HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ( by obh21220

VIEWS: 73 PAGES: 54

									              ~ ~
             2,j   session }
        1 1 0 CONGRESS
                                       HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES                                  (       REPORT
                                                                                                        110-




          ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS
                           BILL, 2009


         JUNE        , 2008.-Committed         to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of
    C                                     the Union and ordered to he printed



                   Mr. VISCLOSKY,
                                from the Committee on Appropriations,
                               submitted the following

                                                    R E P O R T
                                                       together with

                                               ADDITIONAL VIEWS
                                                 [To accompany H.R.                  1
          The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in
        explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for en-
        ergy and water development for the fiscal year ending September
        30, 2009, and for other purposes.
                                               INDEX TO BILL AND REPORT


                                                                                                              Pnpe rronlbri
                                                                                                               Bill    Hepoi*
                                                                                                                           "
        I. Department of Defense--
    C       Corps of EngineersAivil:


!
h"
                Operation and Maintenance
                       -
                Rermlatorv Promam
                          ,     "
                Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies ....................................
                Expenses .......................................................................................
                Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)
                General Provisions .......................................................................
        11. Department of the Interior:
             Central Utah Project Completion Account ........................................
             42-697
     Bureau of Reclamation:
         Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Overview
         Water and Related Resources
         Central Valley Project Restor
         California Bay-Delta Restoration
         Policy and Administration
        .General Provisions
111. Department of Energy:

     Energy Eff~eiency  and Renewable Energy ........................................
     Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
     Nuclear Ener

     Clean Coal Technolo
     Fossil Energy Research
     Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves
     Strategic Petroleum Reserve
     Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve
     Energy Information Administration
     Non-Defense Environmental Management .......................................
     Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup




     Departmental Administration ............................................................
     Office of Inspector General .................................................................
     Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
     National Nuclear Security Administration
         Weapons Activities

          Naval Reactors



     Other Defense Aetivitie




        Southwestern Power Administration
        Western Power Administration ..................................................
        Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund ..........
     Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
     Committee Recommendation
     General Provisions
W . Independent Agenei

     Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety B
     Delta Regional Commission
     Denali Commission




V. General Provisions:
    House of Representatives Report Requirements                                            ...
                                      3
             SUMMARY ESTIMATES RECOMMENDATIONS
                   OF        AND
      The Committee has considered budget estimates, which are con-
    tained in the Budget of the United States Government, 2009. The
    following table summarizes appropriations for fiscal year 2008, the
    budget estimates, and amounts recommended in the bill for fiscal
    year 2009.
                            [INSERT TABLE]
                               INTRODUCTION
       The Energy and Water Development Appropriations hill for fiscal
    year 2009 totals $33,265,000,000, $2,078,300,000 above the Presi-
    dent's budget request and $2,377,000,000 above the amount appro-
    priated in fiscal year 2008.
       Title I of the bill provides $5,332,900,000 for the programs of the
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, $591,900,000 over the budget re-
    quest and $258,975,000 below the fiscal year 2008 enacted level
    (excluding emergency spending). The fiscal year 2009 budget re-
    quest for the Corps of Engineers totals $4,741,000,000 which is
    composed entirely of new budget authority.
       The budget request also included $5,761,000,000 in emergency
    appropriations for the provision of 100-year storm protection for
    the greater New Orleans, Louisiana area. The Committee has in-
    cluded this funding in a fiscal year 2008 emergency supplemental
    appropriations Act'
       Title I1 provides $957,479,000 for the Department of Interior and
    the Bureau of Reclamation, $163,680,000 over the budget request,
    and $193,434,000 below the fiscal year 2008 enacted level. The
    Committee recommends $42,000,000 for the Central Utah Project,
    including $987,000,000 for deposit into the Utah Reclamation Miti-
    gation and Conservation Account, both the same as the budget re-
    quest. The Committee recommends $915,479,000 for the Bureau of
    Reclamation, $163,680,000 above the budget request and
    $192,434,000 below the fiscal year 2008 enacted level. The Com-
    mittee recommendation includes a rescission of $120,000,000 in un-
    obligated balances. rather than the $175,000.000 rescission re-
    que&ed by the ~dministration.
              1
       Title 1 1 provides $27,204,820,000 for the Department of Energy,
-   $1,286,932,000 over the budget request, and $2,715,718,000 above
    the fiscal year 2008 enacted level (excluding emergency spending).
    The Committee recommends funding for renewable energy and en-
    ergy efficiency programs a t $2,518,552,000, an increase of
    $1,263,159,000 above the request; electricity delivery and energy
    reliability programs a t $149,250,000, an increase of $15,250,000
    above the request; nuclear energy programs including the Mixed
    Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility a t $1,238,852,000, a decrease of
    $101,800,000 below the request; fossil energy research and develop-
    ment programs at $853,578,000, an increase of $99,548,000 above
    the request. The Committee recommends $4,861,669,000 for the Of-
    fice of Science an increase of $139,700,000 above the budget re-
    quest and $843,958,000 above the current year.
       Environmental management activities-non-defense            environ-
    mental cleanup, uranium enrichment decontamination and decom-
    missioning, legacy management, and defense environmental elean-
up are funded at $972,273,000, an increase of $12,887,000 above
the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and an increase of $92,548,000
above the budget request.
   The Committee recommends a total of $494,742,000 for the
Yucca Mountain repository. This includes $247 371,000 for Nuclear
Waste Disposal, the same as the request, and $247,371,000 for De-
fense Nuclear Waste Disposal, the same as the request.
   Funding for the National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA), which includes nuclear weapons activities, defense nuclear
nonproliferation, naval reactors, and the Office of the NNSA Ad-
                                                                       R
ministrator, is $8,823,243,000, a decrease of $274,019,000 below
the request, and an increase of $12,958,000 above fiscal year 2008.
The Committee recommendation includes $1,530,048,000 for De-
fense Nuclear Nonproliferation, an increase of $194,052,000 above
the current year and $283,000,000 above the budget request. Fund-      *
ing for the Power Marketing Administration is provided a t the re-
quested levels.
   Title IV provides $305,701,000 for several Independent Agencies,
an increase of $37,688,000 above the budget request, and
$24,405,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted level. The requested
funding is provided for the Appalachian Regional Commission, the
Delta Regional Authority, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspector General, the
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, the Denali Commission,
and the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas
Transportation Projects. The request for the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission is increased by $37,682,000 and no funds are provided
for the Office of Inspector General for the Tennessee Valley Autbor-
ity.
                        THE ENERGY CRISIS
  Across the Nation, families already stung by an economic down-
turn have seen their energy bills skyrocket over the last year and
their homes and lives endangered by floods, tornados, and hurri-
canes. With the price of gasoline now exceeding $4.00 a gallon, and
the potential costs of adverse consequences of global warming, such
as an increase in frequency of severe weather, becoming painfully
clear, the urgency to address energy and climate change has never
been greater and the consequences of inaction more dire. Unfortu-
nately, there are no easy or quick solutions to these problems. For
example, from an economic perspective we cannot promise that we
will lower the price of gasoline a t the pump tomorrow, but we will
do everything possible to help increase vehicle gas mileage. From
a national security perspective we will work hard to enhance the
use of biofuels to reduce our dependency on foreign sources of oil,
                                                                       .
but their use will not in and of themselves solve our global warm-
ing problem. Environmentally, we will work diligently to move our
country away from a carbon based economy to reduce global warm-
ing, but our success will unfortunately not be measured in days
and months.
  Funding provided in this bill supports a substantial expansion of
research, development, demonstration, and deployment programs
focused on efficiently utilizing our domestic natural resources to
fulfill our energy needs while addressing global climate change.
The bill supports water infrastructure investments which represent
the Nation's front-line defenses for protecting our homes and fami-
lies from some of the possible impacts of global climate change. In
addition, the bill recommends funding to reduce fuel consumption
through infrastructure investments which will Increase the effl-
ciency of our marine transportation system. These expanded activi-
ties alone cannot immediately reduce our energy bills or green-
house gas emissions substantially, but they are a critical first step
to addressing these issues sustainably in the long-term.
                ADDRESSING HIGH GASOLINE PRICES
   The Energy and Water Development appropriation includes
$888,938,000 for research, development, demonstration, and de-
  loyment of improved vehicle technology and production of biofuels,
i 387,715,000 above the fiscal year enacted funding level and
$313,914,000 more than requested by the President. This substan-
tial increase includes funding or many new initiatives to address
the impacts of high gas prices authorized in the Energy Independ-
ence and Security Act of 2007, including new research and develop-
ment programs for advancing battery technologies for electnc and
plug-in hybrid vehicles; Renewable Fuel Infrastructure grants to
deploy more renewable fuel blends and make them more widely
available; and Advanced Vehicles Manufacturing Facility grants as
well as $1,000,000,000 in direct loans for assistance for automakers
and suppliers to more readily convert domestic manufacturing ca-
pabilities for the manufacture of new vehicles which are less de-
pendent on fossil fuels. Over the next five to ten years, the results
of these activities should address high gas prices by reducing de-
mand for gasoline derived from oil and increasing supplies of alter-
native fuels.
         ADVANCING ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
  For fiscal year 2009, the Energy and Water Development appro-
priation includes $3,636,804,000 for research, development, and
demonstration of advanced energy technologies, $877,291,000 above
the fiscal year 2008 enacted funding level and $219,340,000 more
than requested by the President. The Nation is engulfed in an en-
ergy crisis which, unlike the crisis of the 1970s, appears to be driv-
en by fundamental, long-term economic, scjentific, political and
technological challenges. The steep increase in energy demand as-
sociated with the emergence of hundreds of millions of people from
poverty internationally along with the significant barriers to in-
creasing conventional energy supplies suggest the need for a funda-
mental transformation of our energy system. Such a radical trans-
formation might be possible with the technologies we have today,
but likely at significant cost. Investments in energy research, de-
velopment and demonstration programs are designed to reduce
these costs by expanding the range of options available to trans-
form our energy system.
  The energy technology research funded at the Department of En-
ergy ranges from basic work to map the genomes of microorga-
nisms that digest cellulose to applied work to increase the effi-
ciency of turbines. The Department supports research and develop-
ment of renewable energy generation technoloses includ~ngad-
vanced biofuels as well as solar, wind, geothermal, ocean, tidal, and
hydropower. Work on conservation aims at development of zero en-
                                 6

ergy houses by 2020, improved energy efficiency for U.S. industry,
technology to further increase the fuel efficiency of vehicles, im-
proved batteries for electric and plug-in hybrid cars, and hydrogen
storage for future vehicles. Nuclear energy currently provides 20
percent of the electricity generation capacity of the United States.
Sustaining this level of energy production is supported with re-
search, subsidies for first applicants to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission for new types of reactors, and demonstration of safer,
gas-cooled next generation nuclear power plants. Fossil energy
spending is devoted to carbon capture and sequestration so that        •
coal can he used to generate energy without greenhouse gas emis-
sions and to improving the energy efficiency of current coal-fired
power plants. Long-term energy science research is focused on
breakthrough ideas like fusion energy, which aims to harness the       a

same source of power that enables the sun to shine to generate
electricity here on earth.
   The Department of Energy is encouraged to pursue all the tech-
nologies that can help abate the current energy crisis while reduc-
ing greenhouse gas emissions and other adverse environmental,
economic, and security impacts, and to do so in creative and inno-
vative ways. The Department must maintain a careful eye toward
what can be used in the private and public sectors in the coming
five to fifteen years while simultaneously funding the visionary re-
search that will be needed to realize a sustainable energy system
over the long-term.
              FUNDING TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE
   For fiscal year 2009, the Energy and Water Development appro-
  riation includes $6,009,524,000 to address climate change,
i 1,326,777,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted funding level
and $1,929,674,000 more than requested by the President. This
substantial increase includes $500,000,000 t o support new initia-
tives authorized by the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007 (Public Law 110-140).
   Funding is provided for research, development, demonstration,
and deployment of energy technologies that increase energy con-
servation and production of energy without emission of greenhouse
gases. Support for utilization of available conservation technology
is provided through a major new energy efficiency block grant pro-
gram, the weatherization grants, state energy grants, and federal
energy management programs. In addition, an increase in budget
authority is provided to cover the risk of providing an additional
$8,500,000,000 in loan guarantees to companies investing in inno-
vative renewable and/or energy efficient technologies as well dis-
                                                                       .
tributed energy generation, transmission, and distribution.
   Increased renewable energy production is supported through
major refurbishment by the Army Corps of Engineers and Bureau
of Reclamation of existing hydropower dams. Funding is also pro-
vided for research to understand and predict climate change, in-
cluding climate modeling using DOE'S state-of-the-art super com-
puters, atmospheric radiation monitoring, and long-term experi-
ments on the response of forests and other ecosystems to increased
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
 INTEGRATING CLIMATE CHANGE INTO LOCAL AND REGIONAL WATER
                    RESOURCES PLANNING
   Existing water resources projects were generally planned, de-
signed, and built on the assumption that the future would look
                               .
orettv much like the ~ a s t A review of the historical record re-
;eale"d the water levels-that have been reached in historical storms,
and the agencies use that information to design proiects that pro-
tect again& a certain frequency event (e.g., t h e 100-year storm,-the
standard project flood, etc.). There are some exceptions, such as
where upitr&am development is changing runoff or where subsid-
ence is changing the ground elevation, but generally our water re-
sources agencies have assumed a steady-state climate.
   There is now increasing physical evidence, supported by increas-
in scientific consensus, that the global climate is warming, wlnch
  7
wi 1 cause substantial changes to global sea level and to regional
precipitation patterns. These changes will, in turn,, affect key de-
 sign parameters for water projects, such as levee heights, reservoir
capacities, and channel depths. Global climate modeling is now so-
 phisticated enough to be able to predict these changes on the re-
 gional scale, where they may have a significant impact over the
 typical project lifetime of Federal water resources projects. While
 not all climate models agree, especially a t the regional scale, the
 Committee expects the water resources agencies under its jurisdic-
 tion, namely the Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Rec-
 lamation, to use the latest available climate models and forecasts
 to inform the planning and design of future water projects.
                              TITLE I
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-CIVIL
                     DEPARTMENT THE A M
                              OF     R Y
                    CORPSOF ENGINEERS-CML
                           INTRODUCTION
   The Energy and Water Development Act funds the Civil Works
component of the Army Corps of Engineers, which encompasses ap-
proximately 23,000 civilians and 190 military personnel. Army in-
volvement in works of civil nature dates back to the origins of the
nation. Over the years, the Corps Civil Works mission has adapted
to accommodate changing societal needs and values. A brief legisla-
tive history and the major mission areas of the Corps have been
included in past Energy and Water Development reports.
        INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT IN THE UNITED STATES
  The Administration's request constitutes an abject failure to
meet the infrastructure needs of our country. Last year, this Com-
mittee characterized the budget request for the Corps as woefully
inadequate; this year, the budget request borders on irresponsible.
This Administration has clearly not learned the lessons of the Gulf
Coast Hurricanes and the Minnesota highway bridge collapse. That
lesson was a simple one-investment today can eliminate the need
for costly emergency response tomorrow. More importantly, ade-
quate investment today can save lives tomorrow. The budget re-
                                  8
quest does nothing to meet the needs of tomorrow, is inadequate
to meet existing requirements, and fails to provide sufficient fund-
ing to provide an economic stimulus through job creation, long term
savings through operational efficiency of existing projects or trans-
portation savings through optimal operation of the nation's harbors
and channels. Beyond economic stimulus and transportation effl-
ciency, infrastructure investment is necessary for the safety of our
citizens. The consequences of under-investment in flood control and
transportation projects are too significant to remain unaddressed.
   In light of the need for increased investment in public infrastruc-
ture, the Committee recommends a significant increase to the              8
Corps of Engineers budget for fiscal year 2009 to address addi-
tional priorities. While insufficient to meet all requirements, this
funding will make progress toward adequate investment levels. The
                                                                         a.
Committee remains adamant that the Corps of Engineers continue
the reforms made in the last several years regarding project man-
agement and execution and out-year planning. The Committee's ex-
pectation, regardless of the amount of the annual appropriation, is
that the Corps will ensure its funding is expended eff~cientlyand
in good faith to achieve the best interests of the public.
                FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET OVERVIEW
  The Committee recommends a total of $5,332,900,000 for the
Corps of Engineers an increase of $591,900,000 above the request
and a decrease of $258,975,000 from fiscal year 2008 enacted lev-
els. In addition, the Committee recommends a rescission of
$1,900,000 from funds appropriated in the fiscal year 2008 Act.
   The fiscal year 2009 budget request for the Corps of Engineers
totals $4,741,000,000, $850,875,000 below the funding level enacted
in fiscal year 2008. The bulk of this reduction was requested in the
Construction account and would have significantly undermined the
provision of new water resource infrastructure. Additionally, the
budget request for the Operation and Maintenance account rep-
resents a reduction from the fiscal year 2008 enacted level, after
adjusting for the proposal to move projects between the accounts,
                                        - -          -
while the reauirements to maintain aeinz existing infrastructure
continue to in'crease.
  The budget request for the Investigations account reflects a se-
vere reduction from fiscal year 2008 levels. The Administration
proposes only $41,000,000 for studies to address water resource
issues in cooperation with local sponsors, $20,000,000 of that
amount is for one study, leaving a small level of funding for the
rest of the nation.
   The requested fiscal year 2009 Construction program is
$1,477,807,000, including $75,807,000 in the Mississippi Rivers and
Tributaries account. The Construction request proposes six per-
formance-based guidelines to guide the allocation of funding con-
struction projects. Flood and storm damage reduction, navigation
and hydropower projects are ranked by their Benefit-to-Cost Ratio
(BCR). Aquatic ecosystem restoration projects are ranked based on
how cost-effective they are in helping restore a regionally or nation-
ally significant ecosystem that has become degraded as a result of
a Civil Works project or a restoration effort that requires the
Corps' unique expertise in modifying an aquatic regime. Two other
key performance guidelines give priority to projects that address a
significant risk to human safety or provide dam safety assurance,
seepage control, or static instability correction. Finally, the budget
proposes funding to complete 12 projects, a new category seemingly
designed to allow funding for one project to be included.
   The 79 construction projects requested for funding consist of 50
Flood and Coastal Storm Damaee Reduction proiects (five budgeted
for completion), 19 Navigation Grojects (seven b;dgeted for comple-
                                           -
tion). five Aauatic Ecosvstem Restoration ~roiects.and five Hvdro-
pow&- repla&ment projects.
                                               "



   The budget reauest is based on an unrealisticallv optimistic as-
sumption that a proposed change to the structure of t h i inland wa-
terways system revenue stream is adopted and enacted. The Ad-
ministratiin proposes to collect lockage-based user fees for commer-
cial barges on the inland waterways to address the declining bal-
ance in the Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF), and to phase
out the existing diesel fuel tax for these waterways. To date, the
legislation is pending. Without enactment, the Inland Waterways
Trust Fund will be depleted by the end of calendar year 2008. The
Committee recommendation on this issue is discussed at length in
the section titled Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
   The fiscal year 2009 budget request is the first to present infor-
mation for Operation and Maintenance activities by 54 areas based
on United States Geological Survey sub-watersheds. This presen-
tation is similar to that proposed in the preceding two fiscal years.
   The Administration requests $130,000,000 for the Formerly Uti-
lized Sites Remedial Action Program, a reduction of $10,000,000
from current year levels. The request for the remaining accounts,
Regulatory, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Expenses and
the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) is
at fiscal year 2008 levels.
   The budget request includes $5,761,000,000 in a fiscal year 2009
emergency request for the additional federal funds needed for the
                  .
followine purposes: to reduce the risk to the Greater New Orleans.
            u .

