; The Plaintiff as Victim and Investor: Prudent Investing and the Calculation of Economic Damages
Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

The Plaintiff as Victim and Investor: Prudent Investing and the Calculation of Economic Damages

VIEWS: 20 PAGES: 29

In recent years, 45 states have adopted laws regulating the actions of those with fiduciary responsibilities over invested funds of their principals. Under these new laws, trustees are required to behave as would a "prudent investor" in light of modern portfolio theory and are freed from depression-era statutes prohibiting all but low-yielding government securities as investment vehicles. Prudent investing recognizes the risk/return trade-off, the role of diversification and financial intermediaries in eliminating default risk, and the importance of aligning investment decisions with specific circumstances of individuals. This paper explores the implications for forensic economists of these legal changes and the changes in background financial institutions and practices that they mirror. In cases of longer-term pecuniary loss where modern investment practices are likely to be followed by the victim with median attitudes toward risk, the discount rate used by forensic economists should reflect the returns that can reasonably be expected from an at least partially diversified investment. If tort damages are calculated based exclusively on risk-free discount rates, a typically diversified investment approach for the lump sum will result in a significant positive balance at the end of the loss period. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

More Info
  • pg 1
									Charles H. Breeden and Brian C. Brush. 2008. The Plaintiff as Victim and Investor:
Prudent Investing and the Calculation of Economic Damages. Journal of Legal Economics
14(3): pp. 15-41.



The Plaintiff as Victim and Investor: Prudent
Investing and the Calculation of Economic
Damages
Charles H. Breeden and Brian C. Brush, Marquette University*
For additional information see Author Contact page

Abstract        In recent years, 45 states have adopted laws regulating the
actions of those with fiduciary responsibilities over invested funds of their
principals. Under these new laws, trustees are required to behave as would
a “prudent investor” in light of modern portfolio theory and 
								
To top