Executive Summary of the Military Transition Seminar, Baltic Defence

Document Sample
scope of work template
							Executive Summary of the Military Transition Seminar,
  Baltic Defence College, Tartu, Estonia, 18 Oct 2002
                                                          By Marc Remillard*

      he Baltic Defence College held a re-       military officers themselves, BG Clemmesen     Poland, for instance, was the length of time
      search seminar on the issues of            believed that they should demonstrate their    it took to create a new constitution (five
military transition on 18 October 2002.          professionalism, and be able to think          years). Only by 2001 was the General Staff
The following executive summary presents         “outside the box”.                             fully adopted into G1, G2, and G3 NATO
an outline of the various contributions              The first presentation was given by        structures. In his conclusion, Major Gen-
and findings of this seminar.                    Major General Andrzej Tyszkiewicz, the         eral Tyszkiewicz provided an evaluation of
    Brigadier General Michael H. Clemme-         title being “The development of effective      the Polish experience, elaborating on a
sen, the Commandant of the Baltic De-            central staffs – focus, ethos, organisation,   number of “lessons learned”, which included
fence College (BDCOL), gave the welcome          procedures, links between the units and        the importance of stable budgets, realistic
address to the participants of the Military      central staffs”. Drawing on his experience     goals and timelines, and the need to estab-
Transition Seminar. In his speech, he stressed   at NATO’s HQ, the “kitchen of NATO’s           lish training links.
the importance of NATO membership as             strategic planning”, Major General                 Commenting on this first presentation,
an objective of defence reform, and argued       Tyszkiewicz described the process of tran-     Ambassador Jüri Luik, former Estonian
that such a goal makes it imperative that        sition, as it has occurred in Poland. Re-      Defence Minister, pointed out the paral-
politicians work closely with the military,      form has been in the direction of NATO’s       lels between the Polish and the Estonian
given that the former are elected, and are       basic standards, but implementation has        experiences. Following independence,
answerable to the domestic population. For       not been easy. A problem in the case of        Estonia created what Ambassador Luik
* Marc Remillard is Head of International Projects, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)


                                                                                                                                               85
     called a “small replica of the Warsaw Pact”,   lem tied to demographic trends in Rus-          process schematically, Col. Siposne
     which had to be changed once NATO              sia.                                            Kecskemethy defined the needs of mili-
     membership became the country’s goal.              In his comments on Dr Nurick’s pres-        tary reform in terms of “concept, re-
        The subject of the next presentation        entation, retired Brigadier General Janis       sources, and willingness”. For Hungary,
     was “Reforming the Body of the Army: a         Kazocins, former UK advisor to the              the concept developed has been that of
     Perspective from Russia”, which was de-        Slovak CHOD, quoted the Wall Street Jour-       “lean, light and lethal” armed forces.
     livered by Robert Nurick, the Director         nal as saying that “the problem behind          Human resources have been the focus of
     of the Carnegie Moscow Centre. In his          the Russia-West tension is the military”.       reform in Hungary (“the main reform
     outline of the state of military reform in     This he felt was a little exaggerated, but to   resource in Hungary is the human re-
     Russia, Mr Nurick noted that there has         be taken into account nonetheless. On the       source”), and have been organised in line
     been little real progress. Attempts have       difficulties of reform, BG Kazocins             with a new career management system.
     been made by past defence ministers, but       pointed out that the military is conserva-      This system has involved the attachment
     with only very limited success: for exam-      tive by nature, and tends to favour exist-      of rank to positions and making progress
     ple, poor attendance remains a problem,        ing structures and resource planning.           based on regular evaluations.
     with approximately 1/3 of junior offic-        Such an outlook should be replaced with            Representing the Czech Ministry of
     ers’ positions currently vacant. In spite      the recognition that plans and structures       Defence, and in particular its human re-
     of events such as the sinking of the Kursk,    tend not to “survive contact with the en-       source division, Mr Zdenek Dvorak
     and the renewed military engagements in        emy”. For this reason, they must be able        concurred with the Hungarian focus on
     Chechnya, nothing has managed to gal-          to adapt to changing situations.                human resource management as the key
     vanize military reform in Russia. As key           Following presentations on the Polish       to defence reform. In his own words,
     factors explaining this failure, Mr Nurick     and Russian experiences, Colonel Klara          “the devil is indeed hidden in the details”.
     pointed to over-sized requirements (“Too       Siposne Kecskemethy, of the Hungar-                Continuing with this focus on human
     big a bite, all at once”), and perception      ian Ministry of Defence, spoke about “The       resource management, BG Michael H.
     that events in Kosovo indicated the            Creation of an effective cadre develop-         Clemmesen gave a presentation on “Of-
     strength of the threat still posed by the      ment and management system”, in the             ficer Cadre Education Reform”. Build-
     West. Also cited was the lack of political     context of Hungary’s experience of de-          ing on the comments of BG Kazocins,
     support for reform, and a conscript prob-      fence reform. Setting out the reform            BG Clemmesen emphasized the centrality

