression                   0.0149               0.0250                0.0123              0.0001                 0.1505               0.0289           0.5896          0.5848
a,b
   Means within a column without a common superscript differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
1
  Boneless, skinless breast weight as a percentage of live weight.
2
  Small intestine weight (from the gizzard to the ileo-cecal junction) as a percentage of live weight.
3
  Fisher’s least significant difference value.
                                                                                                                                                                                         JAPR: Research Report
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE                                                                       251

Table 5. Influence of particle size and pellet texture on      Feed Passage Time
4.5-wk broiler TMEn (mean ± SD)
                                                                   One hundred forty-four, 1-d-old, straight-run
                                         TMEn (kcal/kg)
                                                              308 × 344 Ross broilers were allotted to floor pens
Mash treatments                                               (0.69 × 2.44 m) containing fresh wood shavings,
 Fine corn mash                           3,546  ± 67         nipple drinkers, and a feed pan adapted to a hop-
 Small corn mash                          3,625  ± 163
                                                              per for 0 to 3 wk. Each pen received a pretest
 Medium corn mash                         3,853  ± 286
 Large corn mash                          3,689  ± 225        mash starter diet (corn particle size of 870 m)
 Coarse corn mash                         3,476  ± 207        and water for ad libitum consumption. Upon con-
LSD1 value                                      —             clusion of the 3-wk period, birds were transferred
ANOVA                                         0.0713          to a similar room as that utilized in the metabolism
Pelleted treatments
 Soft pellet                              3,256 ± 150b
                                                              study and 3 birds per cage were placed in each
 Hard pellet                              3,419 ± 93a         of 48 raised wire cages for a 10-d adaptation
LSD value                                      162            period. Eight groups of 6 adjacently caged birds
ANOVA                                        0.0492           comprised blocks for a randomized complete
P-value for quadratic
                                                              block design. Six mash diets were manufactured
 regression of mash diets
  Quadratic regression                        0.0042          utilizing similar formulation and corn particle size
a,b
                                                              as those used in the performance study for each
  Means within a column without a common superscript
differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).                               of the 5 mash diets (fine, small, medium, large,
1
 Fisher’s least significant difference value.                  and coarse) and the soft pelleted diet. The soft
                                                              pellet diet was tested to determine any effects of
                                                              high soybean oil inclusion on feed passage time
week), birds were restricted from feed for 24 h.              and was fed in mash form using the fine corn
Following restriction, feed was provided for 45               particle size to exclude feed-form effects. Each
min, and then removed. Those birds not assigned               of the 6 diets was randomly assigned to cages
a diet received no feed during this time. Total               within each block. Diets were fed to birds during
excreta were collected for 48 h from the time                 the adaptation period and fecal samples were
of feeding, air-dried, weighed, and ground. All               taken to determine percentage acid insoluble ash
samples were analyzed in duplicate for gross en-              (AIA) from diets without added AIA. At the end
ergy [29] and nitrogen [27]. Retained nitrogen                of the adaptation period, birds were feed restricted
was calculated and corrected for eventual uric                for 24 h. Birds were fed 200 g/cage of the assigned
acid formation and oxidation [30]. Nitrogen-cor-              experimental diets containing 0.5% AIA [31].
rected TME was calculated using the weight of                 Feed was provided for a 2-h period, then removed
feed consumed, total excreta, gross energy, and               and weighed to determine feed intake. A diet
retained nitrogen oxidation values.                           without added AIA corresponding to diets as-


Table 6. Influence of particle size and fat inclusion level on passage time as determined by percentage of acid
insoluble ash (AIA)

                                                                     Passage time (h)
                        1        2
Treatment            FI (g)     0         6            8     10         12       14      16       24       30       36

