Banking Crises
Regulation & Performance Economics 102 Winter 2002
Early Regulation
• Scams, Bank failures ==> bank licensing from early 1800s
• Minimum capital requirements
• Attempt to exclude criminals • But US had 20,000+ banks
– In much of midwest, branch banking prohibited
– Interstate banking prohibited
• Federal Reserve System from 1913
• Smooth interest rate swings • Support faith in money, quell banking panics • Foster national market
Great Depression
• Big swings in prices: deflation
– Debtors hurt, many default – Real GDP fall likewise leads to defaults
• Banking “panic”
– Fears lead to bank runs
• 9755 banks failed in 1929-33 • FDR declared bank holiday in March 1933 to stop panic
• Sum
– Illiquidity issues – Insolvency issues
Regulation
• Promote “sound” banking practice
• More below...
• Depositor insurance (FDIC, 1933)
• Restores confidence
• But insurance has side effects
– Moral hazard
• Encourages risk taking • Heads I win … tails you lose
Safe Banking
• Sound practice
– Glass-Steagall (1933): segment services
• Insurance - banking - securities - underwriting • NOW DEFUNCT cf. Enron issues
– Bank supervision (gradual from 1800s, state & federal)
• Inspection • Case study: Bank of Tokyo NY, 1979
– Regulation Q (1933)
• Prevent competition for deposits • Help guarantee margins
Banking Crises
• Structural change is the enemy of sound banking
– Managing risk is undermined
– Mix of products / operations undermined
1970s shifts
• 1970s
– Inflation rose ==> disintermediation
– MMMFs developed
• Donahue and money market [mutual] funds • Incentive to pull money from term savings accounts • Also could buy bonds directly …. such as I did.
– Regulation Q broke down [for S&Ls from 1982]
• Banks were freed to pay market interest rates
S&Ls
• Savings & Loan Institutions
– State-chartered banks (initially) – Restricted to local residential real estate ca. 1936
• No geographic or industry diversification
– Typical product fixed-rate 30 year mortgage
• Core of business
– Borrow short – Lend long – “Maturity transformation”
Demise of S&Ls
• 30 year mortgages
– Collecting 4%
• Short-term deposits
– Paying 10%
• Entire sector rendered insolvent
Further deregulation
• So rechartered as federal institutions
• Freed S&Ls to lend to new business • Allowed to enter new, more profitable types of lending, such as commercial real estate development in other states
S&Ls in the New Age
• • • • But the same old regulators - and understaffed And the same old bankers In a brave new world California S&Ls in Texas … ….. Dentists as Bankers?!
• No ability to practice or assess sound banking • Outright fraud
– Ex: Over $1 billion in fraud at one S&L in Colorado – Chs Keating bought 5 US Senators to protect himself, with $2 billion in losses and (for him) a brief stint in jail
Bottom Line
• Initial $250 billion cost to taxpayers
– Liquidation of real estate recouped $90 bil thereof
• Lots of bad assets
– Lots of unmitigated waste – Local business cycle accentuated (Tx, Fl, La)
• Ultimate total elimination of S&L segment • Commercial banks alternatives
• floating rate mortgages [undermined S&Ls in their latter days] • so it’s still possible to finance a home purchase
More recent crises
• Japan
– Traditional business disappeared
• Growth slowed from 10% pa to 5% pa • Less Investment
– business borrowing fell by 10% of GDP – savings (deposits) continued to rise
– So need new business
• Small firms (60% of economy) • Real estate (good collateral, prices always rise)
Japan’s Crisis
• New business plan a failure
• Good small businesses already had bankers • Real estate prices could fall, too
• Began shift in a boom, hiding bad practices
• Banking crisis from 1992
• Real estate prices fell
• Stock-market based financing backfired • Japan in 2001 is back in recession, with only one year of good growth since 1990.
Thailand, Argentina
• A supposedly fixed foreign exchange rate
– But domestic interest rates high! – Answer?
• Borrow in US $ from foreign / offshore banks
• But the exchange rate depreciated
– Suddenly instead of owing B20,000 you owe B40,000 – And interest payable doubles too
• Widespread defaults / bankruptcies
Tomorrow’s crisis?
• Citigroup gone awry? • Home mortgage loans in a falling real estate market? • Etc .. ? • Why worry?
– – – – Structural change but management change? Expansion in up cycle when hard to lose money Mistakes now coming home to roost
Summary
• Leverage:
– a little is very powerful – Try to move too much and something will snap - or spring back and slap you – Institutional change: both regulators & lenders find hard to handle
• Regulation
– Regulations generate side effects
• Moral hazard
– Heads I win, Tails you lose – Adverse selection: if you try to expand quickly, you have to lower standards, and (like grade inflation) those rejected by conservative banks will seek you out! Losses always prove worse than average!