; Muench Corbis Houghton Miflin
Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

Muench Corbis Houghton Miflin

VIEWS: 206 PAGES: 24

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of NY ruled in the Muench case regarding copyright infringement of photographs that the copyright registrations that Corbis made for its photographers are invalid. The court held that because Corbis’ registrations do not identify the “authors” of the photographs as required by 17 USC 409 (2), “the registrations at issue here cover only the database as a whole (the compilation) but do not cover individual contributions.”

More Info
  • pg 1
									Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 1 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 2 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 3 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 4 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 5 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 6 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 7 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 8 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 9 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 10 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 11 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 12 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 13 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 14 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 15 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 16 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 17 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 18 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 19 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 20 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 21 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 22 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 23 of 24
Case 1:09-cv-02669-LAP   Document 38   Filed 05/04/2010   Page 24 of 24

								
To top