Fine                74.13     0.1332   15.814     10.473    2.630     0.638    1.108    0.522    0.222    0.617    0.399
Small               78.93     0.0270   16.705     10.101    2.543     0.943    0.733    0.213    0.159    0.430    0.384
Medium              65.53     0.0174   13.865     10.466    2.176     0.750    0.965    0.248    0.130    0.428    0.432
Large               80.25     0.0196   15.193     10.704    2.094     1.068    0.738    0.151    0.040    0.669    0.394
Coarse              87.78     0.1872   13.030      7.350    1.795     0.891    0.701    0.249    0.070    0.383    0.339
Soft mash           72.73     0.2549   13.747      9.502    2.765     1.282    0.636    0.124    0.078    0.356    0.233
ANOVA P-values3      0.4682   0.5453    0.2100     0.4982   0.8054    0.6639   0.6731   0.2393   0.1035   0.4258   0.8352
1
 Feed intake of diets containing 0.5% AIA per cage.
2
 Percentage AIA of excreta resulting from unmarked diets.
3
 There were no significant differences (P > 0.05).
252                                                                       JAPR: Research Report

signed to each cage was fed upon removal of diets     preference. Fisher’s least significant difference
containing added AIA. Fecal collection began 6        test was used for multiple comparisons between
h after providing diets containing added AIA and      mean values. Linear and quadratic regression was
continued every 2 h for the following 12 h, then      performed with coefficients for unevenly spaced
at 24, 30, and 36 h post-AIA administration. Wa-      treatments to determine trends among mash diet
ter was provided for ad libitum consumption           variables. Nonsignificant quadratic terms were re-
throughout the experiment. Collected excreta          moved from the model. Trends in particle size
were stored and analyzed for DM [26] and AIA          preference were determined using a regression
[32]. Acid insoluble ash measurements were cor-       model with block and treatment as categorical
rected for AIA contained in diets without             values and time as a continuous variable. Con-
added AIA.                                            trasts were used to compare 3, 6, 9, or 12 h to
                                                      time zero. In all analyses, α was 0.05.
Particle Size Preference
                                                            RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    One hundred twenty 1-d-old, straight-run 308
× 344 Ross broilers were fed a starter mash pretest   Particle Size
diet (1,042 m) from 0 to 3 wk of age. Birds                Broiler feed intake (FI) increased (P =
were then transferred to a room similar to that       0.0001) and feed efficiency (FE) decreased (P =
used in the TMEn study and placed in 40 raised        0.0013) as dietary corn particle size increased
wire cages (3 birds/cage) for a 10-d adaptation       (Table 3). Broilers fed diets containing coarse
period. Each cage of 3 birds constituted an experi-   corn had significantly increased FI and decreased
mental unit. Eight groups of 5 adjacent cages         FE compared with birds fed most other mash
provided blocks for a randomized complete block       diets. Hetland et al. [7] reported increased FI
design. Upon conclusion of the adaptation period,     when feeding diets with high inclusions of whole
birds (4.5 wk of age) were restricted from feed       cereals. The authors remarked that excessive feed
for 24 h. The 5 experimental mash diets that          wastage contributed to the increased FI. Exces-
differed in particle size (Table 1) were randomly     sive feed wastage was not observed in the current
assigned to cages within each block. Experimen-       study. Past literature has also suggested that broil-
tal diets were supplied in 1.0-kg aliquots. Water     ers may not be able to efficiently utilize large corn
was provided ad libitum. A 100-g feed sample          particles due to underdeveloped gastrointestinal
was taken from each cage to determine initial diet    tracts [1, 34]. In the current study, linear regres-
particle size. Homogeneous feed samples (100 g)       sion indicated that increased corn particle size
were taken following feed administration at 3-h       significantly increased nitrogen retention. Simi-
intervals for a 12-h period. Homogeneity of feed      larly, increased corn particle size showed trends
samples was created by 30 s of manual stirring.       toward increased lysine retention (P = 0.0669).
Particle size analysis was performed on all test      Hence, broilers fed larger particle corn did not
samples [20]. Preference was determined by com-       seem to be affected by underdeveloped gastroin-
paring the average particle size at each time point   testinal tracts. Broilers fed coarse corn had sig-
with the initial average particle size of the as-     nificantly lower FE compared with broilers fed
signed diet. Increases in diet particle size over     diets containing fine, small, or medium corn.
time indicate a preference for smaller particles           Breast weight and breast weight as a percent-
and vice versa.                                       age of live weight decreased (P = 0.0149 and
    All experimental protocols were approved by       0.0250, respectively) as dietary corn particle size
the West Virginia University Animal Care and          increased (Table 4). Conversely, gizzard weight
Use Committee (ACUC # 02-1002).                       and gizzard weight as a percentage of live weight
                                                      increased (P = 0.0123 and 0.0001, respectively).
Statistical Analysis
                                                      Fat pad weight per se was not significantly af-
    The GLM procedure of SAS [33] was used            fected; however, fat pad weight as a percentage
to determine effects of particle size and pellet      of live weight increased (P = 0.0289) as dietary
texture on performance, carcass characteristics,      corn particle size increased. Differences in fat pad
TMEn, nutrient retention, feed passage time, and      weight as a percentage of live weight may have
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE                                                                     253

