Beyond the Human Genome: Transcriptomics
Dr Jen Taylor Henry Wellcome Centre for Gene Function Bioinformatics Department of Statistics taylor@stats.ox.ac.uk
Beyond the Human Genome: 1995
Human Genome sequencing begins in earnest “Mapping the Book of Life”
1999
Human Genome = approx 140, 000 genes
2000 - First Draft
Human Genome
= 30, 000 – 40,000 genes ??
2003 - Essential Completion
Human Genome = 24, 195 genes !!!???
Commemorative stained glass window for F.C. Crick, designed by Maria McClafferty.(Photograph: Paul Forster) Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge, UK.
Beyond the Human Genome:
Gene Number ≠ Complexity
Complexity
Gene
Regulation
Transcriptome
Commemorative stained glass window for F.C. Crick, designed by Maria McClafferty.(Photograph: Paul Forster) Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge, UK.
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data analysis
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Transcriptome:
“transcriptome, the mRNAs expressed by a genome at any given time..” (Abbott, 1999)
Central Dogma of Molecular Biology
mRNA – single stranded RNA molecule
Complementary to DNA
Processed (spliced and polyadenylated) RNA transcript Carries the sequence of a gene out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm where it can be translated into a protein structure
Image: Access Excellence, National Institutes of Heath
Transcriptome: An evolving definition
(the population of) mRNAs expressed by a genome at any given time (Abbott, 1999) The complete collection of transcribed elements of the genome. (Affymetrix, 2004)
mRNAs: 35, 913 transcripts (including alternative spliced variants) Non-coding RNAs tRNAs (497 genes) rRNAs (243 genes) snmRNAs (small non-messenger RNAs) microRNAs and siRNAs (small interferring RNAs) snoRNAs (small nucleolar RNAs) snRNAs (small nuclear RNAs) Pseudogenes (~ 2,000)
The human transcriptome
Nucleotides High density oligonucleotide arrays across 11 different cell lines
~ 70% of transcripts non-coding
~79-88% have multiple transcripts
Kapranov et al., 2002
~ 90% of transcribed nucleotides outside annotated exons
The dimensions of the unique transcriptome?? >>> current 40,000 estimate
Kampa et al., Novel RNAs identified from an in-depth analysis of the transcriptome of human chromosomes 21 and 22. Genome Research. 2004
Transcriptomics
Scope
the population of functional RNA transcripts. the mechanisms that regulate the production of RNA transcripts dynamics of the trancriptome (time, cell type, genotype, external stimuli)
Definition
The study of characteristics and regulation of the functional RNA transcript population of a cell/s or organism at a specific time.
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data analysis
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Observing the transcriptome
High-throughput friendly Genome
Predicts Biology
**
Regulatory network
Transcriptome
Context dependent and dynamic
Proteome
**Li et al., 2004
Publications: Expression Profiling vs Proteomics
Expression Profiling 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0
19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99
Proteomics
Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA arrays themselves, but “ The challenge is no longer in the expression microarray. in developing experimental designs to exploit the full power of a Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO. global perspective.” Stanford University Medical Center, CA. Eric Lander
Data from PubMed
20 00
20 01
20 02
20 03
Observing the transcriptome?
Classic Human Transcriptome Profiling Studies: Trancriptome reflects Biology
Golub et al., Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999.
ALL – acute lymphoblastic leukemia
AML – acute myeloid leukemia
Scherf et al.,
A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nature Genetics 2000
60 human cancer cell lines
Observing the transcriptome
Focussed Experimental Approaches:
Northern Blotting Analysis Real time PCR (quantitative or semi-quantitative)
Highthroughput Approaches: Closed System Profiling: Microarray expression profiling Open System Profiling: Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (MPSS)
Red – increase of Cy5 sample transcripts Green – increase of Cy3 sample transcripts Yellow – equal abundance
Limit of Detection: 1 in 30,000 transcripts ~ 20 transcripts/cell
Experimental overview:
Cell population A Cell population B
RNA extraction
A A B B
Quantify pixel intensities.
