Mat mngt by amyncharaniya


									Material Management
      Concepts of material management

                      Kunal Dhandhania- 283011

                      Neelkanth Bajaj- 283003

                      Tapan Kanakiya- 283024

                      Sujal Solanki- 283055

Importance of materials in organizational performance has been felt for several decades. Only recently
have the productions and operations managers found it necessary to develop and organized body of
knowledge on this subject. The resulting set of related disciplines is known as material management.

Materials are used directly or indirectly in producing a product or service such as raw materials,
component parts, assemblies and supplies.

                        Importance of Materials Management
Management of materials in most organizations is crucial to their success because:

       The amount of money spent on materials in higher than other inputs put together (i.e., machinery,
        labour, energy etc.).
       Materials offer considerable scope for reducing cost and improving profits.
       Materials add value to the product.
       The efficiency of a firm depends upon the availability of right materials in right quantity; at the
        right time, at the right price from the right source of supply.
       Materials are life blood of development of humanity.
Material Management is the “management of the flow of materials into an organization to the point,
where, those materials are converted into the firm‟s end product(s).”

                                                                                         (Bailey and Farmer)

                           Concepts of Material Management
The following are the concepts of material management:-

       Centralization
       Decentralization
       Integration
       Profit

         It is required to have better control on the total materials activities in a particular organization.
When it is small in its beginning phase it has compact organization were all the functions of materials are
carried out together and at one place. The materials department reports to the head of the operations, who
can be general manager as per organization. The organization structure is simple as shown in the figure
                         Centralized Materials Management
         The controls are better and the interdepartmental coordination is good and well defined as long as
it is simple. When the company grows and becomes multi product and multi location, the materials
department functioning is kept centralized and it continues catering service to all the products groups.
This set up is called as centralized materials management. In such a case the organization is as follows.

        The company has four divisions operating independently. The general managers of respective
product group A, B, C and D report to president. For day-to-day materials requirement they depend on the
central materials department, who holds total responsibility to provide material to the product divisions.

         Usually companies, which use similar or identical parts or materials at a number of factories, tend
to have a centralized buying organization to exploit their buying power. For example, most chemical,
steel, and petroleum companies have a centralized buying organization, both to permit companywide
buying of key raw materials and to facilitate handling problems.

Advantages of Centralized Organization:

       Big buying Power is useful. The material requirement of different plants gets clubbed together at
        corporate level. This generates more quantity. When it is dealt with few vendors it naturally
        results in good negotiating power for getting lesser price, which improves the profitability of the
        company. This also results in better vendor service. As against this the vendors get divided in
        decentralized system.
       Specialized staff for particular manufacturing processes. There are more number of engineers
        who get technically specialized in the areas in which they are working. This is not possible in the
        decentralized style. The buyers get dividend. So they are less for each plant. So in the central
        materials department for each subject the specialized skills get developed.
       Specifically the teams can handle the capital goods like plant and machinery and also the
        construction type projects. Some persons are required at center that has to know the capital
        investment in the company. It helps to take prudent decisions at the company level.
       Highly uniform procedures followed in the organization gives benefits of discipline. Common
        forms, system help to have mobility and quick actions.
       Consolidating purchases of certain materials as follows could make substantial savings.
         Stationary items,
         Regular consumables like chemicals, lubricants, and coolants.
         Plant maintenance items.
         Standard off the shelf tools.
       The coordination is quick and easy at corporate level. The selection of the vendor is possible and
        it helps to create good vendor relations. The chief purchase engineer has good controls on the
       The chief of the company is involved in the major decisions. He is aware of the expenditure. This
        is essential for him since it is materials department through which money goes out of the
        company. Close look and controls of the chief is absolutely necessary.
Disadvantages of Centralized organization:

       No belongingness to the product of the materials personnel. Budget and expenses have to be
        in concurrence of the principles, philosophy of the product division. Each division has its own
        culture, which makes it a successful team. This matching is missing in the centralized system.
       Less coordination with the operating departments. Many a times it is seen that the response
        from operating people from divisions is poor. People speak with each other only when there is
        utmost need. This may not be good situation to get good results.
       Lack of responsibility and authority. The person in the central department develop attitude to
        deal with division persons that we are independent and you should not dictate terms. Their
        hierarchical bosses are different and the services given are different. Boss is different than the
        person for whom they work is doing their performance appraisal. This brings organizational
       Difference in the goals of the business. If there are four divisions a person is giving service, he
        has to understand the goals of each person. Each person is guided with specific goals of his
        division. That brings him together as a team. This common goal is responsible to bring success.
        This is missing in centralized system.
       Wrong planning by any of the initiator brings all the people in trouble. The buyer collects the
        requirements from different initiators in the different divisions. They buy the quantity by clubbing
        requirements. When one initiator overdraws the quantity due to any reason like wrong planning
        or higher changed production schedule all other initiators suffer for not having enough stocks
        when required by them. Sometimes someone else also may draw the item, which is not planned
        for him.