Louisiana, area from storm surges that have a one-percent annuai
chance of occurring; to improve internal drainage; to restore and
complete construction of hurricane and storm damage reduction
features in surrounding areas to previouslv authorized levels of
                                  ate
protection; and to i n ~ o ~ ~ o rcertain non-federal levees into the
federal system. The Committee has included this funding in a fiscal
year 2008 emergency supplemental appropriationsubill. This
amount brings the total cost of reconstruction and the provision of
 100-year protection to the Greater New Orleans area to approxi-
mately $14,000,000,000, roughly double the original cost estimate.
   Pre-Katrina, storm damage reduction was provided through sep-
arately authorized projects, which were designed to different stand-
ards, subject to different requirements for non-federal cost sharing,
and managed by different local entities. The budget request pro-
poses to authorize the works in Greater New Orleans as a single
          to
~roiect. be constructed with the State of Louisiana as the cost-
&   <   ,

sharing partner, and subsequently maintained and operated by the
                      is
State. The ~rooosal now obsolete, due to the consolidation of the
levee boardi ili the greater New Orleans area a t the urging of Con-
gress. The Committee did accept the proposal to cost share the pro-
vision of 100-year protection 65 percent federaV35 percent non-fed-
era1 and included it in the emergency supplemental bill. Addition-
ally, the budget request proposes to defer by one year the state's
obligation to pay its $1,500,000,000 cost share. This language is not
included in the supplemental appropriations bill as it is simply a
restatement of existing law.
  A table summarizing the fiscal year 2008 enacted appropriation,
the fiscal year 2009 budget request, and the Committee rec-
ommended levels is provided below.




Emergency appropriationr ....................................
Missssipp Rlver and trbutarei ................................
Operaton and Maintenance ..................................
ReEUIatOw oroeram ..........................................
                                                                                /            2
                                                                                                 387,402
                                                                                                               1   5.761.000

                                                                                                                   4
                                                                                                                     240.000
                                                                                                                                 1         -
                                                                                                                                       278.000
                                                                                                                                     2,300,000
                                                                                                                                       180 onn




        Emergency appropratlans           1   ..............................                          -            15,761,0001             -
                                                                                                                                          11
        Rerc8rronr ..........................................................                 (-4.7881                    -          I- 1,9001
  3   Emergency a y p r o p i ~ a t o n irecommended in the FY 2008 Sopplementai R p p r o v a t o n r ~ c t

                                              JNIAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND
   The Committee's recommendation includes funding for projects
cost-shared from Inland Waterways Trust Fund largely as re-
quested. However, to achieve this level of funding the Committee
has suspended withdrawal of funds from the Trust Fund for sev-
eral major rehabilitation projects that have been funded out of the
Trust Fund for decades but are not legally required to do so. This
change in policy is necessary due to the Administration's failure to
address declining revenues.
   The Committee is disappointed with the Administration's lack of
timely action on revising the structure of the revenues generated
for this purpose. The Administration has been aware for years that                                                                               .
the Trust Fund would become the limiting factor in appropriations
for this purpose, yet little or no action has been taken. The Admin-
istration testified on March 13, 2007, in part that, "the Administra-
tion is developing and will propose legislation . . . [that] will ad-                                                                            .
dress the decline in the balance in the Inland Waterways Trust
Fund . . . The legislation will be offered this spring for consider-
ation by Congress." The legislation was eventually submitted to
Congress on April 4, 2008, more than a year after it was promised
and years after the bankruptcy of this Trust Fund was projected.
The Committee insists that the Administration work with the ap-
propriate authorizing committees to reach agreement on restruc-
turing the revenue stream. The Committee will oppose any pro-
posal which includes a change to the non-federal cost share re-
quired for inland navigation projects.
  The Committee's recommendation in no way changes its position
that capital improvements to the inland waterway system must be
cost shared from the Trust Fund. All investment decisions must be
made in light of national priorities and all projects must compete
against each other for the limited funding. The Committee expects
that once the revenue stream to the Trust Fund is restored, the
total cost of these major rehabilitation projects will once again be
cost shared a t fifty percent. Due to existing obligations which ac-
count for the vast majority of the current revenue stream,,language
is carried prohibiting the Corps from awarding any additional con-
tinuing contracts for projects funded from the Trust Fund.
              FISCAL YEAR 2009 BUDGET PRESENTATION
  For the third year in a row, the Corps of Engineers has proposed
several changes to the manner that the Civil Works program is
presented and appropriated. The most significant change appears
in the Operation and Maintenance account, into which four cat-
egories of projects are moved from Construction. These categories
are: the rehabilitation of infrastructure; Endangered Species Act
compliance; the construction of facilities, projects or features (in-
cluding islands and wetlands) using materials dredged during Fed-
eral navigation operation and maintenance activities; and the miti-
gation of impacts on shorelines resulting from Federal navigation
operation and maintenance activities. Additionally, the budget re-
quest aggregates operation and maintenance projects into geo-
graphical regions and provides a single appropriation for all
projects contained within each of the 54 regions. The approach pro-
posed by the Administration is simply a project-by-project budget
which has been regionally aggregated to give the appearance of a
regional or systems-level approach. The Committee supports a re-
gional to systems approach to Operation and Maintenance budg-
eting, but it must be based on substantive regional analysis and
decision-making, not merely aggregation for the sake of appear-
ance.
  The Congress offered to consider the regional approach in budg-
eting operation and maintenance projects once the Corps proved
that it was budgeting on the basis of systems-level needs rather
than by individual project needs; the Corps has not yet accom-
plished this task. The fiscal year 2008 appropriation included the
conditions under which the Coneress would consider a r e ~ o n a aD-l
propriation of the Operations and Maintenance account and the
movement of uroiects from the Construction account. To reiterate,
the Corps is ciirected to prepare four systemized, integrated budg-
ets for four different areas of the nation, the Ohio River, the Great
Lakes, the Texas coast, and the California coast, to demonstrate
the value of system or watershed planning and budgeting. Further,
the Corps is directed to develop a comprehensive capital expense
policy to distinguish clearly between activities that should be con-
sidered routine maintenance and those that should be considered
a c a ~ i t a lexuense consistent with industrv ~ractices.Caoital im-
                 'are                    in
pl.ov&n~c~~ts properly hudg~ttt~d th; i:onstruction 'account;
ruuti~~e   activities assuciatc,d with the upkeep 111'existing projcct;i
are properly budgeted in 0prr;rtions and Maintenance account.
  The regionalization of the Oprration and .Maintenance accuunt
                                                           id
was initi;illy proposed hy the Administration t c ~a v ~ ~ conk~msional
reprogramming limitations. Regrettably the Office of Management
and Budget has politicized this account by declaring each project
in the fiscal year 2008 program a congressional earmark, despite
the fact that the program was appropriated largely as requested by
the Administration.
   Additionally, the budget documents for the Corps of Engineers
included no detailed information for this $2,475,000,000 Operation
and Maintenance account. The documents contained no information
on how the Administration arrived a t the final funding levels for
the 54 regional systems or information that would allow compari-
son to past years. The Administration further directed the Corps                                                                                  r
of Engineers not to release this information beyond the executive
branch; it required a letter from this Committee in order for Con-
gress and the public to have access to the underlying data which
supported the regional funding level. The Administration's prob-
lematic steps have been counterproductive.
   The Committee recognizes the Operation and Maintenance ac-
count can require a higher degree of flexibility than the Construc-
tion or Investigations accounts. As the Corps has reformed its fiscal
management, this Committee has supported higher levels of re-
programming authority for this account without the need to seek
approval from the Congress. The Committee has also been willing
to consider reprogrammings necessary for the greater good, even
when these reprogrammings are politically unpopular. It is the Ad-
ministration's own policies that have resulted in the Corps' inabil-
ity to reprogram funds necessary to meet national or regional
needs.
   The Committee reiterates its support for a more systematic ap-
proach to funding the operation and maintenance of the nation's
waterways and understands the dynamic nature of the project
needs under this account. However, the Corps must first comply
                                                               rt
with the conditions necessarv for the Committee to s u ~ ~ othe Ad-
ministration's budget structure. The appropriation ;&commenda-
                                                              al
tions included herein reiect the Administration's ~ r o ~ o s and are                                   &       A


consistent with the fiscal year 2008 structure.
   The following table provides a comparison of the Operation and
Maintenance and Construction accounts for fiscal years 2006-2009:
                                                               10a1lari tn lOOOrl


                Account                      FY 2006 anacted     FY 2001 enacted      FY ZOOS enacted   FY 2009 a q u a i t   c          O    ~       ~   ~   ~
Operatlonr and Maintenance ..........           $1,969.000           $1,973,347           $2243.637         $2,475,000            2,300,000
                                                                                                            I2.200.0001
Canrtruct~on .............................        2,348,000            2,336,368           2,294,029         1,402,000            2,070,000