Reverse transcription
A A B B
“Overlay images” Klenow label incorporation
Sample A labelled with cy5 dye
Sample B labelled with cy3 dye
Scan cy5 channel Scan cy3 channel Washing
Hybridisation
Red – increase of Cy5 sample transcripts Green – increase of Cy3 sample transcripts Yellow – equal abundance
Limit of Detection: 1 in 30,000 transcripts ~ 20 transcripts/cell
Platforms and Formats
Isotope Nylon – cDNA (300-900 nt) Two-colour Glass cDNA or Oligo (80 nt) 500 – 11,000 elements Affymetrix Silicone – oligo (20 nt) 22 ,000 elements Tissue Arrays Glass Tissue Discs (20-150)
Affymetrix GeneChip®
Limits: 1: 100,000 transcripts ~ 5 transcripts/cell
Affymetrix GeneChip®
http://www.affymetrix.com
Affymetrix:
Gene Expression Arrays Arabidopsis Genome C. elegans Genome Drosophila Genome E. coli Genome Human Genome U133 Plus Mouse Genome Yeast Genome Rat Genome Zebrafish Plasmodium/Anopheles Transcripts/Genes 24,000 22,500 18, 500 20, 366 47,000 39, 000 5, 841 (S. cerevisiae) & 5, 031 (S. pombe) 30, 000 14, 900 4,300 (P. falciparum) & 14,900 (A. gambiae)
Barley (25,500), Soybean (37,500 + 23,300 pathogen), Grape (15,700) Canine (21,700), Bovine (23,000) B.subtilis (5,000), S. aureus (3,300 ORFS), Xenopus (14, 400)
Microarray and GeneChip Approaches
Advantages:
Rapid Method and data analysis well described and supported Robust Convenient for directed and focussed studies
Disadvantages: Closed system approach Difficult to correlate with absolute transcript number Sensitive to alternative splicing ambiguities
Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE)
The principles: Velculescu et al., Science 1995
A transcript (new or novel) can be recognised by a small subset (e.g. 14) of its nucleotides – a tag
Linking tags allows for rapid sequencing. Open system for transcript profiling
14 nt
Modified SAGE methods LongSAGE (21 nt) SAGE-lite, micro-SAGE, mini-SAGE
TAG TAG TAG
AAAAAAAAA – 3‟ AAAAAAAAA – 3‟ AAAAAAAAA – 3‟ TAG
RASL/DASL methods (5‟ and 3‟ Tags)
AAAAAAAAA – 3‟
TAG
TAG
TAG
TAG
Sequence
AGCTTGAACCGTGACATCA TGGCCATTGGCCCCAATTG AGACAGTGAGTTCAATGC
SAGE
Advantages:
Potential „open‟ system method – new transcripts can be identified Accuracy of unambiguous transcript observation Digital output of data Quantitative and qualitative information
Disadvantages: Characterising novel transcripts is often computationally difficult from short tag sequences Tag specificity (recently increased length to 21 bp) Length of tags can vary (RE enzyme activity variable with temperature) A subset of transcripts do not contain enzyme recognition sequence Sensitive to a subset of alternative splice variants
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data analysis
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Biological question
Sample Attributes
Experimental design Platform Choice Microarray experiment 16-bit TIFF Files
Image analysis
(Rspot, Rbkg), (Gspot, Gbkg)
Normalization
Clustering Statistical Analysis Classification
Data Mining
Pattern Discovery
Biological verification and interpretation
Analysis
47,000 x 2 x 2 Liver datapoints 188, 000
Brain
47,000 x 2 x 2 datapoints
188, 000
Lymphocyte
47,000 x 2 x 2 datapoints
188, 000
Analysis
Essential problem: Given a large dataset with technical and biological noise:
Find: A) Transcripts: patterns (common themes or differences) measures of robustness or some idea of uncertainty B) Sample: similarities or differences between samples on global/multi-gene level
Analysis
Liver
Brain
Lymphocytes
Which transcripts are different?
What are the patterns?
Biologists Nightmare: Statisticians Playground
Characteristics of the expression profiling data:
High dimensionality Sample number (n) low and observation number high (p) Non-independence of observations Complex patterns: visualisation and extraction Incorporation of contextual information Standardisation and data sharing Integration of & with other data types
Analysis Methods
Classical parametric & non-parametric statistical tests for hypothesis testing Unsupervised clustering algorithms Hierarchical clustering Kmeans and Self-Organising Maps Classification e.g. Machine learning and Linear discriminant analysis Dimensionality Reduction or Principal Component Analysis e.g. Gene Shaving and Multi-dimensional Scaling Probabilistic Modelling Dynamic Bayesian Networks Markov Models
Analysis Methods
Classical Parametric Statistical Analysis:
H 0 (GeneA) AL AB ALy
AL
Fold Change Tools: T-test
ALy
ANOVA Mann Whitney U Test
AB
Liver Brain Lymphocyte
Analysis Methods
Classical Parametric Statistical Analysis:
H 0 L B Ly
(P=0.01) 20,000 transcripts = 200 transcripts
Difficulties
???