86
of change to military education. Rather         central executive structures”. Accepting       armed forces being able to understand
than focus on doctrinal issues, and fitting     that politicians and the military do not       each other. Such is the lesson to be learnt
the theory onto the practice, education and     always “speak the same language”, Ambas-       from events such as General Jackson’s re-
training systems must be given by leaders       sador Luik argued for active interaction       fusal of General Clark’s order to retake
and managers, who can themselves stand as       between the two spheres, notably in the        Pristina Airport (Kosovo) in 1999.
professional role models. In addition to        form of strategic guidance documents and           As respondent, Commander David
ordinary officers, military academics must      the educating of politicians in military       Clarke pointed out that problems of civil-
also think “out of the box”.                    affairs. Essential also is a proper dialogue   military relations are not particular to the
    This stress on adapting training and edu-   with the public, one that would inform         East, but exist in the West also. Examples
cation to changing rather than static secu-     the public of what demands are necessary,      given included the U.S., where Donald
rity environments was present in Colonel        and what hurdles are to be overcome.           Rumsfeld recently over-ruled, as Secretary
Algis Vai²eliunas’ response to the presen-      Reform planning is driven by a correct         of Defence, a decision made by the Joint
tation by BG Clemmesen. As Comman-              assessment of threat perceptions, and the      Chief of Staff on the identity of the next
dant of the Lithuanian Military Academy,        public must be informed of what threats        Chief of Operations. Commander Clarke
Col. Vai²eliunas spoke about Lithuania’s        the government is focusing its efforts on.     also made the points that Ministry of De-
approach to reform, which involves always          In addition to public understanding,        fence activities today are about planning,
thinking about the future. Thinking “out        there is a need for the military to under-     programming and budgeting, and that con-
of the box” should make the soldier to con-     stand exactly what demands are to be made      temporary security is less about soldiering,
sider “non-military scenarios”, and orient-     of it by governments. Any misunder-            and more about National Security. By that,
ing education to the consideration of chang-    standings are likely to lead to objections     Commander Clarke indicated that issues to
ing environments should imply a break with      on the side of the military. In the light      be addressed are those of Law Enforcement,
the old heritage. According to Col.             of clarifying objectives and demands,          Finance, Border Security and Asymmetric
Vai²eliunas, this can only be done with a       Ambassador Luik cited PfP and NATO             threats, all of which demand inter-operabil-
group of newly trained instructors.             documents as particularly informative,         ity, international coordination, and the in-
    In the last presentation before the break   and he suggested that as international ac-     creasing contributions of “other” armed
for lunch, Ambassador Jüri Luik spoke           tivities increase, the success of coopera-     forces, notably the police and other non-
on “Political-Military Cooperation at the       tive efforts would depend upon different       military structures.

                                                                                                                                              87

						
Related docs