  1BrarXeted flgurei reflscf account totals follonng the rtructur, used n l s c a l year 2006-2008
                                                                                                            11.677.0001
                                                                                                                                                  .
                              PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND EXECUTION
   This Committee has repeatedly emphasized that sound infra-
structure investment is not iust a matter of monev., but also re-
                                                     "
quires continued improvemeits in project management and execu-
tion. The Committee recognizes and au~reciates    the Corus' efforts
in this area, but more canbe achieved.' *
   Fiue-year comprehensive budget planning.-The Committee has
not yet received the Corps' updated five-year plan, despite repeated
assurances that its delivery was imminent. This lack of responsive-
ness is disappointing. This Committee has used the Corps as an ex-
ample of an agency that has consistently improved with each sub-
mission of this critical planning tool. The Committee is left to con-
clude that, once again, the Administration is unwilling to provide
transparency in its own budgeting even as it exhorts the Congress
to do so.
   Emphasis on expenditures.-Recent changes to the Corps' budg-
eting and contracting policies have resulted in the carryover of sig-
nificant levels of funding from year to year. The Committee fully
expected obligated balances to increase. However, the Corps is di-
rected to minimize unohlieated carrvover to the extent ~racticable.
This direction should nor be viewed as an excuse toLreprogram
funds liberally between projects or activities, but rather an admoni-
tion to the Corps to estimate capabilities accurately and execute
projects within baseline scope and schedules.
   dontinuing contracts.-16 recent years, Congress has placed re-
strictions on the Corps' use of continuing contracts, a unique au-
thority which allows the Corps to obligate the federal government
in advance of appropriations. In response to concerns surrounding
the reforms made to the Corps' contracting, the fiscal year 2008 ap-
propriation included direction to the Corps and to GAO to provide
reports describing the overall effects, both positive and negative, of
this new policy in relation to the Corps' ability to execute the Civil
Works mission, including any recommendations for changes or im-
provements to this policy if necessary and appropriate.
   Neither the Corps nor GAO have completed the reauested re-
ports. Accordingly,-the Committee recommendation includes a pro-
vision that prohibits the use of funds to execute any new con-
tinuing contract, or modifications to an existing contra&, that com-
mits an amount for a project in excess of the amounts appropriated
for such project or otherwise available through carryover.
   While the Committee is willing in the future to revisit its posi-
tion on continuing contacts, the Corps must be mindful to only use
continuing contracts where justified. Once issued, these contracts
should be managed to existing and realistically expected future
year appropriations. Under no circumstance should the contractor
be allowed to dictate the pace of expenditures; the Corps as the
contracting agent holds this responsibility. The Committee restates
its direction that the Corps develop criteria and standards for the
use of continuing contracts as well as examine alternatives to this
contracting.
   Reprogrammings.-To ensure that the expenditure of funds in
fiscal year 2009 is consistent with congressional direction, to mini-
mize the movement of funds, and to improve overall budget execu-
tion, the bill incorporates by reference the projects identified in the
report accompanying this Act into statute.
   Emergency Operation and Maintenance Reprogrammings.-Fiscal
year 2008 brought significant flooding to the Midwest, resulting in
increased sedimentation that threatened to close the lower Mis-
sissippi River to deep draft navigation. The Corps initially in-
formed the Senate and House Committees on Appropriations that
there was no alternative to reprogramming funds from existing Op-
eration and Maintenance projects, despite the fact the Corps had
approximately $10,000,000 in unobligated emergency funds that
may be used to restore navigation projects to authorized depths
                                                     14
when the sediment accumulation is the result of natural disasters.
The situation required both Committees to intervene in the re-
programming so as not to adversely impact projects appropriated
through the regular appropriations process. Subsequent to the ini-
tial reprogramming, less than $10,000,000 in additional funding
was needed to maintain Mississippi River navigation. The Corps
Headquarters requested assistance from all field offices, yet they
were unable or unwilling to provide even minimal funding to assist.
This response is unacceptable when the Operation and Mainte-
nance account is $2,300,000,000. Accordingly, the Committee has                                            9
reduced the budget request for each Operation and Maintenance
project and funded an emergency line item, which will be used to
respond to unforeseen requirements in this account. The Corps
Headquarters will manage the fund, with any allocation subject to
the consultation and approval of the House and Senate Committees
on Appropriations.
  New Starts.-The Committee recommendation includes a limited
number of new start studies and construction oroiects. The Com-
mittee recommends no new start environme;ltii inti-ir,tructure
oroiccts: all nthw>t:~rts I~rn~trd the trn(Iiti(~n;~l
                         :ins        tu                lniiiions of the
~ O & S of Engineers.
   Projects.-Congress has made significant reforms in the way it
reviews funding for the Federal government; reforms which the
Committee takes very seriously as it executes its constitutional au-
thority. Earmarking or directed spending of Federal dollars does
not begin with Congress. It begins with the Executive Branch. For
examole. the Construction. Investieations and Mississiooi River
and 'I'ributaries accounts id the bndzet request are almoi<entirely
made of individual earmarked projects. The Administration, in se-
lecting these projects, goes through a process that is the functional
eauivalent of earmarking. When the Committee reviews the budget
request, it goes throughUaprocess of rigorous review and may alxer
or modify this list to reflect additional priorities. The Administra-
tion hasproposed the Operation and Miintenance account on a re-
gional basis to avoid the appearance of an earmarked account; how-
-
ever, the regional requests are simply aggregated individual
projects. The method used by the Administration simply obfuscates
the details of the budget request so that it is difficult to compare
the information to past requests and appropriations for the projects
owned and operated by the Corps of Engineers.
                                          INVESTIGATIONS
                           (INCLUDINGRESCISSION OF FUNDS)
                                                                                                           .
  ~~~      ~
                                                                                                .   .
Comparison:
   Appropriation, 2008 ...................................................................   24,361,000
   Budget estimate, 2009 ...............................................................     +51,900,000
                          ion
  This a ~ ~ r o ~ r i a tfunds studies to determine the need for, the
engineel./lig ind <>runumic                                           and
                              ti~asihilityof, .ind they en\ironrnrl~tal
social iuitabilit\, of ~olutiunsto ware,. and velared land resource
problems; funds preconstruction engineering and design; data col-
lection; interagency coordination; and research.
    The Committee recommends an appropriation of $142,900,000, a
decrease of $24,361,000 from the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and
an increase of $51,900,000 over the budget request. The Committee
                                                         .
recommendation includes a rescission of $1.900.000 auurouriated in
- -
  ~




Public Law 110-161.
                                            . .     A.




    The budget request for this account and the approved Committee
allowance are shown on the following table:
                                                                        CORPS OF ENGINEERS . INVESTIGATIONS
                                                                              (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                                     . REQUEST .....          HOUSE
                                                                                                                      INV.     PLNG    RECOllMENDEO




 ALASKA REGIONAL PORTS. AK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     ...
 ANCHORROE HARBOR OEEPENING. AK                                         ........................                     100
 BARROW COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AK . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               .                                                     .
 YAKUTAT HARBOR AK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                     400
                                                                                                                     700

                                                        ARIZONA

 L I T T L E COLORAW RIVER WATERSHED. A2                                         ...................                 ...
                       .
 PASCUA YAQUI A2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                   ...
                   .
 PIMA COUNTY U. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              275
                                       .
 R I O SALAD0 OESTE SALT RIVER. U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                            -~
 VA SHLY-AY AKIMEL SALT RIVER RESTORATION AZ . . . . . . . . . .                             .                       .-.
                                                        ARKANSAS

P I N E ROUNTAIN LAKE. AR                              ................................                              ...
WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO NEWPORT. AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                              ~   ~   ~




                                                       CALIFORNIA

 A L I S O CREEK RAINSTEn. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                        ...          390
ARRDYD SECD WLTERSHED . CA                                  ............................                                         ...          200
                    E                                                            .
 BALLOW~CREEK C O S Y S T E ~ R E S T O ~ T I O N CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                               ...
                                                                                                                                 ..
                                                                                                                                              500
 CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MASTER PLAN. CA                                                             . . . .                              BOO
                                   .
                                                                                                                                   ~




 C I T Y OF NORWALK CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 COYOTE 8 BERRYESSA CREEKS C                                .
                                               A .................
                                           .
 DESERT HOT SPRINGS CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 ESTUDtLLO CANAL. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

W
L
 GRAYSON AND MURDERER'S WALNUT CREEK B A S I N CA
 A
 ~
 I
IH            CITY. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                 .         . . .
 HUnBOLDT BAY LONG TERM S H M L nGnT CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   .                         .
 LAUNA CREEK WATERSHED CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTOWTION CA . . . . . . . . . . .                         .
 LOS ANGELES RIVER UATERCOURSE HEALWORKS . CA . . . .               .
 LONER MISSION CREEK. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                       .
 MIDDLE CREEK CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                       .
 PAJARO RIVER CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .               .                .
 RAYMOND B A S I N S I X CHINO B SAN CABRIEL BASINS C A . , ,                                              .
                                                   .
                        SAMP CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                     COMP CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   ND LEVEES CA                                      .    ........
                        LINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   .
 SAN FANCISQUITO CREEK CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 S I N JUAN CREEK. SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY CA                                        . ...............
 SAN JOAQUIN RIVER B A S I N . WEST STANISLAUS ORESTInBA CR                         .
                                                        .
 SAN JOAOUIN RIVER B A S I N LOVER SAN JAOQUIN R I V E R U                                 . ..
 SANTA ANA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SANTA CLARA RIVER WATERSHED. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                         .
                                                                .
 SOLANA.ENCTNITAS SHORELINE CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SHORELINE. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                               .
                      SHED CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
                 M CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


                                                        COLORADO

 CHATFIELO      . CHERRY AND BEAR CREEK . RESERVOIRS.                                                     CO   ........
                                                   CONNECTICUT

CONNECTICUT RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION                                                  .   CT.IIA. NH 8 VT         ...
                                                    CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTlGATlONS
                                                          (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                    -    REQUEST - - - - -         HOUSE
                                                                                                        INV.     PLNG.       RECOMMENDED
...............................
                                        DELAWARE

DELAWARE RIVER COMPREHENSIVE. NY,NJ.PA & OE . . . . . . . . . . .                                       ...          ~..
MID ATLANTIC RIVER BASIN COUUISSIONS, DE,DC,NY.IID,PA.V                                                 ---          ...
    DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               ...          ...
    POTOUAC RIVER COHnISSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        ...          ...
    SUSPUEHANNA RIVER COMMISSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            ...          ...

                                        FLORIDA

BISCAYNE BAY,
EGMONT KEY. F L
FLAGER COUNTY,

M I L E POINT, F L
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ST JOHNS COUNTY. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ST. L U C I t COUNTY INLET. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                        GEORGIA

AUGUSTA. GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LONG ISLAND. HARSH AN0 JOHNS CREEKS. GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION. GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N B E E ISLAND. GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                            GUAM

HAGATNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, GUAM

                                          HAWAII

ALA WAI CANAL. OAHU. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        300          ...
MAALAEA HARBOR. MAUI. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     ...          200
WALILUPE STREAM. OAHU. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    ...          ...
                                        ILLINOIS

DES PLAINES RIVER, fL (PHASE 1 1 )                       ......................
GRAYVILLE DAM. I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I L L I N O I S RIVER BASIN RESTORATION. I L .              ..............
K E I T H CREEK, ROCKFORD. 1 L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
P R A I R I E DUPONT LEVEE. I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S. FORK, SOUTH BRANCH. CHICAGO RIVER. (BUBBLY CREEK)
UPPER U I S S - I L L I N O I S W SYSTEM. IL.IA.flN.MO J W1                        . . . .
                                         INDIANh

CENTRAL WABASH RIVER. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   ...          ...
INDIANA HARSOR. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 300          ...

                                            IOUA

CEDAR RIVER T I M E CHECK AREA. I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         ...          ...
                                          KANSAS

TOPEKA. KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         .
                                                                                                        ..           100

                                         KENTUCKY

C I T Y OF PAOUCI\H. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   ...          ~..
GREENUP LOCK AND EXTENSION. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                ~ . .        ~.
NORTH KENTUCKY RIVERFRONT COMMONS. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     ...          ...
                                                                  CORPS OF ENGINEERS . INVESTIGATIONS
                                                                        (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANOS)

                                                                                                          ..... REQUEST .....          HOUSE
                                                                                                               INV.     PLNG .   RECOMMENDED
              ..................................................................................


                                      .
BIYOU SORREL LOCK U. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .
CALCASlEU LOCK L A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CALCASIEU RIVER B A S I N LA              .               .............................
                  .
CROSS U K E L A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                         .
L O U I S l A N A C M S T N AREA ECOSYSTEM REST L A (SCIENCE PRO
L O U I S I A N A COASTU, AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION L A
ST . CHARLES PARISH URBAN F L W D CONTROL U . . . . . . . . . . .            .           .   ......
SOUTWEST COASTAL L W I S I A N A HURRICANE PROTECTION LA . .                                 .
SEARSPORT HARBOR. ME

                                              MARYLAND

ANACDSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES CO~P  PLAN. MD . . . . . . . . .
BALTIHORE METRO UATER RESOURCES . PATAPSCO URBAN RIVER
EASTERN SHORE. MID-CHESAPEAKE BAY ISLAND HD                                      .       ..........
LOWER POTOHAC ESTUARY WATERSHED S T . MARY'S. MD . . . . . . .
MIDDLE POTOMC COMP PLM MD,VA.PA.W.DC                  .                          ..............
MIDDLE POTOMAC WATERSHED GREAT SENECA CREEK AND MUDDY .
                                          MASSACHUSETTS

BLACKSTONE RIVER WATERSHED RESTORITION MA li R I
                                                                   .
BOSTON HARBOR (45-FOOT CHANNEL) MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                             .               .......
                . .
P I L G R I M LAKE TRURO li PROVINCETOWN. MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SALISBURY P L A I N RIVER BROCKTON. HA        .                         ..................
                                              MICHIGAN

                          .           .....................................
CLINTON RIVER M I

GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS ( R A P ) . M I
                                                  . . .
GREAT LAKES NAV SYST STUDY. M I I L I N MN NY. OH. PA
                                                              ...........
                                                                                     .
     NIAGARA R I V E R AREA OF CONCERN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                    .....................
                              .
     HAUMEE R l V E R AREA OF CONCERN
S T C L A I R RIVER M I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                              MINNESOTA

MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED. MN                                .........................
TWIN VALLEY. WILD R I C E . MN                            ............................
                                  .
Y I L O R I C E RIVER RED RIVER OF THE NORTH BASIN. ON . . . . .

                                              MISSOURI

                      .
KANSAS C I T Y S MO li KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MISSOURI RIVER OEGRAOATION 0 0                            .       ........................
MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM U N I T S L 4 5                   .R180.471
RIVER OES PERES. MD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                H0            .   .
                                                                                                      .
SPRINGFIELD.     no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                  .
S W P E PARK. KANSAS C I T Y MO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                              MONTANA

YELLOWSTONE RIVER CORRIDOR. MT.                                    .................
                                          NEW HAMPSHIRE

                                                                   .
UERRIMACK R I V E R WATERSHED STUDY NH & MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PORTSHOUTn HARBOR AN0 PISCATAQUA RIVER HN            ME . . . .           .
                                                             CORPS OF ENGINEERS . INVESTIGATIONS
                                                                   [AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                             . REQUEST .....          HOUSE
                                                                                                              INV.     PLNG .   RECDMMENDEO


                                     NEW JERSEY

DELAWARE RIVER CDUPREHENSIVE. N J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                             .
HUDSON . RARITAN ESTUARY HACKEHSACK MEADOWLANOS N J                                               .
                                             .
HUDSON . RARITAN ESTUARY LOWER PASSAIC RIVER. N J . . . . .
LDUER SAOOLE RIVER. BERGEN COUNTY. NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PECKMAN RIVER B A S I N . NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY HIGHLANDS. N J . . . . . . . .
RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY KEYPORT N J . . . . . . . . .
                                                             ..                   .
SHREWSBURY RIVER AND T R I B W A R I E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                   .                                              .
SOUTH R I V E R RARITAN RIVER B A S I N NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                      NEW YORK

                             .
BRONX RIVER B A S I N NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BUFFALO RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       .
                                                     .
OUTCHESS COUNTY WATERSHEDS NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                     .
ESOPUS . RDNDOUT WATERSHEO NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GDNANUS CANAL. HUOSON-RARITAN ESTUARY. NY . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HUDSON . RARITAN ESTUARY. NY & N J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                   .
J A R A I M BAY NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                         .
NIAGARA R I M R WATERSHED NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NORTH SHORE OF LONG ISLAND ASHARDKEN NY .

OhOllOAGI .ALL     hI
                                         . .                                .
NORTH SHORE LONG ISLAND B A Y V I L L E . NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                              .     .      .

81.1 n! I RIVER * a r e a s d i o h~
1 6 h MI.C   RIVER YATERSHED OLIC~ESS C r r hv 6 1 1 1 . ~ 1 ~                             .
UPPFR DFLA-ARE R I V F R WAlERShCD h l

                                             NEVADA

TRUCKEE MEADOWS. NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                  NORTH CAROLINA

CURRITUCK SOUND. NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             .
NEUSE R I V E R B A S I N NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                      .
SURF C I T Y AN0 NORTH TOPSAIL BEACH NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                 onlo
HOCKING RIVER B A S I N . MONDAY CREEK                                . OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                       OKLAHDM

SOUTHEAST OKLAHOllA WATER RESOURCE STUDY                                          . OK . . . . . . . . . .
                                             OREGON

WlLLAtlETTE RIVER FLOODPLAIN RESTORATION                                          . OR . . . . . . . . . .
                                   PENNSYLVANIA

                                                 .
DEL4WARE RIVER WATERFRONT PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                         .
UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION STUDY PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                  SOUTH CAROLINA

EOISTO ISLAND          . SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                    SOUTH DAKOTA

WATERTOWN AN0 V I C I N I T Y        .       SO .        .......................
                                                  CORPS OF ENGINEERS              -   INVESTISATIONS
                                                             IAMOUKTI IN THOUSANDS)
                                                                                             .....    REOUEST .....       HOUSE
                                                                                                     IN".     PLNG. RECOUnEUOED
.......................................................................................
                                      TEWHLSSE

L I T T L E RIVER. T N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           ~ . .    .~~         100
M I L L CREEK MITERSHED, DI\VIOSON COUNTY. TN . . . . . . . . .                                      100      ...         100



ABILEIIE. T
BRAZOS I S L
BUFFALO 8 1                             . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BUFFILO BAYOU RHD T R I
CORPUS CHRIST1 SHIP C
FREEPORT HARBOR, T
GI*.    HIGH ISLAND TO B M Z O S RIVER REALIGNnENTS. TX                               ...
G i W . HIGH TSLRND TO BRAZOS R I V E X . TX . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GIW. PORT OCONHOe TO CORPUS C H R I S T I 8 R Y . TX. . . . . . . . .
GUADALUPE AH0 SAN ANTONIO RIVER BASINS. T X . . .                              .        .
L W E R COLOWDO RIVER BASIN, i X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L O W R COLOMDO RIVER BASIN. UHIRTONIONION. T X . . . . . . . . .
NUECEE RIVER AN0 TRIBUTARIES, TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R(\YMOIIOVILLE ORhIY. T X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
R I O GRAUDE BASIN. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S(\BIYE.UECHES WATERWAY. T X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SPARKS ARROYO COLONIA. E L P1SO C O U U Y . T X . . . . . . . . . . .
UPPER T R I N I T Y RIVER BASIN. T X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



ELIZABETH RIVER. HAMPTON ROADS. V4
FOUR U I L E RUN. YA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JOHN H XFRR DAM AND RESERVOIR. VA & NC (SECTION Z l l ) . .
LYNNHAVEN RIVER BASIN, YA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MIDDLE POTOtlllC R I V L R . CAMERON RVNlHOLbES RUN. VA. . . . .
P H I L P O T L A I F . Vh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Y l C I N l T l &NO WILLOUGHBY S P I T , V A . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                    WASHINGTON

CENTR4LIA. WA
CHLHALIS R I V E

LOWER COLUUSlA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION. WA 8 OR.. .
PUGET SOUND NEIRSHORE MARINE H A B I T I T RESTORATION. VA
PUYALLUP RIVER. MA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SIAGIT RIVER, WL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SXOIOIIISII RIVER B A S l n . U1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                   VEST V I R G I N I A

UPPER GUYANWTTE.


                                      WlSCONSIN

ST. CROIX RIVER BASIN. IIN ii XI.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 1 . CROlX RlVER RELOCATION OF ENOANGEREO UUSSELS, UN 6

          SllOlOTlL FOR PROJECTS..               ..................
                                NATIONAL PROGRAnS
                                                         CORPS OF ENGINEERS . INVESTIGATIONS
                                                               (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                        . REQUEST .....        HOUSE
                                                                                                         I w.     PLNG . RECOMHENDED


ENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FEMAIHAP M O COORDINATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                O
FLOOD DAMAGE OATR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                          .
     Leoninster M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                   .
     S i d n e y c o n p r a h a n r i u e f l o o d rellucflon s t u d y NY . . . .
                              .
     Buchs County PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                              .
     Be118 View and New A l e x a n d r i a VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .                       .
     s p r i n g v a l l e y K r o u t r Creek w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HYDROLOGIC STUOIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDEPENDEKT PEER REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NATIONAL SHORELINE STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OTHER COORDINATION PROGRAMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
     ~ o l o k a iWater Resources H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                    I
     S t a t e o f Hawaii and P a c i f i c T e r r i t o r i e s , H I . . . . . . .
                      .
     Humboldt I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     S t a f f o r d County, I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                      .
     E a s t B a t o n Rouge LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     B a r d s t o w , KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
     L i n e C r w k WmterPned. 6 0                  ..........................
     A s h e u i l l e . NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                      .
     G a l l a t i n 1 %. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                     .
