Consultation questions - Notification of Decisions
W
Shared by: jmg99553
Categories
Tags
consultation document, consultation process, public consultation, interested parties, decisions made, decision making, the committee, consultation procedures, consultation period, consultation questions, notification requirements, consultation policy, member states, consultation letter, written submissions
-
Stats
- views:
- 3
- posted:
- 4/30/2010
- language:
- pages:
- 3
Document Sample


Consultation questions - Notification of Decisions
WorkSafeBC is seeking input from stakeholders on the following key issues:
1. What is a decision?
In considering stakeholders’ request for a definition of decisions, WorkSafeBC
proposes the following definition:
• A decision is a determination awarding, denying or limiting entitlement
to benefits and services or imposing or relieving an obligation under
the Workers Compensation Act (“Act”) or policy.
Please rate the following:
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
I support
the
proposed
definition of
decision.
2. When is a decision made?
The Act provides that the timelines on reconsiderations, reviews and appeals
commence on the date the WCB decision is made. However, the Act does
not direct when a decision is considered to have been made. WorkSafeBC
proposes the following to address this issue:
• A decision is made for the purpose of triggering the timelines for
reconsiderations, reviews and appeals, on the date the decision is
communicated to the affected party.
Please rate the following:
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
I support the
proposed
amendment.
3. How are decisions communicated?
WorkSafeBC aims to communicate decisions in writing. Decision letters will
be provided where the decision:
• denies or limits benefits to a worker; or
• is protested by the employer.
Policy will also contain a list of examples where decisions letters should be
provided.
Verbal communication of decisions may occur where the decision is:
• favourable to the worker; or
• is uncontested by the employer.
Please rate the following:
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
I support the
proposed
amendment.
4. Finding of fact
WorkSafeBC has identified an opportunity to clarify the difference between a
decision and a finding of fact. Accordingly, WorkSafeBC proposes that a
finding of fact:
• is not subject to the 75-day limit on the WCB’s reconsideration
authority; and
• may not be reviewed or appealed in the absence of an expressed or
implied entitlement decision under review or appeal.
Please rate the following:
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
I support the
proposed
amendment.
5. Rejected claims
WorkSafeBC proposes to provide notice of review and appeal rights to
applicants whose claim for compensation benefits has been rejected due to
lack of standing under the Act, as is currently done in practice.
Please rate the following:
Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
I support the
proposed
amendment.
General Comments:
Please provide us with your comments on any or all of the key issues addressed
in this policy review.
Get documents about "