TO HELP OR NOT TO HELP— CIMIC AND PROJECT

Shared by: zwi14607
-
Stats
views:
27
posted:
6/1/2010
language:
English
pages:
17
Document Sample
scope of work template
							The Army Lessons                                                                                          For Soldiers By Soldiers
 Learned Centre

   Vol 11 No 1


   In This Issue…

    To Help or Not to Help—CIMIC and Project Management
    The Evolving Role of Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC)
    Operations in International Settings
    KMNB V Information Operations—An Effective Combat
    Multiplier Against an Asymmetrical Threat in a Complex
    Environment
    Intelligence Surveillance Target Acquisition and
    Reconaissance Coordination Centre (ISTAR CC)—
    Providing the Commander's Situational Awareness




                                         TO HELP OR NOT TO HELP—
                                      CIMIC AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
                                              By Major A. Demers, G9 KMNB, Op ATHENA Roto 1

            Refs: A. B-GG-005-004/AF-023 Civil-Military Cooperation in Peace, Emergencies, Crisis and War
            B. AJP-9 NATO CIMIC Doctrine
            C. Op ATHENA KMNB Roto 0 CIMIC Lessons Learned
            D. Annex W to KMNB OP O 18
            E. KMNB CIMIC SOPs

        INTRODUCTION



        I
          f you ask the question "what is civilian-military cooperation (CIMIC)?" to most soldiers,1 you will probably get "CIMIC does
          projects" or "CIMIC provides humanitarian aid to the locals" as an answer. Yet those answers only scratch the surface of
        CIMIC operations (see figure 1). The primary intent of CIMIC operations, according to Canadian (CA) doctrine, is to support
        civilian authority, population, international organizations (IOs) and/or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in order to assist
        in the pursuit of a military objective.
        When we turn to AJP-9 NATO CIMIC Doctrine, the                              implementation of a civil plan. The long-term purpose
        immediate purpose of CIMIC is to establish and                              of CIMIC is to help create and sustain conditions that
        maintain the full co-operation of the NATO commander                        will support the achievement of alliance objectives in
        and the civilian authorities, organisations, agencies                       operations.       Finally, looking at the core CIMIC
        and population within a commander's area of                                 functions at the tactical level, we can see that projects
        operations (AOO) in order to allow him to fulfill his                       are a sub functions of the support to civil environment
        mission. This may include direct support to the                             line of activity:
        1. "Soldiers" is a generic term that includes officers, senior NCOs and junior ranks.
                 Figure 1. Types of Civil-Military Cooperation (from B-GG-005-004/AF-023, page 1-10).

    Civil Military Liaison and Assessments. Advise              Support the Force. Maximize civil support for the
    commanders on local activities as they may                  timely entrance, conduct of operations and orderly
    influence their mission and their responsibilities          withdrawal of alliance forces, and reduce civil
    towards the civil populace.       Also, carry out           interference on operational matters.
    continuous assessments of the local civil                   Support the Civil Environment. Where necessary
    environment, including local needs, in order to             [emphasis added], commit resources to create
    identify the extent of any vacuum and how that void         conditions that facilitate the execution of operations,
    might be filled.                                            and where possible hasten a return to normalcy.




                             Figure 2. KMNB Project Flow Chart (from KMNB SOP 903).

2                                                                                                          The Bulletin
  From the previous paragraph, we can readily see that                       priorities.3 If approved, by KMNB, the project was
  projects are only one part of CIMIC work. The question                     submitted for approval by the donors. Once the funds
  that remains is why do projects take on such prominence                    were allocated, the CIMIC team implemented the
  in the eyes of both the population and our own forces?                     project with or without the help of the activity cell,
  The aim of this paper is to explore CIMIC projects and see                 depending on the scope of the endeavour. Figure 2
  how we can execute project activities, while at the same                   summarizes the KMNB project management process.
  time managing the expectations of all the different actors
                                                                             Various sources of funding were available to KMNB V.
  in a theatre of operations where the population is in need
                                                                             Money was rarely a factor in the project approval process.
  of everything.
                                                                             It was essentially a question of identifying valid projects
                                                                             supporting the commander's intent. The following table
  KABUL MULTINATIONAL BRIGADE PROJECT ACTIVITIES                             gives a summary of what type of funds were available for
                                                                             CIMIC activities in the Kabul area:
  For the duration of KMNB V, the aim of CIMIC projects
  was to support the commander's mission within the AOO
                                                                              Source of
  by establishing goodwill, trust, credibility and a measure                                      Amount                     Remarks
                                                                               funding
  of positive reinforcement in support of the local
  authorities. CIMIC projects would only be undertaken to
  support an increase in overall force protection by gaining                                                       Actual figure was
                                                                                                                   1 000 000 Euros for one
  the support of local populations in areas which posed the                                    Approximately
                                                                                   EU                              year, so about half was
  greatest threat in the brigade "forward defence" concept.2                                   500 000 Euros
                                                                                                                   available for new projects for
  Consideration was given to focus CIMIC projects in those                                                         KMNB V
  geographic areas that would support this objective.
  Particular attention was given to increasing project                                                             Roto 0 had difficulties
  activities north of Kabul, in the Shamali plain area, in the                                                     spending its own allocation
  Eastern district and in the southwestern portion of the                                                          due to various administrative
                                                                                                                   problems. Roto 1 completed
  AOO. Other than force protection, KMNB CIMIC project
                                                                              CIDA KMNB        500 000 CA $        four Roto 0 projects. Some
  supported the regional economic development (by buying                                                           of that amount (90 000 US $)
  supplies locally and using local workers in contract work).                                                      was spent by ISAF for
  Furthermore, project activities would generally fall within                                                      provincial reconstruction
  one of the following categories:                                                                                 team (PRT) in Kunduz

       Social projects included support to education, public
                                                                              CIDA CA BG       250 000 CA $
       health and sports programs.
       Infrastructure improvements projects included water,                                    3 000 US $—
       electricity and any minor repair or re-construction of                                 US CERP Funds
                                                                                 Others
       physical structures.                                                                    Other national
                                                                                                   funds
  Regardless of the line of CIMIC activity, KMNB projects
  always tried to bolster support for the Afghan Transition                  The final part of the implementation was the handover
  Authority (ATA) at the local level.                                        of the project to the local government and the
  The KMNB project cycle was a simple process that                           community during an official ceremony. As part of the
  started with the CIMIC team leaders identifying                            information operations (Info Ops) campaign, such
  possible projects during the normal day to day                             project activities were featured regularly in venues like
  framework operations. The tactical teams always                            ISAF News or a local newspaper like the Kabul Times.
  identified the most urgent needs of the population in a                    This allowed KMNB CIMIC to get the maximum effect
  given area and produced a project proposal, which                          on the population from each project. Such good news
  was submitted to the KMNB activity cell. At that level,                    stories played a key role in shaping the perception of
  the project was evaluated in order to ensure that the                      the Afghan population towards the reconstruction
  funds were available, that the project did not go                          efforts and promoted the legitimacy of the ATA,
  against the donor's guidelines and, most importantly,                      supported by ISAF, through the display of visible and
  that the project proposal was in line with the brigade                     tangible results on the ground.
  2 Extending the "outer" ring of protection around Kabul.
  3 Other project guidelines during the planning included detailed consideration of the sustainability of the project since KMNB did not support CIMIC
  projects that would result in subsequent or ongoing involvement of military resources. There must be no ongoing maintenance or other support
  costs for equipment attributable to KMNB or donors. The beneficiary must accept full responsibility for the equipment or infrastructure including
  maintenance. Projects that facilitate timely transition to the appropriate civilian organization or authority are sustainable in the long term and
  emphasize self-reliance as opposed to dependency are to be undertaken. Collectively, the projects throughout the KMNB AOO involved and
  benefited a broad spectrum of ethnic groups and both genders. Finally, infrastructure projects were conducted in accordance with local standards.
  Projects provided the minimum necessary infrastructure and actively involved the local community (self-help or locally employed labour).


