Lessons from Asia - TECHNOLOGY P

Document Sample
Lessons from Asia - TECHNOLOGY P Powered By Docstoc
					— TECHNOLOGY PLANNING Workshop  —
         Nairobi, 24-27/02/2009

 ‘Lessons from emerging Asian countries’

 Dr.-Ing. Yves M. Lamour
 Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA)
 Executive Director,
 Pan-African Institute for Technology & Development (PAITD)

a. Address of UNECA’s Executive Secretary, Mr. Abdoulie Janneh
   to the AU- Summit on Science & Technology in Addis Ababa, on
   23-30 Jan. 2007.
• It called Africa to undertake “a major science and technology
   capacity building initiative in order to generate, revamp and
   deploy large numbers of scientists, engineers and technicians”.
• It stressed the “…need to create and foster strong links
   between technology-based industries, academic institutions
   and governments, as well as establish public-private
   partnerships in scientific and technological research to allow
   Africa to develop appropriate technologies for national needs.”
b) Context of the endeavour

• In the past four decades, our energies have been
  directed towards ‘Economic Planning’.
  Assumption: Economic planning would take care of all
  the variables necessary for facilitating growth and
  progressive economic change.
• Additionally, development strategies have built on
  inadequate apprehensions of the economic system…
• Besides, strategies have neglected the socio-
  technological dimensions of development, so vital in
  modern technology-driven economies/consumer
  >> Thus need for ‘Technology Planning’!
c. Example of Asian countries:

  Economic development is possible!
  – Overcoming all known constraints…
  Thus, African countries can do it too!
  – But how?
  – What can we learn from the Asian successes?
    What characterises the Asian economic wonder?
    What are the drivers?
  – Are the Asian successes transferable to Africa?
Factors responsible for the transformational process:

