Early Determinants of Ethical Decision-Making
Stephen Murphy Center for Applied Social Research University of Oklahoma ORI Conference Tampa Bay, FL 12/02/06
Collaborative Effort
Professors:
Dr. Michael Mumford Dr. Lynn Devenport
Ethan Waples Alison Antes
Dr. Shane Connelly Dr. Ryan Brown
Jason Hill
Graduate Students:
Also like to acknowledge the National Institutes of Health and Office of Research Integrity for funding this research
Decision-Making in Ethical Dilemmas
Decision-making in ethical dilemmas is a complex process:
Competing values, causes, and goals Emotions are at play Situational cues often conflict Outcomes are uncertain An illustrative example May have a number of different influences
Choices in ethical decision-making:
Final action follows a sequence of choices
Causes of Misconduct: Organizational Climate versus Career Experiences Individual factors Organizational Climate:
Shared perceptions of the organization Expectations of social interactions
Career
Experiences:
Direct specific experiences or incidents Experiences provide information
Method
Participants:
102 first-year doctoral students
Social Biological Health Organizational Climate inventory Career Experiences measure Ethical decision-making
Sampled from 3 graduate sciences:
Measures:
Organizational Climate Survey
Example
items:
A wide variety of viewpoints are expressed here Distribution of rewards and credits is fair here
Factor
Analysis:
Equity Interpersonal Conflict Occupational Engagement Work Commitment
Career Experiences Measure
Example Items:
How often has a professor asked you a question about class readings that you were unable to answer? How often has your group challenged itself to develop unique research ideas or products?
Professional Leadership Poor Coping Lack of Rewards Limited Competitive Pressure Poor Career Direction
Factor Analysis:
Ethical Decision-Making Measure
work simulation Taxonomy of four broad domains of misconduct:
Low-fidelity
Data management Study conduct Professional practices Business practices
Scored
on ethicality
Moderate (2) Low (1)
High (3)
Ethical Decision-Making Measure
During graduate school, Langston developed a new methodological approach for analyzing data, with guidance from his advisor. He trained several graduate students on the use of this approach before he graduated. At a recent professional conference, Langston heard a student present preliminary results from her Master’s thesis in which she used the data analytic approach. He noticed a potentially serious error in the interpretation of the data, attributable to improper use of the approach. He mentions this possibility after the presentation.
Ethical Decision-Making Measure
A month after the conference, one of Langston’s colleagues shows him a manuscript written by the student and Langston’s former advisor. It has been submitted for publication and contains the same information and errors he observed at the conference. He tells his former advisor that he’s sure the analytic approach was applied improperly and can demonstrate this. What should Langston’s former advisor do? Choose two from the following:
(H) Retract the submitted manuscript (M) Submit new analyses and interpretations indicating that the wrong version of the manuscript was submitted (L) Wait for reviews and do additional analyses if indicated
Results
Block One Data Study Conduct
β
Equity Interpersonal Conflict -.06 -.13
β
.07 -.03
Professional Practices β
Business Practices β
-.02 -.22*
-.09 -.29*
Occupational Engagement
Work Commitment R
.11
.01
.14
.19
.02 .20
.19 .24
.07 .31*
.24* .37*
Note: * sig. p<.05
Results
Block One Data Study Conduct
β
Professional Leadership Poor Coping .12 -.28*
β
.00 .01
Professional Practices β .14 -.12
Business Practices β -.02 -.05
Lack of Rewards
Limited Competitive Pressure Poor Career Direction R
Note: * sig. p<.05
-.16
.09
-.13
-.16
-.34*
.18
-.03
.10
.04 .37*
.16 .27
.11 .47*
.25* .33*
Results
Block One Data β Equity Interpersonal Conflict Occupational Engagement Work Commitment Block Two Professional Leadership Poor Coping Lack of Rewards Limited Competitive Pressure Poor Career Direction R .14 -.33* -.15 .08 -.05 .00 -.10 .11 .13 -.18 -.35* .14 -.02 -.05 .03 .04 -.08 .02 .06 .00 Study Conduct β .07 .05 .05 .18 Professional Practices β -.16 -.06 .14 .04 Business Practices β -.02 -.20 -.17 .23*
-.07 .40*
.16 .33
.04 .51*
.17 .43*
Summary
Compelling
evidence for the influence of Organizational Climate and Career Experience on the choices people make influences on Ethical Decisionmaking:
Early
Organizational Climate:
• Influence of interpersonal conflict
Career experience:
• Impact of poor coping and lack of rewards
Discussion
Organizational
but…
Climate remains critical,
More
attention focusing on experiences in the work environment the relationship between direct experiences and perceptions of organizational climate
Study