; At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of

VIEWS: 38 PAGES: 17

  • pg 1
									At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County
of Warren held in the Warren County Government Center on January
16, 2007 at 7:00 p.m.

Present:   Richard H. Traczyk, Chairman (Shenandoah District);
           Ron   L.   Llewellyn,    Vice-Chairman   (North    River
           District); A. Gray Blanton (South River District);
           Tony F. Carter, (Happy Creek District); Archie A. Fox
           (Fork District); also Douglas P. Stanley, County
           Administrator;   Blair   Mitchell,   County   Attorney;
           Richard J. Magnifico, Deputy County Administrator;
           Carolyn W. Stimmel, Finance Director; Janice C.
           Dearaway, Deputy Clerk of the Board; Robert King,
           Northern Virginia Daily; Roger Bianchini, Warren
           County Report and Matt Van Tassel, Warren Sentinel

Absent:    None


Adoption of Agenda - Additions or Deletions

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn, seconded by Mr. Blanton and
by the following vote, the Board of Supervisors adopted the
agenda as presented:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Report   –  Virginia    Department   of   Transportation   –   Jeff
Lineberry/Bob Childress

     Mr.   Jeff   Lineberry, Residency  Administrator   for  the
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), reported on
routine maintenance, e.g. grading, brush control, drainage, pipe
structures.     He reported that they continued to make good
progress on the North Fork Bridge project.    The contractor had
completed approximately $5.8 million of the $19.3 million
project.    They were still working on the substructure.      He
anticipated that the contractor would begin setting bridge steel
in the late spring. The initial milestone was to get traffic on
the first section of the bridge later this summer and then begin
demolition of the existing structure.

     Mr. Lineberry reported that they just finished meeting in
work session to review and discuss the Secondary Six-Year Plan.
The public hearing was scheduled for February 20, 2006.


                                 1
     Mr. Llewellyn noted that he had received an e-mail about
the rough pavement on Strasburg Road.      The response indicated
that the developer was doing numerous crossings across Route 522
and Strasburg Road, which resulted in rough pavement.     He said
apparently the rough cold patch paving they were doing was not
very smooth and within a couple of days there were huge pits in
the road again.     He noted that there had been a number of
accidents in that area. He asked Mr. Lineberry to discuss this
with the construction company performing the work. He felt they
could do a much better job.    Mr. Lineberry said he would pass
that on and that it was their intent to do a better overlay over
all the patched areas later in the spring.

     Mr. Carter reported that there had been a problem with one
of the sensors at the light on the north bound lane at Route 619
and that had been remedied.

     Mr. Carter reported that there were reflectors in the
middle of the road on Route 55 from Linden to Markham, which was
in another VDOT residency.    He felt the reflectors would help
tremendously in foggy conditions particularly on that portion of
Route 55 from Linden to Front Royal.      Mr. Lineberry said he
would take a look at that. He pointed out that they were taking
a look at the practices used in other districts.


Public Presentations

     There were no presentations from the public.


Reports - Board Members, County Attorney, County Administrator

     Mr. Fox reported that he had attended a committee meeting
on the future Warren County High School and he understood from
Shockey that the expansion would be completed in May and the
County could begin moving into the building in August.

     Mr. Carter noted that the Board had started the budget
process last week.     He said the actual process began for
departments in November. He said this was ongoing and the Board
needed to adopt a budget by June 30, 2007.    In years past the
Board had been able to adopt a budget by May 1. He encouraged
the public to bring requests for new projects or programs to the
Board now.

     Mr. Carter reported that this past Wednesday the Planning

                                2
Commission approved the Brookfield rezoning for the Catlett
Mountain Road project with a recommendation of 150 homes with
proffers.    The Planning Commission made a recommendation for
this project to move forward and it needed a municipal water
source.    He understood that one of the Planning Commission
members had recommended that the County seek an answer from the
Town now.   The Town had adopted a water policy.    He requested
that the Board direct staff to start that process now.        He
suggested that the Board ask that the Town provide the County
with an answer within 90 days.   He noted that the County could
continue through the rezoning and/or conditional use permit
process, but if there was no municipal water source, it would be
mute point.

     Mr. Traczyk asked if the documentation was prepared to
submit to the Town regarding this request.  Mr. Stanley said
staff had all the information and they could easily put it
together in a formal packet for the Town.

     On a motion by Mr. Carter, seconded by Mr. Blanton and by
the following vote, the Board of Supervisors forwarded a request
for the provision of municipal water and sewer for the proposed
Brookfield development to the Town and asked that the Town
provide a response to the County within 90 days in accordance
with their policy:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Traczyk        Abstain:   Llewellyn

     Mr. Llewellyn had recused himself from participating in any
discussion or vote on this matter.

