Control of the Corn Earworm on Sweet Corn in

W
Document Sample
scope of work template
							 to 500 ppm. These higher concen-
 trations also caused some killing o f
                                                    Control of the Corn Earworm
 small shoots, particularly in the           on Sweet Corn in Southern California
 tops of trees. However, little leaf                                 G. G . Kennedy       H. N. Nakakihara     E. R. Oatman
 drop was observed in these tests.
 Some fruit on treated trees began to
 darken and shrivel within about
 ten days after ethephon applica-                                                        reduced level of infestation has
 tion.                                                                                   apparently continued through 1974.
    Additional studies conducted in                                                      Similarly, a reduction in the level
 1973 and 1974 indicated that 250                                                        of tomato fruitworm (= corn ear-
 ppm was the maximum concentra-                                                          worm) infestations in processing
 tion that could be used on Royal                                                        tomatoes occurred in Orange Coun-
 Ann cherries in California because                                                      ty in recent years. There, the level
 of gumming from treated trees.                                                          of fruitworm-infested tomatoes in
 Even at this concentration, howev-                                                      untreated plots averaged 5.3 per-
 er, serious gumming can occur in                                                        cent between 1969 and 1972
 some seasons. A concentration of                                                        whereas, between 1973 and 1974, it
 125 ppm h a s not produced serious                                                      averaged only 0.7 percent. Under
 gumming but loosening at 125 ppm                                                       conditions of low earworm infesta-
 has been inconsistent. Hence, there                                                     tions, satisfactory contro1 may be
 appears to be seasonal variability                                                      obtained by insecticides that do not
 in the response of sweet cherry                                                         provide acceptable control under
trees and fruit to this material.                                                       the pressures of a severe infesta-
   Limited trials with ethephon                                                         tion.
were conducted on the fresh ship-                                                          During 1974, four commercially
ping varieties, Bing and Van, dur-                                                      available insecticides and three ex-
ing the 1972, 1973, and 1974              Larva of corn earworm feeding on kernels of
                                                          sweet corn.                   perimental compounds were evalu-
seasons. Ethephon at 250 ppm gave                                                       ated for control of the corn ear-
adequate loosening with no adverse          T H E CORN EARWORM, He-                     worm on sweet corn in Riverside,
effects on fruit color, soluble solids   riothis zea (Boddie), also known as            where late-season corn earworm
or weight. In the tests with Bing         he tomato fruitworm and cotton                infestations continue to reach high
and Van, no serious phytotoxic           ~ollworm, is a serious pest on                 levels. The commercial materials
effects were noted.                      weet corn, tomato, cotton, and                 were also evaluated for effective-
   While ethephon can greatly aid        ;everal other row crops grown                  ness in controlling the aphid Rho-
in fruit removal, the potential phy-     :ommercialIy in California. Sweet              palosiphum padi &.). This aphid is
totoxic effects of this material on      :orn, however, is the preferred host           usually not a serious problem on
sweet cherry trees in California         tnd, although the Iarvae also feed             sweet corn, but it occasionally
appear to outweigh its fruit loos-       in the tassel in the whorl, the most           develops high populations which
ening advantage. The use of ethe-        iignificant damage results from                are capable of devitalizing their
phon on cherries is not recom-           ‘eeding on kernels in the develop-             host plant. Additionally, it pro-
mended b y t h e University of           ng ear.                                        duces copious quantities of sticky
California and because of its phy-          In the past, corn earworm infes-            honeydew which foster the growth
totoxic effects, this material is not    ations in southern California were             of a black sooty mold which inter-
labeled for use on sweet cherries in     io severe that virtually all ears not          feres with normal photosynthesis
California.                              reated with insecticide were dam-              and discolors the husk of the ears.
                                         tged by this pest. For example, in                All insecticides tested were ap-
                                         he absence of insecticides, an                 plied to ‘Golden Cross Bantam’ (t
   W. C. Micke is Extension Pomol-       iverage of 99.1 per cent of harvest-           strain) sweet corn planted June 17,
ogist, U. C. Davis; W. R. Schreader      :d ears from successive plantings              1974, at the University of Califor-
is University o f California Farm        n Orange County during 1963,                   nia’s Citrus Research Center and
Advisor, San Joaquin County; and         !964, and 1965 were injured by the             Agricultural Experiment Station.
J. T. Yeager and E. J. Roncoroni         .ern earworm. In the Coachella                 Applications were made with a
are Extension Staff Research Asso-       Jalley of Riverside County, be-                high-clearance ground sprayer,
ciates, U. C. Davis. The authors         ween 1966 and 1968, an average of              equipped with four D-4 hollow-
gratefully acknowledge Amchem            39.0 percent of all untreated ears             cone nozzles per row. Fifty gallons
Products, Inc., for supplying the        iarvested during June were injured             of spray mix per acre were applied
ethephon used in this study and for      )y the corn earworm. More recent-              at 90 to 100 psi. All treatments
the technical assistance of its repre-   y, however, earworm damage has                 were replicated four times in a
sentatives Ken Dunster and Sheron        )een considerably less severe in               randomized complete-block design.
Christensen. The following grow-         he Coachella Valley. Between                      The commercially available com-
ers also assisted in these studies:      -969 and 1972, for example, only 9             pounds, lorsban (not presently ap-
Mario Podesta, Caminata and Po-          )ercent of t h e untreated ears                proved for control of corn earworm
desta, Lagomarsino Bros., and Rob-       harvested during June were infest-             on sweet corn), Lannate, Sevimol
ert Russell.                              d
                                         b by the corn earworm. This                    and Gardona were appIied to plots
4                                                                           CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, AUGUST, 1975
235 ft. x 4 rows (40-inch spacing) phate), and UC 49035 (a carba-                                   The present studies indicate that
at the rates shown in table 1. mate) were evaluated in a separate                                 under conditions of a moderate
Presilk applications were made on test in which the plots were 50 ft. x                           corn earworm infestation, Lannate,
August 2 and 5; remaining applica- 3 rows. These materials were ap-                               Gardona, and Lorsban provide ef-
tions on August 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, plied on August 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17,                       fective earworm control, while Sev-
19, and 21. On August 27 and 28, 19, and 21. On August 29-30,                                     imol does not. The experimental
fifty ears were harvested per plot twenty-five ears per plot (100 per                             compounds tested showed suffi-
(200 per treatment) and individual- treatment) were harvested and ex-                             cient promise to warrant additional
 ly examined for corn earworm dam-       amined individually for corn ear-                        testing.
 age and the presence of aphids.         worm damage. The results are
   Lannate, Lorsban, and Gardona         presented in table 2.
provided effective control of the           Although FMC 33297 and RH
corn earworm in the presence of an       218 at 1 Ib. appeared to give
 infestation that produced 78 per-       slightly better control than UC-        G. G. Kennedy is Assistant Pro-
cent worm-infested ears in the           49035 and RH 218 at 0.5 Ib., there fessor and Assistant Entomologist;
untreated plots (table 1). In the        were no significant differences be- H. N . Nakakihara is Staff Research
presence of this moderate level of       tween the mean percentages of Associate IV; and E. R. Oatman is
infestation, Sevimol at 3 Ibs. actual    infested ears in these treatments. Professor and Entomologist, De-
toxicant per acre did not provide        All treatments had significantly partment of Entomology, Universi-
acceptable control. The use of Sevi-     fewer ears than the untreated plots. t y of California, Riverside.
mol (or Sevin and molasses) for
                                           Table 1. Evaluation of insecticides for control of
control of corn earworm is present-               corn earworm and R. pod; on sweet corn in       Table   2. Evaluation o insecticides for control of corn
                                                                                                                         f
ly widespread among sweet corn                               Riverside, Ca.-1974                            earworm on sweet corn in Riverside,    Ca. -
growers in southern California.                                                                                                  1974
However, the results indicate that                        Lb. actual      Percent       Percent
this material may not provide ade-                          toxicant    earworm-        aphid-                              Lb. actual             Percent
                                                                per       infested     infested                           toxicant per    eorworm-infested
quate protection when earworm            Treatment             acre           ears         ears   Treatment                       acre                ears
populations are high. Of the com-                                           ~