     Oklahoma comp water p l a n OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                          .
     ~ a r r i s iverfront w.............................
                   R
     Bad R I v e r Band o f t h e Lake S u p e r i o r Chippewa H I . .                .
                                                     .
     Cedar Lake U a t o i Q u a l i t y U I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PRECIPITATION STUDIES (NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE) . . . .
 REMOTE SENSING I GEOGRAPHIC INFORHATION SYSTEM SUPPORT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS . . . . . . . . . .
STREAH GAGING 1 U . S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 .      ~~




TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WATER RESOURCES PRIORITIES STUOY                               ...............
           SUBTOTAL, NATIONAL PROGRAW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


           TOTAL
  Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration, California.-Funding is
included to continue the existing study. This funding shall not be
applied to the new authorization for the Los Angeles River which
the Committee considers a new start.
                                        CONSTRUCTION


Corn arisan:
    $propriation, 2008 ...................................................................   - 224,029,000   d
    Budget estimate, 2009 ..............................................................     +668,000,000
 'Exclude8 emergency supplemental appmptiat~unsrequest of $6.7fi1,000.000.

  This appropriation funds construction, major rehabilitation, and
related activities for water resource projects whose principal pur-
pose is to provide commercial navigation, flood and storm damage
reduction, or aquatic ecosystem restoration benefits to the nation.
Portions of this account are funded from the Harbor Maintenance
Trust and the Inland Waterways Trust funds.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,070,000,000,
$224,029,000 below the fiscal year 2008 enacted appropriation and
$668,000,000 over the budget request. The Committee rec-
ommendation does not include the proposal to move funding in the
amount of $275,000,000 for four categories of projects from the
Construction account to the Operation and Maintenance account.
  The budget request for this account and the approved Committee
allowance are shown on the following table:
                                                           CORPS OF ENGINEERS . CONSTRUCTION
                                                                 (AWUNTS I N THOUSANOSI

                                                                                                             BUDGET               HOUSE
                                                                                                            REOUEST         RECOMOENOEO
                                                                                                            .....................
                                                           ALABAMA


                                                                ..
MOBILE HRRBOR TURNING BASIN & . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     ...            15.300
                           .
PINHOOK CREEK HUNTSVILLE AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     ...               500



SITKA HARBOR BREAKWATER UPGRADE                                           .       AK .   .............          ...              1 . OD0



                       .
NOGALES WASH AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                       .
1110 OE FLAG FLAGSTAFF RZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                2.000
                                                                                                                                    100
               .
TRES RIOS A2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   .
TUSCON DRAINAGE AREA A2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                               10. 0 0 0
                                                                                                                                5 . 000

                                                           ARKANSAS

                                               .
FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN L I T T L E ROCK AR . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 .                             ~   ~   ~        2.300
                                                       .
MKARNS 4 2 - F T CHANNEL AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                   ...                  100
OLARI    JETA TAYLOR POWERHOUSE AR (MAJOR REHAB) .                        .                                  17.300             17.300

                                                                . .
RE0 RIVER BELOW OENISON DAN LA.AR d TX . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                ...              2 . 000
WHITE RIVER NIN
              U
              M
              IM       FLOW AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                ...              5.000

                                                           CALIFORNIA

AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (COMMON FEATURES1
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM MOOlFICATIONSl. C
                                                                  U.......                      .
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED [FOLSOM OAM R A I S E ] CA . . . . . . .                               .
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (NEW BRIDGE B E L M FOLSOM D M 1
                                                                          .
CALFEO LEVEE S T A B I L I T Y PRffiRAn W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                           .
C I T Y OF INGLEWOOO CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                       .
C I M OF SANTA CLARITA CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CORTE MADERA CREEK CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




                       .
KAWEAH RIVER CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             .
LOWER WALNUT CREEK, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                       .
 ID VALLEY AREA LEVEE CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               .
"URRIETA CREEK CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                   .
NAP* RIVER CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OAKLAND HARBOR (50-FOOT PROJECT). CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PETALUMA RIVER. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PLACER COUNTY. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        102 &NGELES M R B O R nAlN CHANNEL OEEPENING. CA . . .
  ..............
PO-
P I E R 3 6 REMOVAL CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SACRAMENTO OEEPWATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION PROJECT. CA .                                     .        .
                                       .
SACRAIIENTO RIVER GLEWN-COLUSA IRRIGATION CA . . .
                                                                      .
SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                            .
                                           .
 SAN LORENZO RIVER CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       SEVEN OAKS WATER QUALITY STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SANTA MARIA RIVER LEVEES. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SANIA PAUL& CREEK. CA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
 SOUTH PERRIS CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOUTH SACRAMENTO COUNTY STREAMS. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                       .                                    .
SUCCESS DAM TULE RIVER C.4 (DAM SAFETY) . . . . . . . . . . .
 SURFSIOE . SUNSET NEWPORT BEACH CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     .
UPPER NEWPORT BRY. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   .
WEST SACRAnENTO CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YUBA R I V E R BASIN. C R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                            DELAWARE

DELAWARE BAY CO-TLINE                                      . ROOSEVELT INLET               TO LEWES BEACH
                                                      CORPS OF ENGINEERS . CONSTRUCTION
                                                            (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                                            BUDGET            HOUSE
                                                                                                                           REQUEST      RECOMMENDED


                                                      FLORIDA

BREVARD COUNTY. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            .
BRWARD COUNTY F L (SEGIIENT I ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                           ..
6ROVARD COUHTY F L (SEGMENT 1 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
C E D M HAMMOCK NARES CREEK F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS F L . . . . . .                                         .
                                          .
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE F L (SEEPAGE CONTROL) . . . . . . . .
                                         .
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LAKE WORTH SAND TRANSFER P L A M F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LEE. COUNTV . FL
                                                                    .
.. .....
n I A M l HRRBOR, F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   .
PINELLAS COUNTY F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                          .
POWCE DE LEON INLET F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PORT EVERGLADES. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOUTH FLDRIOA EVERGLAOES ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION F L . . .                                                    .
                                                                            .
       C e n t r a l a n d S o u t h e r n F l o r i d a FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       l n d i a n R i v e r agoo on S o u t h . F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                          ..
       Evergladel and S F l o n d a E c o s ~ r t e m estoration . . .
                                                                   R
       K i r r i n n a s R l u r r FL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                .
       M o d i f i e d Water D e l l v e r i e r F L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               .
ST LUClE INLET F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TAMPA HARBOR. F L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                      GEORGIA

ATLANTA
RICHARD
                 l . GA .
            . BERUSSELL. .DAM .AND . LAKE.. .GA. a . sc. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
                           .. .. ... . . .                                                                                      ...
                                                                                                                             1.650
                                                                                                                                             2.000
                                                                                                                                             1.150
SARANNAH HARBOR                    .   GA .   ...........................                                                       ...            700

                                                        IDAHO

RURAL IDAHO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                       ...          5.000

                                                      ILLINOIS

ALTON TO GALE LEVEE D I S T R I C . I L a M O                                               ..................                  ...              300
                                              .
CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL M I S S I S S I P P I RIVER. I L (DEF CORR)
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP C A N ~ LDISPERSAL BARRIER. L .    I
                                                                                                                             2. 500
                                                                                                                             5. 750
                                                                                                                                             2.500
                                                                                                                                             5.750
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL SECOND BARRIER I L . . .                .                                       .                500
                                                                                                                             1 . 000
                                                                                                                                                 500
                                                                                                                                             1 . DO0
CHICAGO SHDRELI
COOK COUNTY I      .                                                                                                            ...
                                                                                                                            5.620
                                                                                                                                                 250
                                                                                                                                             5.620
                           .
EAST ST LOUIS I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                       200                200
I L L I N O I S WATEWAY. LOCKPORT LOCK AND ORM 1 L IREPLACEM                                        .                      28.600           26. 600
LOCK AN0 DAM 2 7 . M I S S l S S l P P l RIVER I L (MAJOR REHAB) .                  .                                           ...
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                             2 . 596
MADISON AND ST . CLAIR COUNTIES. I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                           500
MCCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS. 1L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                         34.000           30.000
OLMSTED LOCKS AND oan. OHIO RIVER                                               .
                                                  IL a K Y . . . . . . . . . . . .                                        1 1 1 . OOD      114.000
UPPER M I S S I S S I P P I RIVER RESTOPATION I L I A MN M &
WOOD RIVER LEVEE. I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                             O          .               . .                20.000
                                                                                                                                  884
                                                                                                                                            20.000
                                                                                                                                             1.984

                                                      INDIANA

                               .
CALUMET REGION I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDIANA HARBOR CONFIND DISPOSAL F A C I L I T Y I N \ 1 . . . . . . .                               .
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                             4.000
                                                                                                                                             8.400

                       .                                .
INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDIANAPOLIS WHITE RIVER (NORTH) I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            .
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                             1.800
                                                                                                                                             5 .SOD
LAKE IIICHIGAN WATERFRONT. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                              ...          2.000
L I T T L E CALUMET RIVER. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                  8 . 000         14 D O 0
                                                  .
n~ ZION #ILL POND DAM FULTON COUNTY IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          .                                   ...             250
                                                            .
OHIO RIVER GREENWAY ACCESS I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                      ...          2. 100

                                                         W
                                                        I A

DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT I A
LOCK AND DAM i 1 . MISSISSIPPI  RIVER  IA (MAJOR REHAB) . .                         .                   .       .......         ...
                                                                                                                                ...
                                                                                                                                              4.000
                                                                                                                                              2.750
MISSOURI RIVER F I S H MITIGATION. 1A.KS.MD.MT.NE 1 1 . . . . .                                                                 ...         6 0 . OD0
                                               CORPS OF ENGINEERS . CONSTRUCTION
                                                     (RUOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                                   BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                                  REQUEST   RECOMnENOEO
                                                                                                                            ............

                                                   KANSAS

TURKEY CREEK BASIN
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE                .
                                     . KS i D AnoSAFETY] .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
                                        KS 8
                                               n
                                                 .....                                                                          10.000
                                                                                                                                23.800

                                               KENTUCKY

                                          .                                     .
                                              ..
KENTUCKY LOCK AND ORB TENNESSEE R I M R KY . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                           .
OARKLAND LOCKS AND DAn K Y . l L ( M J O R REHAB) \l. . . . . . .
WCALPINE LOCKS AND OAU OHIO RIVER KY 8 I N . . . . . . . . . .           .
SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                .
WOLF CREEK KY (SEEPAGE CONTROL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                               LOUISIANA

CO~ITE RIVER DIVERSION  CANAL. LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 BENNETf JOHNSTON UI\TERWAY. L A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                               MRYLANO

ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES HO 6 OC . . . . . . . . . . . .    .
                                 .
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND no i> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             ..
                                                       .
BALTInORE METRO RESOURCES GWYNNS FALLS. nD . . . . . . . . . . .
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY. 0 0 6 VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POPLAR ISLAND. HD \ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                     .
S n l T H ISLAND SOMERSET COUNTY. no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                      MASSASSACHUSETTS




ECORSE CREEK. n I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                         .
GENESEE COUNTY n~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GREAT LAKES FISHERY AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION M I . . . . .
                     .                                 .
HAMILTON OAR F L I N T RIVER F L I N T nlCMIGAN. Ill . . . . . . .
                                                                                             .
WEGAUNEE. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             .
SAULT STE IIARIE M I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                   UINHESOTA

BRECKENRIDGE. MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRWKSTON. n N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                 .
n l L L E LACS nN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                              .
NORTHEASTERN IIINNESOTA UN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                     .
ROSEAU RIVER ROSEAU. HN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                   nlS5OURI

601s BRULE DRAINAGE 8 LEVEE DISTRIC.                       no . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             . .                              . .
BLUE R I E R BASIN KANSAS C I T Y UO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RIIIF R I V E R CWIINEL KANSAS C I T Y no.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                 AU. 110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
            FIELD        no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               IEEPAGE CONTROL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               110 AND no RIVERS ( n E c M R K S ~ . no
              . . PROTECTlOM. no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
               ..
                         .
            NEVIEVE 110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                   MONTANA

FORT PECK CABIN              CONVEYANCE                    . nr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   NEBRASKA

                                                   .
ANTELOPE CREEK. LINCOLN NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                 .
SIINO CREEK SAUNOERS COUNTY. NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                           CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION
                                                 (AMOUHTS I N THOUSANOS)

                                                                                                          BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                         REPUEST RECOlltlENOEO
                                       ...........                                                       .....................

                                        NEW JERSEY




                                        NEW MEXICO




                                          NEW YORK

ATLANTIC COIST OF NYC. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON W I N T ,
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET L JANAICA BAY.NY
FIRE ISAND INLET TO JONES INLET. N I \ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUX POINT. NY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW YORI AND NEW JERSEY IWRBOR. W k NJ.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                  Y
OIONOAC.4 LkKE. N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ORCHARD BEACH. BRONX. NY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                     NORTH CAROLINA




                                      NORTH OAKOTL

GARRISON DAM AN0 POWER PLANT. NO (REPLACEMENT)                                          ..    ,.
GRAND FORKS 10 . EAST GRAND FORKS. IIN . . . .
              1                                                                           . . .


HOLES CREEK. VEST CARROLLTON. OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
METROPOLITAN REGION OF CINCINNhTI. DUCK CREEK. OH..                                                ..
OHIO RIVERFRONT. CINCINNLTI. OH... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O
HI   E,
      I       OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    A U S t l n b u r y Townrhip, OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    Brunr*lck, OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    Campbell B r a n f l s l d .
    Clfy O f nillsboro. 0

      CulpoppB'.           OH..      ...............................


      Falrvlew cannons.. o z.v t m.. OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Frenonf. OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       Llftls 3qu.I               c r e e * . OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       n s r l b o r o . OH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       I I a r y l l v i l l e , OH., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       ncllac*in il0.d. I l 8 d l l o " . OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       Richmond Dale. OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        ROY^^ ( 1 . p r i m e . on. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       S p r l n g f i e i d HosDital. OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      S t e e t r b o r o . Portage County. OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      s u m n i t ~ m d C l r y o f ~ a r b e r i o n . OH . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .
      l o l s d o . OH.. . . . . . . . . . .                        ..............
      u p p e r Hocking. OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      VIllsge o f S t . U a r t l n . OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Uillolcrelf. OH..                       . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION
                                             (AnOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                 BUDGET          HOUSE
                                                                                                REPUEST   RECOMllENOEO


      Youngefom, uick ~ i s t r i c t .OH..                   .................
                                       OKLAHOMA

CANTON LAKE. OK (DAM SAFETY).                     .......................
                                         OREGON

COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEIIENTS. OR i U A . . . . . . .
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES. OR 8 M A . . .
ELK CREEK M E , OR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w 1 L L A n E n f TEIIPER~TURE CONTROL. OR \ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                    PENNSYLVANIA

A S P I W A L L BOROUGH. PA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EnSVORTH L 6 0 . OHIO RIVER. PA (STATIC I N S T A B I L I T Y CORRE
GRAYS LANDING LOCK AN0 D M , )IONONWHEU RIVER. P A . . . . .
LACKAHANNA RIVER. SCWNTON. P A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LOCKS AND DAMS 2 . 3 AN0 4 . MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA . . . . . .
NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA. P A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
POINT RARION, LOCK AND DAM 8 . MONONGAHELA RIVER. PA 6
PRESQUE I S L E , P A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SAW ILL RUN. PITTSPURGH. P A . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SOUTH CENTRAL PA ENVIRONWENTAL 11IPROVEIIENT. PA . . . . . . .
SOUTHEASTERN PEMSYLYANIA ENVIRONIIENTAL INFR4ITRUCTURE
       TACONY CREEK. PA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       COBBS CREEK HABITAT. PA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                   PUERTO RICO

PORTUGUES AN0 BUCANA RIVERS, P R .                        ..................
R10 PUERTO NUEVO, PR. . . . . . . . .                   ..............
                                  SOUTH CAROLINA

FOLLY BEACH. SC \ 1 . . . . . . . . . .                ..................
LAKES MARION AN0 IIOULTRI. SC.. . .                    .................
                                       TENNESSEE

CENTER H I L L DAM. TN (SEEPAGE CONTROL). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHlCKAHliUW LOCK. TENNESSEE QIVER. T N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CUMBERLANO COUNTY. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                          TEXAS




                                      VIRGINIA

.oh& I .IN* "an aro a6rravola ,A r rr                              REP    rrcsrai
h0QlO.r r(ARBOH ah0 CnlWLE.S OtEPLhlrC                               *L
RIcl*nJhO ( 5 0        rl\
HOII\ISL     *I.eil      PYCR 8191'.         nEAOLIIIkY> &.@)A             ,A
                                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION
                                             (MOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                    BUDGET       HOUSE
                                                                                                   REPUEST RECOMMENOED
................................................................................
HOWARD HANSEN O M W \I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                      A    .                                                                           ...         15.000
LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORAlION, OR S WA.. ,                                             1,500           1,500
LOUER MONUMENT LOCK S OAW. VA i l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                ...         3,123
LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AN0 U l L O L l F E COUP. W A O R . I D 11                                      ...         1.500
PIT ST HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL. W A . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     1 ,d l 0       1,410
MUD MOUNTAIN 01\11, VA ( F I S H PASSAGE1 . . . . . . . . . . .                                     1,000          1 ,000
PUGET SOUND &NO ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION. W A . . . . .                                             ...            300

                                     K S T VIRGINIA

BLUESTONE LAKE. YV (OAtl                                                                           12,000          12.000
CEMRAL WEST VIRGINIA.                                                                                  ...          3.000
GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN.                                                                                ...          1.500
LEYISA AN0 TUG FORKS N O U
    Kentucky.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   ...          7.000
    virgins.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              ...          2.000
MARMET LOCK. K M U H A RIVER. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                           V                                                        9.000           9.000
ROBERT c B D
          R
          I    LOCKS ANO DAM, O             HI       RIVER, w s OH.. . . .                          1,000           1.000
SOUTHERH WEST V I R G I N I A .                                                                        ~   ~   ~    1,500
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE.                                                                                900            900
WEST VIROINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL, PA & UV.                                                 ...          2,000

                                       WISCONSIN

NORTHERN WISCONSIN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE. W I .                                   . . .
ST. CROIX FALLS, WI.  . . . . . . . . . .      .                                    . . .
          SUBTOTRL FOR PROJECTS.                  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                 NATIONAL PROGRAMS

