Get documents about "Open Spaces Master Plan
Document Sample
Parks
&
Open Spaces
Master Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN
In 2003, the District of Sechelt prepared a Parks and Open Space Master Plan as a
summer student initiative. The Plan includes the following components:
• A demographic analysis;
• A user survey;
• An inventory and assessment of existing parks
• An Inventory of trails and beach accesses, and
• A recommended strategy for the development of parks, trails and beach
accesses.
Since the completion of the draft Parks Plan, considerable subdivision has occurred
resulting in parkland dedication being made by developers. In addition, improvements
have been made to Kinnickinnick Park and Hackett Park, the District’s two primary
sports fields.
The purpose of this Executive Summary is to identify future park and trail development
priorities and improvements that should be developed by the District’s Parks department
or by local developers as a condition of land development. The Executive Summary
does not reference the demographic analysis; the community consultation process
including user interviews or a number of parks currently maintained by the District.
(Picadilly, Creekside) These are detailed in the main report
1. Sports Fields
With the completion of the new ball fields, Kinnickinick Park now has 4 ball fields. Kinn
Park and Hackett Park should satisfy the requirements for fastball and soccer for the
foreseeable future. In addition, the school fields at Davis Bay Elementary, Sechelt
Elementary, West Sechelt Elementary and Piccadilly Park should meet the future
demands for minor soccer and softball.
The proposed Silverback development in East Porpoise Bay proposes a 2.8 ha site
located at the south east corner of the intersection of Sechelt Inlet Road and the golf
course access road to accommodate a community sports field and tennis courts.
The Trails development offers approximately 15 ha of open space. The easterly portion
adjacent to Woods Creek could accommodate a small community play field. Staff will
negotiate this with the developer as condition of subdivision.
The Havies Road subdivision (named Davis Lookout) includes a 1.13 ha site for a
communal septic system and a .52 ha park dedication. Although the septic field has
moderate slope it could serve as a field area for unstructured recreation activities.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 1
The West Sechelt Neighborhood Plan designates future park sites in DL 4302 and DL
1384. These District Lots fall within the West Sechelt Comprehensive Development
Area. A requirement of land development is the preparation of a comprehensive
development plan which will identify specific park requirements for this area.
2. Waterfront Parks
The District and community organizations have accorded a high priority to waterfront
parks and land acquisition for future waterfront parks. The Davis Bay waterfront is a
major Sunshine Coast feature. The District has been aggressively pursuing waterfront
properties at Mission Point to extend the Davis Bay public recreation area to Chapman
Creek. The Maritime Gateway Park adjacent to the Trail Bay Pier will be a significant
park focusing on the Trail Bay waterfront and connecting to the Boulevard and Snickett
Park. The Urban Greenway Committee has examined access options to the Trail Bay
Boulevard between Ocean Avenue and Inlet Avenue.
The following land developments have offered parks which provide improved access to
the waterfront.
Sangara – DL 1384
A 30 lot subdivision facing Trail Bay includes the provision for a .25 ha park adjacent to
the Sunshine Coast Highway with views of Trail Bay. As a condition of development the
developer will construct a trail to a granite ledge on the waterfront.
Wakefield Creek
Phase 1 includes a .06 ha corridor from the Sunshine Coast Highway leading the
Wakefield Beach waterfront and a walking path that the developer will construct. Phase
2 proposes a .02 ha park area adjacent to Mason Road and a water feature in Mason
Road as well as the completion of the waterfront trail.
The Silverback development in East Porpoise Bay includes a 1.1 ha linear park along
the Porpoise Bay waterfront as well as a 3.2 ha park dedication in the Shannon Creek
area. (The Silverback development also proposes blocks of open space at the upper
elevations of the site)
Maritime Gateway Park
In 2006, Petro-Canada conveyed the remediated lots 15 and 16 to the District of
Sechelt thus enabling the development of the Maritime Gateway Park, an initiative that
has been under consideration since 2000. The Sunshine Coast Rotary Club proposes
to develop a childrens adventure playground on lot 17 facing the waterfront. A concept
plan has been prepared by District staff and the Rotary Club and includes the following
components.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 2
• Deactivation of Snickett Boulevard and Wharf Road and construction of a new
connector to Xenichen Boulevard.
• A parking lot,
• Washrooms;
• Beach volleyball courts
• Improved access to the waterfront
• Site landscaping
• Tie up floats off the Trail Bay Pier
The completion of the Maritime Gateway Park will present a significant improvement to
the Trail Bay waterfront and be a major contribution to Downtown Revitalization.
West Porpoise Bay
The Concordia Homes development at the north end of Gale Avenue dedicates a 1.8 ha
natural park above Snake Bay as well as a 240 meter waterfront trail along Snake Bay.
Poise Island Estates
The Poise Island Estates subdivision included a small waterfront park dedication
abutting Lot 24. The site is relatively steep bluff rising above Porpoise Bay. In addition a
road right of way on the extension of Poise Island Drive extends from the road down to
the waterfront. Although small, this area could be improved for water access.
Blue Northern
The Blue Northern Strata development on Marine Way immediately east of Mackenzie
Marina includes two small waterfront park dedications on rock bluffs above Porpoise
Bay. The developer will provide site improvements (view corridors, picnic benches) as
a condition of development.
3. OCP Policies
The Parks and Open Space section of the OCP includes wide ranging policies for Parks
and Open Space. A stated Objective is the continued enhancement of public access to
the waterfront. And the development of a comprehensive linear pedestrian oriented
walkway and open space system which parallels the shoreline of the Strait of Georgia
and Sechelt Inlet (incorporating view corridors, beach accesses and rest areas). A
specific policy (2.12.17) includes the acquisition of linear pedestrian oriented walkways
no less than 3 meters parallel to the Strait of Georgia and Porpoise Bay either through
development approvals or purchase. It is important that Council and Administration
support these policies through the development process in the future interests of the
community.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 3
4. The Trails
The Parks Plan identifies the importance of trails in linking neighborhoods and linking
neighborhoods to the downtown core. The Plan talks of standards for trail development
and a number of trails that should be developed either by the District or through the land
development process.
West Sechelt to Sechelt
The OCP outlines a corridor that follows the SCRD waterline from Derby Road through
to the Trail Bay Estates property (Clayton property adjacent to Chatelech High School).
This trail traverses large undeveloped properties but should be dedicated as greenway
and a trail constructed with the development of the Sangara and Clayton properties (DL
1385, 1384, 4295.A)
Wilson Creek to Downtown Village
The proposed upgrade to the Sunshine Coast Highway between the Conveyor Belt and
Davis Bay includes the provision for a dedicated pedestrian/bike path. This feature will
be fundamental to enhancing safe pedestrian and bicycle movement from the Davis
Bay, Selma Park, Wilson Creek neighborhood into the downtown.
The plan recommends that the District and the Band coordinate the development of a
trail between the boat launch at the SIB marina along the shore to Sinku Boulevard,
thus providing a dedicated trail system into downtown Sechelt. This could link to the
future sidewalk system on the Sunshine Coast Highway upgrade.
East Porpoise Bay Trail
The Plan recommends the construction of a number of trails which could provide a
major trail between Downtown and Sandy Hook. This network includes the following
sections:
• A trail from Osprey Street (near the Duck Marsh) along the foreshore at the head
of Porpoise Bay Sechelt Inlet Road.
• The Meandering Trail
• Trail improvement along the waterfront esplanade between Allen Road and Yew
Road
• A bike path from Marmot Drive into the Porpoise Bay Provincial Park, then north
to the Silverback development.
• A bike path along Sechelt Inlet Road between Silverback and the Gray Creek
logging road.
• Sandy Hook pedestrian/bike paths on Skookumchuck Road, Deerhorn Road,
Sandy Hook Road, Klahanie Drive to Tillicum Bay Road.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 4
Because of its length and complexity, this system will take considerable time and effort
to develop.
Chapman Creek Trails
The Chapman Creek corridor contains several trails. The lower trail runs on the west
bank between Brookman Park upstream approximately 3 km. This part of the trail is
characterized by carved gnome figurines. An old tote road runs along the top of the
bank from Chapman Road north to the BC Hydro line (approximately 4 km). The trail
continues another 3 km to the Chapman Creek Falls. Tributary trails branch from the
Chapman Creek trail to Selma Park road and join the Sunshine Coast Highway.
The Chapman Creek system is a nature trail and well used by hikers, cyclists and dog
walkers. Required improvements are minimal. Park dedication should be taken by the
development of private lands. The District should apply for a Crown recreation reserve
(UREP Reserve) on those Crown Land sections through which the Chapman Creek
trails traverse.
5. Beach Access
In 1994, the District undertook an inventory of beach accesses to the Georgia Strait and
Porpoise Bay. These are incorporated in the Parks Master Plan, which identifies 76
Beach accesses. (improved and unimproved.) The Plan recommends a number of
priorities for construction in the Selma Park area; West Sechelt, West Porpoise Bay,
Sandy Hook, East Porpoise Bay and Tuwanek.
The Parks staff should commit to the planning and construction of a beach access each
fiscal year subject to demonstrated public demand.
6. Financial Resources
In 2005 the District’s Park Acquisition fund stood at $938, 659. (This fund includes cash
in lieu of parkland contribution.) The Parks DCC Fund had a balance of $266,410.
7. Conclusion
The Parks Master Plan is an extensive document intended to guide the future
development of Parks and Open Space amenities. This plan should be referred to the
Greenway Committee for comments. Parks staff and Planning staff should review this
Plan and prepare annual budget allocations for capital works.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 5
1.INTRODUCTION
The parks and open spaces within the District of Sechelt promote public health by
encouraging physical fitness and a high quality of life for residents and visitors. In
addition, parks and open spaces build a spirit of community, by creating central space
for public gatherings.
The District of Sechelt parks and open spaces offer a multitude of opportunities ranging
from organized field activities to mountain biking to simply enjoying a day at the beach
or taking a stroll along the waterfront.
In the past, parks and open spaces have developed in the District of Sechelt without a
strategic plan other than the general guidelines in the Official Community Plan. As a
result, parks and open spaces in the District have not been developed to their full
potential. Many parks remain undeveloped and new park dedications taken at the time
of subdivision have been unsuitable for park development. Many neighbourhoods do
not have adequate beach accesses and lack a trail system for safe walking and cycling.
The Parks and Open Space Master Plan was initiated in 2003 to determine a strategy
for future park and open space development.
The Parks and Open Space Master Plan is divided into five main sections:
1. The Parks and Open Space Analysis outlines the methodology used to research
and prepare the plan;
2. The Parks Strategy prioritizes the development of parks in the District including
site-specific recommendations;
3. The Beach Access Strategy outlines the detailed plan for development of beach
accesses throughout the District;
4. The Trails and Greenways Strategy details a plan for the development of Trails
and Greenways in the District;
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 1
5. The Partnerships section outlines how the District can develop partnerships with
organizations, groups and individuals that participate in developing Park and
Open Spaces.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 2
2. Existing
Parks and
Open Space
Analysis
2.1 Introduction
An in-depth analysis of the District of Sechelt parks and open spaces was conducted in
2003 to identify deficiencies and locate optimum locations for future park and open
space facilities. The analysis consists of the following:
• a geographical analysis;
• a community consultation process; and
• a demographics analysis.
2.2 Geographical Analysis
A geographical analysis of the District was conducted to assess the distribution and
quality and quantity of the current distribution of parks and open spaces and plan for
future park locations. It is divided into a situational analysis, and a demographic
analysis.
2.2.1 Situation Analysis
An acceptable park and open space system should have a distribution of parks and
open spaces within walking distance of all residents. A situation analysis relates the
park location to the tributary residential area. (Map 1 shows the existing park
distribution within the District and Official Community Plan future park acquisition
locations. Map 2 shows developed and undeveloped beach accesses including
locations where access to waterfront should be taken at the time of subdivision in
accordance with the Land Title Act.)
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 1
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 2
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 3
(a) Situation Analysis of Neighbourhood Parks (Map I)
A 500 m radius around District mini parks and a 1000 m radius around large
neighbourhood parks was chosen as a catchment area for parks. Map I shows
residential areas that are outside the above distances from a neighbourhood park
facility. The areas that are currently most lacking neighborhood park facilities are
Selma Park, the north side of Davis Bay, East Porpoise Bay, West Porpoise Bay and
Tuwanek. These areas have no neighbourhood park space thus making them a
candidate for the acquisition and development of parkland.
2.2.2 Demographic Analysis
The population composition of neighbourhoods is outlined in Section 2.5 and shows a
wide range of population densities in the District of Sechelt ranging from rural areas with
large acreages to very small lot subdivisions. The downtown village area has the
largest concentration of multi-family housing.
2.3 Community Consultation
An extensive community consultation process was undertaken to determine resident’s
opinion on the adequacy of parks and open space. The consultation process consisted
of: interviews with community associations/ratepayers and user groups, a telephone
survey, a public questionnaire, a paper suggestion form, an internet suggestion form,
public meetings, and participation in the District of Sechelt Trail Committee.
