No.4 (CMO 4), § II.G.; such dismissal with prejudice

							COUGHLIN DUFFY LLP
                                                                          FILED
350 Mount Kemble Avenue                                                JUL 18 2008
P.O. Box 1917
Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1917                                  Judge Jamie D. Happas
(973) 267-0058
Attorneys for Defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP,
AstraZeneca LP, KBI Sub Inc., Zeneca Inc., and Astra USA, Inc.

                                             SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
DOROTHY BENNETT,                             LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY

                  Plaintiff,	                DOCKET NO. MID-L-1373-07-MT

       v.                                    CIVIL ACTION

ASTRAZENECA                                  In Re Risperdal/Seroquel/Zyprexa Litigation
PHARMACEUTICALS LP, et al.,                  Case No. 274

                  Defendants.	               ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

                                             RETURN DATE:        ~~YJ( 2.O0~




           THIS MATTER having been brought before the Court by Coughlin Duffy LLP,

attorneys for Defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, KBI Sub Inc.,

Zeneca Inc., and Astra USA, Inc. (collectively "AstraZeneca") to dismiss plaintiffs Amended

Complaint with prejudice for failure to serve a Short Form Plaintiff Fact Sheet pursuant to Case

Management Order No.4 ("CMO 4"), § II.G.; such dismissal with prejudice being authorized by

Case Management Order No. 4A ("CMO 4A), § II.H2. in the event a plaintiff fails to vacate an

Order of Dismissal without prejudice after the expiration of ninety (90) days from the order of

dismissal without prejudice (in this case, on or before June 6, 2008); plaintiffs Amended

Complaint having been dismissed without prejudice on March 7, 2008; plaintiff having failed to




230479 1
serve a Short Form Plaintiff Fact Sheet and having failed to vacate the March 7,2008 Order of

Dismissal without prejudice on or before June 6, 2008; and for good cause shown;

          IT IS on this   J9l day of ...)\A\'-\             ,2008;
          ORDERED that AstraZeneca's motioJ is hereby GRANTED and that plaintiffs

Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all parties -                       I d

F!!I      I 'pursuant to CMO 4, §II.G. and CMO 4A, §II.H.2.; and it is further    ,DO
                                                                          ewA f~"'ff
          ORDERED that a signed copy of this Order be served on all counseYwithin seven (7)

days of the date hereof; and it is further




 ~nopposed	                                               Hono ble Ja ie D. Happas, J.S.C.
                                                                b0      Ion I find it
_ _ Opposed	                           Having revi~we.d the ~n its face' and is
                                       to be mentonous              t 0'\ '6·2 it
                                                  d      Pursuant 0 .I~· ,
                                       unoPPose "11 begranted essentially for the
                                        thereforesWl forth in the moving papers.
                                         reasons et




230479j