ABANOOWEO MINE RESTORATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           ...            455
    Ilt. O l a b l o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       ...           11001
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . .                                  I . BOO            ...
AOUkTIC PLRNT CONTROL PROGRM.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        3.500           I , 500
CONTINUING RUTHORITlES PROGRAn
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 2061
         C h a t t a h o o c h s e F a l l L i n s E s o r y r f e n . AL. . . . . . . . .
         B r o w n r v , l l e B r a n c h AR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         S t . Helens            .  Nape R l v e r P r o j s c t C A . , . . . . . .
         U p p ~ r ~ r h r e e k Dan Removal. C A . . . . . . . .
                      Y         C
         Goose C r e e k . CO.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         T B R a l i B k E r s d l c a t i o n . CO . . . .                         . . . .
         M i l l R l v e r Rsrtoiet~on. S t a m f o r d . CT . . . . . .
         Rose Bsy. Volvisla c a . FL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         J1CklOn Cre8k. W.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         Enlquan Prererva. I L. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         Eugene F i e l d . I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         ~ o f n a n no a o . I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         OrltndPar*. IL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   .
         Pins T o n , Il . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         s t & Lake, r a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         Ysntura narrh Habltar, C l e a r L a k e . I A . . . . . . . .
         A r k a n s a s R i v e r F,sh HaDitat. I S . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         l a l d e n R i v e r E c a n y r t s n R e r t o r s t , O n , MA . . . . . . . .
         M i l t o r d Pond R e s t o r a t i o n , M i l l a r d , MA. . . . . . . .
         n i l 1 pond ~ e r f o r s t i o n . L i t t i a t o n , n~...... . . .            .
         Franklin P o i n t , HD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         North Beach, n o .                  ....................
         Noithwesf B r a n c h . I.nacari,a R i v e r . no. . . . . . .
         Rancoca, E r e & F i s h ParraQe. "J . . . . . .
         S a u n d v l e r P a r k , B r o n x . NY.               . . . . . . . . . .
         A s h a v > l l e , Buncomb. C o u n t y , NC . . . . . . . . . .
          Concord S t r e a m s Rarfoiafion. NC . . . . . . .
          Yesfern C a r y S t r e a n Rsrfarat~on. C s r y , N C . . . .
         U ~ l o o nBop Restoration. NC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Drayton DO..               NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          C n r l r f i n s i H i C k r a n ~ e n r .NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Ongoad Pond. M i l f o r d . WH.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         Arrowhead C r e e k . OR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Eugene DBlfs Ponds. OR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION
                                      (AIIOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                             BUDGET             noust
                                                                                            REWEST         RECOMNENOED


      S p r i n g f i e l d N l l l r s c e . OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      C a n o n ~ b u r gLshs Ec(l3ysten R e s t o r e t i o n , Pa. . .
      Dents Runs. PA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Sreet Arrow Lake. P a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      P a c o t s l i g o R i v e r d Srsnp R e s t o r a t i o n . SC . . . . .
      J a n e r b a u r ~ hWatershed. TN.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      P i s t o l Creek, M a r Y V I I l e . TN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      s p r r n g ~ a k a . an n a r c o r , T X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              s
      "eriden. W P . T X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Sf~phenville, W P . TX.. ......................
      c a r p e n t e r Creek. "A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED IIITERIAL (SECTION 204,                                             ~   ~   ~        4.000
    1x1s Aur Herbas. AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   B I a ~ L h a w kB O t t O m l . I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   C a l c Ru. Ni 5 - 1 1 KE. LA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   N J l W B e n a f i c l a l Use, NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   u ~ n c h e s enarrn c r e a t i o n . NC . . . . . . . . .
   naunee Bay R e s t o r a t i o n . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                              H
   Uyon Road COF. O H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   R e I T O r s t l O n of C s f I s l a n d s H I . . . . . . . . . . .

EMERGENCY STREANBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ISEC                                           2.301             10,000

FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION                        205)..............



      White Slough. C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       itt tie n i l ? Creek. New C a s t l e County. DE . . . . . .
      Turkey Cvaak, Ben H i 1 1 County. GA . . . . . . . . . . .

      w a i l e l e Sfrs
      neredosia. I

      WinnePB20 River, naron c i t y . I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Crosrcrask. R o r r v i l e , XS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      Cancord,a. KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      H o p k i n r v i l l e Ory-Dan. KY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      T o m o f C a r e n c r a . L s f s y e t t e P a r i s h . LA . . . . . . . .




       Blacksnake Creek. S f Joseph, U 0 . . . . . . . . . . . .
       FertuP C r y s t a l C l f Y , 110.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       L i t t l e R i v e r Diversion, O u t c h t o m . N . . . . . . . . .
                                                                     O
       P l a f f a R i v e r . Frenonl, NE . . . . . . . . . . . .
       P l n t f e R i v e r . S c h u y l e r . NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       ~ r s u n p i n k reak. v a n l i t o n ~ o w n r h ~ p ,
                         c                                           Mercer Cou
       Jackson Brook. NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       P o p l a r Brook. Deal and Ocean T o r n r h r ~ .NJ . . . .
       Upper Paifsic R i v e r and T r i b u f a n e r , Long H l l l
       Limestone Creek. F a y e f l e v l l l e , NY. . . . . . .
       S f s e l Creek. N I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       Wahpefon. N O . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       R l o DEssaisbrBdo. PR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       R l o Euamanl-Guayo. PR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       Cvyahoga R i v e r . OH...                . . . . . . . . . . . .
       buck Creek F l o o d Warnine System. O . . . . . . . .    H
       Findis". . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                  ~ .H
       O t r e r a . OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       n e a r e r c r e e k s r r i b s , s n a t o i , TN. . . . . . . . . . . .
       Beaver Creel B n o t o l TN, and B r l J t o l . V A . . ,
       Farmers Branch. Tarrant c o u n t y . TX . . . . . . .
       Pecan Creak. G e i n e i v l l l e . TK..               .............
       E s t a t e La Grange. " I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       W S t a t e w i d e F l o o d Warmng Syrifcn. W . . . . . . .
                                                             30
                                   CORPS O TNGINEERS
                                          F                        .
                                                        CONSTRUCTION
                                         (MOUNTS I N THOUSANDS!

                                                                                                  BUDGET            HOUSE
                                                                                                 REDUEST      RECOnHENDEO
                                                                                               ..........

    NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     559
        Savoonga HarDor. AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Kahaolavs Harbor. Kshoolars. H I . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Bucks Harbor. HE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        RhOdef p o i n t . Somerset county, no. . . . . . . . . . .
        st. ~ e r o m e ' scrack. s t . nary county. no.. . . . .
        Woods Hols. Great Harbor. Woods, Hale, H . . . . .                      A
        nacklnsc I s l e . Harbor Breakwall. H I . . .                             . .
        N ~ r f h l e s t m i nM1ChiOBn. T r a v e r l s C l t y . Ill......
        7.0 Harbors, M N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Halnpton Harbor, N H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Cooley cane,. OH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        os1aware R i v e r . ~ a i r l s r r u r m n g B a r i n . P . . . .
                                                     T                            A
        C h a r l e s t o r n BreaChwsy and i n l e t . R I . . . . . . . . . . .
        C l a r k s v i l l e . TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        ~ o r t n w e s t1enne01ee ~ e p l o n a lHarcior. TN . . . . . .
        NesSarradox. " A , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    nlTlGATION O SHORE OMAGES (SECTION 111) 11 . . .
                          F
         n o b i l a Pars. AL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         camp ~ l h r Saco, ME.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             .
         Vsim,llion. O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             H
         F s i r p o r t Harbor. O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   H
         n a i t , t u c k Harbor. NY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         Tybea I r l s n d Channel I n p a c f i . GA. . . . . . . . . . . .

    PROJECT HODS FOR IIIPROVEHENl O THE ENVlRONHENT (S
                                                    F
        L o w e r Cache R s r t a r a t i a n . AR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        T u l ~ n g aVsrh Enulronmenfal R e r f a r a t ~ o n . CA.. . .
        Lower l i n g n a n l r i a n d . OC, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        ~~nsna        pond. n s u i HI..             ...................
        ~ a u n s k a k a is t r , n o l o k a i , HI.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Rathbun Lake H a b i t a t R e l t o r a t ~ o n . I A . . . . .
        lndian ~ i d g e       Harsh. Chicago, EL.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Spunky B o t t o s l . I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Green R i v e r Oan, nod. K I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Sand H l l i R l r e r , nn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Duck Creak, no.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        8 l o o n i n g f o n S t a t e Park. 110. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Blue V a l l e y Wetlands. Jackson. MO.. . . . . . . . . . .
          Prison Fern.          no.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Asrunpink Creek. Trenton. NJ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Route 0 6 Environmental R e r t o r a t i a n , I\lbuqueipu
          AQuatlc H a b l f l t R s s t o r a t l o n . NU.. . . . . . . . .
          G e r r l t P e n Creek. WY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          S p n o g Creek. N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          T8c.P"" Lake. O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   H
          Lower Columb,a Slough. O . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                R
          Eagleland Econyrten. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          L e w i r v i l l e Dam. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          Brs>ded Rsach. W I \ ,            ........................
          S h o r t y ' s I s l a n d , HA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

     SHORE PROTECTlON (SECTION 109) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         u n a l a k l e e t storm namags R e a u s t ~ o n . U n a l s k l s e t ,
         Bau Farm I s l a n d . CA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




           Pnllade
           ~t Ssn Gerontao, P             R ...........................
           v s t e r e n ' s o r i v e s h o r e l i n e . st. Tnonsr. VI . . . . .
           Cnsrapsaue nay Shoreline. Hamptoo, VA.. . . . . . . .
           Lincoln Park Beach S e a t t l e . HA, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D M SAFEN AN0 SEEPIGEISTABILITY CORRECTION PROGRIII.
 A                                                                                   ..
DREDGED RATERIAL DISPOSAL FkCILITIES PROGRlll IDNOFI
    Savannah Harbor, G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                      L                                                                .
                                         CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION
                                               (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                       BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                      REQUEST RECOfiIlENDEO


        Rogue R i v e r . Il. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               l
        C n a r l e s t e n Harbor. SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        Green Bay Harbor, W I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    EMPLOYEES COIlPENSATION.                ...............
    ESTUARY RESTORATION PROGRAn (PL 1 0 6 - 1 5 7 1 . . . .
    INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD                   .
                                                   BOAR0 EXPENSE.
d
    INLANO WATERWAYS USERS BOARD - CORPS EXPENSE.
                                                                                  ........................
         SUBTOTAL FOR NATIONAL PROGRAnS .                   ................         105.316      225,078


         TOTAL


    31      ITEMS REQUESTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION I N
            OPERATIONS AN0 MAINTENANCE
                                                                        32
   Kaweah Riuer, California.-Within the funds provided for the
Terminus Dam, Kaweah River project, the Secretary is directed to
reimburse the non-federal sponsor for a portion or all of the reim-
bursable worked carried out on the project and to ensure that the
non-federal sponsor is fully reimbursed not later than March 1,
2010.
  Everglades Restoration, Florida.-The Committee recommenda-
tion includes no funding for the Modified Waters element of the Ev-
erglades Restoration within the Energy and Water Development
Appropriation. The funding for this project is contained within the                                                                              b
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act.
   Upper Mississippi River Restoration, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota,
Missouri & Wisconsin.-The Committee directs the Corps to com-
plete a plan to transition this project to the Navigation and Eco-
system Sustainability Program (NESP) for the Upper Mississippi
                                                                                                                                                 .
River System. The Committee has not provided funding for this
new project and will consider the new start when an adequate plan
to complete ongoing projects and transition future projects to the
new authority is received by the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations. In order to facilitate this transition the Corps is di-
rected not to initiate any new projects under this authority. Fund-
ing should be focused on completion of all existing work to facilitate
the initiation of the new authority.
   Muddy River, Boston and Brookline, Massachusetts.-Funding is
included to continue project design and construction, including eco-
system restoration features.
   Columbia River Channel Improuements, Oregon and Wash-
ington.-The Committee has recommended the full request for this
project, despite the fact that the Corps of Engineers has failed to
respond to repeated requests for information that verifies that this
level of funding would complete the project as claimed by the Ad-
ministration.
   Continuing Authorities Program.-The fiscal year 2008 omnibus
appropriation directed the Corps to reevaluate the management
and backlog of the Continuing Authorities Program (CAP). The re-
view recently provided to the Committees on Appropriations shows
nearly $1,000,000,000 is required to complete all existing, active
projects. For a program that receives approximately $120,000,000
annually, this review reaffirms the Committee's belief that the pro-
gram is over subscribed. A summary of the review, by CAP author-
                                                                                                                                                 -
ity section, is included in the table below.
           CAP sacton                            Proleci federal cost        Pr$acf a l a a t o n i   FY 08 total alioca   Balance to complete
                                                         ($1                   thru i Y 07 ($1        t8onr planned ($1            ($1

                                                        69,548,012                   38,328,057              9,707,357            21,512,598
                                                        48,386,819                   15,522,875              4,451.555            28,322,389
                                                       118,598,140                   38,181,184              7,232,400            73,184,556
                                                        50,283,000                    3,574.645              1,919,000            44,789,355
                                                        35.317.018                    7,398,318              1,373,000            26545.700
                                                       548.772.450                  162,448.027             42,370.804           343,953,619
                                                       457,038,102                  120,987,115             29,149,778           306,901,210
                                                         1,349,900                      713,899                       -              636.001
                                                       267,133,752                  117,611,141              23.l74.000          120,408,611

      Totals .................................       1,596,487,193                  504,765,251            125,467,894           966,254,038
                                 33
  In fiscal year 2009 the Committee recommendation lists projects
for CAP Sections 103, 107, 111, 204, 205, 206, 208 and 1135, hut
only specifies funding for two of the listed projects in recognition
of the dynamic nature of the projects within the program. No
projects, whether requested by the Administration or Members of
Congress, are listed for the Section 14 program. This funding is
only for emergency streambank protection of public facilities and,
as such, shall be distributed on the basis of urgency.
   The preceding table titled "Construction" includes the list of
projects designated by Congress for fiscal year 2009 funding. The
Corps may allocate funds to other, active projects after the funding
for named projects is addressed. Under no circumstances shall the
Corps initiate new projects in Section 205, 206 or 1135. New
projects may he initiated in the remaining sections after an assess-
ment is made that such projects can be funded over time based on
historical averages of the appropriation for that section and ap-
proval by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.
The Corps shall prioritize the projects based on the following cri-
teria:
   Priorities for Design and Implementation (D&I)Phase:
        1. D&I work for continuing projects that have executed
     Project Cooperation Agreements (PCAs).
       2. D&I funding for projects approved by Corps Headquarters
     to execute a PCA.
       3. D&I work which does not require executed agreements
     (e.g. continuing or pre-PCA design) for ongoing projects.
       4. D&I funding for projects with approved Feasibility Re-
     ports moving into D&I.
   Priorities for Feasibility Phase:
        1. Feasibility phase funding for projects with executed Feasi-
     bility Cost Sharing Agreements (FCSAs).
        2. Feasibility phase funding for projects approved by Corps
     Headquarters to execute a FCSA.
                               work which does not reauire a FCSA for
        3. Feasihilitv ~ h a s e
     ongoing
                               fundinp. for initiations or restarts,
        4. Feasibilitv ~ h a s e
   within-the last-?&ded               level within the D&I and Feasi-
bility phases, if the projects qualifying for funding exceed the avail-
 able funding, funds shall he allocated based on project outputs and
the non-federal sponsor's ability to meet local obligations.
   Remaining funds, if any, may he allocated to additional projects
in accordance with the aforementioned priorities, except that all
funds for Section 14 projects shall be allocated to the most urgently
 needed projects.
   The Corps is directed to maintain a split of approximately 80-
20 percent between the Design and Implementation (DM) phase
 and the Feasibility phase within each authority. This split should
be considered a guideline only, as there may be specific cir-
cumstances that require a slightly different weighting.
                           RIVERAND TRIBUTARIES
                 MISSISSIPPI
Appropriation, 20                                       $387,402,000
Budget estimate,                                         240,000,000
Recommended, 2                                           278,000,000
Comparison:
   Appropriation, 2008                                  109,402,000
   Budget estimate, 20                                   +38,000,000
  This appropriation funds planning, construction, and operation
and maintenance activities associated with projects to reduce flood
damage in the lower Mississippi River alluvial valley below Cape       L
Girardean, Missouri.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $278,000,000, a
decrease of $109,402,000 from the fiscal year 2008 enacted appro-
priation and an increase of $38,000,000 over the budget request.
  The budget request for this account and the approved Committee
                                                                       .
allowance are shown on the following table:
                         FLOOO CONTROL              -  MlSSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
                                                     (ABOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                          BUDGET          HOUSE
                                                                                                         REOUEST   RECOBflENDEO


                                   INVESTIGATIONS

ALEWNDRIA TO THE GULF. LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          780            IS0
ATCHAFhLAYA BASIN FLOOWY SYSTEM LAND STUDY. LA . . . . . .                                                 100            100
COLWATER RIVER BASrN BELM ARMBUTLA LIKE. BS . . . . . . .                                                  125            125
MEMPHIS BETRO hRE.4. STORM WATER MGm STUDY. TN 6 M S , . .                                                  16             34
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BllSIC DIITI. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                        I                                                                  400            400

                                     CONSTRUCTION

BAYOU MET0 BASIN, AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        ...         2,800
CHANMEL IMPROVEMEHT. DIKES. AR.IL.KY,U.MS.MO                         & TN..                     ..       12.134        12,134
CHANNEL IMPROVENNT. REVETBENT OPERATIONS, AR.IL.KY.LA                                                    33,088        40.741
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AF.IL.KY.U.MS.HO & TN..                                             ....       20.000
                                                                                                            ...
                                                                                                                       35.000
     MEN MDRID LEVEE CLOSURE no PED ACTIVITES . . . . . . .                                                             3,800
ST, FRLHCIO BASIN. AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       ...         3.300
ATCMFALAYII BASIN, FLOODWAY SYSTEM. LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                    2 025         2.025
ATCHAF*UYA BASIN. U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     8,300         8.300
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION. LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              2,258         2.258
ST. JOHNS BAYOU & NEW MADRID FLOOWAY, M . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                         O                                                  ...            200
E S T TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES. TN.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                     ...            500

                        OPERATIONS AND MINTENkNCE




 MAPPING
                                                                                                      .............
          TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      210,000       278.000
   This appropriation funds operation, maintenance, and related ac-
tivities a t the water resource projects that the Corps of Engineers
operates and maintains. Work to be accomplished consists of dredg-     L
ing, repair, and operation of structures and other facilities as au-
thorized in various River and Harbor, Flood Control, and Water
Resources Development Acts. Related activities include aquatic
plant control, monitoring of completed projects, removal of sunken
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce statis-
tics. Portions of this account are financed through the Harbor
Maintenance Trust Fund.
   The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,300,000,000,
$56,363,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and
$175,000,000 below the budget request. The Committee rejects the
Administration's proposal to move $275,000,000 for four categories
of projects from the Construction account to the Operation and
Maintenance account. After accounting for this change, the Com-
mittee's recommendation is $100,000,000 over the budget request.
   The budget request for this account and the approved Committee
allowance are shown on the following table:
                                CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPE6ATION AN0 IUINTENANCE
                                            (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANOS)

                                                                                                  BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                 REQUEST   RECOnlNOEO




 &LAYIU             COOEL COIIPRTnEhSIVE VATTR 5 T V O l A I
 A.ASAIIII RIVER L A W S AI
 BLLCK Y A R Y I W 110 TOn8lGBTF RI.fRS                At
 CJ-F IITOACMISIAL d h r l R Y A I 1      .
 I I S P f C T I O l O r (MIPLETEO W R L S L.
 MOBILE HARBOR. M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. N . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 TENNESSEE        .   TOHBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE I I I T I W I T I O N . U
 TENNESSEE . TOOBIGBEE WATERWAY. AL 6 ns.. . . . . . . . . . . . .
 WALTER F GEORGE LOCK W D OAn. AL 6 W\. . . . . . . . . . .
 WATERIENVIRONKENTAL CERTIFICATION, U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                            ALASKA

 ANCHORLGE HARBOR. AX
 CHEW RIVER LAKES, L K . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 O I L L I N G H M IIIRBOR. AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 HOMER HARBOR. AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS. AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 N l N I L C H l K HARBOR. AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 NOME HARBOR. A K . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



ALAnO LAKE, A Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION a COIIWETED UORXS. AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                               .
PAINTEO ROCK OAO. M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SCREDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WHITLOW RANCH OAM, u.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                 ...
                                       ARKANSAS

BEAVER LAKE. AR.. . . . . . . . . , . .
                              ...........
BLhKELY PIT O M . LAKE U U I C I I I 4 I . AK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BLUE OOU NTAlN LAKE, Au. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BULL 5HOALS LAKE, Au. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
       ............
                                        .
                                      AR.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                i. A u . . ................................
      EN LAKE, Au. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DIERK!5 LAKE. A u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GILLHIU LAKE, AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GREER 5 FERRY LAKE, A u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..........
            ~-~~
                   -..      ~




I~SPECTIOI or COW.ETLO             .ORLS, AR
8CCLE.LAh.LFRR BRKI*SAS RIVER h l \ r l G A T I O h 5vSTfn AR
                       .
N I L L W O O LLLE A R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NARROWS DAM. LAKE GREESON. AR.                     ...................
 ........
HlllllOr       -
         1 LAKE. A R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NORFOI LAKE, A u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
         7K
OSCEOLA HARBOR. A u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O U K H I T A AN0 BLACX RIVERS. LR li LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OZARK - JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM. R R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS. AR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WHITE RIVER. AR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YELLOW BEND PORT

                                     CALIFORNIA

BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BUCHANAN D A ~ ,wv EASWN LAKE, C A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHANNEL ISLANDS WARBOR. C A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COVOTE VALLEY DAM, M E PIENOOCINO, CA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CRESCENT CITY HARBOR. CA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DRY CREEK [WARII SPRINGS) LAKE AND CHANNEL. CA.. . . . . . . .
FAROINGTON PAN, C A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HIDOEN orn, HENSLEV LAKE. CA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~UMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, C A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AND "AINTENANCE
                                                   (AtIOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                     BUOGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                    REQUEST   RECOMMENOED