2.3.1 Community Associations/Ratepayers
In order to gather information about each neighborhood in the District, meetings were
arranged with local community associations and Ratepayers groups. Interviews were
informal in nature and involved gathering general information on current and future
needs for parks and open spaces. Initial contact with the associations was made by
attending the “G8” general meeting. Interviews were held with the presidents of each
association to gain specific information about individual neighborhoods. The following
groups were contacted in the public consultation process:
• Davis Bay/Wilson Creek Community Association
• East Porpoise Bay Ratepayer’s Association
• West Porpoise Bay Community Association
• Tuwanek Ratepayers’ Association
• Sandy Hook Community Association
• Sechelt Village Residents’ Association
• Sunshine Heights Owners’ and Residents’ Association
• West Sechelt Community Association
The following questions were used to guide each interview:
1. Are your current park needs being met by your neighborhood parks?
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 4
2. What new park and open space facilities do you believe are needed in the
District of Sechelt?
3. Will your neighborhood require any new facilities to meet your needs in the next
ten years? What will your neighborhood need? When do you expect to need
these facilities?
4. What facilities including trails, beach accesses and parks would you like to see
established in your neighborhood and the District as a whole in the next ten
years?
5. Does your neighborhood have any volunteer groups who do volunteer labour in
parks, trails or beach accesses? What would they be willing to do in the future?
Table 2.1 summarizes the information and opinions gained through consultation with
community groups.
Table 2.1 Community Association Interviews
Neighbourhood Comments
Associations
Davis Bay, Selma - Maintenance is required in the Chapman Creek area and
Park, Wilson Creek a bridge should be built to cross the creek
- Trails at Chapman Creek could follow example of Cliff
Gilker park
- Improvements required to Davis Bay pier, paint, widening
- No additional benches are required
- No new fields are required
- Chapman Creek Park should be expanded
Sandy Hook - Playground Equipment is desired
- Some beach accesses are not accessible for many users
- Hidden Grove park should be protected
- Buffer areas should be left between communities and parks
- More beach accesses that are accessible to a variety of
users should be developed
East Porpoise Bay - Trails should be developed in Burnet Creek park
- The Meandering trail should be completed
- Yew Rd. beach access should be opened
West Porpoise Bay - Would like to see more parks
- Kinnickinnick is an excellent, well-used park
- Duck pond should be developed as a park
- Access to the waterfront should be made more accessible
for seniors
- More beach accesses are required and they should be
accessible to a wide range of users
- The waterfront park land in near Ripple Way should be
developed as a park
- Kinnickinnick park should be expanded as planned
- A seniors complex should be developed at Kinnickinnick
Tuwanek - A park should be acquired near Lamb Brook
- Buffer areas or Greenways between developments are desired
- The Tuwanek Spit requires more maintenance
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 5
- Volunteer groups could help with development and
maintenance
Village - Lack of unorganized play
- Increasing population of seniors warrants more senior oriented
parks that include walking paths, seating areas
- Seniors would benefit from development of many smaller parks
that they could walk to easily
- A larger waterfront park is desired
- Seating areas, ponds, and gardens should be added
2.3.2 User Groups
Interviews were conducted with the main park user groups to assess how well their
needs were being met by current park facilities. The groups were also asked to identify
their future facility requirements. The following user groups were interviewed:
• Sunshine Coast Fastball League
• Sunshine Coast Youth Soccer Association
• Sunshine Coast Women’s Soccer Association
• Sechelt Minor Softball
• Ultimate players
• Sunshine Coast Men’s Soccer Association
(Central Minor Hardball did not respond)
The following questions were used to guide the interviews:
Are your current park requirements being met?
1. What new park facilities do you believe are needed in the district?
2. Will you require any new facilities to meet your needs in the next 10 years?
What will you need? When do you expect to need these facilities?
3. At what times does your group usually use fields?
4. Could these times be expanded or changed decrease the need for fields?
5. What facilities do you use now? Which Parks?
6. Do you use school properties?
7. Could you name four park improvements that are required in order of
priority?
These interviews gathered suggestions about future park development and current park
needs of District sports groups. Table 2.2 shows the results of the user group
interviews.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 6
Table 2.2 User Group Interviews
Sechelt Minor - Needs are barely met
Softball (Spring - Another field is required
Season) - Hackett Park and Kinnickinnick Park are used 5 nights a
week
- The size of the league is fairly stable now but it is expected
grow as the population of the District increases
- School fields are in bad condition and are too small for older
teens
- One game is played on each field per night during the
season
- Existing backstops at Picadilly and Kinnickinnick Parks need
to be heightened and wrapped around more
- Hackett could use another set of bleachers
- A small softball diamond would be useful at Cascade Green
Sunshine Coast - Use Hackett Park
Fastball League - Will not require any new facilities in the next 10 years
(Summer - Kinnickinnick park needs netting to keep the balls from going
Season) into the forest
Sunshine Coast - All fields are currently used to the maximum, more fields
Youth Soccer should be constructed
Association - More lighted fields are required for nighttime practices
(Winter Season) - Picadilly Park has an excellent field and more like this
should be constructed
- Hackett Park gets the most use
- Shared fields are not ideal for soccer since the pitch
changes from grass to double crush on the baseball
diamonds
- Expansion of Kinnickinnick Park will help considerably
- Ted Dixon fields need to be repaired
- Fields are overused
- Scheduling problems
- Currently the registration is stable but as growth continues
in the District the league is expected to grow as well
- Ideally a ¾ pitch all weather lighted field would be
constructed
- Construction of a lighted gravel field for evening practices
would take the pressure of other fields
Sunshine Coast - Evening practice spaces are lacking due to lack of lighting
Women’s - There are currently enough fields for weekend games
Soccer - Lighting and all-weather fields are required
Association - The league is not currently expanding but may expand in
the future as the population in the District grows
- Expansion of Kinnickinnick Park will provide a good
competition site
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 7
Sunshine Coast - Needs are not being met
Men’s Soccer - Fields are overused
Association - When Kinnickinnick Park is expanded it will help to fill the
need for fields
- Fields must be properly drained or not built at all
- Fields should be built where the can be developed into
larger field complexes in the future for competition use.
- Lighted fields should be constructed
Ultimate user - Currently only drop-in, could expand into a league in future
group - Field size is 40x70 m
- There is a shortage of fields in the District of Sechelt
The following identifies concerns expressed by sports user groups:
• Lack of lighting for night practices: this problem will be solved when Kinnickinnick
Park is fully developed to include a lighted field. Also, when the fields at Ted
Dixon Park are repaired they will provide additional lit fields.
• Condition of soccer fields: Overuse of fields in the District causes the closure of
some fields. This puts extra pressure on the few fields that remain open to meet
the demand. In 2002 field closures at Ted Dixon Park (SIGD) caused scheduling
problems for local soccer groups. Interagency cooperation on field maintenance
as detailed in the Partnerships section of this report could help to remedy this
problem.
• Inadequacy of fencing and backstops: The backstops at Kinnickinnick and
Picadilly Park are not high enough to keep balls from being lost in the forest.
Also at Picadilly Park, the fencing behind the soccer net on the East side is too
low to keep the balls from going into the backyards of the neighbouring houses.
2.3.3 Telephone Survey
A random-sample telephone survey was administered to assess Sechelt residents’
attitudes and opinions on the parks and open space in the District. The survey was
designed to determine what park facilities should be developed in the future. The
results are contained in Appendix A and complete survey is contained in Appendix B.
2.3.4 Paper Suggestion Form
This form was made available to the public at the District of Sechelt office, on the library
bulletin board, outside the District of Sechelt office on the community message board
and at Trail Bay mall on the notice board. The forms were held in colourful folders and
were clearly visible. Suggestions from this form are included in Appendix B.
2.3.5 Internet Suggestion Form
In order to solicit opinions and ideas with regard to future park locations, facilities
needed and types of parks required a web based suggestion form was added to the
District of Sechelt Web Page. Unfortunately not many people used the form.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 8
2.3.6 Public Meetings
Parks Master Plan Public Forum
A publicly advertised forum was held on July 24, 2003 to gather opinions and ideas
about the types of parks, beach accesses and trails that should be developed in the
District. The meeting began with a short presentation detailing the Master Plan process
and then solicited input from the attendees. A copy of the minutes recorded at this
meeting is provided in Appendix C and an outline of the presentation that was given is
included in Appendix D.
Cascade Green Public Meeting:
This meeting was held on June 26, 2003 to hear public opinion on the future
development of the Cascade Green Park in West Sechelt. Architectural sketches were
presented that offered two options for development of the park. The residents who
attended the meeting voiced strong opposition to a soccer field being built at Cascade
Green Park. Those in attendance much preferred a more natural park including walking
trails and meadows with seating areas. The minutes from this meeting are included in
Appendix E.
2.3.7 Trail Committee
The District of Sechelt Trail Committee comprises six members and convenes once
every three weeks to discuss the implementation of a comprehensive trail system in the
District of Sechelt. The consultant met with the Trail Committee four times during the
planning process. The meetings of this committee were used to produce much of the
Trail Strategy and map the trails that should be developed in the District.
2.4 Trends in Park and Open Space Use
Based on the community consultation process the following trends in park usage have
been identified in the District of Sechelt:
• Fastball leagues in the District are shrinking and may not exist in the District in
the future
• Baseball leagues on the coast will continue to expand requiring additional
diamonds to accommodate all games
• The men’s soccer league has reached a plateau in recent years and will grow
slowly as the population continues to expand
• The women’s soccer league is not currently expanding but is expected to grow
as the population increases
• Ultimate users will likely increase in the future and will require additional field
space
• Disc golf, is increasing in popularity and a course may be required in the future
• Unorganized play in parks has decreased over time
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 9
• An increasing number of seniors are looking to stay active through activities
such as walking
• Beach accesses and walking trails are the most often used park and open
space facilities by residents in the District of Sechelt
2.5 Demographics
2.5.1 District of Sechelt Population Statistics
The following population statistics show the growth in the District of Sechelt.
Estimated population 2005: 8,500
Census population in 2001: 7,775
Census population in 1996: 7,343
Change 1996-2005: 15.9%
Population over age 65 in 2001: 1,780 (22.9%)
The following table, obtained from SCORE, shows the population growth for the District
of Sechelt from 1991-2001.
Table 2.3 Total Population and Annual Change, District of Sechelt
The above table shows the annual population growth from 1991-2001 at approximately
3.8% per year. However growth in the area has been irregular making it hard to predict
future growth accurately. The Planning Department projects annual growth at 2% per
annum. Using this growth rate, Sechelts’ population in 2011 could be 9,500.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 10
2.5.2 Age Distribution by Neighbourhood
Detailed age distribution data for each neighborhood in the District has been acquired
from the 2001 census. This data has been used to guide the type of park facilities that
should be developed in each neighborhood. For instance, neighborhoods with a high
percentage of seniors should have park facilities designed for seniors, such as walking
trails and seating areas. Conversely, in neighborhoods with a high percentage of
families and young children, sports fields and playgrounds are a more appropriate use
of park space. By designing neighborhood park facilities based on the nature of the
population that surrounds them, usage and resident approval will likely be high.
The following tables present age distribution data for each neighbourhood area. A
summary of the data is then provided for each neighbourhood.
West Sechelt (Between Mason Road and Norwest Bay Road, 0045)
Number of Residents
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100+
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85-89
90-94
95-99
0-4
5-9
Age (Years)
Population of Area: 865
West Sechelt (above Norwest Bay Road, 0046)
Number of residents
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4
9
0+
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
Population of area: 820
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 11
The age distribution in West Sechelt is similar throughout the neighborhood. The graphs
above indicate that the neighborhood is composed of predominantly young families with
children. There is also a large proportion of seniors who account for approximately 25%
of the population. Parks and Open spaces in the area should therefore be designed
with these two main user groups in mind.
West Porpoise Bay (Total Population: 880)
West Porpoise Bay (Reeves Rd. to Heritage Rd., 0048)
90
Number of Residents
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85-89
90-94
95-99
100+
Age (Years)
The age distribution in West Porpoise Bay indicates a large number of young families
with children. Secondarily, there is a significant population of seniors whose Parks and
Open Space needs should also be met.
Village (Total Population: 1445)
Village (South of Medusa Street, 0054)
Number of Residents
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0+
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
Population of Area: 710
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 12
Number of Residents Village (North of Medusa Street to Anchor Road, 0050)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0+
4
9
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
0-
5-
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
Population of Area: 735
The age distribution of residents in the Village shows that a very large proportion of
residents are seniors. In the area south of Medusa Street 50% of residents are over 60
years of age. North of Medusa Street 39% of residents are over 60 years of age. This
is a very significant trend that should be reflected in the Park and Open space facilities
in this area.
Selma Park (Total Population: 515)
Selma Park (0058)
70
Number of Residents
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0+
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
The Selma Park area is composed mainly of seniors with the over 60-age group
constituting 39% of the population. There are also many residents in the 50-60 age
group who will likely stay in the area causing the demographics of the area to age in the
future.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 13
Davis Bay (Total Population: 900)
Davis Bay (Below Havies, 0059)
100
Number of Residents
80
60
40
20
0
0+
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
Davis Bay has many residents who are over 60 year of age, constituting 32% of the
population. However, this area also has a large number of young families with small
children.