February 2005                                                                                                                                            3
                                                                                                     ISAF News—Issue 58




                          Kabul Times—15 June 04

                                      Figure 3. Examples of CIMIC products for KMNB IO campaign.

    MANAGEMENT OF EXPECTATIONS                                              always be carefully balanced with the need to be seen
                                                                            as a key player in the field, able to provide some
    When dealing with projects, CIMIC teams are usually                     direct help to the population.
    victims of their own good press. Since January 2003,                    The first rule of how to manage project expectation is
    KMNB CIMIC teams have completed 344 projects,4 and                      to never promise anything to anybody. The second
    another 204 are either planned                                          rule is to always ask if your force is the best suited
    or ongoing. It is easy to see why the expectations are                  organization to provide the required help. Thirdly, one
    so high. Soldiers, especially the ones from Western                     should always look at the long-term impacts. For
    armies, like to help people in need. This "need" is at                  example, the distribution of humanitarian aid (HA) by a
    the heart of the project dilemma: having the                            military force should only be done in an emergency
    willingness and the means to do something versus the                    situation, as it will usually be counter productive in the
    needs of the mission and the possible long term-                        long run: people will always expect more, and you will
    impact of executing a project.            In a complex                  only make life harder for the next force that will come
    environment, second and third order effects are very                    in after you. Finally, before starting a project,
    hard to predict. Are we helping or hindering the                        commanders at all levels (assisted by the G9 Staff)
    emancipation of young women by building a school                        should ask themselves the following set of questions:
    for girls in a remote village still under the influence of                   Who's asking for help?
    religious traditions? Are we making the water
                                                                                 Are they the people who need it the most?
    situation worse, on a macro level (impact on the water
    table), by digging wells (cheap, small, quick impact                         What do they need?
    projects)? Should we help the police instead of
                                                                                 When do they need it?
    helping the population at large? As well, all those
    project activities are time consuming, and they can                          Who will do the work?
    shift the CIMIC team focus away from other key
                                                                                 When should the task be completed?
    CIMIC tasks. This is where project priority is key in
    managing which projects will be executed and which                           What is the payoff for our forces, and is the need
    project will be cancelled. In the end, there is no easy                      actually confirmed by the CIMIC team's assessment
    answer. The need to curb our enthusiasm must                                 of the area?
    4 CA BG CIMIC counted all projects (including the minor ones) into the database. As well CA BG CIMIC enjoyed the use of 250 000 CA $ from the
    Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) for implementation of projects exclusively in the CA BG AOO.


4                                                                                                                                  The Bulletin
                                           Figure 4. KMNB Project SITREP Jan 2003–June 2004.

  As noted in the previous paragraph, the case of                             CONCLUSION
  humanitarian assistance 5       must also be carefully
  managed, lest CIMIC accidentally supplant or even                           In the case of KMNB V, CIMIC activities had to result in an
  replace an NGO/IO. It is vital to maintain a co-operative                   increase of the force protection level, i.e., implementing a
  relationship with these civilian organisations in order to                  project to "win the hearths and minds of the population."
  avoid having CIMIC dragged into a permanent or semi-                        That was the real payoff for our troops. Implementing
  permanent role of delivering aid to certain segments of                     projects and providing HA are only one part of CIMIC
  the population. The direct delivery of humanitarian aid                     operations, albeit, the most visible and attractive one. It
  can have unexpected or undesirable consequences. In                         must be managed carefully if we are not to fall prey to
  some cases, this can cause resentment and civil unrest                      mission creep7 and become enamoured with only the final
  in parts of the population that know that this has                          result of a project, forgetting why we executed that project
  happened but have received nothing. In cases where                          in the first place.
  this occurs, a safe and secure environment is sacrificed                    It must be understood that CIMIC projects are a small
  in favour of humanitarian action. In other cases, the                       portion of the many functions required. Assessments,
  involvement or distribution of aid may be against the                       liaison and contributions to Info Ops were by far the most
  stated policy of government organisations (GOs) or IOs,                     significant and important contribution of KMNB CIMIC to
  such as United Nations High Commission for Refugees                         the overall effectiveness of the mission. In the end, we
  (UNHCR) policy with regards to displaced persons,                           must always remember that CIMIC is not, after all, an
  refugees and evacuees (DPRE) camps in Kabul.6                               NGO in uniform.

  5 This includes donations from charitable organisation back in the home country. Although these HA campaigns are full of good intentions, the
  logistics of such small aid projects are usually inversely proportional to the actual benefits on the ground. As well, these small HA drives create an
  expectation that more free help should come. They also contribute to the "hand out" mentality that can attract people to stay close to potential aid
  distribution point instead of working towards a more normal way of life.
  6 From Ref C, para 4.6.
  7 One definition of mission creep is derived from situations in which the military moves from well-defined or achievable missions to ill-defined or
  impossible ones. For further discussion on mission creep see Adam B. Siegel, "Mission Creep or Mission Misunderstood?" Joint Force Quarterly
  No. 31 (Summer 2002), pp. 112-115.

February 2005                                                                                                                                              5
             T H E E V O LV I N G R O L E O F C I V I L - M I L I TA R Y C O O P E R AT I O N
               ( C I M I C ) O P E R AT I O N S I N I N T E R N AT I O N A L S ET T I N G S
                                                         By Lieutenant Alden Skidd

      More often than not, the center of gravity will be an intangible, essential element of the political and moral forces
      that keep our enemies in the fight against us.

                                                                                             —U.S. Marine Corps DP1, Warfighting

    BACKGROUND



    C
       ivil-military cooperation (CIMIC) is an important, but frequently misunderstood, area of operations in both domestic
       and international missions. Many see CIMIC as the military equivalent of humanitarian organisations. This ill-
    conceived perception neglects the important military role CIMIC can and does play. It has become clear from recent
    missions that the need for further discussion and analysis of the current CIMIC doctrine, which is still evolving, is
    required to help strengthen this significant operational tool. Indeed, when CIMIC activities are well orchestrated, they
    become a combat multiplier, which plays an important role in the campaign to "win the hearts and minds" of the civilian
    population. This article seeks to examine several of the lessons learned from Operation ATHENA in Kabul,
    Afghanistan, from a CIMIC perspective and offers several ideas for enhancement of the current doctrinal guidelines.