Factor 1: Independent and assertive approach
          —> thinking out of the Box!
Priority: Responsibility towards their people!
         • Allegiance to rules set by others is secondary!
         • Priority = must do!
           >> Follow-up with plan and bold/decisive action.
Factor 2: Exemplarily responsible government leadership
  — Study cases: Taiwan, Korea, Singapore, China.
Factor 3: Government-private sector linkages
• Public-private-partnerships (PPP)
• PPPs were initiated by Governments to support the industrial
• Forum for exchange of information on problems e.g.:
   – competitiveness with foreign producers on the Western
   – inland competition …
• Platform for discussing solutions including:
   – Decide upon industrial development areas
   – Needs of firms (HR, know-how, access to credit, financial
      backup, equipment…
   – Obtain reduction in government taxation
   – Marketing strategy…
• In Taiwan:
   – Early government strategies to upgrade the existing
     industrial structure and enter into secondary ‘import
   – Subsequent restrictive trade policies and high tariff rates
     for protecting domestic consumer goods from foreign
   – Foreign advice sought for upgrading industrial structure
     and enter into secondary import substitution.
   – Establishment of capital intensive, heavy and
     petrochemical industries — for increasing production of
     raw materials and intermediate goods needed by export
   – In 1990s, Government’s new strategy focused on high-tech
     industry following loss of competitiveness of low-tech
– 1980/1990, establishment of an R&D Consortium — with focus
  on technological learning
– Government encouraged firms to cooperate for raising their
  technological levels to compete with advanced technology
– Focus was mainly in IT sectors, consumer products,
  telecommunications, data switching systems…
– In 1990s, the alliance innovatively brought together private
  firms and public sector research institutions, with organisational
  input from trade associations
– Key role of the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) in
  leveraging of advanced technologies from abroad, and their
  diffusion to Taiwanese firms.
– Taiwan firms’ capacity to leverage and adopt new levels of
  technological capability enabled them to compete with IBM,
  and in 1995, to have ready a range of computing products based
  on IBM’s new power PC microprocessor at its official
• In Korea:
   – Firstly, Government worked at developing the business
   – Secondly, Government adopted policy approaches
      borrowed from other countries
   – Industrial promotion by Government in cooperation with
      Private Industry.
   – Targets for production levels set by the firm and industry
      associations, in consultation with government.
   – Monthly meetings between government officials and
      leading exporters were chaired by the president himself
   – Latest information on export performance of firm, product
      and market were analysed, reasons for discrepancy
      between target and performance discussed
   – Also ministers collaborated with firms to identify the
      problems and to take suitable actions
– Besides, Government developed a flexible and adjusted
  incentive system to support ‘industry champions’
– Expectations were: knowledge development, creation of
  employment opportunities, and contribution to export.
– Firms became part of government’s long-term
  commitment to keep exports profitable.
• In Singapore:
   – Government focused on maximising learning,
      technological acquisition, rapid movement up the
      industrial ladder
   – Supported the development of the skills and incomes of its
      working population
   – Government contributed infrastructure, capital, tax
      concessions, education and skills training, and a stable and
      friendly business environment
   – Government incentives targeted FDI by multinationals in
      the electronics industry
   – The Economic Development Board managed industrial
      policy and FDI targeting; industrial competitiveness was
      assessed by strategic periodic studies
– From 1991, Government has encouraged the formation of
  clusters of industrial firms
– Accelerated performances through sharing of resources
  (e.g. knowledge, equipment, human resources, etc.)
– Establishment of a Cluster Development Fund
– Government coordinated market penetration.
• In China:
   – Knowledge acquisition: Problems with copyright
   – Know-how acquisition from European companies
Factor 4: Repatriation of skilled HR from the Diaspora
• Case of Korea:
   – Repatriation of the countries’ wealth of highly skilled
     HR in the Diaspora was crucial in operationalising the
     process of technological adaptation
   – Diasporan brought in know-how in specific fields,
     research capabilities, and fuelled in-house learning
   – Repatriation as alternative to capacity building — also
     time issue
   – Repatriation programmes not confined to provision of
     attractive salaries and housing
   – Good working conditions were crucial for ensuring
     effectiveness of the expensive human assets.
Factor 5: Human resources development
• All emerging countries invested heavily in HR
   – Improvement of the school system and enrolment
   – Expansion of third level formal education
   – Strengthening of training institutions imparting
      technical knowledge/skills
   – Capacity building programmes on the job…
• Case of Korea:
   – Expansion of primary and secondary education
   – Enhancement of universities’ training capacities
   – Accent on technical universities
   – But strict control on access to university
   – Focus on vocational training to raise availability of
     skilled labour.
Factor 6: Private sector initiatives
• In India:
   – ‘Bajaj’: Knowhow acquisition through venture/
   – Village networks: National NGOs for village
   – ‘Silicon Valley’ in Bangalore > Key role of the IITs!
Factor 7: University-private sector linkages
   – Introduction/strengthening of targeted areas *
   – problem-oriented R&D *
   – knowledge acquisition, adaptation and development
     in targeted production areas*
   – Cooperation between universities (inland and
Factor 8: Knowledge management
  – Transformation of East Asian countries into
    ‘knowledge economies’
  – with intellectual capacities to acquire and develop
    needed knowledge,
  – (technical and managerial skills are combined with)
  – dynamic information systems that permitted private
    sector and research centres to tap global knowledge
2.2 Inside Asian countries’ economic emergence

• Performances are not a ‘Quick Fix’!
• Also not the result of external plan & assistance!
• Asia’s economic successes are also not based on
  natural resources wealth…
• It is due to technological adaptation, and
• a transformation of the whole societies!
• No specific development model:
  – Targets, strategies and interventions were fitted to
    given situation, availability of resources, economic
    Thinking out of the ‘Box’

•    Development process: Not primarily Technology!
•    Primarily: They think differently !
•    They apprehend their situation and the system differently
•    They think of themselves differently
•    They understand their relationship to the world differently
• In their understanding:
 — “Development is socio-economic empowerment!” —
Asian countries operationalisation strategy
• Focus on developing national capacities
• 1st Phase: Import Substitution > Focus on local market!
  With development of low-technologies and on capacity
  building (building on the existing base)
• 2nd Phase: High-tech commodity Export
  Development of high-technology capacities.
• Leadership role of responsible and dedicated Governments
• Strong cooperation between governments and the private
• Public-private-partnerships : — Instruments for driving
  technological adaptation and market development.
2.3 Transferability of the Asian experiences to Africa

 Are these experiences transferable?
 Which are the criteria for their transferability?