Wilson Creek (Total Population: 740)
Wilson Creek (0060)
70
Number of Residents
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0+
4
9
4
4
9
9
4
9
4
9
9
4
9
4
9
9
4
4
9
4
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
-3
-7
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
Wilson Creek has a fairly even age distribution with many young families and seniors.
The over 60-age group constitutes 32% of the population in this area.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 14
East Porpoise Bay (Total Population: 245)
East Porpoise Bay (0091)
25
Number of Residents
20
15
10
5
0
0+
4
9
4
4
9
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
9
4
9
4
9
9
4
4
0-
5-
-1
-2
-2
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
-1
-3
-7
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
East Porpoise Bay is largely a family oriented area with many families and young
children. Only 18% of the population is made up of residents 60 and over. However
there are many residents in the 50 - 60 age group. If these residents stay in the area
the age distribution for the area will age with them. The young age demographic in this
area could also be related to the predominance of large lots that are difficult to maintain.
It is likely that as more subdivision occurs in the future that the demographics of the
area will age.
Sandy Hook and Tuwanek (Total Population: 555)
Sandy Hook and Tuwanek (0093)
60
Number of Residents
50
40
30
20
10
0
0+
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
4
9
0-
5-
-1
-1
-2
-2
-3
-3
-4
-4
-5
-5
-6
-6
-7
-7
-8
-8
-9
-9
10
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
Age (Years)
The population of Sandy Hook/Tuwanek has a large number of young families.
However, there are also many residents who are over 60 years old in the area
constituting 23% of the population. It is also important to note the large number of
residents who are between 45-60 years of age who constitute 27% of the population. If
most of these residents stay in the area to retire they will cause the age distribution of
the area to shift towards a predominantly older community in the future.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 15
2.6 Conclusion
An analysis of the demographic trends, user group comments and the situational
analysis shows the following concerns:
• A shortage of field facilities
• An uneven distribution of parks throughout the Sechelt neighborhoods
• Scheduling issues for organized field sports
• Quality of sports fields
• A need to balance park facilities with neighborhood demographics.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 16
3.Parks
Strategy
3.1 Introduction
This section of the Parks Plan provides an inventory of park space in the District and
develops a strategy to enable the District of Sechelt to meet the park needs of residents
and visitors to the year 2010.
Section 3 identifies the following:
1. Park development standards and classification systems;
2. An inventory of parks;
3. An evaluation of Sechelt neighborhood parks;
4. Recommendations for a parkland acquisition strategy;
5. Funding options.
3.2 Park Classification System
The National Parks and Recreation Association (NRPA) has developed a park
classification system which serves to standardize planning, design, development and
maintenance of community parks. The NRPA classification system includes a
hierarchy of parks (community parks, neighborhood parks, tot lots; their location and
size vis a vis residential areas) (Butler et al) The criteria of the NRPA system have
been included in the Parks and Open Space section of the OCP.
3.2.1 Neighbourhood Parks
• Neighbourhood Parks typically provide a broad range of recreation opportunities for
an entire neighbourhood. They are located at central points of major residential
areas with prominent street access. The minimum area requirement for
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 17
neighbourhood park space is 1.2 hectares per 1000 population. (400 -500
residences)
In conventional single family neighbourhoods, parks should be located within a
maximum distance of 1000 m from all residents. Ideally, this type of park should be
planned and developed adjacent an elementary school that serves the area so that
facilities might be shared.
A neighbourhood park usually includes a number of the following components:
• creative play area;
• minimal parking;
• passive park area (treed sites) for sitting and reading;
• washrooms;
• a garden area;
• ancillary elements such as benches, trash containers, drinking fountain;
• soccer pitch;
• softball/baseball diamond;
• picnic area; and
• an asphalt play area for tennis and basketball.
The requirement for neighbourhood parks is less in rural areas and or where lot sizes
are very large due to the large amount of open space associated with lower density
developments. In rural areas, school sites serve as a neighborhood parks. Whitaker
Park, Picadilly Park and the field facilities at Davis Bay Elementary, Sechelt Elementary
and West Sechelt Elementary serve as neighborhood parks.
• Mini-parks (Tot-Lots) are typically the smallest areas of open space within the
community. These parks are used to serve areas that have a high percentage of
families with young children.
A tot lot should be designed to include the following elements:
• a creative play area including highly visible play equipment;
• a grassy area;
• small picnic area; and
• a garden feature.
When provided, tot lots should be located in the heart of subdivisions or housing
developments and are directly accessible by walking or cycling.
Tot lots should be constructed where there is insufficient population to warrant a full
sized neighborhood park and where residents are further than 500 m from a
neighborhood park. Since tot lots have relatively high maintenance costs
partnerships with strata corporations or community associations should be
developed for ongoing maintenance and development.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 18
3.2.2 Community Level
• Athletic Parks are intended to be major tournament level sport facilities. These
parks should be centralized wherever possible to avoid duplication and include high
quality support facilities (e.g. concession, dressing rooms, washrooms, lighting etc.)
Ideally, all of the following components should be accommodated on each site:
• Ball Diamonds
• Lighting
• Concessions
• Washrooms
• Parking
• Spectator seating
• Ancillary elements such benches such containers, drinking fountain;
• Soccer Pitches/Ultimate Fields
• Dressing Rooms
• Maintenance/Storage Area
The Kinnickinnick Park sports fields and Hackett Park serve as major athletic parks in
the District of Sechelt.
• Natural Parks include informal outdoor facilities and serve as destinations for
residents throughout the district for walking, picnicking and communing with
nature, as well as more rigorous forms of recreation, such as hiking and
mountain biking. In addition such areas can protect unique flora and fauna, as
well as natural and historic features.
• Components should include the following:
• interpretive trails;
• nature/historic centre;
• perimeter parking;
• picnic areas;
• rest areas;
• viewpoint(s);
• mountain bike trails
• the identification, protection and interpretation of sensitive ecological features
Location and size is dependent upon the resource base rather than any planning
standard. Boundary delineation should encompass not only the natural area but
also a sufficient buffer zone and staging area for access, parking and public
services.
Kinnickinnick Park, the Heritage Forest and the Chapman Creek trail network are
examples of natural park areas.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 19
• Garden Parks are extensively landscaped areas, the primary function of which is
urban beautification. Their role is to beautify the landscape and to make an
impression on the visitor entering the community or on the residents of the area.
Components may include:
• Floral Displays
• Interpretive Displays
• Landscaping
• Seating Areas
• Special Exhibits
• Walkways
The location of decorative parks should focus on areas adjacent to the entrances to
the community, around public buildings and along streets where landscaping can
create a positive visual impression.
Examples include Acacia Park, the Cenotaph square, Davis Bay Waterfront, Block
Seven and the Seaside Center.
3.3 Park Development Guidelines
3.3.1 Area Requirements:
The National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) guidelines for neighborhood
parks, includes 1.2 hectares of neighborhood park space per 1000 residents. This
standard has been adopted in Section 2.12 of the OCP outlined below.
2.12.1 A general interim guideline for provision of neighbourhood level park
space shall be 1.2 ha/1000 persons. Provision of neighbourhood level
space may be at lower levels in areas of low density (particularly where the
density is below 2.5 units per hectare) or where there is a high proportion of
seasonal residents.
2.12.2 As a general rule, neighbourhood park sites should be adjacent to public
school sites. Failing this they should be as near to school sites as possible.
2.12.3 Public elementary school sites should provide some neighbourhood open Deleted: <#>¶
space on a portion of the site. This portion (field and play areas) will be Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
considered within the inventory of neighbourhood level park space.
2.12.4 New family-oriented multiple family housing will provide easily monitored Deleted: <#>¶
“tot lot” type play areas on site, or contribute to such facilities within easy Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
access of the housing site. Deleted: "
Deleted: "
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 20
2.12.5 The District of Sechelt will consider the need for garden allotment spaces in
the Village area, and the possibility of incorporating such a use into
neighbourhood level park space where required.
Deleted: ¶
¶
¶
Table 3.1 below compares the major neighbourhood parks to this standard .
Table 3.1 Neighbourhood Park area Requirement by Neighbourhood
Neighbourhood Population Total Park Area Park Area per
(hectares) 1000 residents
(hectares)
West Sechelt 2490 4.69 1.88
Village 1445 2.07 1.43
Selma Park 515 0 0
Davis Bay/Wilson 1640 1.80 1.1
Creek
East Porpoise Bay 245 0 0
West Porpoise Bay 880 1.0 .88
Sandy Hook Approx 430 1.09 2.5
Tuwanek Approx 125 0 0
The above table shows that West Sechelt, the Downtown Village and Davis Bay exceed
the 1.2 ha/1000 resident criteria whereas, Tuwanek, West Porpoise Bay, East Porpoise
Bay, and Sandy Hook fall short.
3.4 Inventory of Existing Parks
Map 3 shows the geographic distribution of the parks in the District of Sechelt. Map 4
shows the future park designations as recommended in the OCP
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 21
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 22
3.5 Evaluation of Park Facilities by Neighbourhood
The following section evaluates Sechelt’s parks by neighborhood.
3.5.1 West Sechelt
West Sechelt currently has six parks that are distributed through the neighborhood. As
Map I shows most developed residential areas are within the maximum distance of a
neighbourhood park area. However, only Picadilly Park, Lynwood Court Park, and part
of Creekside Park are developed. Cascade Green Park has been developed to a
natural park standard with maximum retention of existing vegetation and the provision of
walking paths and seating areas.
The West Sechelt Elementary School includes playfields which cater to minor baseball,
softball as well as a playground facility.
West Sechelt is currently undergoing a high level of urban development. The West
Sechelt Neighborhood Plan calls for a provision of future parklands in the presently
vacant areas that are designated “Comprehensive Development”. The Far West
Sechelt Comprehensive Development Area (at the west end of the municipality), the
Mariner’s Watch Comprehensive Development area (“the Trails”) Wakefield Creek, and
the West Sechelt Comprehensive Development Area (Sangara/Clayton properties) all
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 23
contain future parkland designations. Each CD area contains specific parkland
requirements that should be met when these properties are developed. (play fields,
natural parks, waterfront parks, pedestrian pathways.
3.5.2 The Downtown Village
The Downtown Village neighborhood currently has five neighbourhood parks including:
Hackett Park, Acacia Park, Snickett Park/Boulevard, the Sechelt Marsh and Osborne
Park. These parks offer a wide variety of facilities including: natural areas, waterfront
areas, walking trails, sports fields, tennis courts, picnic tables, seating areas and more.
Other field facilities in the Village include Sechelt Elementary School and Chatelech
High School. Together the schools offer sports fields, a playground, a basketball court
and a skateboard park.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 24
As illustrated in the Demographics section of this report, residents of the Downtown
Village neighborhood are predominantly seniors. Parks facilities and open spaces
should be accessible to seniors. In addition the Village area presents a tourist attraction
due to the waterfront.
With the conveyance of the Petro Can property, the District is working on a plan for the
Maritime Gateway Park on lots 15, 16 and 17 in partnership with the Sechelt Rotary
Club, SDBA and the Urban Greenway Committee. Elements include a floating dock at
the end of the pier, a children’s waterfront playground, parking lot, and washrooms.
Block 7 is a civic precinct that includes the Sechelt Public Library, the Sechelt municipal
offices, the RCMP building, provincial courthouse and the Seaside Center. The
Sunshine Coast Regional District aquatic facility scheduled to open in 2008 will be
located on Block 7. As of November 2005, Block 7 has been landscaped by the District
of Sechelt and the Botanical Garden Society. This project won a provincial BIA award
for downtown enhancement in 2006.
3.5.3 West Porpoise Bay
The West Porpoise Bay neighbourhood contains the District’s major recreation facilities
including Kinnickinnick Park, the Sechelt Golf and Country Club and the Sechelt Arena
and Kinnickinnick Elementary School. Residential subdivisions have dedicated
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 25
parkland that will include improvements such as seating areas and walkways. In July
2006, the Sechelt Tennis Club has cleared a site adjacent to the arena for an indoor
tennis facility.
The recently completed West Porpoise Bay Neighborhood Plan identifies the need for
additional neighbourhood park space to meet the need for toddlers and children’s
activities.
The age distribution of West Porpoise Bay indicates a younger population than much of
the District with many young families and children. To accommodate the needs of these
residents priority for park development should be placed on developing neighborhood
parks and small fields for informal play.
A small natural feature known as the “Duck Pond” (Lot 1, Plan 17163) is located on the
north side of Fairway Avenue near Beacon Street. Many local residents use this area
for nature appreciation and educational purposes. Public input from the West Porpoise
Bay Community Association and other members of the public indicate that the Duck
Pond at Fairway Avenue and Beacon Street is an important feature of the
neighbourhood.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 26
3.5.4 East Porpoise Bay
The East Porpoise Bay neighbourhood currently has one park, Burnett Creek Park and
an esplanade along the Sechelt Inlet waterfront between Allen Road and Yew Road.
