The Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database
A custom-designed electronic database for real-time collection of information during CPR
Medical Student, UCD & St. Vincent’s University Hospital Consultant in Emergency Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology, University College Dublin
Brian Hayes
Mr. John Ryan
Dr. Anthony Staines
Topics for discussion
Project background: Cardiac arrest Resuscitation research and Utstein Style Aims of the Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database User interface of the Database Other features of the Database Conclusions
Sudden Cardiac Death
Common and often first manifestation of coronary heart disease 50% of all cardiovascular disease mortality in developed world In Ireland, 11,000 deaths are caused by cardiovascular disease every year. 6,000 can be classified as “sudden”
Survival after cardiac arrest
Usually defined as “survival until hospital discharge” Varies greatly between different Emergency Medical Systems worldwide If the links in the chain come together rapidly and Chances of survival efficiently, the probability of improved by well survival is increased. integrated “chain of survival”
Classification of Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital vs In-hospital
Survival generally much worse in out-ofhospital arrests WHY?
– Less likely to be witnessed by bystanders or HCPs – Delay in commencement of CPR especially if not witnessed – Delay in defibrillation – Delay in definitive care (airway mangement, ACLS drugs)
70% of cardiac arrests in Ireland occur outside the hospital setting Overall survival rate to discharge for such patients is close to zero
The Utstein Style
Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest can be compared between EMS systems using the Utstein Style Consensus Conference of international experts developed Utstein style in 1990 to standardise reporting of study results Provides definitions for commonly used terms
– E.g. “Response time”, “Return of Spontaneous Circulation”, “Survival”
Lists important variables that must be gathered for every patient
– E.g. Arrest witnessed, Collapse-to-defibrillation interval, etc.
Recommends a template for reporting study results, in a flow-chart format
The Utstein Results Template
Break down arrests into groups and subgroups according to:
•Aetiology •Witnessing •Initial rhythm •CPR •Discharge alive •Alive at one year •etc.
Resuscitations attempted
Non-cardiac aetiology
Cardiac aetiology
Arrest not witnessed
Arrest witnessed (bystanders)
Arrest witnessed (EMS personnel)
Initial rhythm asystole
Initial rhythm VF
Initial rhythm VT
Other initial rhythms
Determine presence or absence of bystander CPR for each subset
Never achived ROSC
Any Return of Spontaneous Circulation
Efforts ceased: a: Expired in the field b: Expired in ED
Admitted to ICU/Ward
Expired in Hospital a:total b:within 24 hours
Discharged alive
Seattle vs. New York
Average Response time New York City Seattle
11.4 mins (median) EMTs: 2.0±1.7 min Paramedics: 6.0±2.9 min
Overall survival to discharge
1.4% 28%
Dublin
?
?
Sources: Am J Cardiol 1990; 65:4B-12B, JAMA 1994; 271:678-683
Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database:
Aims
To develop a user-friendly computerised database for the resuscitation room in SVUH ED which would:
– Gather all pre-hospital data on each arrest
according to the Utstein Criteria. – Gather all emergency department data in real-time, while resuscitation is in progress. – Gather outcome variable data days, weeks or months after the index arrest.
Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database:
Aims (continued)
Requirements of the database:
– Incorporate a straightforward and intuitive user interface – Make the process of data entry as easy as possible for the user – Follow the Utstein criteria
Improve the quality of data obtained for audit purposes
Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database:
Long-term aims
Enable rapid computer analysis of data Allow comparison of SVUH ED with other hospitals and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Ireland and worldwide, through the Utstein template Highlight deficiencies in pre-hospital and Emergency Department care and provide guidance for improved patient management and staff training at both levels
Current auditing system in SVUH
Paper based and retrospective Does not gather all of the recommended Utstein “core” data variables
E.g “Arrest witnessed by emergency personnel” “Time of arrest” entered in only 62% of cases “Initial AED rhythm” in only 48% of cases
Poorly completed
Why is this?
Retrospective data entry Poor layout of audit form Confusing use of language on audit form
Utstein Cardiac Arrest Database
Programmed in Microsoft Access® 2000 and Microsoft Visual Basic® 6.0 Multitable relational database Gathers several hundred discreet data points Filters data as it is being entered to ensure its validity Locks data after it is entered to prevent it being altered without a password
Design Process
Iterative process Close consultation with departmental staff Presentation of progress to staff to obtain feedback and advice
Data Entry
Point-and-click
– –
Keyboard control also Barcode reader to be added Limit possible values and avoid typographic errors
Drop-down lists
–
Free text entry Greyed-out options “Now” button
– –
–
Time-sensitive process Hard to record accurately Synchronisation with atomic clock through internet ensuring accuracy and precision
Data Entry
Option buttons Automatic calculation of values
–
Glasgow Coma Scale, Fluid balance pupils, drugs
Default values
–
Data Analysis
Print-out
Conclusions
Functioning database program created
–
Awaiting implementation in SVUH ED – Iterative developmental process to be continued through qualitative analysis over next few months
Observation
of the program in action Interviews with users to obtain feedback
–
Further improvement: integration of this database with the ED patient management system to share data
Conclusions (continued)
Electronic and paper-based systems to run in tandem until computer system firmly established Database will grow over several years, data eventually to form the basis of an outcome study Website to be established to distribute program as freeware
Questions and Discussion