      Mr. Fox asked if they were in compliance with the Town’s
water policy as submitted.    Mr. Traczyk understood that they
were.

     Mr. Llewellyn said he was discouraged that there were
virtually no funds available for the upcoming year for
maintenance or new road improvements.      He urged citizens to
contact their state legislators regarding this matter.

     Mr. Blanton reported that Mr. Stanley and he had had
informal correspondence with builders of the facility in Ottawa,
Canada that would allow municipal waste to be burned to create
steam and a gas that burns in turbine engines to generate
electricity.   They seemed convinced that they could pass the
environmental issues.   The County had been in touch with the
County’s environmental consultant and one of them may visit that

                                 3
facility with staff later this spring.       He   said   preliminary
discussion looked promising at this point.

     Mr. Traczyk reported that he continued to receive a number
of calls about the power lines proposed to go through the
northern part of the County.      He noted that the County had
submitted letters not supporting this as a Board several months.
The letter was available on line for public review.     He added
that citizens should contact their legislators as this was
basically a state and federal issue.       The County had done
everything it could at this point.

     Mr. Traczyk reported that the 2006 construction numbers
were still well within the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan.
The 358 units represented a 2.3% increase.

     Mr. Traczyk said that transportation dollars for next year
were miserable and not enough to do much of anything.   He said
the Six-Year Plan was closer to a 15-year plan.    He said they
would continue to seek more funding.

     Mr. Traczyk welcomed Mr. Blair Mitchell as County Attorney.

     Mr. Mitchell said that this was a welcomed change and he
looked forward to working for the County.

     Mr. Stanley reminded the Board members to submit to him
their lists of proposed County goals for the upcoming year.

     Mr. Stanley noted that the budget work session with the
School Board had been rescheduled to February 15.

     Mr.   Stanley  reported   that  worked continued   on  the
installation of traffic signals at the entrance of Skyline High
School and the Blue Ridge Shadows development.        VDOT was
coordinating both of these projects and they were scheduled to
be completed by the end of February 2007.

     Mr. Stanley noted that, as requested by Mr. Fox, the
Balanced Growth tapes were aired on the government access
channel this past weekend.

     Mr. Stanley reported that the Board of Assessors had
completed   hearings  with   property   owners   on  the   recent
reassessment. The next step in the appeals process would be for
citizens to schedule hearings with the Board of Equalization.
These hearings will be held February 1 through April 30, 2007.

                                4
Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting of January 3, 2007

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn, seconded by Mr. Carter and by
the following vote, the Board of Supervisors approved the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors’ regular meeting of January
3, 2007:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Additional Appropriations and Transfers

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn, seconded by Mr. Carter and by
the following vote, the Board of Supervisors approved the
additional appropriations and transfers as shown below:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk

                             TRANSFERS

From 71020-5444 Parks & Rec Rec Program - Spe Int    $      200.00
To   71020-5447 Parks & Rec Rec Program - Spe Events

From Courthouse Renovation Fund                          27,749.25
To   9200-7048 Capital Outlay - Bldg Improve Fund

From Special Projects
To   42040-3017 Refuse Disposal - Stump Grinding         29,105.00
     53000-5301 Social Services - Public Asst            12,500.00


Approval of Accounts

     Mr. Fox had made      some inquiries regarding the    list of
accounts, which were       addressed by Mrs. Stimmel,       Finance
Director.

     On a motion by Mr. Carter, seconded by Mr. Fox and by the
following vote, the Board of Supervisors approved the list of
accounts:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk

Checks:   #221636-221926                    Total:   $1,209,480.10


                                 5
Discussion – Use of $25,000       from   Washington   Gas   Light   for
Pipeline Easement – Archie Fox

     Mr. Fox said he would like this money to be forwarded to
the library fund.

     Mr. Fox made a motion that the $25,000 received from
Washington Gas Light for a pipeline easement across the Front
Royal Golf Club property be forwarded to the library fund.
There was no second. The motion failed.

     Mr. Carter made a motion that the Board of Supervisors
approve the proposed 2007 Capital Projects List for improvements
to the Front Royal Golf Club for the Parks and Recreation
Department. Mr. Blanton seconded the motion.

     Mr. Llewellyn said he was very much in support of the
public library and he shared Mr. Fox’s commitment to funding the
library, but in this instance he would defer to a different use
of these funds.