Neither is developed. The neighbourhood currently has only 245 residents and most of
the lots are quite large. However, this area is expected to grow in the near future, with
the proposed Silverback golf course and waterfront resort development and a proposed
subdivision in the former Gow Pit. The neighborhood fronts on Sechelt Inlet and a
significant waterfront recreation asset includes the Porpoise Bay Provincial Park.
The present demographic makeup of the neighbourhood shows a variety of age groups
with a low percentage of residents over 60. Therefore park facilities in this area should
be developed with emphasis on facilities for younger residents.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 27
3.5.5 Sandy Hook
The Sandy Hook neighborhood currently has one large neighborhood park with a
waterfront and boat launch on Arc Road at the east end of Coracle Road. Although
steep, this park area has flat benches and an internal trail network. Additional parkland
in Sandy Hook includes: a developed mini-park, one undeveloped mini-park on
Deerhorn and Skookumchuck Roads and the Heritage Forest which was downloaded
from the Ministry of Forests to the District of Sechelt in 2003.
Sandy Hook is geographically spread out and characterized by steep topography. The
Neighbourhood Parks Distribution map (Map I) shows that most of the area is within 500
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 28
m of a neighborhood park. However, most of the parks are very small and none of them
offer flat field space for field activities.
There are a variety of age groups in the Sandy Hook area including many seniors and
young families. To meet the needs of all residents of Sandy Hook a wide range of
facilities will be required in the parks.
3.5.6 Tuwanek
Tuwanek does not have any formal parks. Future development is limited by
topography. A kayak staging area exists where Sechelt Inlet Road lies adjacent to the
waterfront north of Islets Place.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 29
Interest has been expressed in developing the old Interfor site at Gray Creek into a
waterfront destination resort. This site is level and has a generous frontage on Sechelt
Inlet with 180 degree views across and up the Inlet.
3.5.7 Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek
The Selma Park area has no developed parks. Neighborhood residents have
expressed a need for a neighborhood park facility has been expressed in the vicinity of
Lot 71 in DL. 1329.
Davis Bay currently has four park facilities including Mission Point Park, Davis Bay
Walkway and beach, Whitaker Park and Brookman Park. Also in this area is Davis Bay
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 30
elementary school, which has soccer field and playground equipment. These park
facilities are at the east end of Davis Bay.
The Wilson Creek area has no developed parks.
3.6 Park Implementation Strategy
The following section proposes a park development strategy for the District of Sechelt.
This divided into the following two sections:
3.6.1 “Development of Existing Parks” which outlines the recommended actions to be
taken in existing parks
3.6.2 “Future Park Acquisition and Development” makes recommendations on where
new parks should be acquired and what type of facilities should be developed within the
new park
3.6.1 Development of Existing Parkland
Currently, there are a number of parks that are underused due to a lack of facilities. In
order to maximize usage and quality of existing parks a number of improvements should
occur. These parks are described below and illustrated on Map III.
3.6.1.1 Pacific View Park (West Sechelt)
This neighborhood park is located on a sloped property in a developing area of West
Sechelt just north of Baillie Road. Vegetation on the site consists of several large
coniferous trees, blackberry thickets and rye grass. There are two pedestrian walkways
that provide access to the park from Derby Road and Baillie Road. The area provides
impressive views of the Strait of Georgia and the Trial Islands.
The topography of this park and its irregular shape would make it impossible to use as a
field site. It is therefore recommended that this neighbourhood park be developed with
the following amenities:
• Off leash dog area: Due to the high number of dogs in this area an off leash dog
area could be developed for neighbourhood residents. In order to accommodate
an off-leash area the park will require a large area with short grass that can be
used as a play area.
• Benches: Benches should be placed in a number of locations through the park
that will provide good viewpoints.
• Vegetation: Native vegetation should be planted in the park to replace most of
the Blackberries bushes that currently dominate the landscape.
• Paths: Walking paths should be created that link benches, planting areas and
viewpoints throughout the park.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 31
• Dog bag dispensers and garbage dispenser: for public users.
Implementation
• Develop a concept plan
• Host an on-site public information meeting to hear residents
opinions and concerns
• Develop a budget and schedule
3.6.1.2 Creekside Park (West Sechelt)
Creekside Park is located immediately west of Bjorn Place and north of Norwest Bay
Road in West Sechelt. It comprises a neighbourhood type park space and a natural
park. The natural area of Creekside Park has been developed to include hiking trails
and seating areas. The neighbourhood park facility has been landscaped and benches
and picnic tables have been added.
Implementation
• A budget and schedule should be prepared to identify and
implement improvements to existing trails, landscaping, signage,
and portable youth soccer goals
3.6.1.3 Wakefield Creek Park (West Sechelt)
Wakefield Creek Park is a large natural park that surrounds Wakefield Creek. It is
accessible from Wakefield Road and Lynnwood Court. This park could be developed to
include hiking and mountain biking trails. Trails should be constructed as far from the
creek as possible in order to discourage hikers and dogs from causing damage to the
creek. Interpretive signs should also be constructed.
Implementation
• A budget and schedule should be prepared to construct, trails,
benches and interpretive signage.
3.6.1.4 Picadilly Park (West Sechelt)
Picadilly Park contains a soccer/softball field and some playground equipment suitable
for young children. It is centrally located on Jasper Road and is used regularly.
Consultation with user groups indicates that the fence behind the soccer net on the
eastern side of the park is too low to keep the balls from going into the neighbouring
residential yards. It is therefore recommended that this fence be heightened to remedy
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 32
this problem. Additionally, the backstop on the softball diamond is reported to be
insufficient to foul balls from flying out onto the Jasper Road.
Implementation
• A budget and schedule should be developed to construct additional
fencing.
3.6.1.5 Burnett Creek Park (Phase 1) (East Porpoise Bay)
Burnett Creek Park is a 1.3 ha. (3.2 acre) park dedication that was taken at the time of
the subdivision of the Marmot Road subdivision on DL 1558. This park land includes a
water feature on Burnett Creek. This park is not well known to residents as it is
accessed by the unopened and unmarked Burnett Road allowance east of Swansons.
Implementation
A park plan should be developed including access, trails, benches and
seating areas and interpretive signage
3.6.1.6 District Lot 1556 (East Porpoise Bay)
The Stockwell family has progressively subdivided portions of property in DL.1556. The
Planning Department and the Stockwell family has agreed that the parkland dedication
associated with the creation of a 1 ha strata subdivision on the west side of Sechelt Inlet
Road would be applied to the future subdivision of the Stockwell land north of Yew
Road and east of Sechelt Inlet Road. Preliminary discussions with the Stockwell family
have included the development of a neighborhood park on Lot 12 of Plan 3836.
Implementation
As a condition of subdivision of the Stockwell lands on the east side of
Sechelt Inlet Road a park plan be developed for a neighborhood park
including a budget and development schedule
3.6.1.7 Silverback
The proposed Silverback Golf Course Resort and Seaside Village includes the
dedication of approximately 23 ha of parkland, open space and trails, including a 1.1 ha
linear park on the Porpoise Bay waterfront; a 3.4 ha park dedication on Shannon Creek
and three large open space blocks at the north and south ends of the development.
The parkland will be developed by the developer in concert with the District. The
developer has agreed that the golf course operation will maintain the parks.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 33
Implementation
• As a condition of Silverback approvals, the developer and the District of
Sechelt staff shall prepare plans and budgets for the parks in the
Silverback development.
3.6.1.8 Kinnickinnick Park (West Porpoise Bay)
This community level park is located in West Porpoise Bay. It currently contains
softball/baseball diamonds, a soccer field and a large natural area incorporating a
network of trails. The park has been expanded to include a second multiuse field with
two softball/baseball diamonds and a soccer field. Based on interviews with user
groups this expansion is necessary and when completed it should satisfy the field
requirements of most user groups. It is essential that lighting be installed as soon as
possible on these fields to meet the growing need for evening practice fields.
It is recommended that this development proceed as planned by Public Works Staff.
Implementation
• The possibility of installing additional netting to stop stray balls should
be investigated and implemented if it will be economical and effective
3.6.1.9 Hackett Park (Village)
Hackett Park is centrally located in the Village and is one of the Districts’ most well used
parks. Residents and visitors use the park for its sports fields, sitting areas, tennis
courts and playground equipment.
Since the Village area is home to more than 50% seniors the park should be well suited
to meet their needs. In order to do this, more senior oriented facilities should be added.
These facilities should include a lawn bowling green or bocce ball court. Lawn bowling
or bocce ball equipment could be made available for people to borrow from the Seniors
Center located across the street from the park. A lawn bowling green or bocce ball
court could be constructed on the lower section of Hackett Park amongst the trees.
Implementation
• A plan be developed for Hackett Park including possible
development of boce ball or lawn bowling, use of the park for
community events.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 34
3.6.1.10 Block 7 (Village)
Block 7 is a civic precinct that includes the municipal hall and public library, the Justice
Service Building and the Seaside Center. The regional aquatic center is proposed for
completion in the summer of 2007. The landscape improvements in the civic precinct
has been undertaken by District’s park staff and volunteers pursuant to a plan
developed by Sharpe and Diamond Landscape Architects (2000). Works include
passive facilities such as: sitting areas, gardens and public pathways to link the
buildings.
The construction of the Aquatic Center in 2006-2007 will include parking and
landscaped facilities.
Implementation
• The future aquatic center parking lot and landscaped areas be
consistent with the Block 7 theme and design
3.6.1.11 Maritime Gateway Park
The Maritime Gateway Park comprises lots 15, 16 and 17 which front the Trail Bay
Waterfront at the CAL pier. Plans to develop this area as a public park commenced in
2001 with the initiative to build a “Seaside Center” on lots 15 and 16 which were
proposed to be gifted to the District of Sechelt by Petro Can. Because of site
contamination issues, title to the subject lots could not be transferred in time to allow the
construction of Seaside Center in 2004 and the building was constructed on Block 7. In
April 2006 the Petro Can lots were conveyed to the District of Sechelt.
In 2004 concept plans were developed by the District of Sechelt in partnership with the
Sechelt Rotary club for a Maritime Gateway park that includes the following elements:
• Deactivation of Sinku Boulevard and Wharf Road and construction of a new road
from Wharf Road to Xenichan Boulevard immediately north of the ambulance
station.
• Development of a parking lot and active play area and landscape treatment
• Development of a children’s playground by the Sechelt Rotary Club
• Development of a float off the wharf to encourage day moorage by tourist
pleasure craft
Implementation
• The concept plan for the Maritime Gateway Park should be refined to
include linkages to the waterfront
• A detailed budget be prepared for site servicing and development
• The road works program be undertaken by the District
• Partnerships be formed between the District of Sechelt, Sechelt Indian
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 35
Band, Marine Gateway Access Committee, service clubs and volunteers
to construct the Maritime Gateway Park
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 36
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 37
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 38
3.6.2 Future Park Acquisition and Development
In order to meet the current and future park needs of residents and visitors of the
District of Sechelt additional parkland should be acquired and developed. Land
recommended for acquisition as parkland has been selected by considering the
information gained through the Geographic Analysis (Section 2.2), Community
Consultation (section 2.3), Trends in Park and Open Space Use (section 2.4), and the
Demographics Study (section 2.5).and the parkland designations in the OCP and
Neighborhood Plan. Park sites are outlined below and illustrated on Map 5 (the Future
Parkland Acquisition Areas) and Map 6 (Downtown Parks and Walking Paths).
This section also includes specific development strategies for a number of parks as
follows.
3.6.2.1 Trail Bay Boulevard (Village)
The Trail Bay Boulevard between Trail Avenue and Ocean Avenue has been proposed
to be closed to vehicles and the roadway deactivated and used as a waterfront
promenade. The residences that front the Boulevard have rear yard access from
Windward Lane (that runs between Ocean Avenue and Trail Avenue). Public parking
might be negotiated with Publico Holdings who own the abutting property between
Windward Lane and Teredo Street.
In the absence of vehicular access to the Boulevard landscaping, dedicated pathway
and beach access could be planned. Completion of the boulevard would connect
Snickett Park to the Maritime Gateway Park and provide a 2 km promenade along the
Trail Bay waterfront between Snickett Park in the west and the Sechelt Indian Village in
the east.
Implementation
• The District of Sechelt finalize a plan and budget and public
information process to implement a road closure on the
Boulevard between Trail Avenue and Ocean Avenue.
.
3.6.2.2 Selma Park
Selma Park residents have voiced concern about the lack of park facilities in the Selma
Park neighborhood. A 75 lot subdivision located between Havies and Nestman Road in
DL 1379 requires a communal septic field and a statutory park dedication. The
communal septic field is located at the south end of the property is 1.13 ha (2.8 acres)
in size and could be suited to a play area. It has access from Pam and Betty Roads via
Nestman Road on the north and is accessible from Havies Road on the south. The
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 39
statutory parkland dedication is .52 ha (1.13 acres) and lies adjacent to the Chapman
Creek trail in the north end of the subdivision.
Implementation
• Develop a plan for both the sewage disposal bed and the
statutory park dedication in DL 1379 that includes playgrounds,
children sports field and seating areas including landscaping.