    In terms of doctrine, CIMIC has often been regarded as                  assess the needs of the local population as a whole. The
    the embodiment of the government's 3-D approach to                      question thus became, where exactly could the limited
    international affairs: it seems to exemplify the cohesion               resources allotted be best expended to achieve the
    of defence, diplomacy and development policy under                      maximum effect? Would it be better to construct a well in
    one umbrella.1 Unfortunately, the vision of the CIMIC                   an area devoid of proper infrastructure or next to the home
    operator as a humanitarian actor building schools and                   of an influential figure in the local community? In a country
    distributing much-needed supplies to those in need                      where the educational infrastructure has been destroyed,
    disregards the operational value of a CIMIC organisation                illiteracy is commonplace and many citizens are unable to
    in enhancing force protection. While these functions, no                recognize signs, let alone national flags. Added to this is
    doubt, contribute to a mission and the overall                          the multiple non-government organizations (NGOs), each
    government direction, it is important to frame the                      with their own slick logo. While many Afghanis understand
    purpose of CIMIC through a military lens: each                          the symbol of the International Security Assistance Force
    successive act of apparent benevolence is carefully                     (ISAF), the question that begs asking is, is it safe to
    orchestrated to bring about the maximum impact with                     assume a Canadian flag attached to a well will be
    the minimum expenditure of resources.                                   interpreted any different than the logo of an NGO?
                                                                            Consequently, there is a great need for careful
                                                                            assessment of the terrain in any CIMIC operation to
                                                                            determine both the needs of the local populace and the
                                                                            mechanism for spreading information. CIMIC, after all,
                                                                            contributes significantly to the information operations
                                                                            campaign. This is not to say that the humanitarian motive
                                                                            is sidelined or sacrificed to the military objectives; on the
                                                                            contrary, the doctrinal guidance points towards the need
                                                                            for harmonization of military activities with both the
                                                                            desires of the local government and the activities of the
                                                                            rest of the international community (IC). Indeed, military
                                                                            and humanitarian imperatives are rarely mutually
                                                                            exclusive, despite the apparent aversion of certain
    Consider the case of Afghanistan, where a small group of                organizations to cooperate with any military activity.
    CIMIC operators are striving to enhance force protection                It should be noted that CIMIC is not a panacea for needs
    and guard the commander's centre of gravity—to win and                  of the local population, although it will likely be viewed as
    maintain the support of the local population. In a country              such. In Afghanistan, especially in the wake of the
    destroyed by 23 years of conflict, it was not difficult to              Taliban's fall from power, a plethora of international
    1 For a good overview of this policy in Afghanistan, see http://www.canada-afghanistan.gc.ca/menu-en.asp.


6                                                                                                                           The Bulletin
                                                                          Some have argued Afghanistan remains a forgotten war,
                                                                          but this overlooks the potential impact for CIMIC activities,
                                                                          especially in areas where NGOs may not operate
                                                                          because of operational security reasons. CIMIC can and
                                                                          does aid in the fostering of a more secure environment by
                                                                          working in concert with the local authorities to both secure
                                                                          the area in question and begin the arduous task of
                                                                          reconstruction. This is one of the reasons CIMIC teams
                                                                          are often deployed as a component of provincial
                                                                          reconstruction teams (PRTs) in Afghanistan, and why
                                                                          Civilian Affairs personnel are invariably meshed with
                                                                          Special Forces by the United States. Indeed, all US Army
                                                                          Civilian Affairs personnel come under the jurisdiction of
                                                                          the Commander in Chief of the United States Special
                                                                          Operations Command (SOCOM).2 The criticism comes in
                                                                          with the inability of locals to distinguish between military
                                                                          and humanitarian actors.3 This is a legitimate concern.
                                                                          However, in many areas, humanitarian actors are not able
                                                                          to provide support, and the choice becomes simple:
                                                                          assistance from the military or no assistance at all.
                                                                          CIMIC acts as a significant force multiplier, especially in
                                                                          theatres of peace support operations such as with ISAF in
                                                                          Afghanistan. As such, it is paramount that sufficient funds
                                                                          be allocated for CIMIC operations. At present, Canadian
                                                                          CIMIC doctrine provides for the "establishment of funding
                                                                          arrangements between DND and OGDs for specified
                                                                          CIMIC tasks in CF international operations."4 Currently,
                                                                          a certain amount of funds is earmarked through the
                                                                          Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) to
                                                                          target specific projects in line with both DND and CIDA
                                                                          objectives. In terms of force protection, however, this
                                                                          alignment may not always be present. As such, funds
                                                                          ought to be allotted for CIMIC operations under a "force
                                                                          protection" umbrella. Force protection is defined as
  organizations entered the country with visions of                       "comprising all measures taken to contribute to mission
  grandeur. Many promises were made, from the basic                       success by preserving freedom of action and operational
  (repair of infrastructure) to the obscene (hotels and golf              effectiveness through managing risks and minimizing
  courses). Alas, as with many things, what began as a                    vulnerabilities to personnel, information, materiel, facilities
  great vision soon revealed itself as a delusion, replete                and activities from all threats5." A small-scale project can
  with broken promises, unfilled mandates and relocation to               often do wonders in improving relations with locals and
  flashier areas of reconstruction (most recently, Iraq).                 reassuring them of our role as keepers of the peace rather
  There is a veritable surplus of studies on everything from              than an occupation force. As those who are familiar with
  infrastructure to information-technology; unfortunately,                Afghanistan's history can attest, foreigners have never
  most of the recommendations therein have not been                       been particularly welcome, making our job all the more
  implemented. The government is desperate to realize its                 challenging but equally important.
  own plan of action, but many of the NGOs are untrusting
  and have circumvented the local authorities with their own              One of the lessons learned throughout rotations 0 and 1
  agendas. The result is a country full of micro projects but             in Afghanistan has been the need for expedited project
  no central organization or database of activities. The                  implementation over the spectrum of deployment and
  donor community seems to trust the NGOs more than the                   not just at the end of a given rotation. The reality on the
  Afghan Transitional Authority (ATA), and so again the                   ground is that the period between project identification
  money is siphoned off without a central tracing                         and implementation can be considerably drawn out due
  mechanism and without a clear, over-arching vision.                     to the lengthy administrative oversight required to utilize
  2 US Marine Corps, MAGTF Civil-Military Operations, Coordinating Draft 01-21-01, pp. 31.
  3 K. Gannon, "Afghanistan Unbound," Foreign Affairs May/June 2004.
  4 Draft CF Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) Policy-14 Apr 04
  5 Ibid.


February 2005                                                                                                                               7
    CIDA funds. Projects identified at the start of tour were                  commanders at all levels to enhance the effects of CIMIC
    implemented (at best) by the third and fourth month,                       activities. It is extremely optimistic to rely solely on the
    whereas projects under the force protection umbrella                       CIMIC element attached to a formation to deal with the
    were completed in a much shorter time span. While the                      local population, as often every member of a patrol will
    government's 3-D approach stresses coordination, it                        come into contact with the host nation on a regular basis.
    does not imply subservience of one branch to another.                      It behoves commanders to be "as familiar with employing
    At all times, the military mission must retain primacy.                    CIMIC assets as they are with employing engineers or fire
    There is an unfortunate tendency in some personnel to                      support.9"
    "go native," especially given the natural human desire to                  With CIMIC currently a forerunner in the Land Force
    alleviate suffering when confronted by scenes of                           Reserve Restructure (LFRR) as a task destined for the
    extreme poverty and suffering.6 However, we must                           Reserve Force, we must carefully evaluate the desire to
    avoid becoming maligned. In the words of US Army                           move away from the ad hoc arrangements governing
    Lt-Col Jacobs, "to cross the line between civil and                        CIMIC formations.10 While it is indeed commendable that
    military operations is to cease providing support to the                   LFQA is moving in the direction of a permanent CIMIC coy
    military commander."7 In sum, military objectives often                    that will train and deploy as a unit, there are certain
    supersede the humanitarian agenda. For a proper                            benefits to be gleaned from the merger of skills and
    CIMIC organisation to operate effectively, it requires its                 knowledge of both Regular and Reserve Force personnel
    own realistic and self-contained funding apparatus in                      in a CIMIC setting. While there is some truth to the myth
    addition to any cross-governmental arrangements.                           that reservists bring important project management and
                                                                               civilian interaction skills to the table, it is equally important
                                                                               to include personnel who are used to working within an
                                                                               operational environment and who have a well-established
                                                                               ability to work and persuade those Regular Force
                                                                               personnel in command positions. This arrangement
                                                                               would minimize the potential for marginalization of
                                                                               Reserve Force personnel and likely increase the
                                                                               efficiency and performance of the CIMIC organization as
                                                                               a whole.
                                                                               Enhancing CIMIC activities is in keeping with the
                                                                               doctrinal shift towards manoeuvre warfare. As this
                                                                               doctrine continues to evolve, careful attention should be
                                                                               given to the potential benefits of CIMIC activities in
                                                                               international operations. As stated earlier, CIMIC is not
    In terms of doctrine, CIMIC also involves respecting the                   a cure-all but rather a force multiplier, providing another
    needs of other civilian organizations operating within an                  means for the commander to achieve his end state. In
    area of operations (AOO). In many cases, civilian                          the truest sense, CIMIC exemplifies the manoeuvre
    agencies may be able to provide similar services to locals                 warfare approach of entering into an opposing force's
    with lower overhead costs, while leaving projects dealing                  decision cycle and disrupting their operations. It lowers
    with security, disarmament and the protection of human                     animosity and increases force protection. It should be
    rights for military organizations and our respective areas                 treated as any other military asset in that CIMIC
    of expertise.8 This can help to protect against mission                    activities in international operations require a clear and
    creep and harmonize CIMIC efforts with the international                   defined military mandate, a proper (but not
    community, thereby reducing the possibility of                             disproportionate) budget and a mix of both Regular and
    competition. This highlights the importance of CIMIC as a                  Reserve Force personnel. As the doctrine is still
    command responsibility. Indeed, it is not only those who                   emerging, this article has sought to offer some
    are qualified "CIMIC operators" who undertake civil-                       suggestions to fine-tune the current CIMIC mechanism.
    military operations (CMO); rather, it is every soldier on the              In cases where the centre of gravity is that intangible
    ground that communicates with the local populace and                       element of local support, CIMIC is a vital task in
    governing authorities. As such, it is important that CIMIC                 bolstering force protection that deserves further
    training, or at least awareness, be made available to                      discussion and analysis.