INSPECTION OF COUPLETED W R K S . U.....................
                       .
ISABELLA LAKE U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                     .
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
M R I N A OEL REV CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                       . .
HARTIS CREEK LAKE CA li NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
llERCE0 COUNTY STREUIS CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
iWJAVE RIVER DAN. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                   .        .
MORRO BAY HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOSS LANDING HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
NEU H D t l N LAKE CR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                 .
                           . ..
NEU E L O N E S LAKE OOYNSTREAII CHANNEL CA . . . . . . . . . . . .
OAKLAND HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OCEANSIDE HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
P I N E FLAT LAKE CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PORT HUENEIIE. C6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                       .
PROJECT CONOITION SURVEYS CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                               .
REOWDW C I T Y MRBOR.CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RICHMOND HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SACRAMENTO RIVER ( 3 0 FOOT PROJECT) CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .
SCRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL). CA .
SACRAtlENTO R I M R S W L L M M A F T CHANNEL. CA                                    ............
                                       ..
 BAN FRANCISCO BAY DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE. U. . . . . . . . . .
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LTMS. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SAN FRINCISCO MRBOR AND BAY. CA (DRIFT REflOVAL) . . . . . .

                                       . .
SW FRINCISCO MRBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SAN J O A W I N RIVER PORT OF STOCKTON CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YW PABLO BAY AN0 NARE ISLAND STF3.11. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                             .
 SW W A E L CHANNEL. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                ..
%KT* ANA RIVER BASIN CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SANTA BARBARA HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. Ck . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~   ~




                    .
SUCCESS LAKE CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUlSUN BAY CHANNEL. U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    ..
TERMINUS M n LAKE KAWAN. CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VENTUR* HARBOR CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 YUBA RIVER. U. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                     COLORADO

BEAR CREEK LAKE. CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                332            315
                           . .
CHITFIELD LAKE CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHERRY CREEK M E CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                     1.178
                                                                                                       870
                                                                                                                   1. I 1 7
                                                                                                                     827
                                                             .
INSPECTION OF COIIPLETED WORKS CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR. CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                       157
                                                                                                     2.118
                                                                                                                     434
                                                                                                                   2.297
                                                                 .
SPHEOULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS CO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               720           684


                                                CONNECTICUT

                               .
B L K K ROCK LAKE CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COLEBRWY RIVER LAKE. R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             ..
GREEWICH HARBOR CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WANCOCK BRWK LAKE CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           .
HOP BROOK W E CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                             .
INSPECTION OF CWPLETEO WORKS CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                 ..
LONG ISLAND SOUNO OMIIP R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M N S F l E L O H O L L M LAKE CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IIORTHFIELO BROOK LAKE. CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           ..
NORUALK HARBOR CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                       ...
PATCHOGUE RIVER UESTBROOI CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS CT ........................
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER CT ........................
                       .
THOMASTON Okll CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                        .
E S T THOnPSON LLKL CT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                     OELAWME



 ..        ~




nISPILLION R I M R
                   .
                                   . OE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           CORPS OF ENGINEERS              .
                                                OPERATION A110 MAINTENANCE
                                       (AMOUNTS I N T W S M Y I S I

                                                                                              BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                             REOUEST   RECOnMENDEO
                         .................................................................
"URDERKILL RIVER, DE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        30            29
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS. OE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 111          140
YILMINGTON ~ 8 0 BE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                     ~ .                                                                      2,750
                                                                                                           2,813

                            OISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IIISPECTIO* Of COWLETED H N ( I S DC                                                             62            59
POTO~UC A h 0 U A C O S T I A RIVERS DC !ORIF1 REMOVAL                                          805           185
PROJECT C O Y O I T I M S U l M Y S DE                                                           28            27
Y W I I W G I O I I U R 8 M L DC                                                                 25            24

                                      FLORIDA




                                       GEORGIA

 ALLATOONA LAKE, W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 APALACHICOLA. CWTTAHOKHEE AN0 F L I N T RIVERS, GA, AL S
 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL UATERUAY. G I . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 BRUNSUICI HRRBOR. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIONEY LANIER. GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 CARTERS OAH All0 LAKE, GA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 HARWELL LAKE, W S SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. GA . . . .
 IISPECTIOB  OF conPLETED WORKS, GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 J STROM THURMOND LAKE. 611 8 SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PROJEO CONDITION SURVEYS. GA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 RICWRO 8 RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE. W S SC.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SAVANNAH HARBOR. W \1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SAVANNAH RIVLR BELOW AUGUSTA. G A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, G A S A L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



  BARBERS POINT HARBOR. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                200           190
  INSPECTION OF COllPLElED WORKS. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      858           826
  PROJECT CONDlTION SURVEYS. H I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     537           510



  ALBENl FRLLS DAM. 1 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      1,138         1.462
  DUORSHAK DAM AND R E a R v o I n . ro . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        2.401         2.264
  INSPECTION OF COIIPLLTED WORKS. I D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  354           311
  LUCKY PEAK LAKE. I D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     1.801         1.711
  SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. I D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     489           166
                                          CORPS OF ENGINEERS   OPERATION AN0 PAlNTENANCE    .
                                                      (KUOUKTS I N THOUSANOS)

                                                                                                                       BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                                      REQUEST   RECOMMENDED


                                                          ILLINOIS

                                      ..
ANOALUSIA HARBOR I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
        CHICAGO HARBOR I L ..........................
        INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                              .
CALUMET HARBOR AND R I M R I L 6 I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                        .
                        .
CARLYLE LAKE I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            .                         .
CHICAGO RIVER I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                          .
I L L I N O I S WATERWAY I L 6 I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              1
                    .
        GRAFTON I L TO LAGRANGE LOCK & 0&U . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONRENTAL PROJECTS I L . . . .                                              .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                      . .
KIISKASKIA RIVER N A V I W T I O N I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                          .
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                      .
LAKE SHELBYVILLE I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LOCK AND OAII 2 7 . M I S S I S S I P P I RVR I L (MAJOR REHAB) !I .
nxss RIVER BTHN no nrvm AND MINNEAPOLIS                           IMVR P R I N
                                                                             O TO )
                                                                                    .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS. I L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REND W E I      .
SUWEILLWCE

                  O
MISS RIVER BT!4N M R I M R AND PINNEAPOLIS (PVS PORTION)

                                                          INDIANA

                                  .
BROOKVILLE LAKE I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                      .
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BURNS UATERWAY SMALL BOAT HARBOR I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                      . .                                           .
CfiGLES H I L L LAKE I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .
INDIANA HARBOR CONFINED DISPOSAL F A C I L I T Y . I N 11 . . .
                              .
INDIANA HARBOR I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COPPLETEO WORKS I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                  .                     .
J EDWRO ROUSH LAKE I N                ..........................
IIISSISSINENA LAXE. I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    .
PONROE LAKE I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    .
PATOKA L&KE I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                  .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS 1N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROUSH RIVER M J O R REHAB PROJECT I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     .
SALAMONIE W E . I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNOARY WRTERT I N . . . . . . . . . .                                .
                                                              IOWA

CORALVILLE LAKE. I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETE0 WORKS. I 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         .
                                  .
LOCK AND OAH $ 1 M I S S I S S I P P f RVR. I A (PAJOR REHAB) \ 1.
MISSOURI RIVER . KENSLERS BEND NE TO SIOUX C I T Y I & .                    . .                             .    .
MISSOURI RIVER . RULO TO nOUTH I A KS. NO 6 NE . . .                        .
IIISSOURI RIVER . SIOUX C I T Y TO THE MOUTH IA.KS.l(O61NE.                                     .
                        .
MlSSOURl RIVER F I S H AND WILOLIFE RECOVERY I A . K S . 6 0 \ 1
PATHBUN LAKE X I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                    .
RE0 ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK. I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                      .
SAVLORVILLE LAKE I A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



                        .
CLINTON LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                              .
COUNCIL G R A M LAKE KS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                            ..
E L DQRADO LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FI K C I N LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          iR LAKE. KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          i W E . XS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                              1s . US . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          ..........
              i LAKE
                             .
                            ... KS . . . ESERVOIR . KS. .. .. .. ............... .. .. .. .. .. .. ......
                                          ......
                               ...................................
   LFORD LAKE           .. KS .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ......................................... .. .
                           KS
                                      CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AN0 HAlNTENANCE
                                                  (AnOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                     BUDGET            HOUSE
                                                                                                    REDUEST      RECOMMENDED


                                                              .
PEARSON . SKU6112 B I G H I L L LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PERRY LAKE, US . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                    1.016
                                                                                                    2.452
                                                                                                                         996
                                                                                                                     2.390
                     .
POMONA LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                              .
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERITIOUS KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                     1.914
                                                                                                          30
                                                                                                                     1 . 871
                                                                                                                          28
                         .
TORONTO LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          535             508
                                      .
TUTTLL CREEK LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                     .
WILSON LAKE KS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                     2 . 080
                                                                                                     1.577
                                                                                                                     2 . 028
                                                                                                                     1.537

                                            KENlUCKY

                                                         .
BARKLEI DAM AND M K E BARKLEY KY 8 TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                      ..
BARREN RIVER LAKE KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B I G SANDY WRBOR KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BUCKMORN LAKE. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .
CARR CREEK LAKE KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CAVE RUN LAK
DEWEY LAKE       .                                       .
E L V I S STlHR [HICKHAN) MARBOR KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                         ..
FISHTRIP LAKE KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GRIYSON LAKE RY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GREEN RIVER LAKE. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF con
KENTUCKY RIVER K              .
LAKE CUMBERLANO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LAUREL RIVER LAKE. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                           .
MARKLANO LOCKS AND DAM KY 6 I N (MAJOR REHAB) $ 1. . .
                                       .
M R T I N S FORK LAKE KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
nlOOLESBOR0 CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                 .                                                    .
NOLIM LAKE I Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                     .
                                                         ..
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND OAUS KY I L . I N 6 OH . . . . . . . . . . . .
OR10 RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK KY. I L I N 8 OH                                 .
PAINTSVILLE LAKE. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                      .........
                                                     .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROUGM RIVER LAKE. I Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                              .
IAYLORSVILLE LAKE. KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              ..
WOLF CREEK O M LAKE CUMBERLAND KY                                         ...................
YATESVlLLE LAKE KY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                 LOUISIANA

ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AN0 BAYOUS CKENE BOEUF AN0 BLACK L
                                            ..                        .
BARITARIA M Y WATERWAY LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                           .         6.993
                                                                                                       926
                                                                                                                      6.543
                                                                                                                        880
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          809              768
BkYOU LAFOURCNE AND LAFOURCML JUIIP WATERWAY LA . . . .
                         .
MYOU PIERRE LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                  .                     121
                                                                                                         18
                                                                                                                        688
                                                                                                                          17
                                                 .
BAYOU SEGHETTE WATERWAY LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER LA . . . . . . . . . . .          .                                     321
                                                                                                          14
                                                                                                                           296
                                                                                                                            13

                  ..
BIVOU TECHE LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CAD00 LAKE LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                     .
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                       209
                                                                                                       181
                                                                                                    14.968
                                                                                                                           199
                                                                                                                           172
                                                                                                                     1 1 . 220
FRESHWATER BAYOU L
GULF INTRICOASTAL W
                                      .                                                                               1.756
                                                                                                                     18.881
HOUnA NAVIOATIOH CANAL                                                                                                1.425
 INSPECTION OF COUPLETEO                                                                                              1.723

                                            .
 LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        17
                                                                                                                     10.027
                                                                                                                         806

                                  . .
 MADISON PARISH PORT LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 MERMENTAU RIVER L I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 ~ISSISSIPPI           RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE                            .
                                                         L(\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                     1.889
                                                                                                           5

                                                                                                     3 . 136
                                                                                                                          81
                                                                                                                      1.871
                                                                                                                      2. 978
 M I S S I S S I P P I RIVER. BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO                                ..   55.325           12.559
 RENOVLL OF AQUATIC GROYTM LA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        1.500            1.425
 WALLACE LAKE
 WATERUAY FROM E n
                         .                                                                               200
                                                                                                          32
                                                                                                                         180
                                                                                                                          30
                                                                                                         238             227



                                                     . .
 DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING HE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED W R I S IIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                      1 .2 0 0
                                                                                                          29
                                                                                                                       1.140
                                                                                                                           26
                                  .
 PORTLAND HARBOR ME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      100               95
                             CORPS OF EHGIHEERS - OPERATION AND flAIWTENIHCE
                                         (MOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                      BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                     REQUEST   RECOMMENDED


PROJECT CONOlTlON SURVEYS. IIE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              750          713
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUHOARY WATERS, OE.. . . . . . . . .                                           17           16

                                       MARYLAND

ASSATEAGUE. nD \ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BALTlUORE HMBOR AND CHkNNELS ( 5 0 FOOT), no.. . . . . . . .
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD DR   (RI          REPWVAL). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CUIIBERLIWO, MD AND RIOGELEY. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HERRING SAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK. nD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NO.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE. 8 0 8 W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OCEAN C I T Y HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD.. .
PARISH CREEK. no.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            ..
               D, MD \I.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                     MD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                         NS, n o . , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                 no . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    ER. 110.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



AUNT L Y D I A ' S COVE, MA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BARRE FALLS DAM, W A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BIRCH H I L L OAII. I(A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BOSTON HLRBOR,
BUFFUWILLE LAK

CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE A R M . MA          .........
CONANT BROOK LAKE. 1U               ................................
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE.
WODGES VILLAGE ORM, N
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS. M . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




      SOUTH JETTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, " A , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TULLY LAKE. MA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WEST WILL 01\11, MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
W E S N I L L E LAKE, MA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                       MICHIGAN




                    OR,
                                                   .
                           n I . . ................................
                                                  "1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                          IY, nl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                        OR M I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




                    R. M
                       I       ....................................
                          nr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                         nr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                        I, n I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                    i    nr .
                        ~ .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS                       .
                                                           OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                                                   (AWUNTS I N THOUSANDS1

                                                                                                                BUDGET        HOUSE
                                                                                                               RMUEST    RECOMMENDED
................................................................................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS. M I   ..........         2 . 414       2 . 322

                                                    tIINNESOTA

BIGSTONE LAKE                  .
                      WETSTONE RIVER. )IN 6 SO . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OULUTH         .
            SUPERIOR HARBOR. n~ a YI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COIIPLETEO WORKS. )IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                   . .
LAC P U I PARLE LAKES HINNESOTA RIVER )IN . . . . . . . . . . . .               .
nINNESOTA RIVER m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
H I S S RIVER B l U N MO RIVER AN0 nINNEAPOLIS ( W P PORTION)
                           .
ORWELL LAKE NN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT COHOITION SURVEYS )IN
                                           .
RE0 LAKE RESERVOIR NN ................................
                                                        .       .........................
RESERVOIRS AT HEAWATERS OF n I S S I S S I P P I RIVER. MN . . . .
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS )IN . . . . . . . . . .                          .
l U D HARBORS. (IN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



CLAIRBORNE COUNTY PORT. )IS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                   .
EAST FORK TOUBIGBEE R I
GREENVILLE HARBOR. MS
GULFPORT HARBOR )IS                .
INSPECTION OF CUM
n o u T n OF YAZW RI
OKATlB8EE LAKE M               .
PASCAGOULA HARBOR                      .
PEARL RIVER IIS 1 LA       .
PROJECl CONDITION SURVEYS. )IS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WSEDALE HARBOR. MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WATERIENVIRON~ENTAL CERTIFICATION
                           .                                                .
                                                 ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VAL00 RIVER MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                    MISSOURI

                                                .
CARWHERSVILLE HARBOR )I0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CLARENCE CANNON O M AND M R K W A I N LAKE 110 . . . . . . . . .                      .
                                   .
CLEUlWATER LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HARRY s TRUMAN OAM AND RESERVOIR                                        .
                                                         no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           ~           ~




