POTATO (Solanum tuberosum)

W
Document Sample
scope of work template
							POTATO (Solanum tuberosum)                                                                             R. Zhang and B.J. Christ
   Early blight; Alternaria solani                                                                     Department of Plant Pathology
                                                                                                       The Pennsylvania State University
                                                                                                       University Park, PA 16802


Severity of early blight on potato cultivars and breeding Lines, 2002.

     Forty-one potato cultivars and advanced breeding lines were evaluated at the Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research
Center at Rock Springs, PA. Soil type was Hagerstown silty clay loam. The previous crop was clover. Entries were planted on
24 May in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Plots consisted of a single 10-ft row with a 5-ft break
between treatments. Fifteen seed pieces were hand-planted and spaced 8-in. apart. Each entry was surrounded by the susceptible
cultivar Norland. Fertilization was 695 lb/A of 10-10-5 (N-P-K) banded in the row during planting. Rainfall was 0.92, 5.23,
1.00, 2.15 in. for May after planting, Jun, Jul, and Aug, respectively. The field was irrigated about 0.56, 1.00, 1.25 and 1.45 in.
on 12 Jul, 23 Jul, 30 Jul and 15 Aug, respectively. The inoculum was from nature. Early blight was assessed on 8, 19 and 26
Aug. Each plot was assessed by visually dividing the plot into three sections and assessing the percentage of diseased foliage in
each section. These values were averaged to obtain a mean disease severity value per plot. Plants were vine-killed on 5 Sep and
harvested on 24 Sep. Tubers were graded into size categories and all those greater than 17/8 -in. diameter were weighed to
determine yield. Disease and yield data were subjected to an analysis of variance and Fisher’s protected least significant
difference test. Vine maturities and yields of all cultivars and lines also were recorded on non-replicated plots that were located
in a nearby field that was managed with fungicide sprays to reduce early blight infection. Specific gravity was evaluated for both
diseased and healthy plots (data are not shown here).

     Early blight severity was low prior to 1 Aug. Low levels of natural inoculum and low rainfall delayed the onset of disease.
All yields reported here were relatively low when compared with yields in sprayed plots (data not shown). ARS-W96-400061,
B1240-1, Katahdin, W1242, A90586-11, AF1775-2, AF1753-16, Russet Burbank, Brise du Nord, Gem Russet, Snowden,
AF1455-20, Atlantic, and Kennebec all had low levels of early blight, and we consider them moderately resistant. The specific
gravity of Chieftain, Dark Red Norland, Envol, ARS-W-96-40022-5 and W1313, was higher in diseased plots than in healthy
plots. The specific gravity of Shepody was reduced in diseased plots.


Cultivar/Line                      %EarlyZ      >17/8-in yieldX        Cultivar/Line                    %EarlyZ      >17/8-in yieldX
                                    blight           (cwt/A)                                              blight          (cwt/A)
Aquilon ..........................41.3 fghijW   180.3      efghijklm   AF1470-6......................55.0 ijklmn     216.8 jklmnopq
Atlantic ..........................16.3 abcd    213.9 jklmnop          AF1569-2......................30.0 cdefgh     284.5 rs
Brise du Nord.................13.8 abcd         214.4 jklmnopq         AF1753-16....................12.5 abcd        202.7 hijklmnop
Chieftain ........................41.3 fghij    228.6 lmnopqr          AF1758-7......................31.3 defgh      188.7 fghijklmn
Dark Red Norland..........98.8 o                163.4 defghijk         AF1763-2......................61.3 klmn       165.4 defghijk
Envol..............................100.0 o      140.0 bcdefgh          AF1775-2......................11.3 abc        242.0 mnopqrs
Gem Russet....................13.7 abcd         98.9 abc               AF1938-3......................41.3 fghij      242.9 mnopqrs
Katahdin.........................8.8 ab         253.4 opqrs            AF2133-17....................66.0 lmn         123.3 abcde
Kennebec .......................17.5 abcd       263.0 pqrs             ARS-W96-4654-1 ........31.3 defgh             87.7 ab
KeukaGold.....................26.3 abcdefg      252.5 opqrs            ARS-W96-400061........7.5 a                   159.3 cdefghijk
Roselys...........................47.5 hijkl    277.1 prs              ARS-W96-40022-5 ......94.5 o                  76.8 a
Russet Burbank..............12.5 abcd           150.1 bcdefghi         ATX84706-2Ru............23.8 abcdef           299.0 s
Russet Legend................47.5 hijkl         153.8 cdefghij         B1240-1 ........................7.5 a         300.3 s
Russet Norkotah ............70.0 mn             168.7 defghijkl        B1425-9 ........................36.5 efghi    219.4 klmnopq
Shepody .........................27.5 bcdefg    194.6 ghijklmno        B1523-4 ........................21.3 abcde    293.5 rs
Snowden ........................13.8 abcd       172.9 efghijkl         CO86218-2 ...................31.3 abcde       108.1 abcd
Superior..........................57.5 jklmn    244.4 nopqrs           NY102 ..........................43.8 ghijk    145.5 bcdefghi
Yukon Gold ...................73.8 n            246.0 nopqrs           NY115 ..........................52.5 ijklm    171.1 defghijkl
Ware’s Pride ..................47.5 hijkl       126.8 abcdef           W1242 ..........................8.8 ab        237.8 mnopqrs
A90586-11 .....................10.0 ab          136.7 abcdefg          W1313 ..........................20.0 abcde    161.0 cdefghijk
AF1455-20.....................15.0 abcd         206.4 ijklmnop

Z
  Assessed on 19 Aug.
X
 cwt/A = Hundred weight per acre.
W
  Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, Fisher’s protected LSD, P = 0.05.