• Achieving technological adaptation not only a technical issue!
• 5 dimensions:
   – technical
   – institutional
   – financial
   – leadership
   – emotional/cultural.
Transferability of the Asian experiences to Africa

a) Technical dimension —
   • In general, no culture of industrial production in African
   • Easy business in Trade with foreign products…
   • Issue of capabilities to carry out industrial production
   • — incl. infrastructures
   • Issue of capabilities to perform technological adaptation
   • — incl. criteria of competitiveness of products.
b) Institutional dimension —
  – Issuing of supportive policies :
      • Enterprise development — at local/regional level
      • FDI
      • capacity building
      • local market protection
      • foreign market penetration, …
  – Creation/strengthening of schools/training institutions
  – Creation of Public-Private-Partnerships
  – Cooperation with foreign
c) Financial dimension —
  – Major stumbling block!
  – Intelligent use of FDI in Korea — while tapping knowledge
    from selected investors
  – Target alternative potential represented by remittances
    from Diasporan Africans, for African capital building and
    for financing key industrial projects in African countries
  – Involve African Banks.
d) Leadership dimension —
  • Emulating the Asian models: Key role of governments
  • Support to initiatives from the private sector/civil
    >> Inspiring examples:
    — Grameen Bank, Bangladesh;
    — Instituto del Tercer Mundo, Chile
    — Federation des Groupements NAAM, Burkina Faso
    — Green Belt Movement, Kenya.
e) Cultural/emotional dimension —
   Are Africans committed to such transformational change?
   What societal/attitudinal changes are necessary?
   What should be the drivers? Which incentives can be

• Overcome socio-cultural resistances
• High motivation/commitment needed for societal
• Work ethics: High societal value of ‘work’ in Asia
  — for the welfare of all
• Need to question African traditional practices, and
  exhibitionist/consumerist lifestyles.
African reactions to the Asian experience
Noticeable inspirational effects on African governments:
1. Uganda: President Yoweri Museveni (‘Pan Africanism’, 1996)
   argues the need for problem solving-oriented research in
   “Technological transfers cannot take place between
   governments for the simple reason that most of the
   technology available in the developed countries is in private
   hands. The big concerns have their own R&D departments and
   this is where most of the action is. The private firms cannot
   give away their technology or discoveries freely because they
   are in business and not charity. Under these circumstances,
   technological transfers are not easy. We must, therefore,
   endeavour to create our own research capacity in Africa.
”Our research must be problem solving-oriented; it must be relevant
to our needs and not esoteric, merely satisfying the intellectual
curiosity of our scientists. Both governments and industries, which
consume the research results, must chip in to support research and
development. The manufacturers must, to some extent, dictate the
kind of research done because we shall rely on them to transform
research into products that our people can readily use…”

“…The UN recently recommended [1996] that in order for the
developing countries to realize any results from research and
development, they must spend, at least 2 per cent of their GNP on
research. What we are now doing is underdosing the patient. This
cannot cure the patient, it merely prolongs misery. It is therefore
crucial that in our national budgets, we reconsider the importance
of research and development in our future struggle for
emancipation from our socio-economic backwardness.”
2. Rwanda: President Paul Kagame emphasises:
  “ We in Africa must either begin to build
  our scientific and technological training capabilities
  or remain an impoverished appendage to the global

  Rwanda: Boosted expenditures on science to 1.6%
  of GDP, striving for 3% within the next 5 years
4. Ethiopia: Establishment of 13 new universities
5. Ethiopia: Programme for producing 5,000 PhDs
   in 10 years by Addis Ababa University
6. Zambia: will offer postgraduate fellowships to
   train 300 science and engineering students, with
   a US$ 30 million loan from the ADB
7. Nigeria: Plans to invest US$ 5 billion to create a
   National Science Foundation
8. Angola and Mozambique: Brazil’s Pro-Africa
   Program, in support to scientific and
   technological capacity building.