Assumes that observations are normally distributed and independent
‘Statistical significance’ does not equal biological significance Appropriate multiple testing corrections are difficult
Analysis Methods
Clustering Approaches: Divides or groups genes/samples into groups “clusters”, based on similarities and differences Number of groups is user defined
Algorithms: Hierarchical clustering Kmeans clustering Self organising maps
Distance Metrics
log2(cy5/cy3)
2 0 -2
Time
Distance between 2 expression vectors
Euclidean Pearson(r*-1)
1.4 4.2 -0.90 -1.00
to to
Distance Metric
log2(cy5/cy3)
2 0 -2
Transcription Factor Transcript Target Transcript 1 Target Transcript 2
Pearson Distance Euclidean Distance
Hierarchical Clustering
g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7 g8
g1 is most like g8
g1
g8
g2
g3
g4
g5
g6
g7
g4 is most like {g1, g8}
g1
g8
g4
g2
g3
g5
g6
g7
Hierarchical Tree
g1
g8
g4
g5
g7
g2
g3
g6
Clustering: Case Study
Sorlie et al., 2001
Breast tissue subtypes Hierarchical clustering
K-means clustering
Partition or centroid algorithms
Step 1: User specifies K clusters x
Brain Expression Level
K=3
x x
Liver Expression Level
K-means clustering
Step 2 – Using Euclidean distance nearest points assigned to clusters (k) Step 3 – New centroids calculated
x
K=3
x x
K-means clustering
Step 4 – Points re-assigned to nearest centroid Step 5 – New centroids calculated Iterates until centroids don‟t move
K=3
Classification
Transcript B
Transcript A K-nearest neighbour methods (KNN)
Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)
Machine Learning: Support Vector Machines Neural Network Analysis
Adapted from Florian Markowetz
Classification
Training Set 2/3 sample set Test Set 1/3 sample set
Define Classification Rule
Linear Discriminant Analysis Gene B KNN
Gene A
Classification
More complex classifiers
Gene B
Gene A KNN – Voting scheme – (k=3) Use three closest points to classify
Adapted from Florian Markowetz
Probabilistic Modelling
Incorporate dependencies and prior knowledge into the identification of patterns/clusters: - relationships in time between samples - relationships between genes Handle measures of uncertainty well Conceptually simple, consideration needed on implementation
Markov modelling Dynamic bayesian networks
Analysis Methods
Classical parametric & non-parametric statistical tests for hypothesis testing Unsupervised clustering algorithms Hierarchical clustering Kmeans and Self-Organising Maps Classification Machine learning and Linear discriminant Analysis Dimensionality Reduction or Principal Component Analysis Gene Shaving and Multi-dimensional Scaling Probabilistic Modelling Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Pattern recognition Markov Models
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data curation and analysis pipelines
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
…. to be continued.