3.6.2.3 Duck Pond (West Porpoise Bay)
A small pond that drains into Carroll Brook is located at Fairway Avenue and Beacon
Street. It is a well known landmark in Sechelt and is home to a variety of ducks, birds,
and amphibians. Many District residents currently use the duck pond for walking, bird
watching and nature appreciation. The property is currently privately owned and it is
recommended the area be protected for environmental protection and park uses.
Implementation
• The land should be taken for parkland at the time of subdivision
of Plan 17163
• Signage should be installed on Fairway Avenue in front of the
pond
• Interpretive signs should be designed and installed at the
entrance to the site to provide an educational experience for
park users
3.6.2.4 Mission Point
The District of Sechelt owns Lot 4, Plan 9551 at Mission Point. It has been pursuing the
acquisition of two abutting properties at Mission Point to extend the Davis Bay
waterfront to Chapman Creek. In 2005 The District entered into a life estate contract
with the Robertson family for Lot 3, Block B, Plan 9551 DL 1356. The District has been
negotiating with the Goodwin family for Lot 5, Block B Plan 17933, and DL 1356. These
properties jointly comprise 1.5ha. These properties could be developed as a significant
waterfront picnic, upland play areas tributary to the Mission Point delta and complement
the Davis Bay Beach area.
3.6.2.5 Sangara Property
In 2006, the Sangara family rezoned and made application for a 30 lot subdivision in
DL1384 (West Sechelt). As a condition of subdivision, a .65 ha park dedication was
taken at the west end of the subdivision below Norwest Bay Road adjacent to Highway
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 40
101. This park dedication offers an opportunity for viewing area to the Trail Islands and
Georgia Straits as well as the potential for a trail to the waterfront and a prominent rock
ledge at the natural boundary. The OCP identifies Park locations on the upland side of
1384 that should be taken at the time of subdivision.
3.6.2.6 Wakefield Beach
In 2005/2006 the Wakefield Inn property was developed as a residential condominium.
The first phase included 16 buildings consisting of duplexes, triplexes and single family
units along the waterfront. A second phase adjacent to Mason Road includes 17 units
comprising of single family dwellings and triplexes.
As a condition of development, Wakefield homes dedicated a .1 ha park at the westerly
side near Wakefield Creek and a .02 ha park adjacent to Mason Road at the easterly
edge. In addition, the developer has constructed a pedestrian trail along the
covenanted “no build” 15 meter set back boundary from the natural boundary. These
park dedications are limited to providing public access to the waterfront and
seating/viewing areas.
3.6.2.7 Trail Bay Estates
The Trail Bay Estates property in DL 1385 lies adjacent to Chatelech High School. In
2006, the first phase comprising 65 lots above the Sunshine Coast Highway received
zoning and preliminary layout approval. As a condition of subdivision, the developer
dedicated a 1.6 ha park north of the extension of Cowrie Street. A draft landscape plan
allows for internal paths and seating areas. The park links to the high school and the
existing trail network that traverses the Sangara/Trail Bay Estates property between
West Sechelt and the high school.
3.6.2.8 The Trails
The Trails is a 343 unit development on District Lots 2337 and 2338 in West Sechelt
covering approximately 75 ha. The developer has dedicated approximately 23 ha of
parkland and open space including a 15 ha park at the east end. The open space
comprises corridors in which a trail network will be developed.
3.6.2.9 Concordia Homes (West Sechelt)
The first phase of the Concordia Homes development at the west end of Gale Avenue
North is a 29 lot subdivision including a 1.9 ha park that fronts on Snake Bay. In
addition, the developer agrees to construct a trail along the Sechelt Inlet waterfront.
3.6.2.10 The Ridge (Downtown Village)
The Ridge consists of a 39 single family lots and 3 multi family sites on Lot 149, DL
1331 at Trail Avenue and Binnacle Roads. The Developer proposes a .12 ha park
dedication that will have a viewing and eating area and a .09 ha walkway that will
connect to Anchor Way and downtown Sechelt.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 41
3.7 Conclusion
Chapter 3 of the Parks Master Plan identifies a number of park areas that exist and
parkland that has been dedicated to the District by the subdivision approval process. A
number of park development plans are recommended for improvement. Development
of these parks would make the District of Sechelt consistent with the National
Recreation and Parks Association guidelines of 1.2 ha. of neighborhood parks per 1000
residents and that all residents should live within 500 meters of a neighborhood park.
Historically the statutory (5%) parkland dedication saw unsuitable development land
such as wetlands or unstable slopes conveyed to the municipality as parklands. While
these areas might be covenanted as protected environmentally sensitive areas, they are
often less than suitable for useable park space. The District’s Planning Department
must recognize the importance of centrally located, relatively level lands which can be a
focal point for a neighborhood as well as increasing the aesthetics and property value of
a subdivision.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 42
3.8 Parkland Acquisition and Development Funding Options
The following section outlines alternate means whereby parkland and open space might
be acquired. In order to create a complete system of parks and open spaces the
District should make use of all of the available options.
3.8.1 Five Percent Dedication
Section 941 of the Local Government Act requires those who subdivide property to
dedicate a maximum of 5% percent of subdivided lands for park purposes or to pay a
cash amount equal to 5% land value. This method helps to acquire neighborhood parks
in larger subdivisions or to build a parks reserve fund for purchasing park land.
Usually the 5% land acquisition is applied to lands suitable to active park development.
Natural hazard areas or ecologically sensitive areas are usually covenanted as no build
areas or designated as open space pursuant to development permit guidelines.
3.8.2 Purchase
The District of Sechelt budgets the following three major sources of funds for the
acquisition of parklands.
“Invest in • Funds acquired in lieu of the 5 percent dedication of land at the time of
land ‘cause subdivision.
they ain’t • Development cost charges that are charged on newly subdivided lands
makin’
anymore of specifically to purchase or develop land for parks to serve the surrounding
it.” community. ($1088 per unit Parkland per DDC Bylaw)
Will Rogers
• The Parkland acquisition fund that receives $150,000 each year as part of the
Capital plan.
3.8.3 Negotiation
The District can negotiate additional parklands and amenities (over and above the
required 5 percent dedication) as part of rezoning or development approval in exchange
for higher density in development. This can be effective where the Official Community
Plan designates a park allocation in excess of the statutory 5% limit.
3.8.4 Crown Land Transfer or Purchase on Lease
The District can negotiate the purchase or transfer of lands held by the provincial or
federal governments for parkland purposes. Transfer or purchase for a nominal fee is
usually contingent on an agreement for local government to use the land for park
purposes. However, a provincial policy is being developed by the Bureau of Land
Management for Crown Land for institutional purposes.
3.8.5 Donation
Landowners may donate full or partial title to lands for park purposes in exchange for
Revenue Canada tax credits. The District can accept land in trust, holding it in
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 43
accordance with the conditions of a trust agreement. As an alternative, the District can
accept cash donations for parkland acquisition.
3.8.6 Private Lease
The District can acquire rights to occupy land for an agreed upon purpose for a
specified period of time. Long-term leases (20 or more years) with the Province for the
use of Crown lands as public open space are fairly common in B.C. Lease agreements
can also be held with private landowners whose interests are compatible with park
objectives (e.g. trails through lands held by forest companies).
3.8.7 Rights of Way and Statutory Rights-of-Way
Rights of Way and Statutory Rights of Way are registered on title to allow access across
a private property. This is usually taken at the time of subdivision. In a right of way title
vests with the municipality. In the case of a statutory right of way title vests with the
land owner, however the covenant that defines the statutory right of way describes its
use, (i.e. .public access or right of passage for maintenance purposes.
3.8.8 Partnerships
By agreement, local government might partner with an organization such as Ducks
Unlimited or the Nature Trust to acquire lands for public use. Usually the above
referenced bodies partner in the acquisition of sensitive habitats or riparian areas.
3.8.9 Development Cost Charges
Parkland Development Cost Charges (DCCs) were implemented in the District of
Sechelt in 1997 based pursuant to Section 936 of the Local Government Act.
The District of Sechelt Parkland DCC rates were set at $1,088 per lot for Single Family
Residential and per unit for Multi Family Residential in 1996. This levy is current in
2006.
For comparison purposes the following table illustrates DCC charges for a number of
municipalities in BC.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 44
Table 3.8.9 Park Development Cost Charges in selected BC Municipalities
Pitt Meadows (for parkland acquisition) $2,230.00 per dwelling unit
Pitt Meadows (for parkland Development) $521.00 per dwelling unit
Port Coquitlam (Single family dwelling) $3132.00 per dwelling unit
Port Coquitlam (Multiple family dwelling) $1788.00 per dwelling unit
Burnaby (Single and Two family) $6521.00 per lot
Penticton (Single family residential) $1162.00 per lot
Courtenay (Single family) $684.00 per unit
Courtenay (Multiple family) $479.00 per unit
Nanaimo (Single family) $1961.67 per unit
Nanaimo (Multiple family) $13.08 per sq. metre gross building
floor area.
Existing Park Funds
The District of Sechelt has two park reserve funds (i.e. the parkland Acquisition fund
and the Parks DCC Fund). The Parkland Acquisition fund includes cash in lieu of
statutory parkland dedication contributions from developers. As of 2005 the balance of
this reserve fund was $938,659. The Parks DCC fund is the reserve fund which
comprises the $1088 per unit charge levied on residential development. As of 2005 the
balance of this account was $266,410.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 45
4. Trails and
Greenways
Strategy
4.1 Introduction
The District of Sechelt currently has a number of walking and cycling trails that are used
frequently by residents and visitors. Many of these are on vacant undeveloped
properties. The District lacks multiuse pathways that link neighborhoods and parks.
This lack of dedicated pathways discourages pedestrian and cycling traffic. The
Sunshine Coast Highway is the only arterial that connects Davis Bay, West Sechelt and
the downtown core. The absence of paved shoulders, narrow pavement width and open
ditches mitigates against safe cycling and pedestrian use of the highway.
Greenways have been considered for the District of Sechelt in the past in a number of
documents including the Urban Greenway Study (Urban Systems, 1996). This study
recommended a number of Greenway projects including the now extremely popular
Davis Bay walkway. This report identified Urban Greenways as a key element in the
pursuit of tourism, access to the core area and outdoor recreation in general. The
report also recommended that greenways form an integral component of the
development framework for the District.
An effective system of trails and greenways could enable residents and visitors to travel
by foot and bicycle throughout the District thus encouraging healthy lifestyles and create
a more vibrant and attractive community. To this end, the Trail and Greenways
Strategy proposes a system of trails and greenways that will connect all neighborhoods
of the District and offer recreational opportunities to residents and visitors.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 46
4.2 Goals
To create a district-wide system of multi-use trails/greenways that will:
• Connect all neighbourhoods of the District of Sechelt with greenways
• Create greenways that connect parks and open spaces
• Create paths that connect residential areas to parks and open spaces
• Create a network of trails/greenways that will encourage use of alternate modes
of transportation
• Increase the safety of residents by providing an alternative to using the
Sunshine Coast Highway as a pedestrian/cycling route
• Provide wildlife corridors
Map # 13 shows a conceptual plan of how greenways and trails should link parks
and neighbourhoods throughout the District.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 47
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 48
4.3 A “Greenways” Approach to Trails
Trails can be considered in a broader context as “Greenway corridors” that serve many
functions. A “greenway” is any linear corridor characterized by natural vegetation and
open space. Greenways that incorporate trails can serve the following functions:
• Environmental Benefits: Greenways can provide increased opportunity for
alternative modes of transportation. A direct result of increased alternative
transportation is a reduction of motorized vehicles on District roads.
By setting aside open space and natural vegetation throughout the Greenway
system, wildlife habitat and corridors may be preserved, as well as shady pedestrian
access corridors.
• Recreation and Social Benefits: Provide opportunities for walking, jogging, cycling
and nature appreciation and buffer conflicting land uses; enhance the value of
adjacent lands and promote healthy lifestyles.
• Economic Benefits: The presence of parks and greenways can increase the value
of nearby properties. Greenway systems can be viewed as a community amenity.
The District of Sechelt is an established tourist destination. A Greenways system will
enable tourists to access a variety of destinations throughout the District. The
Greenways system could become a legacy, attracting tourists and providing them
with safe, enjoyable pedestrian and cycling corridors.
• Transportation Benefits: Offering alternate routes between residences and parks,
workplaces, shopping and other services. A well-planned combination of trails and
local streets can provide a safe, attractive and more efficient route for commuting by
bicycle or on foot.
Greenways may vary in width and level of development, depending on the size and
scale of subdivision development and the functions that they serve.
4.4 Public Input
Residents of the District of Sechelt have expressed great interest in the construction of
a network of trails that connect all neighborhoods and parks. The Parks and Open
Space Plan Phone Survey determined that 56% of residents rated these trails as
“definitely needed” in the District. Residents who attended the Parks Master Plan Public
Forum also strongly agreed with the construction of additional trails to link parks and
neighborhoods.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 49
4.5 Types of Trails and Greenways
Depending on the location, level pre-existing development, and the intended users, the
most appropriate type of pathway or a variation thereof should be constructed. The five
basic types of paths systems that could be used to guide the developments of trails
throughout the District of Sechelt include:
1. multi-use (including wheelchair access),
2. shared-use,
3. pedestrian easements and walkways,
4. commuter bicycle lanes; and
5. hiking trails.
