Talent Management Survey Results Executive Summary

W
Document Sample
scope of work template
							Talent Management
  Survey Results
Executive Summary
                                   Overview
In the shadow of global recession, banks are fundamentally reexamining their primary source
of comparative advantage: their people. Amid increased regulatory scrutiny and growing
operating costs, banks face mounting pressure to demonstrate returns on talent investments—
and deep uncertainty about whether current investments are working.

In early 2009, the American Bankers Association and the Corporate Executive Board invited a
sample of more than 3,500 bank CEOs to participate in a survey about talent management
practices at their institutions. The survey asked respondents questions on the following talent-
related topics:

 –    Current Talent Management Practices
 –    Retention and Succession Planning
 –    Developing High Performers
 –    Assessing Talent Gaps
 –    Future Talent Management Priorities
                            Overview (cont.)



The research reveals that although bank CEOs are increasing their talent focus, talent
programs fail to yield consistent results. The report finds that:

 –  A wide range of talent management practices are only partly in place at most banks

 –  Banks depend heavily on internal talent and lack succession planning capabilities

 –  Banks are under developing high-performing talent, creating severe threats to retention of
    key personnel and longer-term profitability

 –  A majority of banks are unable to assess training needs and outputs, and run the risk of
    making continued investments in underperforming programs.
                           The Survey Results
•    The results of ABA’s Talent Management Survey paint a somewhat concerning picture on the
     state of how banks manage one of their most important assets – their people - within the banking
     industry

•    The issue requires creative leadership skills and a dedicated executive level commitment if we as
     an industry are going to solve these challenges and position ourselves for success

•    We define talent management as including the following 11 activities:

      –    Culture and values
      –    Workforce planning
      –    Recruitment
      –    On boarding new hires
      –    Training and development
      –    Coaching
      –    Employee Engagement
      –    High performer development
      –    Rewards and recognition
      –    Succession planning
      –    Talent record-keeping/reporting and analysis
Talent Management System
     Talent Management in Crisis: Cross Industry Trends

The economic downturn has dramatically affected employee outcomes in three ways:

•    Declining Employee Productivity. Overall employee performance is suffering due to declining
     employee engagement , and declining employee morale coincides with serious drops in employee
     effort and productivity. Over the past 4 years, the number of employees exhibiting high levels of
     discretionary effort has declined by 53%, leading to productivity losses.

•    More Disengaged Employees. Low performing employees are less likely to quit now than they
     ever have been before , and the rise in disengaged employees places even greater pressure on
     managers. This trend has created even more complex people challenges for managers who often
     have limited experience in re-engaging uncommitted staff

•    Increased Risk That High Potentials Will Leave. High potential employees – future leaders – are
     indicating increased risk of turnover , while the tolls of disengaged and low-producing employees
     are increasing, High potential employees are now more inclined to quit., and 25% of high potential
     employees plan to leave their current job over the next twelve months.
                       Bank Specific Talent Challenges


•    Difficulty Executing Effective Talent Strategies. With serious talent challenges present across all
     industries, it’s not surprising to find CEOs re-evaluating their talent management practices. The
     ABA/CEB research finds that CEOs recognize the importance of talent to their enterprises, but
     suffer from dry talent pipelines and uncertain payoffs from current training and development
     investments.

•    Building a Talent Pipeline is Essential. An important link between talent management and high
     potential employee development focuses on the identification of key positions within the
     organization and building the talent pipeline to fill those roles. “The most effective talent
     strategies first identify those jobs in the organization that are key to the ongoing business strategy,
     ensuring that staff are ready for the jobs they are slated to fill”, reports a recent study on
     leadership practices conducted by the Chief Learning Officer.
                  Implications for the Banking Industry


•    Increased Retention Risk. Banks underemphasize the importance of high performer development
     and under invest in high-performer programs.

     To mitigate against high-performer attrition, banks must formulate clear development plans
     and career paths for their best talent.

•     Uncertain Training ROI. Banks routinely emphasize the importance of training and development
     yet fail to measure training needs or outcomes.

     To generate demonstrable returns on training investments, banks must focus programs on
     applied learning, which increases employee engagement and productivity levels.