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data curation and analysis pipelines
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Regulation of Gene Expression
Abundance (transcript) = Rate of Transcription – Rate of Decay
Transcription
Decay
Protein/DNA interactions cis and trans regulatory sequence motifs
Protein/RNA interactions cis-acting regulatory motifs secondary structure
chromatin structure
Methylation
Regulation of Transcription
Wray et al., 2003
Regulation of Decay
Stabilisation – facilitates rapid increase in potential protein production Destabilisation – facilitates precise time and dose control of transcripts
Abundance Abundance
Stabile
Decay
Time
Time
Sequence-mediated mRNA decay – AU rich elements (AREs) 3‟ UTR, 50 – 150 nucleotides
usually multiple copies (e.g. AUUUA x 5)
protein recruitment for destabilisation size and content variation (functionally critical motif unknown) >30% of vertebrate homologous mRNAs have highly conserved elements in the 3‟UTR - often sequence & position
The importance of the decay process
BMP2 (bone morphogenetic protein 2) developmentally critical, highly conserved protein in vertebrates (Fritz et al., 2004)
3‟ UTR conservation:
- 73% /100 nucleotides, 450 myr evolution - 95% within mammals
Cancer related genes:
C-fos, C-myc, C-jun, MMP-13, Cyclooxygenase-2, Cyclin D, Cyclin E, Cyclins A and B, Cdk inhibitors, DNA methyltransferase 1………. (Review: Audic and Hartley, 2004)
Regulation of Transcription
Wray et al., 2003
Regulation of Trancription
Diverse orientations, structure and functional properties of regulatory modules
Wray et al., 2003
Regulation of the transcriptome
Finding regulatory elements using co-abundant transcripts
Assumption: shared abundance profile = same cluster = shared regulatory machinery
Penacchio and Rubin, 2001
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data analysis
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
The transcriptome & the genome
Using the genome to infer/observe the transcriptome:
Construction of whole genome/transcriptome arrays and SAGE tags Using sequence features to predict gene expression: Beer and Tavazoie. Predicting gene expression from sequence. Cell 2004 Using chromatin structure to predict regulation of gene expression: Sabo et al. Genome-wide identification of DNaseI hypersenstive sites. PNAS 2004 Quantitative trait loci mapping Morley et al., Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression. Nature 2004 Schadt et al., Genetics of gene expression surveyed in mouse, human and maize. Nature 2003
Transcriptome & Genome
Beer and Tavazoie, Cell. 2004 Abundance profile
Transcription factor binding site
Predict potential gene expression patterns
Transcriptome & Genome
Beer and Tavazoie, Cell. 2004 AND Logic: AND Logic, OR Logic:
OR Logic, NOT Logic:
Combinatorial patterns help identify groups of transcripts predicted to show similar abundance profiles
Solid: Actual expression Dashed: Predicted
Introduction:
The scope of transcriptomics – a definition of the transcriptome
Part I: Observing the transcriptome
Experimental methodology Data analysis
Part II: Using the transcriptome
The regulation of the trancriptome
The transcriptome and the genome The transcriptome and the proteome Beyond the Human Transcriptome
The transcriptome & the proteome
Functional annotations of co-abundant genes Yang et al., 2003 Decay rates of human mRNAs: Correlation with functional characteristics and sequence attributes. Genome Research. Co-ordinated patterns of decay rates within functional classes of transcripts Transcription factor functional classes have “fast-decaying” mRNAs (<2 hr half lives). Transcripts of multi-subunit proteins have correlated decay patterns and rates
The transcriptome & the proteome
Do they agree?
Studies of direct correlation between mRNA abundance and protein abundances ( r = 0.6) (Hegde et al., 2003)
Biological Issues: Post-translational modifications Protein stability and folding Alternative splicing products Technical Issues: Inter-platform variability (microarray and RT PCR: r = 0.8) Protein abundance measures – 2D gel electrophoresis
The transcriptome & the proteome
The integration of transcriptomics and proteomics
Hegde et al., 2003 Synergistic approaches to biological problems using both transcriptomics and proteomics
Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Challenges for the Future: (short and long term)
Integration of different datatypes - sequence, exon structure, transcript abundance, protein abundance and function Dealing with alternative splice variants The regulatory processes behind any given RNA abundance Dealing with gene ontologies in a quantitative manner
Beyond the Human Transcriptome
Future Directions:
„Open‟ systems for comprehensively cataloguing the transcriptome - between tissues/cells/developmental time points - between individuals Variation of transcriptome between individuals - coding variants, epigenetic variation and inheritance Clinical deployment of transcriptome profiling approaches in diagnostics and pharmacogenetics Human Regulatory Network Resources for Tissues
Acknowledgements
OX-FORD BIOINFORMATICS GROUP Genomes, Sequences and Function
Oxford Centre for Gene Function Jotun Hein Chris Holmes Gerton Lunter Lizhong Hao Ben Holtom Karen Lees
http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~taylor/Presentations
sammyc2007 4/12/2008 |
85 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/29/2008 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/17/2008 |
64 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/29/2008 |
74 |
4 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/17/2008 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/15/2008 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/29/2008 |
213 |
3 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/5/2008 |
813 |
9 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/28/2008 |
137 |
2 |
0 |
educational
mountainmom01 5/14/2008 |
53 |
1 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/11/2008 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
educational
AmnaKhan 4/16/2008 |
30 |
1 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/12/2008 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 3/28/2008 |
78 |
4 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 4/9/2008 |
64 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
72 |
4 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
57 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
94 |
4 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
80 |
2 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
138 |
1 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
123 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
69 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
162 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
legal