The following cross sections illustrate alternative trails and greenways that could be
applied in Sechelt.
Figure 4.5.1 Multiuse Trail
4.5.1 Multi-Use trails
Multi-use trails are intended for use by bicyclists, pedestrians and joggers and have the
following characteristics:
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 50
• Tread width: 2.0 m minimum to allow for two way bicycle traffic
• Tread surface: Compacted stone fines or asphalt
• Trail Clearing: 4.0 m minimum
• Gradient: maximum 10% grade (15% over short distances)
• Buffer width: 3.0 m minimum buffer on either side of trail
• Optimum cross slope 1 - 2% for drainage
Figure 4.2 Shared Use Trail
4.5.2 Shared Use Trails
Shared use trails are a more economical alternative to Multi-use trails. They provide
routes for bicyclists and pedestrians and have the following characteristics:
• Tread width of 2 meters is desirable target.
• Tread Surface: Natural or crusher dust
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 51
4.5.2 Pedestrian Easements and Rights of Way
Pedestrian easements and rights of ways are intended to provide links to local parks,
and school sites, and to link adjacent neighborhoods. Walkways should be planned
before the land is cleared for development so that trees and other vegetation can be
preserved. Generally the developer should be responsible for construction of these
trails as they develop the subdivision. These trails should be recognized not only as
pedestrian transportation routes but also as a revitalization and beautification greenway.
The standards currently used for these easements are totally unacceptable and create
eyesores in the neighbourhood rather than beautiful, natural looking greenways. In
order to remedy this problem these easements and walkways should have the following
characteristics:
• Minimum Tread width: 2 m
• Tread surface: compacted stone fines, P.I.P concrete or concrete brick, asphalt
should be used where appropriate
• Buffer width: 1.0 m on each side of the trail should be planted with native
vegetation to beautify the trail
• Total Minimum Right of Way: 3 m
• Gradient: maximum 10% grade but the lowest grade possible should be achieved
to ensure universal access
• Optimum cross slope 1 - 2% for drainage
• Chain link fences should be used where appropriate to protect private property
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 52
5.3 Bicycle Commuter Lanes
Commuter bicycle lanes should be provided along existing roadways to provide a safe
area for cyclists (as per TAC standards).
Figure 4.5.4 Hiking Trail
4.5.4 Hiking Trails
Hiking trails are the most economical type of trail and can be used by a wide range of
users. These are usually in large wooded areas such as the Heritage Forest and the
Trails development. They should have the following characteristics:
• Tread width: variable
• Tread surface: natural surface, wood chips or stone fines.
• Buffer width: 0.5 - 1.0 m on each side of the trail
• Gradient: variable
• Optimum cross slope 1 - 2% for drainage
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 53
4.6 Trail and Greenway Implementation
The following section describes the various trails and recommends improvements.
4.6.1 West Sechelt to Sechelt Connection
A dedicated trail from West Sechelt to the Downtown Village would allow West Sechelt
residents to walk to work and school. It would provide a safe, peaceful walking
alternative for the many non-motorized commuters who currently use the highway as
their route. As the school district decreases its level of bus service to students in the
West Sechelt area more children will be forced to walk along the highway unless a trail
is developed as an alternative.
An informal hiking trail already exists between the two areas along the SCRD waterline
RoW. The trail has been cleared and used by local residents, many of them students of
Chatelech Secondary School. This trail is designated in the OCP and West Sechelt
Neighbourhood Plan and should be developed as a multi use trail or shared use trail
standard in conjunction with the development of the Sangara and Clayton properties.
Implementation
• Trails should be developed as multi use or shared trail and formally
dedicated at the time of subdivision of DL 4295A, DL 1384, and DL
1385
• The District could contact and develop agreements with the
landowners as required
• The trail should be surveyed to ensure that it lies on the SCRD
waterline easement
4.6.2 Wilson Creek to Village Connection
A dedicated walking/cycling trail from Davis Bay to the Downtown Village is necessary
to encourage pedestrian and cyclists. Most pedestrians and cyclists use the Sunshine
Coast Highway which is extremely dangerous. The Ministry of Highways/District of
Sechelt Highway 101 upgrade from the conveyor belt to Wilson Creek includes a
dedicated sidewalk for pedestrians and cyclists. This project will not be commenced
until 2008.
4.6.3 Sinku Drive
Sinku Drive runs along the Trial Bay waterfront through Indian Band Lands between the
Boulevard in the District and a beach opposite the Band’s marina. Between the end of
Sinku Drive and the boat launch ramp there is no trail and pedestrians can traverse a
small beach to the boat launch where an access road links to Selma Park Road and
Highway 101.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 54
Implementation
In order to complete this trail so that cyclists and pedestrians will use it
more often the following actions must be taken:
• The District of Sechelt should initiate a joint project with the SIB.
• Signage could be installed at entrances to the trail and
periodically along the length of the trail.
• Eventually, a crusher dust or asphalt path connecting the end of
Sinku Drive to the boat launch should be constructed. This trail
connection may involve cutting a trail through the forested area
behind the beach or building a breakwater along the length of
the beach. Due to the extremely high cost of constructing a
breakwater it is recommended that a trail be cut through the
adjacent land.
4.6.4 Downtown Walking Path
The District of Sechelt Trail Committee has researched and proposed a plan for a trail
network that will accommodate pedestrians and cyclists through the Downtown Village.
It will encourage residents and tourists to shop, and to visit the Trail Bay Boulevard,
Snickett Park, the Sechelt Marsh, and a number of other areas. The route travels along
the current road and trail system passing mostly through smaller streets and pathways.
This is illustrated on Map 5.
Implementation
In order to complete this path the following actions must be taken:
• The route should be checked to ensure that it lies exclusively
on public Rights of Way
• The trail committee should liaise with the downtown
revitalization committee to discuss signage and route
• A system of signage should be designed and installed along
the routes
• The route should be beautified by planting native vegetation
4.6.5 Village to East Porpoise Bay Trail
Connecting Sechelt to East Porpoise Bay with a multi-use pathway will provide an
important linkage between the two neighborhoods. It will also be an important linkage
for the many touring cyclists who camp at Porpoise Bay Provincial Park. The pathway
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 55
should begin near the Sechelt Marsh at Osprey Street and continue to the end of
Osprey Street where a trail exists along the waterfront of the SIGD lands. (This
pathway already exists but it is in disrepair and would require some clearing to make it
more accessible.) This trail could then link with the Meandering Trail in East Porpoise
Bay by a bike lane along Sechelt Inlet Road.
Implementation
• The District of Sechelt should make contact and cooperate with the
SIGD through the Trail Committee
• Signage should be installed at entrances to the route and periodically
along the length of the trail
• The trail section should be widened and improved through the Band
Lands
• A dedicated bicycle lane should be constructed on Sechelt Inlet Road
4.6.6 Meandering Trail
The Meandering Trail has been constructed adjacent to Sechelt Inlet Road between
Allen Road and Marmot Drive. The trail is approximately 1.5 m wide and has been
constructed through private property with permission of the landowners and winds
through standing trees.
The meandering nature of the trail makes it an interesting pedestrian path, but limits its
usefulness as a cycling trail. In order to make the trail accessible to cyclists it must be
widened, and straightened and come as close as possible to the specifications for a
Multi-use trail.
Implementation
• Landowners should be contacted to get permission for use of the land
• The trail should be completed
• Signage should be installed at a number of entrances to the trail and
along the length of the trail
4.6.7 East Porpoise Bay Esplanade
An historic road Right of Way (esplanade) exists along the waterfront in East Porpoise
Bay between Allen Road and Burnett Road. In order to make use of this feature access
should be constructed along Yew Road.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 56
Implementation
• Access should be constructed
4.6.8 Sechelt Inlet Road Bicycle Path (Sandy Hook)
A bicycle path should be constructed along Sechelt Inlet Road from the East Porpoise
Bay Provincial Park to the Heritage Forest as part of the Silverback development.
Implementation
• A bicycle path should be included in any road upgrade
associated with the Silverback development.
4.6.9 Sechelt Heritage Forest Trail
This bike path is proposed on Sechelt Inlet Road to link the proposed Sechelt Inlet Road
Bicycle Path at the Silverback development to the Sechelt Gray Forest Service Road
7575 Branch 9 (Jackson Log Sort Road).
Implementation
• The trail should be planned with the help of local volunteers
• Signage should be installed at entrances to the trail and
periodically along the length of the trail.
4.6.10 Sandy Hook Cycling/Pedestrian Route (Porpoise Drive/Tillicum Bay Road)
This Route should be marked and signed for use as a cycling/pedestrian route. The
route would begin at the Sechelt Heritage Forest Trail and Forest Road. From the south
it would then turn right onto Skookumchuk Road, right on Deerhorn Drive, left on Sandy
Hook Road, right down Klahanie Drive, and right onto Porpoise Drive. The route would
then follow along Porpoise Drive and connect to Tillicum Bay Road via the Davis Brook
Path. (See Davis Brook Path below) Due to the many turns in this area it will be
essential to have highly visible signage in place.
Implementation
• Signage should be installed at entrances to the route and
periodically along the length of the route.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 57
4.6.11 Sandy Hook to Tuwanek Connector Trail
This trail should be constructed from Tillicum Bay Road through DL. 1410 to Sechelt
Inlet Road. Public right of ways should be acquired for the trail as the area is
subdivided. This section would create a recreational walking/cycling path between
Tuwanek and Sandy Hook.
Implementation
• Right of Ways should be acquired at time of subdivision through
DL. 1410
• A trail should be constructed to Shared Use Standard
• Signage should be installed at the ends of the trail and
periodically along the length of the trail
4.6.12Davis Brook Path
Currently there is no direct connection between Tillicum Bay Road and Porpoise Drive
in Sandy Hook. Pedestrians and cyclists must detour via Sechelt Inlet Road and around
to get from Tillicum Bay Road to Porpoise Drive. An unopened road right of way
connects the two roads through the Davis Brook Ravine. The ravine is fairly steep and
would require the construction of stairs and a bridge to cross the creek.
This trail would give Tillicum Bay Road residents access to the sand beach that is
located at the bottom of the Davis Brook beach access.
Implementation
• The trail should be planned and budgeted including stairs and a
bridge.
• Signage should be installed at entrances to the trail
4.6.13 West Sechelt to Kinnikinnick Park
An informal trail currently exists between West Sechelt and Kinnikinnick Park and is
used by a variety of users and provides an important link between West Porpoise Bay
and West Sechelt. Currently the trail trespasses across private lands and has problems
with drainage particularly in the area of Ripple Way
This trail should be protected by rights of way when land is developed.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 58
Implementation
• A pedestrian RoW should be acquired by the District
• Trail should be cleared and enhanced
• Signage should be installed
4.6.14 Downtown Village to Kinnikinnick Park Bicycle Path Connection
A dedicated bicycle path should be completed to link the Downtown Village to
Kinnickinnick Park in West Porpoise Bay along Trail Avenue/Reef Road/Shoal
Way/Lighthouse Avenue. Currently there is a paved bike path along part of this route
but it is not complete.
Implementation
• A bicycle path should be constructed along the route shown on Map
V.
• Signage should be installed
4.6.15 Chapman Creek Trail
Chapman Creek currently contains many trails of varying widths and level of difficulty in
lower Chapman Creek and upper Chapman Creek. Along the lower section of the trail a
local carver has installed wooden gnome figurines throughout the forest.
Hikers and mountain bikers of a variety of ages and ability levels use these trails. The
lower trail runs from the Chapman Creek Bridge upstream approximately 2 km. An old
tote road runs along the top of bank of upper Chapman Creek from Chapman Road to
the Chapman River falls. Some parts of the lower Chapman Creek trail have fallen into
disrepair in recent years and will need to be reconditioned and in some cases rebuilt or
relocated. The trails also lack signage making them difficult to follow for visitors and
first time users.
The Trails Committee has identified the lower section of trail (The Gnome Trail) as an
important part of the trail system and recommends that it be promoted as an attraction.
The public awareness initiative for this trail could include installation of an informative
sign at the trailhead. The sign should contain a map of the local trails and information
about the gnomes.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 59
Implementation
• Designate the Crown Land portions of the Chapman Creek corridor as
a UREP Reserve. (Use for Recreation and Enjoyment of the Public)
• Trail maintenance and construction should be performed by the
District or an Adopt-a-Trail group to increase the quantity and quality
of trails in the park
• The artist who created to the gnomes should be contacted before
signs are designed
• Signage should be created and installed at a number of entrances to
the trail and along the length of the trail
4.6.16 Hidden Grove DL 3006 (Sandy Hook)
The Hidden Grove is a forested area adjacent to the Heritage Forest in Sandy Hook.
The area is presently under tenure to the Sechelt Community Forest. In 2003 the
District of Sechelt in partnership with the Sandy Hook Ratepayers Association prepared
a park plan and submitted an application for a Crown Grant for the Hidden Grove. This
application was rejected. A number of hiking trails have been constructed by local
residents.