     Three tactics critical to training success are:
      –  Emphasize learners’ ability to apply the skills learned through training
      –  Communicate the payoffs of training to employees
      –  Engage managers in employee training to make learning application effective
             TOP TALENT CHALLENGES FACING BANKS




1. A wide range of talent management practices are only “partly in place”
   at most banks.

2. Banks depend heavily on internal talent and lack succession planning
   capabilities.

3. Banks are under-developing high-performing talent, creating severe threats
   to retention of key personnel and longer-term productivity.

4.  A majority of banks are unable to assess employee training needs and
    outputs and run the risk of making continued investments in
    underperforming programs.


       American Bankers Association/The Corporate Executive Board Company
1. A wide range of talent management practices
   are only “partly in place” at most banks.
CEO Assessment of Importance of
  Talent Management Practices


                           Ranking in
                           Importance:

                           • Banks
                           consistently rank
                           all Talent
                           Management
                           Practices as
                           important
                            T
                           •  op 3 rankings:
                           - Culture and
                           Values (6.4)
                           - Training and
                           Development (6.2)
                            -Employee
                           Engagement (6.0)
CEO Assessment of Existing
Talent Management Practices



                     The Issue is in Execution:

                     CEOs indicate that the practices
                     listed below rank among the top
                     three in terms of importance, but are
                     only ‘somewhat to mostly’ in place:

                      C
                     •  ulture and Values
                      T
                     •  raining and Development
                      E
                     •  mployee Engagement
CEO Assessment of Talent Management Practices
“Importance” Versus Ability to Put These “In Place”
2. Banks depend heavily on internal talent and
  lack succession planning capabilities.
Banks Fill 60% of Positions Internally




                                         Banks rely
                                         heavily
                                         on internal
                                         talent.
High Performers are Important – they exert 21%
     more effort than average employees




                                     Does your
                                     organization know
                                     who your high
                                     performers are?

                                     Do you recognize
                                     them?
High Performer Risk - One in four expect to leave within
                       one year




                                     HiPo’s contribute more to
                                     your organization, but 25%
                                     are considering leaving
                                     within 12 months.

                                     How do you retain them?
Banks have limited ability to rely on talent pipelines.




                                              Attracting and
                                              retaining high
                                              performing
                                              talent
                                              Is a critical
                                              issue for
                                              your
                                              organization.
3. Banks are under-developing high-performing
  talent, creating severe threats to retention of
  key personnel and longer-term productivity.
    High performers exert 21%
more effort than average employees




                              Has your
                              organization
                              identified your
                              high
                              performers?
Without significant ability, aspiration and engagement,
     employees will not excel in their next jobs.
Banks underemphasize high performer development
   and under-invest in high-performer programs.



                                      Have you
                                      communicated
                                       to your HIPO’s?

                                      Have you provided
                                      an individual written
                                      development plan?

                                      How actionable is
                                      the plan?
    To mitigate against high-performer attrition, banks should
formulate clear development plans and career paths for top talent.
4. A majority of banks are unable to assess
   employee training needs and outputs and run
   the risk of making continued investments in
   underperforming programs.
A majority of banks are unable to assess training needs and the
                impact of training on performance
   Focus training programs on applied learning, which
increases employee engagement and productivity levels.
Visibly supporting employee development can increase
                 performance by 20%.
                                 Call to Action

  1. Invest in high potential employees to increase output levels,
  develop a leadership pipeline and retain these key performers.

  a. Help high potential employees build professional, information-rich relationships
  with managers, peers, and direct reports.

  b. Build customized and achievable development plans that are coupled with visible
  executive-level commitment.


2. Focus training programs on applied learning to engage employees
  and increase their productivity levels.

  a. Emphasize learners’ ability to apply the teaching more than emphasizing skill building.

  b. Communicate the payoff s of training to employees.

  c. Engage managers in employee training to make learning application effective.
             ABA Contacts


For further information on survey findings please contact:

  Jim Edrington          or           Maryann Johnson
jedringt@aba.com                     mjohnson@aba.com
    (202) 663-5490                      (202) 63-5199

						
Related docs