Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

Ethical Case Study Presentation by xpj11142

VIEWS: 28 PAGES: 2

									Ethical Case Study Presentation


Scoring Standard
5/10 = Excellent; criterion is fully addressed

4/8 = Satisfactory; criterion is met but minor errors or omissions exist

2/4 = Needs Improvement; criterion is attempted but major errors or omissions exist

0 = Unacceptable or not found

Scoring Guide
                               Criteria                                       Ratings
1.    Background                                                             Background
2.    You describe ethical dilemmas using a neutral tone.                   5  4    2      0
3.    You summarize the history of ethical issues.                          5  4    2      0
4.    You identify facts and evidence relevant to ethical issues.           5  4    2      0
5.    You define terms that are unclear or contested.                       5  4    2      0
6.    You identify questions that are relevant to ethical issues.           5  4    2      0
7.    You ask "what if" questions about ethical issues.                     5  4    2      0
8.    Values                                                                   Values
9.    You identify values associated with issues.                           5  4    2      0
10.   You describe conflicting values underlying an ethical                 5  4    2      0
      issue.
11.   Ethical Theories Applied to Case                            Ethical Theories Applied to Case
12.   You explain ethical issues from more than one ethical                10     8   5     0
      perspective.
13.   You apply terminology appropriate to ethical theories.               10     8   5     0
14.   You identify potential consequences of alternative courses           10     8   5     0
      of action or perspectives.
15.   Critical Thinking Applied to Ethics Case                    Critical Thinking Applied to Ethics
                                                                                 Case
16.   You make generalizations that are specific, clear, and                5    4   2     0
      representative of the dilemma.
17.   You make comparisons to cases that are relevant and                   5    4   2     0
      true to the dilemma.
18.   You infer cause from correlation that are accurate and                5    4   2     0
      supported by evidence.
19.   You describe conflicting values underlying an ethical                 5    4   2     0
      issue.
20.   You use neutral, descriptive language, avoiding "loaded               5    4   2     0
      language."
21.   You select sources of information that are valid, reliable,           5    4   2     0
      and objective.
22.   You describe the perspectives of others using unbiased                5    4   2     0
      language.
23. Personal Analysis                                                Personal Analysis
24. You describe your personal assumptions relevant to                5   4    2    0
    ethical issues.
25. You identify your own prejudice pertaining to selected            5      4     2    0
    ethical issues.
26. You provide a rationale based on ethical theories for your        5      4     2    0
    conclusions.
27. You explain how your socialization has influenced your            5      4     2    0
    ethical stance.
28. You analyze your growth/change pertaining to your own             5      4     2    0
    prejudice about ethical issues.
29. Core Abilities                                                        Core Abilities
30. You document sources of information using APA citation            5      4   2       0
    style.
31. You adhere to formatting requirements.                            5      4     2    0
32. You produce products (written work) that meet standards           5      4     2    0
    of neatness and quality.
33. You synthesize information from a variety of sources              5      4     2    0
34. You provide valid, relevant evidence to support your              5      4     2    0
    conclusions.
35. You draw logical conclusions from evidence.                       5      4     2    0
36. You differentiate among facts, inferences, and                    5      4     2    0
    judgements
37. You apply critical thinking standards: clarity, accuracy,         5      4     2    0
    precision, relevance, depth, logic, significance, and
    validity.
38. You avoid the use of absolutes (all, always, everyone, no         5      4     2    0
    one, totally, all of the time, etc.).
39. You apply standard rules of language structure including          5      4     2    0
    grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
40. You provide details to aid in understanding your ideas and        5      4     2    0
    information.
41. You organize information.                                         5      4    2     0
42. You meet deadlines.                                                      10    0
43. Total Points Possible                                                      200
44. Total Points Earned

                                                                    Total Points ___________

                                                                              Grade __________

Name _________________________________________                   Date ____________

Evaluator's Signature _________________________________ Date ____________

Comments:

								
To top