History of the Peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the First Millennium: A Craniometric Point of View

Document Sample
History of the Peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the First Millennium: A Craniometric Point of View Powered By Docstoc
					1
        History of the Peoples of the Great Hungarian Plain in the First
2
3
        Millennium: A Craniometric Point of View
4
5       gábor holló, 1 lászló szathmáry, 1 antónia marcsik, 2 and zoltán barta 1
6
7
8              Abstract We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573
9              crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven
10             archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1–4th century), the period of transi-
               tion (about 400–420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420–455 and 455–567,
11
               respectively), early Avar age (about 568–670), late Avar period (about 670–
12             895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895–1000),                              [First Page]
13             and the Arpadian age (about 1000–1301). We were curious about the anatomi-
14             cal background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhab-                           [655], (1)
15             ited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the popula-
16             tions, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a
17             principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components                              Lines: 0 to 42
18             showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all                              ———
19             the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic
               origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic popula-
                                                                                                                       4.39401pt PgVar
20                                                                                                                     ———
21             tion and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with
                                                                                                                       Normal Page
               a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical
22                                                                                                                     PgEnds: TEX
               patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second princi-
23             pal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height)
24             showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars.
25             Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypothe-                         [655], (1)
26             ses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subse-
27             quent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this
28             result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought.
29             In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women
30             survived and were assimilated into the conquerors’ populations with higher
31             probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are
32             significant only in men.
33
34      Ancient cultures of a given territory change many times, which is well known from
35      both historical resources and archeological finds. These kinds of data, however, do
36
37              1
                  Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, P.O. Box 3, Debrecen
38      H-4010, Hungary.
                2
39                Department of Anthropology, University of Szeged, P.O. Box 660, Szeged H-6701, Hungary.

40              Human Biology, December 2008, v. 80, no. 6, pp. 655–667.
41              Copyright © 2009 Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309
42
              key words: craniometrics, history of human populations, general-
43      ized linear mix
				
DOCUMENT INFO
Description: We carried out an examination relying on six dimensions of 1,573 crania coming from the Great Hungarian Plain. The crania represent seven archeological periods: Sarmatian age (1-4th century), the period of transition (about 400-420), Hun and Gepidic epochs (about 420-455 and 455-567, respectively), early Avar age (about 568-670), late Avar period (about 670895), the epoch of the Hungarian conquest and settlement (about 895-1000), and the Arpadian age (about 1000-1301). We were curious about the anatomical background behind cultural changes of the various populations that inhabited this area. After having noticed some discontinuities between the populations, as revealed by univariate analysis of single dimensions, we performed a principal-components analysis to see whether or not the diverse components showed eventual breaks in the sequence of the populations. Knowing that all the dominant populations had Asian roots, except for the Gepids of Germanic origin, we expected a considerable difference between the Gepidic population and all the other inhabitants. We also assumed that a conquest itself with a large-scale assimilation was unlikely to leave breaklike traits in anatomical patterns, except for aggressive conquests. We found that the second principal component (which correlated with cranial breadth and partly with height) showed a remarkable hiatus in both sexes between Gepids and early Avars. Having done a statistical proof (simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses) of the observed phenomenon, we found that the gap referring to subsequent populations was significant only in males. A possible reason for this result is that the Avar conquest was much more radical than has been thought. In addition, considering that men were more likely to die in wars, women survived and were assimilated into the conquerors' populations with higher probability, so it is not surprising that the results of multicomparison tests are significant only in men. [PUBLICATION ABSTR
BUY THIS DOCUMENT NOW PRICE: $6.95 100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEED
PARTNER ProQuest LLC
ProQuest creates specialized information resources and technologies that propel successful research, discovery, and lifelong learning.