     Mr. Blanton felt that Mr. Fox’s proposal was interesting.
In reading background information, it appeared to him that on
November 8 the Board voted that this $25,000 would go to
improvements. He noted that Mr. Weinberg had voted in favor of
that and he felt it would not be appropriate to change his vote
so he would support the use of the $25,000 for improvements to
the Front Royal Golf Club.

     Mr. Carter concurred.  He said the Board had agreed that
the $25,000 would go for capital improvements.  He noted that
this was one-time money.   They were able to make some good
strides with the Golf Club and pay off the debt.   He felt it
would be a good asset for the County and its residents, e.g.
open space, river access.

       The motion was approved by the following vote:

Aye:    Blanton, Carter, Llewellyn, Traczyk                 Nay:    Fox


Consent Agenda

1.     Erroneous Assessments – John Smedley

       a.   2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 Real Estate Taxes – Ivar X.

                                  6
              & Linnea M. Cederholm - $6,923.56

         b.   2006 Real Estate Taxes – Tammy L. Cook - $1,138.06
              2005 Real Estate Taxes – Tammy L. Cook - $1,096.52

         c.   2006 Real Estate Taxes – Olive C. Meadows - $1,480.10

2.       Coyote Bounties - $50 Each – Animal Control

         a.   Anthony Widmer

         b.   Scott Levi

         c.   Darryl L. Day

3.       Modification of Conditional Use Permit 91-07-01 – Name
         Change from Quarles Petroleum, Inc. to The Apple House, LLC
         – Matt Wendling

4.       Road Name – Skyline Vista Drive - John Kulnis

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn, seconded by Mr. Carter and by
the following vote, the Board of Supervisors approved the above
consent agenda items:

Aye:      Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Request – Memorandum of Agreement between the County of Warren
and Warren County School Board for Maintenance of Warren County
Vehicles – Doug Stanley

     Mr. Stanley noted that last year the County had asked that
the School Board enter into an agreement with the County to
assume maintenance of County vehicles.        The initial pilot
program   in  which   the  School’s   Transportation  Department
maintained County vehicles stationed at the Government Center
worked very well and was advantageous to both the County and the
School Board.

     He noted that he had considerable discussion with             the
School Board staff and they agreed to the following terms:

        Guarantee that the School Transportation Department will
         receive a minimum of $25,000 in labor for the remainder of
         the 2006-2007 fiscal year.
        The County will transfer $40,500 to the School Board budget
                                    7
       for the School Transportation Department upon approval of
       the MOU to cover the capital costs and guaranteed funding.
      The County will work with the School Board in the future as
       the need arose, including the need to find additional
       parking for buses, County vehicles and impound vehicles
       with the Sheriff’s Office.
      After completion of the first year, the County would review
       the program and budget with the School Board staff to
       ensure that this action is not negatively impacting their
       operations. (taking away education dollars for vehicle
       maintenance)

     Mr. Stanley noted that the School Board had approved the
memorandum of agreement at its meeting of January 11, 2007. The
agreement would take effect upon the County’s termination of its
agreement with Jack Evans Chevrolet.    The County gave 60 days
notice to Jack Evans Chevrolet on November 29, 2006.         The
proposed agreement had been reviewed by the County Attorney.

     Mr. Carter made a motion, seconded by Mr. Fox, that the
Board of Supervisors approve the proposed Memorandum of
Agreement with the Warren County School Board to assume vehicle
maintenance as outlined.

     Mr. Carter noted that the Chairman brought this up when he
was first on the Board. Three years later, they have a proposed
agreement. He said there was some concern about competing with
private industry, but they had to consider what was most cost
effective for the taxpayers.    He felt this would benefit both
the County and the School Board. He pointed out that they could
do this on a trial basis and it could always be amended.

     Mr. Traczyk felt the County would realize a savings under
the proposed agreement.

       The motion was approved by the following vote:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Public Hearing - Proposed Ordinance to Amend the South River
Agricultural   and Forestal  District  to  Withdraw  Property
Identified on Tax Map 34 as Parcel 21A and 95.50 +/- Acres in
Size – Taryn Logan

     Mrs. Logan noted that an ordinance creating the South River
Agricultural and Forestal District had been adopted by the Board
                                  8
of Supervisors on December 16, 2003.

     Mr. Jim Guy was requesting that his property be removed
from the District.       He was placing his property in a
conservation easement, which required as assessment of the
property.   Mr. Guy believed the value of the property would be
greater if it was not within the Agricultural and Forestal
District.   The property was identified on Tax Map 34 as Parcel
21A and contained approximately 95.50 acres. Both the Planning
Commission and the Agricultural and Forestal District Advisory
Committee forwarded the request to the Board recommending
approval.

       Mr. Traczyk opened the public hearing.