pounds tested, only Lorsban pro-         Lorsban                1 .o        .
                                                                           35a           2.5 a    FMC 33297                        .
                                                                                                                                  01                  5 a
vided effective control of both the      Lannate               0.45        3.0 a        56.0 b    RH 218                          0.5                15 a
                                         Gardona                1.5        4.5 a        86.5 c    RH 218                           1 .o               8a
corn earworm and the aphid.              Sevimol                3.0       20.0 b        49.5 b    uc 49035                         1 .o              12 a
   T h e experimental compounds,         Untreated                        78.0c         96.0 c    Untreated                                          75 b
FMC 33297 (a synthetic pyreth-
roid), RH 218 (an organophos-                Means in column followed by same letter not              Means in columns followed by same letter not
                                         significantly different - Duncan's multiple range test   significantly different - Duncan's multiple range test
                                                               P10.05                                                     P50.05




               Reseurch Briefs for CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE

    HIGH-ENERGY RATIONS                  cent concentrates appeared to be Imperial Valley. - F. E. Robinson,
                                         optimum. Costs, obviously, would Department of Water Science and
   Results of three studies to date in   determine the levels chosen. - G. Engineering, Davis.
a continuing project aimed at deter-     P. Lofgreen, Department of Animal
mining the effects of dietary treat-     Science, Davis, Imperial Valley HEAT-TREATED, VIRUS-FREE
ment on body composition and             Field Station.                       MEYER LEMON CLONES
performance of beef cattle indicate
that maximum performance on a                                                                        Two heat-treated, virus-free Mey-
high-energy ration is achieved by        CATTLE WASTE NITRATE DIS-                                er lemon clones developed through
cattle grown to 500 lbs. before                   POSAL                                           the Citrus Variety Improvement
being given the high-energy ration.                                                               Program are being compared with
To obtain data for determining             A recent Imperial Valley Field                         four old-line, virus-infected clones
what procedure should be used to         Station study of an unlined, liquid-                     on three rootstocks and as own-
grow calves to 500 Ibs., various         cattle-waste digestion pond showed                       rooted seedlings in a study at the
energy levels were compared. In          that soil sealing occurred in 3                          South Coast Field Station. So far,
general, the rate of growth was          weeks and that the order of magni-                       evaluation of the heat-treated, vi-
dependent on energy concentration        tude of nitrate addition to the                          rus-free clones for production and
in the ration. Considering the           ground water was 0.27 Ibs. per                           fruit quality in this planting give
growth and efficiency to 500 Ibs.        steer per year. The study was                            every indication that they can suc-
on the growing ration and the            conducted as part of a current                           c e s s f u 11y rep 1ace v i r u s - i n f ect ed
performance on the high energy           project at the station which is                          Meyer lemons.- W. Reuther and E.
ration from 500 Ibs. to finish, a        aimed at improving irrigation man-                       C. Calavan, Department of Plant
growing ration containing 72 per-        agement and salinity control in the                      Science, Riverside.
CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, AUGUST, 1975                                                                                                                   5

						
Related docs
Other docs by ojd96442