    6 AJP-01A Civil-Military Cooperation, Chapter 20.
    7 J. Jacobs, "Civil Affairs in Peace Operations," Military Review, July-August 1998.
    8 J. Walter, "Security and Keeping the Peace," Afghanistan: Crossline's Essential Field Guides to Humanitarian and Conflict Zones 2nd ed. (Geneva:
    2004).
    9 J. Jacobs, "Civil Affairs in Peace Operations," Military Review, July-August 1998.
    10 B-GL-300/005/FP-001 Information Operations, Chapter 8, "Civil-Military Cooperation," pp. 103.

8                                                                                                                                      The Bulletin
   K M N B V I N F O R M AT I O N O P E R AT I O N S — A N E F F E C T I V E C O M B AT
       M U LT I P L I E R A G A I N S T A N A S Y M M ET R I C A L T H R E AT I N A
                             COMPLEX ENVIRONMENT
                                         By Lieutenant-Colonel Eric Tremblay, DCOS KMNB

     Guerilla leaders spend a great deal more time in organization, instruction, agitation, and propaganda work than
     they do fighting, for their most important job is to win over the people.1

                                                                                                                             —Mao Tse-Tung

  BACKGROUND



  T
     he guerilla principles and tactics developed and employed by Chairman Mao during the last century continue to
     influence conflicts waged around the world. The Opposing Military Forces (OMF)2 in Afghanistan, for example, put
  the Maoist military lessons into practice on a regular and bloody basis against major actors such as the Afghan
  Transitional Authority (ATA), the United Nations Assistance Mission Afghanistan (UNAMA), various international Non-
  Governmental Organizations (NGOs), the US Coalition and, to a lesser extent, the Canadian-led International
  Stabilization Assistance Force (ISAF) in Kabul. This should not come as a surprise. As Mao would have argued, the
  marked imbalance in resources that are available to the various in-theatre adversaries inevitably pushes the less
  fortunate among them, in this case the OMF, to adopt guerilla tactics.

  In modern parlance, we speak of unconventional methods                      INTEGRATION OF IO WITHIN THE COMMANDER'S INTENT
  of warfare pursued by the weak to accommodate their
  limitations while facilitating their ability to attack their                A complex and dynamic "information environment" results
  opponent's overwhelming conventional advantages as                          when a large number of actors with divergent interests
  "asymmetrical".3 For the NATO forces in Kabul, this                         operate in a hotly contested theatre of conflict. The
  asymmetry of force is compounded by a complex, built-                       absence of unity of command between the US Coalition
  up, multi-ethnic milieu and the fact that OMF attacks vary                  and ISAF, and that the unity of effort between major
  significantly over time in their origin, intensity and intent.              international players is not easily synchronized,
  To further complicate the situation, unity of effort among                  compounds the challenges they collectively face to bring
  players on all sides of the conflict is occasionally fleeting               peace and stability to the country. It must be understood,
  and opportunistic, but most often absent.                                   moreover, that the information environment is not limited
                                                                              merely to the physical plane, but also encompasses moral
  In such a complex environment, the provision of                             and electro-magnetic dimensions.
  superior, timely information is key to ensuring success in
  operations. Information operations (IO) are not only a                      The OMF's aim has been to persuade as many people as
  combat function but are an essential combat multiplier,                     possible to join their cause by employing all the
  one of the few effective tools available to the                             "information means" at their disposal. The KMNB's
                                                                              objective has been to understand the in-theatre
  commander of a conventional military force to protect his
                                                                              environment and master it to the extent required to
  own center of gravity (CoG) while attacking that of his
                                                                              effectively counter the OMF's activities. IO have been the
  asymmetrical adversary. To demonstrate how and why
                                                                              key to the KMNB's success.
  this is so, the paragraphs below describe how IO were
  integrated into the Kabul Multi-National Brigade (KMNB)                     As a combat function, it is critical that IO facilitate the
  commander's concept of operations, the range of IOs                         sharing of information among key actors, but not at the
  employed, and their usefulness against a strong                             expense of operational security (OPSEC).              In a
  asymmetrical threat deployed in complex environment,                        knowledge-based, command-centric operation such as
  such as that found in Kabul, Afghanistan during the                         that undertaken by ISAF, IO is the key by which
  period January to August of 2004.                                           knowledge is attained and the advantage gained while

  1 Tse-Tung, Mao, On Guerilla Warfare, (New York and Washington: Praeger Publishers, 1961), p. 8
  2 The term used in Afghanistan to designate Enemy combatants from all backgrounds.
  3 Steven Metz and Douglas V. Johnson II, Asymmetry and US military strategy: Definition, Background, and Strategic Concepts, (US Army War
  College, Strategic Studies Institute, January 2001), pp. 5-6. According to American strategist Steven Metz, asymmetry is a way of acting, organizing,
  and thinking differently than opponents in order to maximize one's own advantages, exploit an opponent's weaknesses, attain the initiative, or gain
  greater freedom of action.