     C o n p l e t e s t l l l r n g banin r o p s ; r r                        ...................
INSPECTION OF COllPLETEO WORKS. MO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 U
LL
 I E                                                .
          BLUE RIVER LAKES 110 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LONO BRANCH LAKE.                          no
nlss RIVER BWN IT
NEW MADRID WRBOR                       ..
P o ~ ~ E TERRE LAKE 110. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
             DE
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS )I0                           .       .......................
                                                                    .
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS flO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S t t I T H V I L L E LAKE. NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SOUTHEAST ~ISSOURI PORT                            . NISSISSIPPI                   RIVER.    no .     .   .
                                   .
 STOCKTON LAKE. )I0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 TABLE ROCK LAKE 110 & L\R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 UNION LAKE. no . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                    MONTANA

 F T PECK 0A)I AND L I K E m .                  .       .............................
 INSPECTION OF COWLETEO WORKS. )IT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                4. 170
                                                                                                                    54
                                                                                                                              4.222
                                                                                                                                  51
 L I W Y O M , nT.........................................                                                      1. 712        1. 826
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. )IT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                         88            84

                                                    NEBRASKA

                                       ..
 GAYIYS PDINT O M L E V I S AND CLARK LAKE. HE 6 SO                                                  . . . .    5.935         6 . 192

                                                                .
 HARLlVl COUIITY LAKE HE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INSPECTION OF COnPLETED WORKS NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 P...........O N CREEK . ME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  APILLI
                                                                                                                1.721
                                                                                                                  506
                                                                                                                  531
                                                                                                                              1.897
                                                                                                                                  463
                                                                                                                                  504
                                                            .
 SALT CREEK AN0 TRIBUTARIES NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      702             667
                              CORPS OF ENGINEERS   OPERATION LND MAINTENANCE
                                          (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS]

                                                                                                   BUDGET         HOUSE
                                                                                                  REOUEST   RECOMMENDED


                                          NEVAOk

IMSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS. NV.                               ................                    121           121
PINE AN0 MkTHEWS CANYONS LAKES. N V .                            ..............                      204           194

                                    NEW HKflPSHIRE

BLACKWATER DAM. NH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           567           539
EDWARD MACWWELL LAKE. NH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     61 1          188
FBANKLIN FALLS 0 4                                                                                   61 9          588
HAMPTON HARBOR. N                                                                                    ...           124
HOPKINTON         .
              EVERE                       .........................                                1,081         1.027
INSPECTION OF COMPLETEO WORKS, un.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                 37            3s
O n E R BROOK LAXE. NH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                598           568
PROJECT CONDITION SURVE                                                                              300           265
SURRY nOUNTAIN LAKE, NH                                                                              596           586

                                       NEW JERSEY

BARNEGAT I N L E T , N J
CAPE I U Y I N L E T TO
COLD SPRING I N L E T . N
DELAWARE RIVER AT CA


INSPECTION OF COnPLETEO M R K S . N J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L W E R CAPE HAY IEAOONS. CAPE MAY POINT. N J \ I . . . . . . . .
MANASQUAN R I M R . NJ.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY. NJ. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEWARK BAY. HACKENSACK AH0 PASSAIC RIVERS. N J . . . . . . .
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEII. N J . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


RARITAN R I M R TO
RARITAN R I M R . N J
SALEn RIVER. N
SHARK RIVER. N
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK. NJ.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SHREUSBURY R I M R . # & I N CHANNEL. N J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                       NEW MEXICO

ABIOUIU DAM. N                                                                                     2.220         2.109
COCHITI LAKE.                                                                                      2.392         2.272
                                                                                                   1.121         1.150
GALISTEO D A I . NM.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              423           402
I H S P E O I O N OF COMPLETED WORKS. NM.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         811           770
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, N                                                                                  684           850
IANTA ROSA D AND   M                                                                                 940           893
SCHEDULING RESERVDIR                                                                                 SO2           477
TWO RIVERS O M . NM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  452           129
UPPER R I O G M O E UATER OPERATIONS MOOEL STUDY. NII. . . .                                       1.201         1.141

                                         NEW YORK

ALMOND M E . N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       424           403
ARKPORT DAM. N V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BLACK ROCK CHhNNEL AN0 TONAUANOA HARBOR. NY.. . . . . . . . . .
BRONX RIVER. NY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                         ..
BUFFALO HARBOR. I".. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL. N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DUNKIRY HARBOR. NY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 EAST R I V E R . N I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      500           675
 E l S T ROCUYAV INLET. MY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   1.220         4.009
 EAST SIDNEY LAKE. N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           475           44s
 EASTCNESTER CREEK. N Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  160           171
 F I R E I S L I N O INLET TO JONES INLET. NY \ I . . . . . . . . . . .                              $00           ...
 FLUSH140 BAY AND CRTEI, m... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                    180           SO4
 GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         60            76
 HUDSON R l M R C W W E L . H Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   ~    ~                                                                                            500           175
 HUDSON RIVER. NY (MAIMT]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     1.125         1,088
                                                                                     45
                                      CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                                                  (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                  BUDGET       HOUSE
                                                                                                 REQUEST RECOMMENDED


                          .
HUDSON RIVER NY ( O O I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS NY . . . . . . . . . .            .
                                                                                                  1.525
                                                                                                  1.031
                                                                                                              1.440
                                                                                                                879
                      .
JAnAlCA BAY NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JONES I N L E T . NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                    250
                                                                                                    350
                                                                                                                236
                                                                                                                333
                                               . .
L I K E MONTAUK HARBOR NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L l l T L E SOOUS BAY HARBOR NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                    roo         865
                                                                                                                821
LON0 ISLAND INTRACOPSTAL UATEWAY NY . . . . . . . . .                        .
M T T l T U C K HARBOR. NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                180
                                                                                                                 19
                                                                                                                   1
                                      .
NORICHES INLET. NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
nOUNT UORRIS DAM NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS MY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .
                                                                                                              4.597
                                                                                                              6.413
                                  .
NEW YORK HARBOR NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW YORK HARBOR. NY 6 N J (DRIFT REMOVAL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                              3 . BOO
                                                                                                              5.985
                                  .
HEW YORK HARBOR NY 1PREVENTlON OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSIT
HEVTOVN CREEK. NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                  903
                                                                                                                  209
                                           .
PORTCHESTER HARBOR NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
PWOJECT CONDITlOLl SURVEYS NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                143
                                                                                                              1.830
                                      .
ROCHESTER HARBOR NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                       1.525
5 d I h M C c O c ~ INLET '11                                                                                 6.460
EO.TIIER~ UI 1 0 1 1 &.OOU CONTROL PROdCTS h?                                                                   797
SURVEILLINCE D r N0111hERN 8O.hOARY YA7EPS h?
 ........                                                                                                       523
                                          ..
UESTCHESTER CREEK NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YHlTNEY W I N 1 LAKE NI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                                238
                                                                                                                525

                                               NORTH ClWOLINli


                                                                    .. .
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B EVERETT JORDAN 0An AN0 LAKE HC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE UILIIINGTON NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                  .
FALLS M E NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
lNSPECTION OF COIIPLETED
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER NC                               ..
MNTEO (SHALLOWBIIG) BAY NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MASONBORO I N L E T AND CONNECTING CHANNELS NC . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   .
MOREH€AO C I T Y HARBOR N C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEW RIVER I N L E T . NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
PROJECT CONOlTION SURVEYS NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROLLINSON CHANNEL. NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SILVER LAKE HARBOR. NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                     .
W KERR SCOTT OAn AWD RESERVOIR NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                          .
WILUINGTON HARBOR NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                       NORTH DAKOTA

                                               .
 BOWRAN . H N E Y LAKE NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                .
 GARRISON DAM. LAKE SIKI\WWEA ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                  .
 HOHME LAXE NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 INSPECTION OF COnPLETEO WORKS. ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .                                          .
 PIPESTEM LAKE NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
 SOURIS RIVER. ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATER NO . . . . . . . . . . .                    .
                                                            OHIO

                                  ..
 ALUM CREEK LAKE OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 ASHTLBULA HARBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                .
   ~   ~~




 CE A
  ISR          CREEK LAKE. on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 CLARENCE J B R n m 0111. OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                  ..
 CLEVELAND IURBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                  .
 CDWWtAUT HARBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 DEER CREEK LAXE OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .
 DELkWARE LAKE OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 DILLON L M E OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .
 FllRPORT HARBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                          .
 HURON HARBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 I l S P E C T l O N OF COnPLETCD WORKS. OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .
 LORAIN HARBOR OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 IUSSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             .
                                          CORPS OF ENGINEERS                 .
                                                               OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                                                      (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                                   BUOOET         HOUSE
                                                                                                                  REPUEST   RECWlntNDEO
                                                                                                                  .....................
 IIICHAEL J KIRWAN OAR AND RESERWIR                                      .   OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 ~OSOUITO CREEK ME.                            on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                .
 flUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                                    ..
 NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 O H I O - M I S S I S S I P P I FLOOO CONTROL OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                      .
 P A I M CREEK U K E OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                        .
 PROJECT CONDITION SUREYS OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                         .
 R O S N I L L E LOCAL PROTECTION PROJER OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS OH ..........                              .
 TOLEDO HARBOR. OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 T M I JENKINS OAR. OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                .
 WEST FORK OF M I L L CREEK LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE. OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                    OKLAHOM

                              .
 A R W I A LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 BIRCH LAKE. OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CANTON L M 0
COPAN LAKE OK         .
                          .
EUFAULA LAKE                  .
FDRT SUPPLY               ..................................
GREAT SALT PLAIN;
                              .                 .
                      LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HEYBURN LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                  .
HUGO LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HULAH LAKE. OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


KEYSTONE LA

                              .
OOLLXAH LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                          .
OPTIMA LAKE OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

P I N E CREEK LAKE. OK
                                           .
PENSACOU RESERVOIR LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES OK .                                     . .     .
ROBERT S KERR LOCK

                                                                    .
SCHEOULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S K I A T W K LAKE. OK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TENKILLER FERRY
W U R I K A LAKE 0
UEBBERS FALLS L
                              .
UISTER LAKE. 0

                                                    OREWN

APPLEGATE LAKE. OR ....................................
                                  .
 BLUE RIVER M E OR ...................................
                                                    .
BONNEVILLE LLXK PJIO DAM OR 6 W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                   A
                              .
CHETCO RIVER OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COLUfl81A 6 LUR UILLAMETTE R BLW VANCOUVER UA 6 PORTLA                                .
       UESTPORT SLOUCH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE H0H)UTH OR 8 UA ..................
        BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGE M E R I A L A 1 TCR
                                                            .                                 ..........
 COLUWIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER. UA AND THE OALLES 0                                                    .
              .
 COOS 8*Y OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 COPULLLE RIVER. OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 COTrkGE GROVE LAKE. OR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                  ..
C O U W LAKE OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DEPOE BAY OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OETROIT LAKE. OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                   . .
OORENA U K T OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FALL CREEX LAKE OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .
FERN RIDGE LAKE OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                        .
                                      .
GREEN PETER . FOSTER LAKES OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
H I L L S CREEK LAKE OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                               .      ...
INSPECTION O f COIIPLETED EHVIROMENThL PROJECTS OR
                                                                .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED UORKS OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JOHN DAY LOCK I)NO D
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE OR
                          m OR s
                                          . .
                                                                                  47

                                        CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AND R A I NTENANCE
                                                    (ARWNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                                                     BUDGET         MUSE
                                                                                                                    REQUEST   RECOHNENOEO


                                .
LOST CREEK LAKE OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                             .
RCWRY LOCK AND orn o s UA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                             n
                    .
PORT ORFORO OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                    ..
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X H E O U L I N G RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                    ......................................
                        NEL           OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 (ERN BOUNDARY WATERS NA . . . . . . . . ..
                                                   , OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
   .
IIMPLIIII RIVER . 011
; ;~ME~TECRIVER rr u l L L l m n r F I S
I
u I . L w L n e RIVER BANK P R O E ~ I O N
                                           PL
                                              OR
                                                     OR

                  T~
U I L L ~ I I E ~RIVER TEIIPERATLIRE CONTROL OR il
U l L L W CREEK LAKE. OR                             .................................
                                                            .
Y A Q U I W BAY AN0 HARBOR OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                     PENNSYLVANIA

ALLEGHENY RIVER. PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                        .
A L V I N R BUSH DAM PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                     .
AYLESWRTH CREEK LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                ..
B E L T Z V I L L E LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BLUE HARSH LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
CONEMUGH R I V E R LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                .
CMiWESOUE LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...........
                                            .
CROOKED CREEK LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EAST 8RANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE P l i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   .
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS OAR, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
FRANCIS E WNTER DAM PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GENERAL EDGAR JAOYIN DAM AN0 RESERVOIR PA . . . . . . . . . . .                       .
HERRING BAY 8 ROCKHOLD CREEK, HO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
JOHNSTOWN P
KINZUA DAN A
                .
LOIALHANNA LRKE P               .
                                            ..
WHONING CREEK LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MONONGAHELA RIVER PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AN0 OARS. P A OH 6 W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL W R K PA. OH & W . . . . . . . . . . . . .       .
                                                                     .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            .
PRONPTON LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                        .
PUNXSUTAWNEY PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            .
RAYSTOW LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SCHEOULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                        .
SCHUYLKILL RIVER PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                .
SHEWANGO RIVER LAKE PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STILLWATER LAKE. PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS PA
                                                        .
                                                                                          .   ..........
TlOGA           HARMON0 LAKES PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TIONESTA LAKE PA            .
UNION C I T Y LAKE                  .
WOOOCOCK CREEK LAKE. PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                    .
YORK I N O l A N ROCK DAN PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                .
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE PA k NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                     PUERTO RICO

 ARECIBO HARBOR                 .       PR .     ..............................
                                                     RHOOE ISLAND

 BLOCK ISLAND HARBOR R 1                        .
           .
 INS?CCTlOh O I CONP-EIFO NRIS
 POINT U O I I d n&UBON OF REVGt I I 1
 PROJECI C C h O l l l O h SLRVCIS R1
                                        R1


 PROYlOEhCE nARBOR S H I P P I L G CIIAN~EL                                      RI
                                      CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AND MINTEWAHCE
                                                  (AIIOUNTS I N THOUSANDS)

                                                                                               BUDGET           HOUSE
                                                                                              REOUEST     RECOHnENDED


                                              SOUTH CAROLINA

ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   .                            721            668

                   . .
CHARLESTON HARBOR SC $ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COOPER RIVER CNARLESTON M B O R SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                  . .                                                   .
FOLLY RIVER SC \ 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                              12.521
                                                                                               4.685
                                                                                                  35
                                                                                                              9.450
                                                                                                              4.451
                                                                                                                 ...
GEORGETOWN HARBOR SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               690          2.660

                                                        . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS S C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                  65
                                                                                                 621
                                                                                                                 62
                                                                                                                593

                                              SOUTH DAKOTA

            11        .
B I G BEND 0 \ 1 LAKE SHARPE SO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .                         .
COLD BRWK LAKE SO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                               6.799
                                                                                                 303
                                                                                                              6.691
                                                                                                                288

                                  .                .
CDTTONWWD SPRINGS LAKE SO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FORT RANDALL DAM LAKE FRANCIS CASE SO . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 .                223
                                                                                               7.328
                                                                                                                212
                                                                                                              8.224
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED M I R K S SD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      49             I7

             . .
LAKE TRAVERSE SD bi nN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                          .
OAHE DAM LAKE OIHE SO & NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SCHEOULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS SO . . . . . . . . . . . .              .
                                                                                                  401
                                                                                               6.977
                                                                                                  52
                                                                                                                 383
                                                                                                              8.902
                                                                                                                 48

                                                   TENNESSEE

                                  . .
CENTER H I L L LAKE TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHEATHAM LOCK MID DAM TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                  .
CHICKAnAUGA LOCK TENNESSEE RIVER. TN . . . .
CORDELL NULL DAM AND RESERVOIR TN . . . . . . .                     .
                                  .
DALE HOLLOW LAKE TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS TN . . . .                        .
J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR TN . . . . . .
                                                   ..
J PERCY PRIEST GREENHAY TN . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                            .
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM TN . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS TN . . . . . . . . . . .