     Mr. Jim Guy, 281 Lazy River Lane, said he did not have
anything to add to what was presented by Mrs. Logan.

     Ms. Margie Hockman, member of the South River Agricultural
and Forestal District, stated that she had no objection to Mr.
Guy‘s proposal.

     There was no further input from the public.   Mr. Traczyk
closed the public hearing.

     Mr. Stanley pointed out that correspondence had been
received from Mr. Fred Andreae and Mr. Tom Lockhart in support
of the application.

     On a motion by Mr. Blanton, seconded by Mr. Llewellyn and
by the following vote, the Board of Supervisors approved the
request of Raymon James Guy to withdraw his property identified
on Tax Map 34 as Parcel 21A from the South River Agricultural
and Forestal District:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Public Hearing - R2006-03-01 Larry L. Andrews – Rezoning from
Agricultural to Commercial – Doug Stanley

     With reference to item L-2 rezoning application of Larry
Andrews, Mr. Carter disclosed that he was not the applicant nor
did he have any financial interest in the application or the
applicant’s business.    He was an adjacent land owner whose
property value could be impacted by this rezoning request and
subsequent development of the subject property if approved. As

                                  9
a result of the potential impact of this application on his
property interests, he would refrain from participating in
discussing or voting on this item pursuant to the Code of
Virginia.

    Mr. Carter left the Board and took a seat with the public.

     Mr. Fox disclosed that he had drilled wells in the past for
Mr. Andrews, but he would not be drilling wells on this property
if this request was approved, so he felt he would be able to
make a fair decision.

     Mr. Stanley outlined that criteria provided in the County’s
Zoning Ordinance to be considered when reviewing a rezoning
request. Mr. Andrews had submitted an application to amend the
Warren County Zoning Map and rezone approximately nineteen and
forty-five hundredths +/- acres from Agricultural to Commercial.
The property was located on Route 55 East (John Marshall
Highway) between Routes 55 and 649 (Dismal Hollow Road) and
Route 55 and the Norfolk Southern Railroad and identified on Tax
Map 31 as a portion of Parcel 18.       The proposed use of the
property was commercial. Mr. Stanley outlined a number of uses
that would be prohibited as proffered by the applicant.

     Mr. Stanley noted that the Planning Commission had
forwarded this application to the Board recommending approval.
He noted that the applicant and his attorney had addressed
concerns raised by the Virginia Department of Transportation,
the   County’s  environmental  consultant  and   the  Planning
Commission.

     Mr. Stanley pointed out that the Planning Commission
supported the furtherance of the 2020 transportation plan with
the dedication of right-of-way to widen Route 55 (John Marshall
Highway) between the railroad tracks to the Apple House and to
relocate a portion of Dismal Hollow Road to the west as
proffered by the applicant.   The applicant proffered a site to
the County on Dismal Hollow Road that could be used as a
compactor site.

     Mr. Blanton asked if the relocation of Dismal Hollow would
be just to the west of the fire department and Mr. Stanley
commented that that was correct.

     Mr. Fox asked if there would be any abandonment of the
existing road.   Mr. Stanley explained that that portion of the
road would eventually be a cul-de-sac with no through traffic.

                               10
    Mr. Traczyk opened the public hearing.

     Mr. Clay Athey, legal counsel to the applicant, noted that
numerous traffic and environmental impact analyses had been
performed for this application.    He noted that this site was
limited to 144,000 square feet of commercial with 72,000 being
potential retail and 72,000 being potential office buildings.
The applicant has proffered sufficient right-of-way to allow a
four-lane divided highway along the frontage of the subject
property to Route 79 plus the right-of-way to relocate Dismal
Hollow Road.

     Mr. Athey was of the opinion that the proposed rezoning was
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

     Mr. Athey showed on a map of the property the site
proffered by the applicant for a potential compactor and/or
commuter parking lot.   He pointed out that area reserved as an
easement for a sewage package plant.    He noted that due to the
environmental challenge of the property, the applicant had
committed to doing test wells on this site and generating no
more than 38,000 gallons of water per day or running any wells
more than 16 of a 24-hour cycle.    The applicant also committed
to no more than 144,000 square feet and at the time of the test
wells, to whatever capacity they would be limited. He said this
site was only conducive to some commercial and office buildings
that would help generate income for the County. He pointed out
that the applicant had committed to removing all the billboards
which was in the County’s interest and would improve that
entrance way into the County.