February 2005                                                                                                                                             9
     denying the same to the enemy. Many in-theatre IO                        If this was the case, the most important task for KMNB
     initiatives have attempted to reconcile the interests of                 staff was to determine the most effective means of
     various international actors in order to increase unity of               preventing the OMF from adjusting the political
     effort.    KMNB planners have met regularly with                         environment to the right "temperature;" and to make
     international organizations at the regional and municipal                appropriate recommendations to the KMNB Commander
     level in order to synchronize activities and enable                      to counter the activities of the OMF.
     development efforts to go forward in a secure
                                                                              Mao theorized that, to be successful in guerilla warfare,
     environment. However, this has proved to be a difficult
                                                                              the "fish" [the OMF in this case] must repeatedly "explain",
     task to undertake and to maintain. KMNB has enjoyed
                                                                              "persuade", "discuss" and "convince" the population. The
     some significant successes, but, at end-tour, there
                                                                              KMNB Staff quickly came to understand that these action
     remains much to be done.
                                                                              verbs represented recurrent themes played upon by the
     Op HERMES is one example of a well-conducted                             OMF in order to win over the people and effect the correct
     operation that was designed to project KMNB V's                          "change in temperature" to expand their sphere of
     presence outside its area of operations (AOO) with a view                influence. KMNB Headquarters, therefore, was faced
     to increasing force protection and supporting voter                      with the dilemma of determining what actions should be
     registration (VRE).     It was driven by the KMNB                        undertaken to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan
     Commander's intent.                                                      people while serving to "paralyze," "disorganize," and
                                                                              "degrade" the OMF.5
     To facilitate success, it was critical for the KMNB
     commander to clearly identify his and his adversary's
     CoGs and to develop ines of operation (based upon his
     intent) in order to determine and maintain priority of effort
     and to appropriately shape the areas of responsibility and
     interest. It is too easy in a complex environment for a
     headquarters to get distracted by the amount of
     information being thrown about by a large number of
     actors. Such distraction could result in mission failure.
     The focus of the commander's "decision-action cycle"
     must be to achieve his desired end-state while protecting
     his CoG and attacking that of his adversary.
     Consequently, the two ("friendly and foe") CoGs must be
     the key planning considerations for the commander and
     his staff in developing courses of actions. OP HERMES
     was successfully implemented because it was solidly
     based upon the commander's intent and met these criteria.                The ability of a commander to act and achieve the desired
     The KMNB commander estimated that the OMF's CoG                          effect in a timely and efficient manner depends upon
     was its ability to penetrate and influence the local                     battle visualization. A commander's capacity to optimize
     populace. Conversely, the KMNB's CoG was viewed to                       visualization is fraught with many challenges at the best of
     be its ability to safeguard a perception of security in its              times. This is even truer when the Commander is
     own AOO. Realistically, if the most important job of the                 engaged on a peacekeeping mission in a "three-block
     OMF was to win over the people to its cause, the KMNB                    war" being conducted in a highly complex environment
     staff reasonably assumed that the OMF was undertaking                    against an asymmetrical enemy.6 In order to be able to
                                                                              act effectively, the commander must know his enemy and
     many activities to further their objective. To borrow Mao's
                                                                              successfully identify his CoG.          This requires the
     analogy:
                                                                              employment of a wide range of capabilities as well as the
       …if the political temperature is right, the fish [in this              ability to effectively protect one's own assets. Intelligence
       case the OMF], however few in number, will thrive                      enabling functions such as understanding and assessing
       and proliferate. It is therefore the principal concern                 friendly and enemy vulnerabilities are paramount. At the
       of all guerilla leaders to get the water [Afghans] to the              critical center of it all, however, are intelligence,
       right temperature and to keep it there.4                               surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance


     4 Tse-Tung, Op.Cit. p. 8
     5 Tse-Tung, Ibid., p.8 and also DAD 5, Land Force Information Operations, Ottawa, 1999, Internet http://lfdts.army.mil.ca/ael/pubs/300-005/B-GL-
     300-05/FP-001/B-GL-300-005-FP-001.pdf , accessed 21 June 2004
     6 The three-block war paradigm was best described by former USMC Commandant, General Charles Krulak and was employed across the theatre
     to describe existing conditions.

10                                                                                                                                    The Bulletin
  (ISTAR) sub-systems, which are the key to gathering of                  the lines of operation ensured that during the "decision-
  current intelligence.                                                   action cycle," KMNB could "…enhance battlefield
                                                                          visualization, improve designation of [the] main effort,
  For ISTAR to be effective, the KMNB had to steer the
                                                                          improve control of [the] operational tempo and improve
  collection effort of all available sensors. Based on his initial
                                                                          synchronization."8     Commander KMNB V's IO's intent
  guidance, the commander initiated battle procedure and
                                                                          "…was to deter, disrupt and degrade our opponents'
  conducted his mission analysis. He drove the collection
                                                                          ability to impede progress in Afghanistan while
  effort by providing his commander's critical information
                                                                          maintaining a balance between Force Protection and
  requirements (CCIR). Based on the CCIR, an intelligence
                                                                          contact with the local populace."9
  collection plan (ICP) was produced, which further
  developed the intelligence requirements and tasked the
  sensors. Once all the information provided by the sensors
  was collected and analyzed, the intelligence was
  disseminated. This, in turn, enabled the commander's
  "decision-action cycle," which repeated itself on a regular
  basis. In order to optimize the commander's cycle,
  however, the staff also had to take measures to enhance
  battlefield visualization. Consequently, in addition to
  situational awareness, environmental visualization and
  asset visibility had to be developed.7 It soon became
  evident that, as the headquarters' understanding of the
  enemy improved, the commander's ability to effectively act
  was considerably enhanced.
  A staff, of course, cannot act in isolation, particularly not in
  an environment such as that present in Kabul.
  Accordingly, it was critical that the KMNB V commander
  provide clear guidance and centrally coordinate the
  activity of the headquarters and subordinate KMNB units.
  To make certain this took place, the KMNB staff was
  thoroughly briefed on his intent, which was, of course, in
  line with the previously determined CoGs. As a result,
  three lines of operation were developed, which ensured
  that KMNB activities were synchronized in a coordinated
  effort to achieve the desired end state. Several decisive
  points were also selected related to the three lines of
  operation. These were specific objectives that were to be
  achieved in accordance with a coordinated timeline,
  designed to maintain the brigade's unity of effort while                To support the lines of operation, KMNB had to manage
  protecting its CoG (and, of course, attacking the OMF's).               Information to its advantage. In Afghanistan, operations
  It was through the process described in the paragraphs                  were conducted under the glare of public scrutiny. With
  above that the KMNB V commander developed his intent                    this in mind, Commander KMNB V effectively used a
  and successfully organized and led operations based                     monthly" soldier's theme card" to inform soldiers about
  upon the effective employment of IO in concert with the                 where they fit within the ongoing mission (and its lines of
  "decision-action cycle."  The remainder of this paper                   operation), what was expected of them, and what issues
  describes how IO were actually employed in operations.                  they should emphasize in discussions with the populace.
                                                                          Similarly, public affairs (PA) provided balanced and
  RANGE OF IO AND ITS USEFULNESS                                          credible messages to support the KMNB lines of
                                                                          operation using various communication media to target
                                                                          different audiences, including the Afghans, the public in
  Armed with a solid operational plan, knowledge of the
                                                                          Canada, and the international community.
  OMF and its physical environment, timely Situational
  Awareness required to achieve information superiority,                  For example, in support of one line of operation designed
  the KMNB had only had one more piece of the puzzle to                   specifically to support the Afghan democratic process, a
  integrate; and that was IO. The integration of IO within                "non-lethal target list" was developed. It formed part of the

  7 Environment visualization includes space, geospatial information, geography, meteorology, the electromagnetic spectrum, sociology and legal
  aspects. Asset visibility provides an accurate status of human, materiel and information resources.
  8 DAD 5, Op.Cit., p.18
  9 G3 Plan, Kabul Multinational Brigade V Operation Order 018 Campaign Plan

