Adaptive strategies within a livelihoods ADAPTIVE Research Notes
Document Sample


Adaptive strategies No. 3a
within a livelihoods
approach ADAPTIVE Research Notes
Key points
• Theories of adaptation to disturbance and ADAPTIVE, Adaptation to climate change
change draw from livelihoods approaches, in vulnerable environments.
entitlement theory, social capital/institutions A Tyndall Centre for Climate
research and rights-based approaches Change research project at the University
• The dynamics and diversity in household
of Sheffield, UK.
strategies is central to understanding livelihood
adaptation
• The sustainable rural livelihoods approach This Research Note provides more detail on the key
provides a useful framework for conceptualising terminology, themes and theory on livelihoods
the multi-dimensionality, feedbacks and approaches as used by the ADAPTIVE project.
substitution of resources between livelihood ADAPTIVE is a collaborative research project funded
components by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
• Institutional, social capital and network theory
provide frameworks for reflecting on the
differentiated processes in collective and The dynamics and diversity of adaptive
agency actions, within which social learning and strategies to manage risk and uncertainty
the formation of identity are experienced Adaptive capacity or livelihood response to disturbance
• The concept of ‘adaptation response space’ and change are concepts that draw on entitlement
acknowledges the dynamic process in adaptive theory, where the emphasis is placed on rights to
strategies over time and space resources and mechanisms of access. Integrating this
with aspects of a political ecology approach, which
includes power and social relations to explain decision-
making, enables a theory that builds in the multi-
dimensional differences of society (based on economics,
gender, age and identity).
Thus, people do not simply draw on their assets but
possess sophisticated skills in managing them, coping
with adversity, adapting with flexibility and taking
advantage of new opportunities over different
timescales. The dynamics and diversity in their ability to
mediate, allows households to pursue different
livelihood adaptations to environmental variability and
shocks at different times. The central focus on the
dynamic strategies of the household lies at the heart of
the now-influential livelihoods approaches in
developmental research and practice.
The livelihoods approach
Research areas:
1 Lehurutshe District (NorthWest/South Africa) The livelihoods approach has been adopted as the
2 Dzanani District (Limpopo/South Africa) primary programming tool for many aid and development
3 uThukela District (KwaZulu Natal/South Africa) agencies in Southern Africa because it allows cross-
4 Manjacaze District (Gaza/Mozambique) scale linkages in decision-making.
The approach focused the debate on defining Institutional approaches to livelihood
sustainable livelihoods (see Research Note 1) and adaptations
highlighting the multi-dimensionality, substitution of
Institutions are conceived as the rules and patterns of
resources between sectors and the impact of
behaviour that shape social interaction. Organisations
cumulative feedbacks within livelihoods. The
are defined as groups of individuals bound by a common
conceptual framework designed by the UK
goal. In their positive sense, both institutions and
Department for International Development is shown
organisations can facilitate collective action and enable
below, illustrating the interactions between the
individuals to transcend the limitations of acting in
vulnerability context, transforming structures and
isolation. Understanding the use of endowments,
processes and household assets (natural, human,
functioning and interaction of institutional and
financial, physical and social capital)
organisation mechanisms of natural resource-dependent
• Natural capital is the environmental resource stock societies is therefore of paramount importance for
to which household members have rights of access adaptation.
• Financial capital is the resources (savings, credit,
Generic knowledge systems for successful collective
remittances, market takings) available that
action include determinants such as small group size and
provides different livelihood options, and includes
a homogeneity in the decision-making group, clearly
flows as well as stocks
defined boundaries to the resource, supportive links to
• Human capital is the ability to pursue different
the external environment and agreement on the
strategies dependent on skill, knowledge, ability to
distribution of benefits. Within such frameworks, it is
provide labour and health
important to know if differential social capital explains
• Physical capital is the basic infrastructure that
success between groups (‘social capital’ reflects the
enables the pursuit of a livelihood
relations within the community, i.e. a ‘collectively
• Social capital is the relations between people and
possessed resource’).
includes networks, associational membership, trust
and exchange ties Social capital, ties and networks
Social capital is a contested concept, but one which
facilitates people in acting collectively using the set of
rules, obligations, norms, reciprocity and trust, flows of
information, economic transactions and networks (social
ties).
Social ties can be ‘bonded’ (informal or horizontal
networks as in kinship) or ‘bridged’ (vertical links
between community and external ties such as NGOs, the
state or urban areas). These ‘informal institutions’ have
to control access to resources (the exclusion problem),
and set rules among users to solve the potential
divergence between individual and collective rationality
(the subtractability problem).
It is important to consider the influence of such
institutional structures on adaptation decisions, as well
as the reasons for their emergence and evolution. Social
learning, responsive experimentation and adaptation are
made of collective activities such as discourse imitation,
and conflict resolution, reinforcing social hierarchies,
power and entitlement inequalities. Coping (often based
on bonding social capital) does not facilitate pro-active
adaptation and can restrict innovation.
Sustainable rural livelihoods framework developed by DFID
It is critical to understand anomalies to such theory. Conceptual frameworks on ‘adaptive response’, now being
Why in some situations do people prefer to work in developed by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change
loose informal or personal networks instead of Research, are also focused on the ‘adaptation response
collective projects? Why work in continuously space’ (see Research Note 3).
changing constellations instead of more enduring
groups? It may be more important for households to
be involved in constellations of social networks (ties)
that cross the border of the local community, rather
than in local collective organisations.
Equitable adaptation and the role of
agency
While social cohesion and connectedness are
important, informal institutions can make an unequal
impact. To understand such outcomes and facilitate
an equitable process of livelihood adaptation,
research needs to study the various agents and social
actors that play a role in specific situations. Agency
strength is related to the set of capacities possessed
by particular individuals, i.e. ‘private social capital’.
Agents that initiate ‘bridging social capital’ may be
critical where there is little effective formal
institutional influence. Evolutionary theories of
change and social learning provide questions on the
process of adaptation that involves changes to
routines. How do people learn and innovate in
response to stimuli, such as climate change? What is
different between formal and informal institutions in
facilitating or hindering proactive or reactive
strategies?
Adaptation within the livelihoods context Top: social networks extend from rural areas into towns and
cities; Above: community-led activities such as building a place for
Interaction between institutional groups (social
village meetings help to reinforce social capital
capital) and the capacity of individuals (agency) is
related to the level of adaptive capacity. Frameworks
for adaptive capacity in the developing world have ADAPTIVE – funded by the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change
been supplemented by analysis of discourse and Research, UK and conducted by researchers at the University of
Sheffield, UK and the Tyndall Centre, in partnership with Oxfam GB,
ideology in livelihoods, seeking to define new ways of and in collaboration with Potchefstroom University, the Department
collapsing the nature-society duality. In exploring the of Agriculture and Nzuki Development Association in South Africa,
social and cognitive basis of the construction of and Save the Children USA in Mozambique.
perceptions of climate change or drought, and in The ADAPTIVE website is
examining the ‘storylines’ which define our http://www.shef.ac.uk/adaptive
understandings, discourse analysis demonstrates that Tyndall Website is
http://www.tyndall.ac.uk
the manifestation of people’s experience and adaptive
practice are often mediated by perceptions of Staff can be contacted by email at
d.s.thomas@sheffield.ac.uk
identity and the wider livelihood context. The central c.twyman@sheffield.ac.uk
question remains the same: how can we grasp the h.osbahr@sheffield.ac.uk
dynamics of the different institutional arrangements n.adger@uea.ac.uk
in which households are involved without imposing Fax: +44 114 279 7912
artificial categories? ADAPTIVE Research Note 3a, January 2004
Get documents about "