                              .
                                                        .
                                      .
TENNESSEE RIVER TN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WOLF RIVER W B O R TN

                                                       TEXAS

                      .
AOUILLA LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ARKANSAS . RED RIVER BASINS CHLORlOE CONTROL . AREA V I
                                                                                               1.354
                                                                                               1.415
                                                                                                              1.266
                                                                                                              1.344
BARBOUR TERMINAL                                                                               1.417          4.346
BAROWELL M E TX           .                                                                    2.182          2. 0 5 1

                  ..
BAYPORT S H I P CHAN
BELTON LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BENBROOX LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                               3.122
                                                                                               3.567
                                                                                                              2. 866
                                                                                                              3.369

BRAZOS ISLAND WUBOR T
BUFFALO RAYOU AND TRIBU
                                              .                                                2.302
                                                                                               3.269
                                                                                               1.723
                                                                                                              2.187
                                                                                                              6 . 075
                                                                                                              1.637
                  .
CANYON LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         3.666          3.502
                                                   .
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CORPUS CHRIST] SNIP CHANNEL TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                  316
                                                                                               3. 3 8 8
                                                                                                                  331
                                                                                                              3.228
OENISON DAM. LAKE TEXORA. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         6 .3 9 3       6.073
      SHORELINE (IANAGEIILNT PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                             ...           475
ESTELLIIIE SPRINGS EXPERIIIENTAL PROJECT TX . . . . . . . .                         .              38             36
FERRELLS BRIDGE D                                                                              4.178          1.8 7 0
FREEPORT NARBOR
GALVESTON HARBOR A
                              .                                                                7.020
                                                                                               6.022
                                                                                                              8.889
                                                                                                              5.721
G I W . CHANNEL TO V                                                                           2.706          2.571
       .
G I W CNOCOLATE BAYOU T
ORANGER OAR AND LAKE TX .                     ..                                               2 .928
                                                                                               2.225
                                                                                                              2 . 760
                                                                                                              2.114
GRIPEVINE LAKE. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             2.900          2.755
                      .
GREENS BAYOU TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                  850
                                                                                              31.874
                                                                                                                  606
                                                                                                             30.260
                    . .
HOROS CREEK LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL T
                                                                                               1.179
                                                                                              15.354
                                                                                                              1.105
                                                                                                             14.111
INSPECTION OF COMPL                                                                            1.836          1.839
J I M CHAPMAN LAKE  .                                                                          1.001          1 . 901

               .. .
JOE POOL LAKE TX
LAXE I E I I P T
LAVDH LAKE
                                                                                               1.771
                                                                                                 214
                                                                                               3.065
                                                                                                              1. 8 8 2
                                                                                                                  203
                                                                                                              2.912
LEWISVILLE DA                                                                                  4.I 1 0        3 . 905
LOWER T R I N I T Y R I V                                                                         ...         2.057
                                        CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AN0 MINTENANCE
                                                    (AMOUNTS IN THOUShNOS)

                                                                                                               BUDGET       HOUSE
                                                                                                              REQUEST RECOMMENDED
  .......................................................                                              ..........................
          H
 MTAGORDA S
          PI                                        .
                    CHANNEL TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                         .
 NAVARRO M I L L S LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN TX . . . . . . . .
                                                        .
 O C FISHER O M AND LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                         .
                                .
 PAT M Y S E LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 PROCTOR LAKE. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 RAY ROBERTS L&KE TX                .
 SABIN€ - NECHES WATE
 SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR                                      .
                                               TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPEMTIONS. r*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 SOMERVILLE LAKE. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 TEXAS C I T Y SHIP CHANNEL. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 TEXAS WATER ALLOCATION A85ESSMENT TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                .
 TOWN BLUFF DAB B A STEINHAGEN LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                            ..
 WAC0 LAKE. TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                    .
 WALLISVILLE LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                        .
 WHlTNEY LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                .
 WRIGHT PATMAN OAM AND LAKE TX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                            man
 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS. m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                         75                 74
 SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     .                                        588                588

                                                    VERMONT

                                        .
BkLL MOUNTAIN LAKE YT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS. YT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                            .
NARROW OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN YT 6 NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NORTH HARTLANO LAKE. n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                    .
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE VT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                . .
TOWNSMENDLAKE n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UNION VILLAGE OAM YT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               578                548

                                                    VIRGINIA

APPOMATlOX RIVER. VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ATLANTlC INTMCOIISTAL WATERWAY . ACC. VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ATLANTIC lNTRACOASTAL WATERWAY                                          .
                                              DSC Vk . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR CIF REFUGE. VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                 .
CHINClITEAGUE .INLET. VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
      ...
WTHRISHT 0 1 AND LAKE 800MAW VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
            11
                   ~~




                    .
HARPTON ROS N?ffF?LK k NWPORT NEWS HBR VA (ORIFT REM
                                                                    .                .
INSPECTION OF ~ u n T ~ O lWORKS VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                         r   r
                                            .                       .
                    INEL VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           1 L M E VA d NC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                           AND RESERVOIR VA . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                .
                CO RIVER VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LYNNHAVEN I N L E T . VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                .
NORFOLK HARBOR VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NORTH FORK OF POU
PHILPOTT LAKE VA
PROJECT CONOITION
                            .
RUDEE INLET V       .
UATERlENVIRONnENTAL CERTIFICATIOH VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          .
                                                                            .
WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF V I R G I N I I I VA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YORK RIVER. VA . . .

                                                WASHINGTON

CHIEF JOSEPH OAn G l S WATEnENT MA \ 1
CHIEF JOSEPH D M . W 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                              ... 785
                                                                                                              s ?on
                                                                                                                                    185
                                                                .
COLUlBIA RIVER AT 8AKER BAY UA 6 OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COLUMBIA RIYER BETWEEN CHINOOK AN0 SANO ISLAND WA . . .                                      .                    3
                                                                                                                  6
                                                                                                                                      3
                                                                                                                                      6
COLUllBlA RIVER F I S H H I T I G k T I O N W1OR li                 .                I 0 il ........         85.700                 ...
               .
ED12 HOOK WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                                        . .
                                                                                                                 83                  60
EVERETT MBOR    AND SNOHOMISH              RIVER        VA . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          1.293            1.228
GRAYS M E O R AND C H E W r S RIVER HA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      8.180            8 . 721
    LONG TERO IIANAGEMEHT STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      ...                358
                                 CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION ANO IIIINTENANCE
                                             ( m o u r n s I THOUSANDSI
                                                           N

                                                                                                    BUDGET       WUEE
                                                                                                   REQUEST RECOUMENOEO
                                 ................................................................
HOWARD HANU)W DAM ECOSYSTEO RESTORATION W \1 . . . . . . . .          A       .
                                     .
HOWARD HANSON D M W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                            A
                                                     .
I C E M B O R LOCK AM0 O U I W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                        A
lNSPECTION OF COUPLETEO EWIRONIIEKTAL PROJECTS W . . .                              A .
                                                                 . .
INSPECTION OF COIIPLETEO WORKS WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LAKE WSHINGTON SP      HI     CANAL WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L I T T L E G W S E LOCK AND M U . W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                            A
LOWER GRANITE L O C I AN0 O M . UA
LOWER %QNUMENTAL LOCK AND 0111
LOWER SNAKE RIVER F I S H AN0 WILDLIFE COIIPENSATION \ 1 .
                                                                   .                      .
  ILL CREEK LUE              .
                        YA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
nr ST HELENS SEOIOEKT COMTROL. WA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                 .
llUD MWNTAlN DNI MA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NEAH BAY. W ..........................................
                  A
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                            A
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBL+TARRY WLTERS W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                 .                       A                .
W l L L A Y U T E RIVER W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                          A


STILLAGUAHISH RIVER W
                        A.
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                       A
SEATTLE H U B O R W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                A        .           ...............................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDMY WATERS YA . . . . . . . . . .                    .
                                     . .
SWINOIIISH CHANNEL W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
          .                 A
TACOMA PUYMLUP RIVER W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
THE DALLES LOCK AN0 M U . UA & OR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                         .
WILLAPA RIVER AN0 MRBOR HA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .




                         ..
BEECH FORK LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
BLUESTONE LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                         ..
8URNSYILLE LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EAST LYNN U K E W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
           .
ELKINS W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

                                                                  ..
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED W R K S W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UNAYHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OHIO RIVER    LWYS AMO DAMS. W . KY 6 OH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
      PARKERSBURGIVIENNA W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK W II 8 OH . . . . . . . . . . . .    .       .
                                                                                                      ~




                                                                                                    2.700
                                                                                                          ~   ~   1 . 425
                                                                                                                  2.565
                             .
R 0 BAILEY LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                 .
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                                    2.836
                                                                                                    1.039
                                                                                                                  2.681
                                                                                                                      987
SUUMERSVILLE LAKE. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  2.044         1.912
S U T O N LAKE. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         2.210         2.100
T I W R T LAKE. W . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       1.521         1.145

                                                 WISCONSIN

EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE
FOX RIVER WI    .                            .   W




                                 .
GREEN BAY HARBOR WI \ I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                      .
lllSPECTION OF COHPLETEO YORYS M I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                 .
MILWAUKEE HARBOR U I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                             .
PROJECT CONOITIOW SURVEYS Y I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
                     .
S U O N HARBOR WI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STURGEOII BAY HAWOR RAN LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP C k H I L Yr . .
SURVEILLANCE OF NOR
                                                                                          .
TWO RIVER HARBOR W               .
                                                     WOnrNG




         SUBTOTAL. PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES . . . . . . . . . . .

                                         REIIAINING I T E n S

AOUATlC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEIRCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ASSET I I A N A G E ~ h l l T l F A C I L I T I E SA110 EPUlPUENT OAIHTENANCE                 .
                           CORPS OF ENGINEERS . OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                                       (AMOUNTS I N THOUSANOS)

                                                                                                   BUOGET       HOUSE
                                                                                                  REQUEST RECOMMENDED
                                                                                            .........................

BUDGETIMANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M 8USINESS LINES . . . .
ACTIONS FOR CHANGE TO IMPROVE OPERATION AND MAINTENANC
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROJECTS NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC L
    BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MTERIAL (SECTION 20412
    NATIONAL MlTlGATlON PROJECTS (SECTION 111) . . .
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRAIC
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMNCE MONITORING SYSTEM .
DREDGING OPERATlONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION ( W E
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM ( W T S )                             ..
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EMERGENCY REPRffiRAMMING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FACILITY PROTECTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INDEPENDENT (PART) ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENT-STEWARDSH
INLAND YATERVAY NAVIWITION CHARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INLAND NAVlGATION SAFETY I N l T l A T l YE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
INSPECTION OF COllPLETED WORKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MONITORING OF COASTAL NAVIGATION PROJECTS . . . . . . . . . . .
NATIONAL COASTAL MAF'PING PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NATIONM DAM SAFETY PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MTIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOO INVENTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES . . . . . .
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATION. . . . . . . .
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT TECHNICM SUPPORT (A8S.PZ.WINABS)                                 .
PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION:
    REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    PROTECT, U M R AND STRAIGHTEN CHANNELS (SEC 3 ) .                              ..
    WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION. . . . . . . . . . . .
RECREATION ONE STOP ( R I S ) NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVAT
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM....
                             .
    Chesapeake Bay N e v p o l n t Comfort. Mathews c o u n t y ,
                                                   .
    Long I s l a n d C o a s t a l P l a n n i n g NY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RELIABILITY UOOELS PROGRAM FOR MAJOR REH- . . . . . . . . . . .
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT IWOTSl . . . . . . . . . . . .
                                                                                         ........................
         SUBTOTAL FOR ITEMS NOT LISTED UNDER STATES                          ......             126.110          182.429
                                                                                         ........................
         TOTAL, OPERATION AN0 IIAINTENANCE. . . . . . . . . . .                              2 . 1 7 5 . 000   2.300. 000



!1        ITEMS FUNDED I N CONSTRUCTION
  Arkansas Lakes (Blakely Mountain Dam, Lake Ouachita, Degray
Lake, Narrows Dam, Lake Greesan), Arkansas.-In             addition to
budgeted activities a t these Corps facilities, $964,600 is included to
provide adequate levels of service a t public facilities.
  Burns Waterway Harbor, Indiana.-The             Committee has rec-
ommended $2,530,000 for this project. Dredging activities should
place priority on the Bailly intake pipe area.
  Moriches Inlet, New York.-It is the Committee's understanding
that the dredging of this project will be completed in conjunction
with a FEMA effort to place sand at Smith Point Park and
Cupsogue Beaches. The Committee will revisit this project to en-
sure adequate funding is in place in the event that the project is
not completed in this manner.
  Regional Sediment Management.-Using funds previously appro-
priated for Southwest Washington Littoral Drift Restoration (Ben-
son Beach) Washington Regional Sediment Management, the Sec-
retary shall conduct a test project by placing dredged material in
the surf zone located on or near Benson Beach at the mouth of the
Columbia River and monitor sediment movement and environ-
mental impacts. This project shall be designed in concurrence with
the existing recommendation of the bi-state working group of local,
state, and federal entities. Additional costs beyond the previously
appropriated funds shall be borne by non-Federal interests.
                         REGULATORY~ROGRAM
Appropriation, 20                                           $180,000,000
Budget estimate,                                             180,000,000
Recommended, 2                                               180,000,000
Comparison:
    Appropriation, 2008
    Budget estimate, 2009                                           -
  This appropriation provides funds to administer laws pertaining
to regulation of activities affecting U.S. waters, including wetlands,
in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of
1899, the Clean Water Act, and the Marine Protection, Research
and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. Appropriated funds are used to re-
view and process permit applications, ensure compliance on per-
mitted sites, protect important aquatic resources, and support wa-
tershed planning efforts in sensitive environmental areas in co-
operation with States and local communities.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $180,000,000,
which is the same as the budget request and the fiscal year 2008
enacted level.
 FORMERLY     UTILIZED
                     SITESREMEDIAL
                                 ACTION     (FUSRAP)
                                      PROGRAM
Appropriation, 200
Budget estimate, 2
Recommended, 200
Comparison:
   Appropriation, 2008
   Budget estimate, 20

active materials and mixed wastes, located mostly a t sites contami-
nated as a result of the Nation's early efforts to develop atomic
weapons.
                                 53
  Congress transferred FUSRAP from the Department of Energy
(DOE) to the Corps of Engineers in fiscal year 1998. In appro-
priating FUSRAP funds to the Corps of Engineers, the Committee
intended to transfer only the responsibility for administration and
execution of cleanup activities a t FUSRAP sites where DOE had
not completed cleanup. The Committee did not transfer to the
Corps ownership of and accountability for real property interests,
which remain with DOE. The Committee expects DOE to continue
to provide its institutional knowledge and expertise to serve the
Nation and the affected communities to ensure the success of this
program.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $140,000,000,
the same as the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and $10,000,000
above budget request. The Committee reaffirms report language
carried in previous years directing the prioritization of sites, espe-
cially those that are nearing completion.
                               EMERGENCIES
                 CONTROL COASTAL
             FLOOD     AND
Appropriation, 2008
Budget estimate, 20


                                                                   -

other measures that ensure the readiness of the Corps to respond
to floods, hurricanes, and other natural disasters, and to support
emergency operations in response to such natural disasters, includ-
ing advance measures, flood fighting, emergency operations, the
provision of potable water on an emergency basis, and the repair
of certain flood and storm damage reduction projects. The re-
quested amount is the base funding necessary for preparedness ac-
tivities.
   The Committee recommends an appropriation of $40,000,000, the
same level as the budget request and $40,000,000 above the fiscal
year 2008 enacted level.
                             EXPENSES
                                                          $175,046,000
                                                           177,000,000
Recommended, 2                                             177,000,000
                                                            +1,954,000
                                                                    -
  This appro nation                                    and manage-
ment of the &ice of the Chief of Engineers, the Division Offices,
and certain research and statistical functions of the Corps of Engi-
neers.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $177,000,000,
$1,954,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and the same
as the budget request.
  The Committee is concerned that the Corps is not filling open
senior positions in a timely manner. The Corps of Engineers is re-
ceiving increasing appropriations on both the military and civil
sides of its program. In addition, the Corps has a program nearly
three times that of its annual national appropriation in the New
Orleans area and is providing assistance for the reconstruction of
Iraq and Afghanistan. It is critical for the success of these impor-
tant missions that leadership positions are recruited for and filled
in a timely manner.
                   SECRETARY THE ARMY (CML WORKS)
OFFICE THE ASSISTANT
      OF                   OF
                                                              $4,500,000
Budget estimate,                                               6,000,000
Recommended, 2                                                 5,000,000
                                                                  +500,000
                                                              -   1,000,000
  The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) oversees Civil
Works budget and policy whereas the Corps' executive direction
and management of the Civil Works - -
                                    program are funded from the
Expenses account.
  The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,000,000,
$500,000 above the fiscal year 2008 enacted level and $1,000,000
below the budget request.


   The bill includri an adrninistrati\re provi.iion limiting rcpresenta-
tional expenses and allow~ny the purchasc or hire of passenger
                               for
motor vehicles.
                                PROVISIONS
                          GENERAL
                       CORPS OF E N G I N E E R S C M L
  The bill includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this
Act to carry out any contract that commits an amount for a project
in excess of the amount appropriated for such project that remains
unobligated.
  The bill includes a provision prohibiting the award of continuing
contracts for any project for which funds are derived from the In-
land Waterways Trust Fund.
  The bill includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds for any
A-76 or HPO study.
                                 TITLE I1
                    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                               UTAHPROJECT
                         CENTRAL
             CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT
Appropriation, 20                                             $43,000,000
Budget estimate,                                               42,000,000
Recommended, 20                                                42,000,000
                                                              - 1,000,000
                                                                       -
  The Central Utah Project Completion Act (Titles 11-VI of Public
Law 102-575) provides for the completion of the Central Utah
Project by the Central Utah Water Conservancy District. The Act
also authorizes the appropriation of funds for fish, wildlife, and
recreation mitigation and conservation; establishes an account in

								
To top