February 2005                                                                                                                                     11
     formal KMNB targeting process, which provided guidance           Lastly, the physical destruction of weapons caches and
     to KMNB units on the non-lethal effects desired on specific      "direct action" taken against key OMF actors served to
     target audience. As part of the KMNB Information                 further neutralized OMF operations.
     Operation and Targeting Board (IOTB), the main forum at
                                                                      Through the successful employment of Defensive IO
     which IO concepts and ideas were regularly exchanged
                                                                      measures, KMNB was able to prevent the OMF from
     between staff and KMNB units, IO actions or initiatives
                                                                      successfully using offensive IO against NATO troops. By
     were developed to support this and other lines of operation.
                                                                      keeping the initiative and progressively attaining the
     In addition, based on the commander's intent, the civil-         decisive points associated with each line of operation,
     military cooperation (CIMIC) function within KMNB, itself        KMNB V maintained its aim and moved steadily towards
     an IO support component, provided a regular interface            its desired end state. Most importantly, the brigade stayed
     with key in-theatre actors and the populace. This served         inside the OMF's "decision-action cycle" by conducting
     to enhance force protection through the conduct of               offensive IO and denying freedom of maneuver to the
     ongoing liaison, IO and various projects and activities          enemy. Through its strong efforts to promote NATO's
     designed to positively influence the behavior of the local       actions and mission using PA and effectively countering
     population. The CIMIC function and KMNB liaison teams,           the effects of the adversary's propaganda, KMNB V
     both principal players on the IOTB, had an important role        further reduced the ability of the OMF to attack its CoG.
     to play in maintaining, influencing or "exploiting" diverse      Finally, by ensuring that brigade personnel and the
     target audiences.                                                population at large were well informed, KMNB
                                                                      successfully maintained its unity of command and effort.
     The final but very important IO actions undertaken by
     KMNB staff to protect the formation's CoG while attacking
     that of the OMF's were offensive and defensive IO. The           CONCLUSION
     elements of offensive and defensive IO utilized in
     Afghanistan were broad and included: operational                 KMNB faced a significant challenge in its efforts to
     security (OPSEC), counter-intelligence operations,               maintain battle visualization in the face of an
     deception, psychological operations, electronic warfare,         asymmetrical threat operating in a complex environment.
     and physical destruction.                                        In order to "paralyze," "disorganize," and "degrade" the
                                                                      OMF, the brigade was required to carefully synchronize its
     In theory Offensive IO elements focus their effects on the       IO activities to achieve synergy and success. At the same
     "…adversary's C2 [command and control] infrastructure            time, the KMNB had to ensure that it won the battle for the
     and information flow to produce a lower quality and slower       hearts and minds of the Afghan people.
     decision-making cycle."10 However, in practice this proved
     easier said than done against an asymmetrical enemy in a         The formation believes that its efforts were successful,
     highly complex environment. It was difficult to get an           largely owing to its ability to effectively align its operations
     accurate battlefield damage assessment (BDA), on the             with the Commander's intent. As stated in the Land Force
     physical or moral plane, against such an opponent. For           Information Operations manual, "…to be effective, IO
     example, it was not particularly easy to pinpoint and            needs to be fully integrated into the commander's concept
     destroy command and control, communications, computers           of operations and coordinated."11 The IOTB had a critical
     and intelligence (C4I) nodes and instantly get a video feed      role to play in the synchronization of operational activities
     of the damage inflicted, as might take place in a more           while successfully protecting the brigade's CoG. By
     conventional conflict. As a BDA measure of success,              employing the full spectrum of IO in a coordinated effort,
     therefore, KMNB attempted to monitor and assess the              the KMNB was able to follow its Lines of Operation
     intent and ability of the OMF to cause destruction.              towards the achievement of its desired End State.
     It was believed that the ISTAR system through the use of         To return to Mao's analogy, despite their best efforts to
     its sensors had, over time, successfully impaired or             follow his prescription, the OMF ["fish"] were provided with
     degraded the OMF information flow by disrupting its              minimal opportunity to alter the temperature of the
     surveillance capability, while simultaneously enhancing          proverbial water. During the tour of KMNB V, the OMF
     KMNB V's ability to operate. Deception, OPSEC and                was patently unsuccessful in their bid to cause their
     counter-ISTAR elements further reduced the OMF's ability         numbers to "thrive and proliferate." As a result, they also
     to formulate and implement decisions while degrading its         failed in their aim to significantly destabilize the political
     information collection ability. Defensive IO methods, such       environment in and around Kabul. It was to a large extent
     as the avoidance of discernable patterns and the periodic        due to the range and successful synchronization of IO
     modification of the modus operandi of KMNB units and             activities employed by the KMNB within theatre that
     elements successfully inhibited the decision-making cycle        NATO forces were able to so successfully operate against
     of the OMF leadership and their ability to strike effectively.   a potentially formidable asymmetrical enemy.
     10 DAD, Op.Cit., p. 97
     11 DAD 5, Op.Cit., p. 87


12                                                                                                                       The Bulletin
         I N T E L L I G E N C E S U R V E I L L A N C E TA R G ET A C Q U I S I T I O N A N D
         R E C O N A I S S A N C E C O O R D I N AT I O N C E N T R E ( I S TA R C C ) —
        P R O V I D I N G T H E C O M M A N D E R ' S S I T U AT I O N A L AWA R E N E S S
                                                     By Captain D.C. Buchanan, CD
  BACKGROUND



  F
     rom the onset of battle, possessing more knowledge of your adversary than he knows about you is a key element
     to success. In order to gain this advantage, the intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance
  (ISTAR) concept was developed. The role of ISTAR is "…to integrate the intelligence function with surveillance, target
  acquisition (TA), reconnaissance and other information-generating assets in order to improve a commander's
  situational awareness (SA), streamline decision-making processes and cue manoeuvre, strike and/or other ISTAR
  assets."1 Over the last 10 years, the capability to gather more information on an adversary and improve the
  commander's SA has increased significantly due to technological advances and the subsequent development of highly
  capable ISTAR assets. The problem with these assets is not the quantity of the information they gather, but rather the
  "how" and the "when" the system gathers the information. As a result, there is a necessity to synchronize ISTAR assets
  in order to collect the right information at the right time so that information exploitation occurs throughout the decision-
  action cycle. In order to synchronize ISTAR assets, the Canadian Army has developed an organization, the ISTAR
  Coordination Centre (ISTAR CC), which "…is responsible for managing the collection efforts of the formation through
  the synchronous tasking and active re-tasking of collectors in support of the collection effort. These efforts include all
  collectors integral to the formation and those placed under its control."2 Op ATHENA Roto 0 and 1 marked the first
  occasions where a Canadian formation headquarters deployed on an overseas operation using an ISTAR CC as part
  of its organization as well as the ISTAR process.

