[...] the Allied air transport commander, United States Army Air Force (USAAF) MG Paul Williams, refused, claiming that his air crews would be exhausted and that his ground crews would need time to repair the damage he expected the aircraft to suffer during the first landings.9 USAAF concerns also forced the landings to more distant drop zones (DZs) and landing zones (LZs) since it was feared that zones nearer to Arnhem would expose the transports to German antiaircraft (AA) fire.10 The multilift concept of Operation Market Garden did not simply mean that MG Urquhart had fewer forces on the ground. Command and Control of Army Forces, discusses the importance of communications to commanders, stating that shortfalls must be corrected to provide full information in order to develop accurate situational understanding.37 It advises that modern information systems can help commanders command forward without losing situational understanding.38 However, without effective information flow, commanders at the front risk becoming overly focused on the fight immediately ahead of them and losing sight of the bigger picture. 39 Summary The 1st Airborne Division's plan in Operation Market Garden represented a tenuous balance between the chance of achieving a great tactical success and the risk of a crushing operational defeat.
Each session of the Engineer Captain’s Career Course much stronger than expected. Of the 10,000 British airborne (ECCC) is required to write an article analyzing a historical troops who landed around Arnhem, 1,130 were killed and battle, and the best overall professional article receives the 6,450 were captured.1 Thomas Jefferson Writing Excellence Award. This article was judged the best article of ECCC 4-07.
Pages to are hidden for
"OPERATION MARKET GARDEN: THE BATTLE FOR ARNHEM"Please download to view full document