For example: 4 planners plan for a screw M8 x 40 long as follow.

                    Planner             Quantity
                       1                  25000
                       2                  53000
                       3                  25000
                       4                  40000
                     Total               368000

The buyer takes action and brings total quantity of 368000 numbers in the stocks and he rests happily in
his place. One fine morning planner 2 draws extra quantity of about 130000 numbers due to production

This brings all the planners in trouble. At times someone else draws the items for some need at their
place. Thinking that it is hardware item there is no problem to draw it. In their day-to-day business no one
feels that they must draw any item only when they have planned for it.

                        Decentralized Materials Management
          To get better control on the activities of material management the stage of the growth of the
company reaches to such a stage that each group calls for having its own materials management set up as
shown in the figure. Here the divisions of products A, B, C and D have their own materials department.
Their functions have their own staff, place, rules and reporting system. This set up is called as
decentralized materials management. The general managers of respective product groups have their own
organizations and they report to the president. The president is not responsible for any materials for any
materials activity. This is department than the earlier structure where one common materials department
has the responsibility for all divisions and it reports to the president of the company.

            The companies that makes a number of products with little resemblance to one another tend to
have a decentralized buying organization. Good examples are M/S Godrej, M/S Larsen & Toubro, M/S
Voltas etc. These companies have purchased departments in each of their divisions that operates
independently. It is significant that they make a wide variety of products, most of which are unrelated to
one another in terms of technology and markets. The expansion process is quite simple and easy in these
cases since there is total independence for each division.

              The decentralization materials management is flexible and can be adapted to suit the
specialized needs of any profit or nonprofit institution. Any of the organizational forms can be expanded
almost indefinitely to fit very large as well as smaller institutions. Each Engineer adds, subordinates to
reach his span on control Then another layer of engineer is added. When these new supervisors reach the
limits of their span of control, still another layer of supervision is added

              Many small companies have grown to giant corporations by following this process. They
may change when this organization goes number of levels deep. The organization becomes cumbersome
and bureaucratic It does not respond fast changes. It develops ample red tape in even the simplest

             Managements of giant corporations shift to decentralization. They break up the corporation
into a number of smaller divisional units, each of which operates as an independent business.

Advantages of Decentralized Organization

       It brings managers closer to the objectives of the business since all the operating persons report to
        one general manager along with materials head.
       It permits tighter control of costs.
       Coordinating of purchasing activity between the persons of the purchase department operating
        department becomes closer. By this they can understand needs and problems better way. This
        results in getting good material at better price. The help of the operating department can be
        obtained easily. At any time personal discussion regarding technical matters can be done. This
        helps buyer and the supplier.
       It provides better environment for training future managers.
       Quick response to the user‟s need is possible. As against this in “centralized system” conveying
        information of buyer and also user takes time. All the matters work as per the matters “written”
        on the paper. Everything cannot be always expressed on the paper. In dynamic situations many
        times verbal matters only can convey meaningful information.
       It also helps stimulate improvements in products and methods. Frequently buyer, supplier and
        user can meet, discuss and communicate the points of problems and possibilities of
       In the multi plant decentralized system it is possible for buyer to place order on the local or close-
        by supplier. Close supplier finds easy to transport at reduced cost. This is possible only in case of
        local supplier.

For example:

A company in Mumbai expanded operations and opened divisions at Nasik, Malanpur and Hazira. The
persons over the period found it difficult to coordinate with Mumbai corporate materials department for
their requirements even though the central department was efficient. The respective factory operating
persons found better to buy from nicely developing local suppliers. This helped to improve the bottom line
of the company.

       Need of different types of parts and manufacturing processes for respective division is not to be
        observed by centralized department. To get real advantage the centralized department needs
        similarity of process and materials and closer distance factory to factory
       The centralized system is found to get advantage when the divisions are small in size to get and
        the buyers are few in numbers. It becomes unjustified to manage and control the activities of
        buying scattered in different divisions. Clubbing these becomes useful to make sizable for
       Responsibility and authority have to go hand in hand. The staff of the company must be
        responsible to the factory seniors and have to tune with them. The authority should be fully with
        them instead of the outsider like central material management staff. The factory management
        should be fully aware of the expenses and activities of the purchase staff. In number of companies
        the coordination is difficult from buyers and the seniors in the relevant factory.