Table 7. Indication of preference determined by average particle size ( m) of diets as consumed over time

                                                              Time of collection (h)

Treatment               Initial                  3                      6                        9              12

Fine                    863.875               885.875*               868.625                   848.5          797.375*
Small                   926.5                 975.125*               934.125                   907.5          857.625*
Medium                  943.125               957                    932.625                   897*          832.75*
Large                 1,065.25              1,073.25               1,034.625                   997.125*       932.375*
Coarse                1,514.875             1,496*                 1,495.5                   1,556.875      1,405.25*
*Means differ significantly from the initial average particle size for that row (P < 0.05).


been confounded by larger changes in live weight,                had numerically the highest AIA percentages at
breast weight, and gizzard weight. Nir et al. [35]               6 h, suggesting increased FPT. Conversely, the
reported a positive relationship between gizzard                 coarse particle diet had numerically the lowest
weight and dietary particle size. Similarly, Healy               AIA percentage at 6, 8, and 10 h suggesting a
[4] reported increased gizzard, proventriculus,                  decreased FPT. Nir et al. [35] reported that con-
and intestinal weights for chicks fed corn ground                tent weight of the gizzard was significantly less
to 900 m compared with that ground to 300                        for diets containing small particles compared with
  m. In the current study, increased grain particle              large, suggesting a decreased particle retention
size seemed to increase the proportion of feed                   time. Larger corn particles may have been re-
energy utilized for gizzard growth and mainte-                   tained in the gastrointestinal tract for an increased
nance as opposed to breast growth. This specula-                 time that may contribute to increased nutrient
tion is also supported by changes in feed effi-                   digestion and energy metabolism.
ciency (Table 3).                                                    Consistent preference trends for feed particles
     True metabolizable energy values were high                  among diets were not apparent (Table 7). How-
relative to the calculated diet ME of 3,200 kcal/                ever, any particle size preference from the initial
kg (Tables 1 and 5). Values might have been high                 diet particle size would indicate that birds are not
in general due to the fast-growing broiler model,                consuming a homogeneous mix of ingredients
                                                                 and, therefore, a nutrient profile different from the
timed feeding regimen, or high soybean oil inclu-
                                                                 calculated formulation. The medium- and large-
sion of all diets. Increasing dietary corn particle
                                                                 particle diets illustrated no particle size preference
size resulted in a quadratic effect on TMEn (P =
                                                                 (P > 0.05) for collection times of 3 and 6 h. The
0.0042). Feeding diets containing medium corn
                                                                 lack of particle preference may have contributed
particles resulted in the highest TMEn. Hetland et
                                                                 to increased performance. However, all mash
al. [7] reported that starch digestibility increased
                                                                 diets illustrated a significant preference for larger
when broilers were fed whole wheat compared                      particles for the 12-h collection period. Portella
with ground wheat. The authors attributed in-                    et al. [36] reported decreases in the concentration
creased starch digestibility to increased gizzard                of larger particles in a crumbled diet over time.
activity that would increase ingredient grinding                     In summary, broilers obtained digestive bene-
and mixing. In the current study, the efficiency                  fits from consuming diets containing medium to
of nitrogen and lysine retention of broilers also                coarse particle corn (i.e., 1,042 to 2,242 m). In
suggested benefits of large particle feeding (Ta-                 addition, broilers may consume a more balanced
ble 3).                                                          nutrient profile from medium and large particle
     Feed passage time (FPT) data are illustrated                corn (i.e., 1,042 and 1,109 m) due to lack of
at different collection times by the average per-                particle size preference. However, feeding coarse
centage AIA of excreta in Table 6. Cage FI did not               corn (i.e., 2,242 m) may increase gizzard growth
differ among diets (P = 0.4682). The maximum                     and maintenance to an extent that compromises
excretion of AIA for all diets occurred during the               performance.
6- and 8-h collection periods. Jensen et al. [13]
reported maximum excretion of chromic oxide at                   Pellet Texture
similar times. Particle size did not significantly                    All physical characteristics of the pelleted
affect FPT. However, fine and small particle diets                diets were similar with the exception of texture
254                                                                                                    JAPR: Research Report