Implementation
The recreational and environmental attributes of the Hidden Grove area
should be identified in the Forest Development Plans of the Sechelt
Community Forest. Where possible the recreational attributes shall be
developed and managed including trails and environmental interpretation of
old growth trees.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 60
4.7 Signage
A successful trail system must be easily recognizable and provide accurate direction to
its users. With this in mind the following signage strategy should be implemented.
The District of Sechelt should plan and install a comprehensive and uniform level of
signage on all trails in the District. This will enhance the safety of trail users, vehicles,
and property; improve travel within and between local areas; and professionalize and
promote the trail system.
Through research and discussion the Trail Committee has decided upon a system of
signage that will be both effective and economical. Trail signage will include two large
general signs, a number of smaller directional and trail marker signs and bicycle path
signs.
4.7.1 Large General Signs
At least 2 large informative signs should be
strategically located including a map of all
trails, beach accesses and parks in the
District. These signs could be installed at the
Davis Bay Walkway and the Trail Bay
walkway. These signs are to inform visitors
and residents of all the recreational areas
available in the District. These signs should
also make reference to the beach access
brochure and trail maps that are available and
how to access them. The following signage
used on the PoCo trail system in Port
Coquitlam has been selected by the trail
committee as a guide for designing signage
for the District of Sechelt. Figure 4.7.1
illustrates the Port Coquitlam Trail Sign by
Folia Industries.
4.7.2 Directional and Trail Marker Signs
A number of smaller directional and trail
marker signs should also be used throughout the trail system to guide users along the
trail. The trail committee has proposed that the following system of signage be adopted
for this purpose.
Paths through urban areas and along asphalt or concrete paths should be marked with
carvings or logos painted onto the trail surface. A logo to be used throughout the trail
system should be designed and application initiated as soon as the trail is designated.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 61
Non-asphalt paths should be marked with the signs pictured below. These signs are
very economical and inform users of what trail they are on and how far along they are
using a colour scheme and carved numbers.
Directional signs should also be installed at intersections along the route. These signs
will vary depending on the location and type of trail but should clearly show users which
direction to follow.
Figure 4.7.2 Trail Markers for Non-Urban Paths
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 62
4.7.3 Bicycle Path Signage
The following are examples of signage that could be installed along bicycle paths as
they are constructed.
Figure 4.7.3 Bicycle path signage
4.8 Partners in Trail Development
Residents can provide knowledge in terms of identifying paths or routes that are used to
travel in and around their neighbourhoods or through areas that are currently
undeveloped. That knowledge should be tapped through the Trail Committee as the
District embarks on more extensive trail development.
After the trail is planned a variety of organizations and neighbourhood associations
would likely volunteer labour to construct all or part of a trail of interest to them. There
may also be opportunities to raise funds for trail building through a “Build-a-Kilometer”
type campaign similar to the one undertaken for the Trans-Canada Trail. The District
may also involve residents in building and maintaining trails through the “Adopt-a-Trail”
program.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 63
4.9 Conclusion
This Trails and Greenway Strategy provides a system of trails for the District. As new
residential neighborhoods develop additional trails should be dedicated and constructed
to achieve the goals of this plan. It is recommended that the Trail Committee continue
to meet regularly to develop additional trails and greenways throughout the District.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 64
5.Beach Access
Strategy
5.1 Introduction
Beach accesses are distributed along the waterfront throughout the District of Sechelt
providing access to the waterfront for residents and visitors (See Map II). Public beach
access points are very important to District residents who use them to access fishing,
swimming beaches, small craft launching areas and for ocean-side strolling. These
accesses ensure that residents of the District have access to the coastline.
Beach accesses have been developed by the District Public Works Department along
Right of Ways that have been taken as part of the subdivision approval process.
Pursuant to the land Title Act subdivision requirements the rights of way have been
dedicated along the waterfront a minimum of every 200 m in urban areas and every 400
m in rural areas. Many of these RoWs have been cleared and walking trails have been
constructed. However, there are a number of areas that do not have sufficient beach
access since trails have not been opened.
To ensure that local residents and visitors can use the waterfront, it is vital that
accesses are made available to a wide range of users. Accessibility concerns of local
residents should be taken into account when constructing beach accesses. Sechelt has
an increasing population of seniors who require easily accessible beach accesses. To
ensure that beach accesses are usable for all residents, steep accesses should be
equipped with stairs, handrails and other safety equipment as needed.
5.2 Beach Access Inventory
In order to determine where beach accesses are required it was first necessary to
prepare a complete inventory of the existing Beach Accesses. The following table is an
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 65
inventory of all of the beach access RoWs that currently exist in the District of Sechelt
from an information brochure prepared by the District’s Public Works Department. The
column “Brochure #” indicates what number each beach access has been assigned in
the Public Works Beach Access Brochure.
Table 5.1 Beach Accesses Inventory District of Sechelt Public Works Dept. (see
map 7)
Beach Access # Brochure # Location Area Status
1 1 7287 Annex Rd. and Redrooffs West Sechelt Open
2 Sergeant Rd. and Highway West Sechelt Unopened
3 Young Rd. and Dale West Sechelt Unopened
4 2 Dale Rd. at Hill Rd. West Sechelt Open
5 Leanne Rd and Highway West Sechelt Open
6 Sea Fiddler Rd. West Sechelt Open
7 Trail Island Drive West Sechelt Unopened
8 Lewarne Road, 6787 Highway 101 West Sechelt Unopened
9 3 Lawson Rd West Sechelt Open
10 Below DL. 2338 West Sechelt Unopened
11 Eastern edge of DL. 2338 West Sechelt Unopened
12 Wakefield Rd. West Sechelt Open
13 Mason Rd. West Sechelt Open
14 Between Mason Rd. and McCourt West Sechelt Unopened
15 4 McCourt Rd. West Sechelt Open
16 Mills Rd. West Sechelt Unopened
17 Derby Rd. West Sechelt Unopened
18 Granite Rd. West Sechelt Unopened
19 West of Camden Rd. West Sechelt Unopened
20 5 Camden Rd. Village Open
21 6 Shorncliffe Ave. Village Open
22 6 Ocean Ave. Village Open
23 6 Trail Ave. Village Open
24 6 Inlet Ave. Village Open
25 6 Wharf Rd. Village Open
26 Gale Ave. North and Walkway near Shoreline Place W. Porpoise Unopened
27 12 Gale Ave. North W. of Highmoor Rd. W. Porpoise Open
28 Gale Ave. North E. of Rimrock Rd. Btw lot 28 and 29 W. Porpoise Unopened
29 Gale Ave. North W. of Fairway Ave. W. Porpoise
30 11 Chelsea Place and Gale Ave. North (6308) W. Porpoise Open
31 Heritage Rd. at Park W. Porpoise Open
32 West of Harbour Way at Park W. Porpoise Open
33 Ripple Way W. Porpoise Unopened
34 Shoal Way Village (Inlet) Open
35 Spray Str. Village (Inlet) Open
36 Marine Way at Ref 13404 Village (Inlet) Unopened
37 Anchor Rd. at Gov't wharf Village (Inlet) Open
38 Osprey Between lot 20 and 21 Village (Inlet) Open
39 Delta Rd. at Sechelt Inlet Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Unopened
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 66
40 Sechelt Inlet Rd. beside lot 20 E. Porpoise Bay Unopened
41 Kontiki Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Open
42 Dusty Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Unopened
43 13 Allen Rd. off Sechelt Inlet Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Open
44 Yew Rd. at Park E. Porpoise Bay Unopened
45 Burnett Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Open
46 15 Heron Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Open
47 16 Marmot Rd. E. Porpoise Bay Open
48 N. edge of Porpoise Bay Prov. Park E. Porpoise Bay Unopened
49 Selma Park Rd. Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Open
50 S. of Selma Park Rd. and Highway Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
51 7 Snodgrass Rd. Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Open
52 Highway Between lot 32 and 33 Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
53 Below Nestman Rd. Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
54 Havies Rd. (between lots 7 and 8) Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
55 Heather Rd. Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
56 Chapman Rd. Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
57 N. of Bay Rd. Btw lot 10 and 1 Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Unopened
58 8 S. of Bay Rd. at N. edge of Davis Bay Beach Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Open
59 8 Davis Bay Rd. at Davis Bay Beach Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Open
60 8 Westly Rd. at Davis Bay Beach Selma P./D.B./W. Cr. Open
61 Beneath Field Rd. at Wilson Creek Selma P./D.B./W.Cr. Unopened
62 John Rd. Selma P./D.B./W.Cr. Unopened
63 9 Paul Rd. off Browning Rd. Selma P./D.B./W.Cr. Open
64 10 Jack Rd. off Browning Rd. Selma P./D.B./W.Cr. Open
65 Coracle Drive beside lot 45 Sandy Hook Unopened
66 Fish Hook Sandy Hook Open
67 Arc Rd. Sandy Hook Open
68 Prawn Way Sandy Hook Open
69 17 Davis Brook at Porpoise Drive Sandy Hook Open
70 Walkway off Tillicum Bay Rd. between lot 11 and 12 Sandy Hook Unopened
71 Tillicum Bay Rd. beside Lot 1 Sandy Hook Open
72 Below Naylor Rd. next to DL. 1410 Sandy Hook Unopened
73 N. edge of DL. 1410 Tuwanek Unopened
74 Sechelt Inlet Rd. Between lot 5 and 6 Tuwanek Open
75 Islets Place in front of Lot 11 Tuwanek Open
76 N. end of Islets Place Tuwanek Unopened
For a more detailed description of the existing beach access RoWs in the District refer
to the report The Roads to the Shore (1995) (6350-70/ RSHO 1995).
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 67
5.3 Priority Areas for Beach Access Development
Priority areas for beach access development have been selected based on the following
criteria:
1. lack of access for local residents
2. accessibility of terrain
3. quality of waterfront
4. level of difficulty to open
Highly developed areas that do not have beach access at least every 300 m are a high
priority for development. In order to identify beach access deficient areas Map II was
created. This map identifies areas within the District where beach accesses should be
acquired at the time of development. If the areas have a large residential population the
area is deemed a high priority for beach access development.
The proposed timing of development of each access is given as Short term (2003 to
2007), Medium term (2008 to 2012) and Long term (2013 to 2021). Specific
timeframes have not been included for some recommendations as priorities may shift
due to budgeting issues and other uncertainties.
In the event that an action plan is not implemented within the proposed timeframe, it
may become a higher priority within the next timeframe (e.g., from a medium priority in
the short term to a high priority in the medium term). It is important that the District
regularly monitors and updates the Beach Access Strategy.
Currently the parks budget does not appropriate specific funds to the development of
beach accesses, however, Public Works does. Considering the importance that local
residents place on their ability to use waterfront areas and the high usage beach
accesses receive (the phone survey results show that 63% of residents use beach
accesses at least once a month) it is recommended that the parks budget is expanded
to ensure that three or four beach accesses are developed each year. Additionally,
many of the easy-to-open beach accesses have already been constructed. In order to
provide adequate access to the waterfront for all District residents some of the more
costly-to-construct accesses will have to be developed. This will require an increased
budget to accommodate material and labour costs. An approximate budget for
developing each beach access has also been included for each recommendation.
5.3.1 Selma Park/Davis Bay/Wilson Creek
The waterfront from Nestman Rd. to Chapman Rd. currently has no beach accesses.
This is especially problematic since the area has a large residential population. Due to
the steep terrain in this area and the long distance from the road to the beach these
beach accesses will require significant funding to develop trails that are accessible to all
residents.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 68
The following Beach Access Trails are proposed for development:
• Nestman Road (53): This access is approximately 200 m long. It
should be fairly easy to open and has attractive waterfront.
Timing: Short term
Priority: High
• Heather Road (55): This access is approximately 200 m long and
has a fairly steep slope.
Timing: Short term
Priority: High
• Chapman Road (56): This access is approximately 150 m long and
has an excellent beach.
Timing: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Havies Road (between lot 7 and 8) (54): This access is
approximately 200 m long and is steep.
Timing: Medium term
Priority: Medium
• Benner Road (between lots 15 and 5) (50): This access is
approximately 150 m long, is steeply sloped and has an excellent
pebble beach.
Timing: Long term
Priority: Medium
5.3.2 West Sechelt
The waterfront at the Eastern edge of West Sechelt from Mills Rd. to Norwest Bay Rd.
lacks adequate beach accesses. The lack of access combined with high-density
residential areas and an expanding population makes this area a very high priority for
beach access development.
The following Beach Access Trails are proposed for development:
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 69
• Derby Road (17): This access is approximately 150 m long and is steeply
sloped.
Timeline: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Granite Road near Norwest Bay (18): This access has a good trail leading
to an undeveloped waterfront. It requires signage and it should be checked
to ensure the trail is on the RoW.
Timing: Short term (will be opened 2003)
Priority: High
• Gowland Road (11): This access is approximately 30 m long and requires
signage.
Timing: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Lewarne Road (8): This access is approximately 70 m long and is already
opened, it requires signage.
Timing: Short term
Priority: Low
• Highway 101 Below DL. 2338 (10): This access is approximately 30 m
long.