Disadvantage of Decentralized Set up:

           Diluted buying power takes place. Decentralization, however, creates a major materials
management problem. One of the advantages of a big corporation over a smaller one is its greater buying
power. That can be achieved by centralizing the purchase activities. The purchase engineer can purchase
in big lots. In some cases they can buy a major portion of, or even the total output of supplier factories.
This results in getting big price concessions. The vendors can provide superior quality, delivery, and
service since they are catering to big customer. Details of disadvantages of decentralized department can
be seen as we discuss advantages in centralized system.

Various components of the management of materials are as:

       Purchasing
       Inventory Control
       Storage and material handling
       Physical distribution of materials
Each of these are equally important & although some division of responsibility and authority is necessary
for dealing with them. The decision taken by a Purchasing executive will have to be modified by the
consideration of inventory control, the decisions taken by the inventory control have to be taken in the
light of feedback provided by the purchasing department; similarly, inventory control has to reckon
considerations of storage and handling of materials and vice-versa. Physical distribution and its attendant
problems have their own feedback effect on control of inventories of finished goods and therefore on
work-in-progress and raw material inventories. In short, there is an interrelationship between the different
functional elements of materials management.


There should be enough adaptability in the system to take into consideration abnormal situations as and
when they present themselves. In this connection a frequent interaction with other related departments
such as purchasing, logistics, etc. is very essential to achieve goals of the organization.

Similarly the purchasing department should be aware of the various components of cost related to
inventories, the problems of inventory keeping, so that their job of getting information about the supply
market and feeding relevant information back into the organization is facilitated. Adaptability
considerations necessitate integration of various components functions of the management of materials.


The inventory control department is often a part of production planning and control. After all, inventory
of raw materials and work in Progress are kept to facilitate the production function. Therefore, inventories
have to be considered along with other cost and problems of production as the objectives is to minimize
the totality of production related cost of which cost of materials is one component(and a major
component). The whole gamut of production cost includes wages- regular and over time, overhead cost
and the cost of materials. Optimizing only the material cost may result in sub optimization of the overall
production costs. Due to labour and machine capacity availability constraints, what may appear to be an
optimum decision ( given by an inventory control model) may not fetch adequate result for the production
function as a whole. Inventory control and material planning should form a part of production planning
exercise. The decision about labour allocation, the quantities of different products to be produced at
different periods of time in the year, the allocation of machine capacity, and the inventory of Work in
Progress, finished goods and raw materials is to be carried may be taken together.

Decision of how much to produce and how much to store cannot be taken without a proper understanding
of the availability of the storage space, of the characteristics of deterioration of materials, of the risk and
costs of handlings materials, of the cost of maintaining components parts and materials in the stores and
warehouses. Stores, warehousing, and material handling have inputs in materials stocking or production


The cost is not the only objective of the materials management function. The primary objective of the
materials management function is to ensure a continuous or an uninterrupted supply as far as possible to
production, the ultimate objective being that the customer is served to his satisfaction. The organization
may use any system but the first requirement is that the suppliers should be adequate for production. To
achieve this, it requires appropriate setting of service levels, consideration of sourcing , an effective
physical distribution network with adequate number of warehouses and facilities for movement.this helps
the organization to produce and deliver its goods on time as per the contracted schedule or as per the
demands of the customer. In short, the organization „effectiveness ‟aspects should not be forgotten in the
zeal to produce „efficiencies‟.


From purchasing to receipt, to inventory-stocking, to production and storage of in-process and finished
goods, to the distribution of the produced goods is one continuous or integrated system of operation
where the material flow from the external supply market to the customers of the company. The
management of materials will not be effective if this entire flow is not kept in view.

The good management itself is the stepping stone for profit of the organization which can be explained
with the few points as given below:

       To take maximum production, the organization should always have the buffer stock in hand. The
        level of buffer stock to be maintained is based on planning and experience. If this is not done, it
        might lead to loss of production and labour (Sitting ideal). Our stocking may lead to loss in profit
        by the way of interest cost.
       Judging constantly the prices of raw material, the demand supply level and the seasonal factor
        level also plays an important role in the profit of the organization through material management.
       Many a times the quantity discount is an important factor in deciding the quantity of a material to
        be purchased at a given time.

To top