as determined by breaking force (Table 2). Mean                            corn was assessed for feed passage time, due to
breaking force for pellets containing commercial                           its high soy oil inclusion (i.e., 6.3%). Feed pas-
binder was greater than that of pellets containing                         sage time did not indicate significant treatment
added water, 1,856.37 and 1,662.45 g respec-                               differences; however, the soft mash formulation
tively, producing a comparatively harder texture.                          illustrated numerically decreased feed passage
The high percentages of fines for both diets are                            time compared with the fine corn particle diet for
indicative of commercial pellet manufacture post                           6- and 8-h collection periods (Table 6).
cooling and transport [37].                                                     The current findings imply that a harder pellet
    Broilers fed hard pellets had significantly                             texture may produce beneficial digestive and sub-
greater live weight gain and FE than those fed                             sequent performance effects compared with pel-
soft pellets (Table 3). Performance benefits of
                                                                           lets of softer texture. The hard pellet texture
hard pellets compared with soft pellets may be
                                                                           (1,856 g of breaking force) was not hard enough
derived by similar mechanisms as observed with
                                                                           to produce carcass characteristic effects that were
increased corn particle size of mash diets. Nitro-
gen and lysine retention were significantly im-                             detrimental to performance but was able to pro-
proved for broilers fed hard pellets compared with                         duce favorable digestive effects despite being
broilers fed soft pellets. In addition, Table 5 illus-                     compared with the soft pelleted diet that had a
trates that hard pellets produced a significant in-                         higher inclusion of fat. Mateos et al. [38] suggest
crease in TMEn compared with soft pellets. Car-                            that supplemental fat may enhance the use of
cass characteristics were not affected by pellet                           dietary energy by slowing the rate of passage of
texture (P > 0.05; Table 4). Feed passage time                             diets, creating an extracaloric effect. The precise
was not performed on pelleted feed. However,                               mechanism of pellet texture effects on broiler
the soft pellet formulation made with fine particle                         performance remains unclear.


                                       CONCLUSIONS AND APPLICATIONS
 1. Feeding broilers medium to coarse particle corn (i.e., 1,042 to 2,242 m) improved nutrient
    digestion; however, broilers fed coarse particle corn (i.e., 2,242 m) demonstrated increased
    gizzard growth and perceived maintenance requirements that compromised performance. Digestive
    benefits of feeding medium to coarse particle corn may have resulted due to lack of particle
    preference during feeding and decreased feed passage time in the gastrointestinal tract.
 2. Broilers fed pellets of hard texture demonstrated improved nutrient retention and subsequent
    performance compared with broilers fed pellets of soft texture (1,856 and 1,662 g of pellet breaking
    force, respectively). Pellet texture may affect broilers in a manner similar to particle size.