  AIM                                                                      ISTAR needs to be in very close physical proximity with all
                                                                           the cells and the formation operations centre in order to
  The aim of this paper is to outline the lessons learned                  manage the dynamic tasking and re-tasking of assigned
  regarding the employment of ISTAR and an ISTAR CC                        ISTAR assets. The G3 ISTAR must maintain SA on
  during operations in order to provide a better                           current operations because he "…is the officer in the
  understanding of the challenges of incorporating ISTAR                   ISTAR CC who acts as central authority for tasking or
  and the ISTAR CC into a formation headquarters (HQ).                     retasking decisions…"4        and he must possess
                                                                           "…complete SA and be intimately familiar with the friendly
  DISCUSSION                                                               Concept of Operations (CONOP)."5 Without complete SA
                                                                           or CONOP familiarity, the G3 ISTAR is unable to make an
  Physical Layout. It is essential that the ISTAR CC have                  educated decision with respect to ISTAR tasking.
  its own space located between the current ops and all                    ISTAR Organizational Structure. During Op ATHENA,
  source cell (ASC).3 Inherent with this point is that the                 2 CMBG and 5 GBMC had clearly different outlooks on
  ISTAR CC should also contain a working area for each of                  ISTAR and its employment. 2 CMBG employed a new
  the key Brigade (Bde) ISTAR assets, such as the                          organization—the ISTAR company. In contrast to this,
  reconnaissance squadron, aviation squadron, electronic                   Roto 1 has approached ISTAR as a process, rather than
  warfare troop, and the surveillance target acquisition                   as an organization. This outlook comes from the idea that
  battery (STA Bty), with its integral tactical unmanned                   information is the key and that with the expedient
  aerial vehicle and counter battery radar troops. The close               passage of information, a quicker decision-action cycle
  proximity of all these cells, essentially composed of a                  occurs. In order to facilitate this, the Roto 1 ISTAR CC
  liaison team, is critical so that the ISTAR CC can                       acquired the added role and functions of the target
  expediently task or re-task ISTAR assets. As well, the                   acquisition coordination centre (TACC), for which Roto 0
  ISTAR CC and its individual cells must be capable of                     had a completely separate agency. This more robust
  operating 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. As well, the G3                 structure for the ISTAR CC worked extremely well during

  1 CFP 352-001 Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance, p. 1.
  2 Ibid, p.27.
  3 Ibid, p.33.
  4 Ibid, p.28.
  5 Ibid, p.28.

February 2005                                                                                                                            13
                                         Figure 1. ISTAR Organizational Structure Rotation 1.

     Roto 1 because subject matter experts (SMEs) on                  handle the vast amounts of information nor provide any
     surveillance target acquisition (STA) artillery, in particular   type of solid analysis. As a result, expedient information
     counter-battery target acquisition radar (CBTA Rdr) and          processing into the Bde HQ did not occur. As well, the
     tactical unmanned aerial vehicle (TUAV), and armoured            ISTAR company was not able to coordinate airspace
     reconnaissance experts were in the ISTAR CC. Since the           effectively with the Bde airspace coordination centre
     ISTAR CC and TACC are so closely linked already, and             (ASCC) nor synchronize its activities easily with other
     deal with ISTAR as an integral part of their job, it was         Bde ISTAR assets, which are ISTAR CC roles. Finally,
     sound for the two cells to be merged into one                    with the introduction of a new organizational structure
     coordination centre. This enabled one organization to            came new command relationships, which will be covered
     plan and task all the major Bde ISTAR assets, to easily          in detail later in this paper.
     synchronize all their efforts, and to receive all information    ISTAR CC Structure. Over the course of Roto 1, the Bde
     gathered directly.       As part of this process, the            staff recognized that the ISTAR CC structure did not
     experimental ISTAR Company died and the                          include just the core cell itself but other cells and their
     reconnaissance squadron with attachments returned to             representatives such as the G3 air and aviation, and the
     life, which resulted in the Roto 1 organizational structure      fire support coordination centre (FSCC) (Figure 2). The
     shown below (Figure 1). This change occurred because             ISTAR CC required a representative from all of the ISTAR
     the ISTAR Company was not equipped to properly                   assets employed on Op ATHENA in order to conduct




                                                    Figure 2. ISTAR CC Structure.

14                                                                                                                   The Bulletin
  effective planning, as well as to ensure synchronization of
  all ISTAR assets. Also, when additional ISTAR assets were
  added to the brigade, an SME was also required to advise
  and coordinate that ISTAR asset so that it could be
  properly integrated into the ISTAR plan. For example, the
  provision of AH-64 Apaches from the Netherlands required
  a liaison staff at Brigade Headquarters in order for the
  ISTAR CC to exploit the added capabilities of this system.
  Proposed Core ISTAR CC Structure. The core
  ISTAR CC requires a proper balance of personnel with the
  crucial knowledge on each of the major ISTAR assets in
  order to function efficiently and effectively task and to re-
  task ISTAR assets. As such, the armoured, infantry, and
  artillery possess the majority of ISTAR assets and require
  representation in the core ISTAR CC in order to conduct
  effective planning and coordination as well as ensure that
  the ISTAR CC functions optimally.
  As previously described, the ISTAR CC for Roto 1 added                Figure 3. Proposed ISTAR CC Core Structure
  the roles and functions of the TACC, which doctrinally is
                                                                   a separate ISTAR radio net, based on the experiences of
  the surveillance & target acquisition battery headquarters
                                                                   Roto 1.
  (STA Bty HQ). The STA Bty HQ is responsible to plan and
  task the artillery STA assets, TUAV and CB radars, as well       G2 and G3 ISTAR Relationship. The G3 ISTAR must
  as provide the artillery intelligence cell to the formation      work closely with the G2 since the latter is the analysis
  HQ. This cell inserts into the formation HQ exactly the          component and the G3 ISTAR is the action component of
  same way the FSCC does. The ISTAR CC for Roto 1                  ISTAR on behalf of the chief of staff and commander. It is
  functioned as the STA Bty HQ throughout both training and        important to emphasize that the G3 ISTAR is a member of
  in theatre in both symmetrical and asymmetrical                  the operations staff of the HQ, and is therefore the
  environments. The STA Bty HQ personnel possess most of           authority for the tasking and re-tasking of formation ISTAR
  the requisite knowledge and skills of ISTAR in order to          assets. Thus under the operations primacy of Canadian
  form the ISTAR CC. First, they possess surveillance and          doctrine, while the G2 and G3 ISTAR must work closely
  target acquisition knowledge and skills due to their             together, the G2 is not the tasking authority for actual
  experience and training in fire effects detachments as well      ISTAR sensors. Instead, he is responsible for accurately
  as CB Rdr and TUAV troops. Second, they are intimately           identifying priority information requirements (PIRs) and for
  familiar with intelligence and the intelligence cycle due to     the development of the Essential Elements of Information
  their training and experience as artillery intelligence          (EEIs) to support these PIRs.
  technicians. However, the STA Bty HQ is missing a
                                                                   Employment of ISTAR Assets. The ISTAR plan should
  familiarity with reconnaissance, but this deficiency is easily
                                                                   be formulated by Bde planners and "…an effort must be
  rectifiable. The permanent augmentation of an Infantry and
                                                                   made to fully exploit the range of capabilities to ensure that
  armoured officer with staff training and reconnaissance
                                                                   a synergistic 'mix' is deployed." From the onset of training,
  experience to the STA Bty HQ would enable it to function
                                                                   it was apparent that the experience of the majority of the
  effectively as the ISTAR CC. Therefore, this merger and
                                                                   Bde staff, and some units using an enhanced complement
  use of the STA Bty HQ and augmentation (Figure 3) as the
                                                                   of ISTAR assets, was very limited. This is completely
  ISTAR CC would achieve synergy and make use of an
                                                                   understandable because most Canadian soldiers' and
  existing structure that already focuses on ISTAR and is
                                                                   officers' knowledge is limited to that learned at Canadian
  capable of operating as an ISTAR CC and STA Bty HQ
                                                                   Land Force Command and Staff College and other army
  simultaneously.
                                                                   courses such as the Artillery Operations Course. As a
  Communications. A key component of ISTAR operations              result, there was a propensity to use the TUAV and AH for
  is that the information collected arrives promptly at the        surveillance of the objective area and an embedded desire
  ASC and ISTAR CC. If the ISTAR CC possesses all of the           to watch the operation unfold. It must be emphasized that
  cells described above, and they possess communications           this type of use of long-range ISTAR assets is a complete
  resources that allow them to talk with their parent              waste of their capabilities. The more appropriate method
  organizations and their integral assets, the sharing of          of employment would have the assets actively operating in
  information becomes simple and very effective. As well, it       areas unreachable by those available to close combat
  is paramount that the ISTAR CC possesses proper                  manoeuvre forces that may have a negative influence on
  information and technology hardware and software to              objective area activities. This lack of knowledge also led to
  quickly manage and filter information that is routed to the      reluctance by some units to request the support of Bde
  FSCC for targeting. Therefore, there is no requirement for       assets. In addition, the ISTAR CC received requests hours

