MUSIC INDUSTRY

Document Sample

Not Bad

August 06, 2008 (3 years 6 ago)
Great information Ty Cohen http://www.MusicContracts101.com

Shared by: Jason Lisa
Stats
views:
611
posted:
3/12/2008
language:
English
pages:
15
MUSIC INDUSTRY

OVERVIEW

U.S. Sales 2002 (U.S. accounts for one third of

sales)

Music $12.6bn ($12.5bn,1996)

Games $10.3bn

Movie Box Office $ 09.5bn

Movie Rentals $ 08.2bn

MUSIC REVENUE TRENDS

Worldwide Sales for Music were $28bn in 2003,

$32bn 2002, and $35.5 billion in 1994 (!)



2001-2002: sales of CD albums fell globally by

6%, singles by 16%, cassettes by 36%, while

music videos grew 9%.



Piracy / CD burning represents annual lost

revenue of $4bn.

MARKET SHARE 2002

Universal (Vivendi) 25.9%

Sony 14.1%

EMI 12%

Warner (AOL Time Warner) 11.9%

BMG (Bertelsmann) 11.1%

Independents 25%

Share of New Releases (U.S.) 2003

 Universal 30.1%

 BMG 18.3%

 Warner 16.8%

 Sony 13.7%

 EMI 10.2%

 Other 10.9%

2003 Sales and Losses

 Universal $3.7bn world sales (down 22%), through

Sept., $43m operating loss (down from profit of

$207m 2002), despite slash of CD prices to $13.

 BMG $1.2bn world sales (down 8%) through June,

$131m operating loss (down from $50m loss, 2002)

 Warner $2.9bn world sales (up 0.01%) through Sept,

$9m operating loss (down from profit of $71m 2002)

 Sony Music Entertainment $2.08bn world sales

(down 9%), through Sept., operating loss $49m (up

from loss of $133m 2002)

 EMI $1.6bn world sales (flat), $129m operating loss

(up 40%).

PLANNED MERGERS 2003

 SONY CORP TO MERGE MUSIC OPERATIONS

WITH BERTELSMANN (BMG) IN JOINT VENTURE

(SONY BMG), EXPANDING MARKET SHARE IN US

TO 28%,SHARING RISK, AND CUTTING COSTS

BY $300M. WILL MERGE ONLY THE LABELS, NOT

MUSIC –PUBLISHING OR CD DISTRIBUTION

 EMI PLANNING TO ACQUIRE TIME WARNER

MUSIC (TW WOULD HAVE 25% SHARE), but was

beaten to it by Bronfman investor group

 DREAMWORKS PLANNING TO SELL ITS MUSIC

DIVISION TO VIVENDI’S UNIVERSAL WHICH IN

TURN IS LIKELY TO BE SOLD TO GE’S NBC

SOURCES OF COMPETITION

 Piracy of CDs and Cassettes. In No.2 market,

Japan, 236m CD-Rs were burned in 2002,

while legitimate CD sales were 229m. In

Spain, two out of five records were pirated.

In Mexico, 1 in 2 people buy pirated music

 MP3 file swapping

 Increased access to Internet worldwide

 Competition from new forms of entertainment

including video games and DVD films

 Downward pressure on prices

Features of Consumption

 Cycles of rapid growth and relative decline

 Major growth periods facilitated by technology and

content (e.g. rock&roll 1955-1969)

 Considerable time spent listening to music

 More hours per dollar spent on recorded music than

on other media, except TV

 Infrastructure of in-home consumer electronics;

changes in technology affect system compatibility,

distribution, sales. Technology is expected to change

 Depends on socially-constructed “culture of listening”

 Subject to massive changes in taste

Industry structure

 Major companies own manufacturing and wholesale distribution

facilities (Vertical integration)

 Major five: Universal Music Group (Vivendi), Warner Music

(AOL Time Warner), Bertelsmann Music Group, Sony, EMI.

(High concentration, partly through horizontal integration).

 Popularity of product highly uncertain; uncertainty reduced

through: star strategies, genre strategies, “over-production,”

structured contracts (commonly five renewable 1-year contracts,

and royalty system that pays the artist 7-15% payable after

costs are met; plus songwriter publishing royalties), controlled

“novelty” (incl. “cross-over” music).

 Cheaper costs of production facilitate independents, often

bought out by big companies when they generate appreciable

revenues. Vertical integration (e.g. Motown) can prolong power

and independence of smaller companies.

Promotion

 Promotion as important as production

 Single largest expense

 Includes attempts to influence positions on

music charts, radio play time (“payola”), tours

Oligopoly

 Oligopoly a fairly consistent feature: in the 50s, 8 companies

controlled 95-100% of weekly top-10 hits; in the 80s and 90s, 6

companies controlled distribution of nearly all popular music

 New fashions (e.g. rock and roll 1955-1970) often upset existing

hierarchies, foster independents

 Certain genres less controlled than others (rhythm and blues in

the 1960s; specialty labels today)

 Old-style concentration correlated with fewer successful songs,

fewer artists, more established stars, and fewer sales. But in

the 1990s, concentration coexisted with high product diversity

and better music. Perhaps because high financial concentration

coupled with decentralization of music –making decisions

Conglomeration

 Synergies through ties to film studios, cable

channels, multi-media conglomerates offers, e.g. film

scores developed for general market rather than for

particular narrative; film yields cheaper music video;

music video channels provide vehicles for music

artists; stars can appear in chat shows, magazine

articles, films etc. all owned by corporate parent; vast

archives provide competitive edge when transitioning

to new consumer electronics formats

 Conglomeration spreads risks and losses

Economies of Scale

 Importance of “first copy” costs increases

where ratio of fixed to marginal costs is high.

More benefit to spreading of fixed costs

across large numbers of units. Once fixed

costs are covered, profit per unit is huge.

 Increasingly national character of radio, cable

channels, record chains with nationally

coordinated inventory, sets high barrier for

definition of market success

Organizing for Uncertainty

 Structured contracts remove need for staff producers

and engineers (though independents may have own

studio, producers, staff), though most have own

promotional office

 Track records and reputations: celebrity power

 Pre-selection systems: selecting that which is most

likely to succeed in light of recent successes

 Overproduction – covering bets - and differential

promotion: more products are produced than can be

successful, while promotional efforts are differentially

assigned to minimize risk


Share This Document


Related docs
Other docs by Jason Lisa
2005-01-19_order_hearing_on_mot_to_intervene
Views: 37  |  Downloads: 0
Organisations and Principles of Management
Views: 149  |  Downloads: 16
2005-08-31_reporters_reply_brief
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
2005-03-30_Miller_Ps_expert_report_OCR
Views: 25  |  Downloads: 0
tech - Single-electron Devices
Views: 91  |  Downloads: 0
multivariate statistical analysis
Views: 130  |  Downloads: 10
Robert Schumann - Landliches Lied
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 1
History - Congress of Vienna
Views: 58  |  Downloads: 1
History - British North America Powerpoint
Views: 332  |  Downloads: 2
Determining the problem and research objectives
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 4
by registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!