                                                 REFERENCES AND NOTES
    1. Lott, B. D., E. J. Day, J. W. Deaton, and J. D. May. 1992.              6. Jones, G. P. D., and R. D. Taylor. 2001. The incorporation
The effect of temperature, dietary energy level, and corn particle size    of whole grain into pelleted broiler chicken diets: Production and
on broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 71:618–624.                            physiological responses. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:477–483.
      2. Reece, F. N., B. D. Lott, and J. W. Deaton. 1986. The effects          7. Hetland, H., B. Svihus, and V. Olaisen. 2002. Effect of feeding
of hammer mill screen size on ground corn particle size, pellet durabil-   whole cereals on performance, starch digestibility and duodenal parti-
ity, and broiler performance. Poult. Sci. 65:1257-1261.                    cle size distribution in broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:416–423.
                                                                                8. Reece, F. N., B. D. Lott, and J. W. Deaton. 1986. Effects of
     3. Jurgens, M. H. 1993. Methods of feedstuff preparation. Pages
                                                                           environmental temperature and corn particle size on response of broil-
220–225 in Animal Feeding and Nutrition. 7th ed. Kendall/Hunt Publ.
                                                                           ers to pelleted feed. Poult. Sci. 65:636–641.
Co., Dubuque, IA.
                                                                                9. Wondra, K. J., J. D. Hancock, K. C. Behnke, R. H. Hines,
     4. Healy, B. J. 1992. Nutritional value of selected sorghum grain     and C. R. Stark. 1995. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth
for swine and poultry and effect of particle size on performance and       performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finish-
intestinal morphology in young pigs and broiler chicks. M.S. Thesis.       ing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 73:757–763.
Kansas State Univ., Manhattan.
                                                                              10. Behnke, K. C. 1994. Factors affecting pellet quality. Pages
     5. Nir, I. 1994. Effect of particle size on performance. 1. Corn.     44–54 in Proc. Maryland Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf., College Park, MD.
Poult. Sci. 73:45–49.                                                      Maryland Feed Ind. Counc. and Univ. Maryland, College Park.
PARSONS ET AL.: PARTICLE SIZE AND PERFORMANCE                                                                                                 255