February 2005                                                                                                                       15
     or minutes before an operation, which for some ISTAR                         Control of ISTAR Assets. The two components of ISTAR
     assets is not practical due to the planning and coordination                 are analysis and action and it is clear that the ASC provides
     required—especially TUAV. Moreover, there was a                              the analysis and the ISTAR CC provides the action.7
     tendency to over task the Bde Recce Squadron and focus                       Employing this as the basis of the relationship between
     too many assets looking at the same NAI at the same time.                    these two organizations, the control of ISTAR assets is
     There is no problem with duplication of effort in order to                   clear. The G3 ISTAR is a member of the operations staff
     avoid loss of coverage, but anything more than that is                       and "…is the officer who acts as a central authority for
     complete misuse of resources. Despite the lack of                            tasking and re-tasking decisions."8 Furthermore, it is
     knowledge and experience with an enhanced suite of                           important to highlight that not all ISTAR assets are solely for
     ISTAR assets, the Bde HQ and units improved drastically                      the ISTAR role. The reconnaissance squadron is an
     over time and were able to create a more synchronized                        example of a Bde asset that is both manoeuvre and ISTAR.
     and effective Bde surveillance plan.                                         As well, the G2 collection coordination information
                                                                                  requirements manager (G2 CCIRM) is to manage the
     Command of ISTAR Assets. When planning the command                           collection effort, is responsible to identify information gaps
     relationship of an organization, planners must take into                     in the ISTAR matrix, and may recommend sensor tasking.9
     consideration the five organizing fundamentals: unity of                     Thus, it is clear that the control of ISTAR assets resides
     command, cooperation, balanced structure, responsive                         with the G3 staff and not the G2 staff. This does not change
     procedures, and dynamic organization.6 The retention of the                  the concept that operations are command centric
     major ISTAR assets under Bde command provides excellent                      knowledge-based but instead enables the operations staff
     unity of command and cooperation because the ISTAR CC,                       to make operational decisions based on the information
     on behalf of the Commander, ensures clarity, unity of effort,                provided by the intelligence staff. As well, it does not hinder
     and effective decision-making by synchronizing all the ISTAR                 the ability of the ASC to acquire information that is more
     assets. As well, there are responsive procedures already                     detailed in order to improve SA, but rather emphasizes the
     established by the various assets that facilitate the                        need to have the approval of G3 ISTAR "…since only the
     maintenance of the tempo and provide the commander with                      ISTAR CC, based on G2/G3 coordination, has the authority
     timely SA so that he can execute a prompt decision-action                    to move or re-task sensors."10 Last, it is also imperative that
     cycle. The TUAV, the commander's primary beyond line-of-                     "…the ISTAR CC shall be informed of all ASC originated
     sight (BLOS) ISTAR asset, is a very good example of an                       amendments/retaskings as they happen and shall retain
     asset that has responsive procedures, but was unable to                      authority to override or cancel. "11
     exploit this when it was OPCON to the ISTAR company
     during Roto 0. Doctrinally, the TUAV would provide                           CONCLUSION
     information directly into the formation HQ through the artillery
     intelligence communication link and facilitate a faster                      Two Canadian Bde HQs formed a Bde HQ for OP ATHENA
     decision action cycle. However, the OPCON command                            in a complex environment faced an asymmetric threat and
     relationship of TUAV used on Roto 0 enabled the OC ISTAR                     doing three block war scenario and operated with an ISTAR
     company to assign missions and tasks to one of the                           CC as an integral part of the infrastructure. During the time
     commander's ISTAR assets without consultation to the Bde                     5 GBMC formed the nucleus of the HQ, there was a
     HQ. Thus, the TUAV is responding to a low level commander                    examination of the ISTAR CC formally undertaken in order
     rather than the needs of the formation commander. In                         to validate its roles and functions. One of the major points
     essence, this command relationship placed the TUAV into                      that 5 GMBC learned from its time using the ISTAR CC was
     OC ISTAR company's hands to employ as he saw fit, which                      that ISTAR was a process and not a structure. The
     was clearly an inappropriate command relationship to meet                    employment of this philosophy resulted in some drastic
     the needs of the commander's critical information                            changes, including the resurrection of the Reconnaissance
     requirements. To address these shortcomings, within the first                Squadron from the ashes of the ISTAR company and the
     month of Roto 1 operations the command relationship                          fusion of the ISTAR CC and TACC into one entity. More
     changed in order to facilitate faster information processing                 importantly, the realization that the ISTAR CC is in fact a
     using proven doctrine. The Bde HQ treated the TUAV                           multitude of organizations working together to fuse
     organization the same as the recce sqn or similar assets and                 information into a useful tool to provide the best possible SA
     operated it under the direct control of the Bde HQ. This                     to the Commander must be emphasized. However, in order
     situation (Figure 1) created a dynamic organization that                     for synchronization to occur it requires a sole voice to
     could adapt and better accommodate the different tactical                    ensure that all parts work towards the common goal and that
     situations that the Bde HQ confronted.                                       is the commander or his ISTAR representative, G3 ISTAR.


     6 B-GL-300-003-FP-000 Command, p.43 and 44.
     7 CFP 352-001 Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance, p. 27.
     8 Ibid, p.28.
     9 Ibid, p.12.
     10 Ibid, p.31.
     11 Ibid, p.32-33.

16                                                                                                                                  The Bulletin
                                                   HOW TO CONTACT

                                        The Army Lessons Learned Centre
                                     CFB Kingston (613) 541-5010 Extension xxxx
                                                   CSN 271-xxxx


                           Director                    Voss LCol CR@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
                           LCol CR Voss—4909           voss.cr@forces.gc.ca

                           SO Operations               Boule Maj M@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
                           Maj M Boulé—5440            boule.m@forces.gc.ca

                           SO Training                 Corriveau Maj NPM@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
                           Maj N.P.M. Corriveau—4816   corriveau.m@forces.gc.ca

                           SO Reserve                  Rankin Maj SR1@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
                           Maj SR Rankin—5117          rankin.sr1@forces.gc.ca

                           SO Coordination             McDonnell Maj IP@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
                           Maj IP McDonnell—4813       mcdonnell.ip2@forces.gc.ca




                              S U B M I T T I N G E X P E R I E N C E S T O T H E B U L L ET I N


   Do you have an experience that others might benefit from?           HOW TO SUBMIT AN ARTICLE TO ALLC

   Would you (or others) like to see your name in print?               Send copy to:
   Then submit an article to the Bulletin today!                       Lieutenant-Colonel C.R. Voss
       On any subject concerning current Army activities               Director ALLC

           Operations                      Fitness                     Mail

           Training                        Etc.                        Army Lessons Learned Centre
                                                                       Land Forces Doctrine and Training System
       Any format (letter, memo or Email) is acceptable                PO Box 17000 Station Forces,
           However, if possible, electronic format preferred           Kingston, ON K7K 7B4

       Length—less than three typed pages or approximately             Email
       1000 words preferred
                                                                       (DIN) Voss LCol CR@LFDTS HQ@Kingston
       Photos appreciated, but not mandatory                           (Internet) voss.cr@forces.gc.ca




February 2005                                                                                                     17

						
Related docs