Timing: Medium term (this access will be required when DL. 2338 is
developed)
Priority: Medium
• Trail Island Drive (7): This access is approximately 30 m long.
Timing: Medium term
Priority: Medium
5.3.3 Sandy Hook
The residents of Sandy Hook are fairly well served by beach accesses. However, as
this area continues to develop it will be necessary to open more accesses to
accommodate the additional population.
The following Beach Access Trails are proposed for development:
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 70
• Coracle Drive (65): This access is approximately 150 m long and is not
steep. It ends at a sheltered waterfront
Timeline: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Tillicum Bay Road (71): This access has a steep trail leading to a small
beach. It requires signage and it should be checked to ensure the trail is on
the RoW.
Timing: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Tillicum Bay Road (70): This access will be opened in 2003
Timing: Short term
Priority: Low
5.3.4 West Porpoise Bay
The waterfront in West Porpoise Bay already contains a number of beach accesses and
it is not densely developed. However, as residential development intensifies the area
will require more access points.
Beach Access trails should be opened at one of the following locations:
• Gale Ave. North E. of Rimrock Rd. Between lot 28 and 29 (28): This
access is about 150 m long and will likely require the use of stairs in some
areas due to the steep slope.
Timing: Short term
Priority: Medium
• Gale Ave. North W. of Fairway Ave. Beside lot 56 (26):
Timing: Short term
Priority: High
• Ripple Way (33): This access should be constructed when DL. 1509 is
developed.
Timing: Long
Priority: Low
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 71
5.3.5 East Porpoise Bay
East Porpoise Bay has five open beach access that provide good access for the
residents. Beach accesses are easy to develop in this area and are highly accessible
due to the flat terrain.
Beach Access trails should be opened at:
• Yew Road: This access is approximately 70 m long and has a low
slope.
Timing: Medium term
Priority: Medium
5.3.6 Tuwanek
Tuwanek currently has two open beach accesses that are very well used. As
development continues it will be necessary to construct additional beach accesses.
Beach Access trails should be opened at:
• Gray Creek (73): This access is approximately 400 m long and runs
beside Gray Creek. The waterfront has nice sandy beach. This access
should be developed concurrent with development of DL. 1410.
Timing: Long term
Priority: Low
• Carmel Place (76): This access is approximately 150 m long.
Timing: Long term (Should be constructed as DL. 3259 is developed)
Priority: Low
5.3.7 Village
The Village is very well served by beach accesses. All of the acquired right-of-ways
have been opened.
5.4 Future Right of Way Dedication
It is important that the District of Sechelt select the best possible areas of waterfront to
construct beach accesses. Too often in the past, very steep accesses with little or no
waterfront have been designated as RoW. When beach access Right of Ways are
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 72
designated at the time of subdivision they should be carefully selected. To encourage
optimum use, beach accesses RoWs should have the following characteristics:
• Low slope: Use of low slope areas decreases safety concerns and
construction costs and increases accessibility for a variety of users.
• Sandy or small pebble beaches: Sandy or small pebble beaches are quit rare
on the coast, where they exist they should be made available to the public.
• Adjacent to streams or creeks (where possible): Locating beach accesses
along streams or creeks creates a more attractive trail and results in a wider
green area due to development setbacks along the creek.
• Island in front of beach area: Beaches that have small rocky islands nearby
provide a more scenic beach and allow people to swim out to the islands.
In order to locate the optimum locations for beach access RoWs, an evaluation of the
coastline in future development areas was completed. The evaluation involved walking
the length of the coast to locate areas that would be useful as beach accesses. Based
on this evaluation and requirements of the Land Title Act, areas that are suitable for
beach access development were selected. The Beach Access Map II displays the
findings of the evaluation.
5.5 Public Awareness
In order to encourage use of beach accesses local residents must be made aware of
their location. At the time of this report there is no publicly available brochure or map
that describes the location of beach accesses. This lack of advertising significantly
decreases the number of potential users of this resource. In order to remedy this
problem a public awareness campaign should be initiated. To increase public
awareness the following measures are recommended:
5.5.1 Beach Access Brochure
A beach access brochure has been completed that contains a description of all beach
accesses including level of difficulty. The brochure should also contains a map showing
the location of all completed beach accesses. The brochure should be available for
purchase at the District of Sechelt counter and at visitors centers.
5.5.2 Web Page
The District of Sechelt web page includes a beach access page that contains
information similar to the Beach Access Brochure.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 73
5.5.3 Signage On Site Signage
Appropriate, high-visibility signage is erected at all
beach accesses at both the road and waterfront side. It
is important that signage is erected at the waterfront so
that people walking along the beach will be able to
differentiate between public and private accesses when
trying to return to the road.
Signage should be standardized for the entire District of
Sechelt in order to avoid confusion and achieve
consistency throughout. However, a number of
communities have chosen to create their own unique
signs. This gives each beach access a unique look and
fosters community stewardship for the trail. However,
unique signs should always be used in combination
with a standard sign to avoid confusion.
Through public consultations it has been noted that the
signs currently in use at beach accesses are not visible
enough. In order to increase awareness of beach
accesses it is important that larger signs are installed
along the highway.
General Signage
The large informative signs that will be installed at Davis Bay and Snickett Park as
detailed in the Trail Strategy (section should include general information about beach
accesses and a map showing the location of all open beach accesses in the District.
5.5.4 Parking
Vehicular on street parking at head of beach access points.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 74
6. Partnerships
6.1 Introduction
The District of Sechelt is involved in informal partnerships with community groups and
government organizations. These partnerships benefit the district and its partner
organizations from a financial perspective through sharing of equipment and expertise.
Effective partnerships also increase the level of service and quality of facilities available
in parks and open spaces. It is recommended that the District of Sechelt continue to
expand its partnerships by working with community groups, conservation groups,
continuing inter-organization cooperation and initiating the Adopt-a-Park, Trail or Beach
Access program and the School District Volunteer program.
6.2 Community Groups
Many community groups contribute to park and open space areas in the District of
Sechelt. Examples would be the washrooms built at the Davis Bay Seawall by the
Rotary Club and the Sandy Hook Community Association maintaining trails and parks.
Community-based park and trail groups help foster community spirit, increase public
knowledge of park resources, and increase the level and number of resources available
to the whole community. Supplying these groups with the equipment and guidance they
require can be time consuming for District employees. However, as the groups grow
and become more self-sufficient they should free up time for District employees to work
on more specialized projects. Effective community groups will also increase the quality
and quantity of parks and trails in the District. For these reasons relationships with
community groups should be encouraged in the future.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 75
6.3 Conservation Groups
The District of Sechelt could enter into partnerships with conservation groups who are
interested in protecting natural areas. There are a multitude of conservation groups in
B.C. who are working and raising money towards protection of important natural areas.
(The Sechelt Marsh Society is an example of a local organization responsible for the
development of a natural area.)
Partnerships could include expense sharing for purchasing natural areas, maintenance
and restoration agreements, fundraising campaigns and information sharing. These
partnerships could also be useful when negotiating with private property owners and
government organizations for acquisition of property. Groups should be contacted as
individual natural areas are proposed and working relationships should be fostered on
an ongoing basis.
Some examples of conservation groups currently operating in B.C. are Nature
Conservancy of Canada, Habitat Acquisition Trust and Ecotrust Canada. A regularly
updated list of conservation organizations is available from Conservation Connections
at www.conservationconnection.bc.ca.
6.4 Inter-organization Cooperation
The District of Sechelt currently cooperates with a number of organizations including the
Sunshine Coast Regional District, Sechelt Indian Band, Town of Gibsons and School
District 46. These partnerships are informal in nature and involve sharing of equipment
and expertise between the organizations. Meetings between maintenance staff are held
quarterly to discuss the needs of each organization. This exchange accrues financial
savings to all partners and enhances parks and open spaces throughout the district.
The District should encourage this inter-organizational approach to park and open
space development and maintenance. As this type of cooperation continues into the
future it may be necessary to develop a method of recording to ensure that it is an
equitable relationship. Recording of this activity could be achieved with a simple
database system that would keep track of equipment sharing and staff time expended
on inter-organizational projects.
6.5 Adopt a Park, Trail or Beach Access
The District of Sechelt could institute an Adopt-a-Park program that would allow private
citizens or community groups to adopt parks, trails or beach accesses. Adopting groups
must commit for at least one year and are encouraged to work at their park at least
once a month. Volunteers are responsible for a variety of tasks depending upon the
area adopted and their agreement with the District.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 76
This program will improve the quality of parks, trails and beach accesses in the District
while encouraging public awareness, involvement and stewardship of parks.
Initiating this program will not necessarily decrease the number of employees required
for park maintenance and development. Rather, the program will shift the focus of
parks employees slightly to include an educational role. Parks workers will assume the
role of training and helping the program participants in their duties.
Who can adopt a park, trail or beach access?
This program aims to unite and support all people interested in improving District of
Sechelt parks and open spaces. Volunteers could include:
• Individuals
• Neighborhood associations
• Schools
• Businesses
• Church groups
• Youth groups
• User groups
What can be adopted?
Particular areas that may be adopted include:
• Sports fields
• Beach Accesses
• Flower beds
• Trees and shrubs
• Playgrounds
• Courts
• Trails
• Natural Areas
How can volunteers help?
• Picking up litter
• Identifying vegetation
• Sweeping courts and pathways
• Gardening
• Raking leaves
• Clearing trails
• Caring for trees
• Reporting park hazard
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 77
How does someone adopt a park, trail or beach access?
1. They must contact the District of Sechelt parks department with a request to
adopt all or part of a park, trail or beach access.
2. Sign and return the required forms.
3. District staff should process the forms and contact the adopter.
4. District staff should train the participant to do the tasks for which they have
volunteered.
What are volunteers responsible for?
• Volunteers are required to maintain their adopted park, trail or beach access for
at least one year. Volunteers should be encouraged to work at their park at least
once a month. Volunteers make up their own schedules.
• Volunteers must abide by all park rules and ordinances.
• Volunteers must notify District parks staff to change specific volunteer duties.
• Volunteers must notify staff when resigning.
• Volunteers must return all supplies upon resignation.
• Volunteers must keep track of the number of hours spent volunteering on a
monthly basis and report total hours to Parks staff. The District should use this
information to tabulate total yearly hours to help program in the following ways:
o Justifying the need for more tools and supplies when submitting reports to
Council.
o Account for total donated time to the City for annual reports.
o Confirms the growth or decline in volunteer participation.
o Assist students that are required to perform community service hours.
o Help the District determine how to award volunteer awards and give
recognition.
District Support
The District of Sechelt should provide the adopters with tools and supplies to assist in
their duties.
Acknowledgement & Recognition
Adopters should receive:
• an official Certificate of Adoption
• an Adopt-A-Park, Trail or Beach Access T-shirt
• an invitation to an Annual Recognition Event
6.6 School District Volunteer Program
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 78
An apprenticeship like program could be developed with
School District 46 which could include a Sports/Facility Stewardship Program, an
Environmental Stewardship Program and a Horticulture Program.
Sports/Facility Stewardship Program
This project would be a leadership project for grade 12 students. The student would be
given the responsibility of coordinating and facilitating sports programs for younger
children on the sport of their choice on their day off. Activities could range from soccer
to hiking to skateboarding to various arena-based programs and just about anything
else that a student was willing to take on. In addition to playing and practicing the
chosen sport participants would also be expected to act as stewards of the facility they
are using and spend some of the organized time doing maintenance, trail building (for
hiking or mountain biking groups) and clean up. For instance participants of a
skateboard program would be responsible for sweeping and general maintenance of the
skateboard park.
Students would require teacher mentors to advise on leadership skills, activities, etc.
One way this could be achieved would be to incorporate the program into a grade 12
PE class.
This program would give students something to do on their day off, give students
leadership experience, increase the level of fitness and activity of all participants, and
increase community involvement in parks and recreation. Also the hours that students
spend on these activities can be put towards the volunteer hours that they require to
graduate.
Environmental Stewardship Program
This project will function along the same principles as the first program but it will be
environmentally based. The target group for this program will be Biology students. The
program would involve students working in conjunction with the District of Sechelt to
enhance and restore the natural environment. Training will be provided by the District
of Sechelt and then students will be expected to perform a variety of tasks such as:
vegetation inventories, restoration, etc.
This program will provide students with valuable experience and fieldwork skills that
could help them in the future. Students will also earn volunteer hours toward
graduation.
Horticulture Program
A horticulture program would help participants learn the required skills before entering a
post secondary horticulture school. It will also help job placement possibilities in golf
course, municipal, and landscape contractors.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 79
CONCLUSION
The Parks and Open Space Master Plan is a comprehensive Strategy to guide the long
term development of the District of Sechelt’s Parks, Open Space and Trails.
It is intended that the Plan be used by the Planning Department and the Parks and
Recreation Department to prioritize and budget for capital works projects on an annual
bases. The Plan should be used as a guide for such committees as the Green Way
Committee, the Downtown Revitalization Committee and user groups in the community.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACES MASTER PLAN
July 2006 Page 80