    11. Runnels, T. D. 1976. The influence of feed texture on broiler       sieving. Page 325 in: American Society of Agricultural Engineers
performance. Poult. Sci. 55:1958–1961.                                     Standard S 319. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Yearbook
                                                                           Standards, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
    12. Heywang, B. W., and R. B. Morgan. 1944. A comparison of
a pelleted and unpelleted all-mash diet for growing chickens. Poult.          24. Pellet breaking strength was tested using a TA-HDi texture
Sci. 23:16–20.                                                             analyzer with a Warner-Bratzler blade.
    13. Jensen, L. S., L. H. Merill, C. V. Reddy, and J. McGinnis.             25. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Associa-
1962. Observations on eating patterns and rate of food passage of          tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA. Water activity
birds fed pelleted and unpelleted diets. Poult. Sci. 41:1414–1419.         was analyzed using an AquaLab model CX2.
    14. Nir, I., R. Hillel, I. Pitchi, and G. Shefet. 1995. Effect of         26. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 1995. Moisture
particle size on performance. 3. Grinding pelleting interaction. Poult.    Air-Oven Method. AACC Method 44-15A. Approved Methods of the
Sci. 74:771–783.                                                           American Association of Analytical Chemists Vol II. St. Paul, MN.
    15. Zatari, I. M., P. R. Ferket, and S. E. Scheideler. 1990. Effect        27. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Associa-
of pellet integrity, calcium lignosulfonate, and dietary energy on the     tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
performance of summer-raised broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 69(Suppl.
1):198. (Abstr.)                                                              28. Stinefelt, B. M., J. C. Eya, K. J. Semmens, and K. P. Blemings.
                                                                           2004. Effect of diet and strain on growth and performance in hybrid
    16. Moritz, J. S., R. S. Beyer, K. J. Wilson, K. R. Cramer, L. J.
                                                                           Bluegill. North Am. J. Aquac. 66:312–318.
McKinney, and F. J. Fairchild. 2001. Effect of moisture addition at
the mixer to a corn-soybean-based diet on broiler performance. J.            29. Isoperibol oxygen bomb calorimeter model 1266, Parr Instru-
Appl. Poult. Res. 10:347–353.                                              ment Company, Moline, IL.
   17. Moritz, J. S., K. J. Wilson, K. R. Cramer, R. S. Beyer, L. J.          30. Hill, F. W., and D. L. Anderson. 1958. Comparison of ME
McKinney, W. B. Cavalcanti, and X. Mo. 2002. Effect of formulation         and PE determinations with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64:587.
density, moisture and surfactant on feed manufacturing, pellet quality
and broiler performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:155–163.                     31. Celite Corporation, Lompac, CA.
   18. Moritz, J. S., K. R. Cramer, K. J. Wilson, and R. S. Beyer.             32. Vogtmann, H., P. Frirter, and A. L. Prabuck. 1975. A new
2003. Feed manufacture and feeding of rations with graded levels of        method of determining metabolizability of energy and digestibility of
added moisture formulated to different energy densities. J. Appl. Poult.   fatty acids in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 16:531–534.
Res. 12:371–381.                                                              33. SAS Institute. 2000. The SAS System for Windows 2000.
   19. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of           Release 8.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
                                                                              34. Kilburn, J., and H. M. Edwards, Jr. 2001. The response of
      20. Ro-Tap particle size analyzer model RX-29 type 110V 60H2,        broiler to the feeding of mash or pelleted diets containing maize of
WS Tyler, Mentor, OH. One hundred grams of ground corn for each            varying particle sizes. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:484–492.
diet was placed in a dust-tight enclosed series of stacked (No. 4, 6,
. . .) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) screens               35. Nir, I., R. Hillel, G. Shefet, and Z. Nitsan. 1994. Effect of
affixed to the Ro-Tap particle size analyzer and shaken for 10 min.         particle size on performance. 2. Grain texture interactions. Poult. Sci.
The screens were then separated and weighed. Particle size was calcu-      73:781–791.
lated by subtracting the weight of the screen from the final weight of         36. Portella, F. J., L. J. Caston, and S. Leeson. 1988. Apparent
screen and sample after shaking. The mean geometric particle size          feed particle size preference by broilers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:923–930.
and log normal geometric standard deviation were calculated as de-
scribed by McEllhiney [39].                                                   37. Scheideler, S. E. 1991. Pelleting is important for broilers.
                                                                           Pages 1–7 in Proc. 18th Annu. Carolina Poult. Nutr. Conf., Charlotte,
    21. Maxibond–urea-formaldehyde resin and calcium sulfate to aid        NC. North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.
in pelleting animal feed and included in the diet at 4 lb/ton.
                                                                              38. Mateos, G. G., J. L. Sell, and J. A. Eastwood. 1982. Rate of
    22. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1997. ASAE
                                                                           food passage (transit time) as influenced by level of supplemental fat.
S269.4, Cubes, pellets, and crumbles-Definitions and methods for
                                                                           Poult. Sci. 61:94–100.
determining density, durability, and moisture. Standards 1997. Am.
Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI. Due to the use of a 5/32 × 1.25 in.          39. McEllhiney, R. R. 1994. Determining and expressing particle
die, pellets were sifted in a No. 6 American Society for Testing and       size. Pages 545–547 in Feed Manufacture Technology IV. American
Materials (ASTM) screen. Five hundred grams of sifted pellets was          Feed Industry Association, Inc., Arlington, VA.
placed in a dust-tight enclosure and tumbled for 10 min at 50 rpm.
The enclosure was of the dimensions 5 × 12 × 12 in., with a 2 × 9             40. Avaigen, Hunstville, AL.
in. plate affixed diagonally along 1 of the 12 × 12 in. sides. The
tumbled samples were then sifted again (No. 6 ASTM) and weighed.
The pellet durability index was calculated by dividing the weight of
                                                                           Acknowledgments
pellets after tumbling by the weight of pellets before tumbling, then          This study was financed by Hatch funds allocated to West Virginia
multiplying by 100. The modified pellet durability index was deter-         University, Project No. H-435 and USDA-NRI 2002-35208-11580.
mined in a similar manner with the exception of adding 5, 13-mm            The authors acknowledge Fred Roe, Bill Miller, and Bill Jones for
hex nuts to the pretumbled sample to obtain added pellet pressure.         assistance with animal welfare. Mark Nazelrodt and Pilgrim’s Pride
  23. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 1983.             Corporation are appreciated for feed manufacture and broiler chick
Methods of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by         support.

						
Related docs