     Mr. Dean Lamb, 32 Gore Road, said coming into the meeting
he was not aware of all the facts and some of his concerns might
be mute points after hearing the presentation by Mr. Athey. He
said he had always been a supporter of a landowner’s rights as
long as it did not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property
owners.   He said that over the years he had seen the stream
polluted and floating dead fish and he wanted to be able to use
this water for agricultural purposes and recreation.     He felt
the traffic issue had been addressed.     His major concern was
water.   He said he had had brown water from his well.    He had
been told that the water table in this area was strong, but
delicate. He assumed that that meant there was plenty of water,
but they had to be very wise in the way they punched holes in
the ground and pulled it out.   The numbers quoted by Mr. Athey
seemed big to him and he was concerned about that.    He said he

                               11
had a small farm and hoped to do a lot more with it and water
was a mainstay of any farm. He was concerned about the loss of
agricultural land. He was also concerned how this would affect
the floodplain.    It seemed to him that people were building
closer to the floodplain now. He said he was still not in favor
of this rezoning. He said the water usage was his main concern.

     Mr. Athey explained that the applicant had an independent
hydrogeologist do a study on this site due to concerns such as
Mr. Lamb’s. He reiterated that there was not much room on this
site for commercial development and that was why they limited
the square footage to 144,000 on both sides of the roadway. The
applicant had also committed to having test wells so the
proposed usage did not affect anyone else’s groundwater.      He
outlined the counter measures and best management practices
proffered by the applicant and noted that this would be
monitored by the Corps of Engineers and others. He pointed out
that the only crossing of the stream the applicant anticipated
would be the relocation of Dismal Hollow Road where a small
bridge would probably have to be constructed.     These concerns
would be addressed by the Department of Environmental Quality
and the Army Corps of Engineers.

     There  was no further input from the public.    Mr. Traczyk
closed the public hearing.

     Finding that the requested rezoning was required and
appropriate for the public necessity, was good zoning practice
and was substantially in accord with the Warren County
Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Llewellyn made a motion that the Board
of Supervisors adopt the ordinance shown below and approve the
applicant‘s request to rezone and change the zoning map
classification of the property identified on Tax Map 31 as a
portion of Parcel 18 (GPIN 5091-46-7457 and 5091-46-9026) from
Agricultural to Commercial with the proffers as outlined.  Mr.
Fox seconded the motion.

                        AN ORDINANCE OF THE
                WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
        TO AMEND THE WARREN COUNTY ZONING MAP AND REZONE
THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED ON TAX MAP 31, AS A PORTION OF PARCEL 18
             FROM AGRICULTURAL (A) TO COMMERCIAL (C)

     Whereas, the applicant has asked the Board of Supervisors
to rezone and change the zoning map classification of the
property identified on tax map 31 as a portion of parcel 18 from
Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C), and

                               12
     Whereas, the Future Land Use Map of the Warren County
Comprehensive Plan identifies the area around the Linden I-66
interchange to be used for commercial, and

     Whereas, the applicant has offset the impact of the
development by proffering certain conditions to the County, and

     Whereas, the Warren County Planning Commission has found
that the requested rezoning is required and appropriate for the
public necessity, convenience, and general welfare and is good
zoning practice.

     BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED AND ORDAINED that the Warren County
Board of Supervisors amends the zoning map and changes the
zoning classification of the subject property identified on tax
map 31 as a portion of parcel 18 from Agricultural (A) to
Commercial (C), and as depicted on the attached map, and
containing approximately nineteen and thirty-four hundredths
(19.34) acres from Agricultural (A) to Commercial (C) as shown
on the attached plan of development and with the conditions
proffered by the applicant.

     Mr. Llewellyn thanked the applicant and his attorney for
their willingness to go through the process, which more clearly
defined the scope of the project.

     Mr. Fox said he had observed the Planning Commission going
through this process and he felt that they had covered
everything on this application.

     Mr. Blanton said the Planning        Commission    had   done   an
excellent job on this application.

     Mr. Traczyk said Mr. Krum, Planning Commission member
representing the Shenandoah District. had been very diligent in
keeping him informed of this application.   Mr. Traczyk thanked
Mr. Andrews for getting rid of the big signs and for proffering
the site to the County for a potential compactor.   He felt the
Planning Commission did a good job on this. He noted that this
was within the scope of the Comprehensive Plan as an area of
development.

       The motion was approved by the following vote:

Aye:   Blanton, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk            Abstain: Carter


                                 13
     Mr. Carter took his seat on the Board.


Proposed   Adoption   of   Warren   County   Commercial Wireless
Technology Facilities Plan as       Component of Warren County
Comprehensive Plan – Doug Stanley

     Mr. Stanley noted that the Telecommunications Act of 1996
mandated that localities could not prohibit the development of
communication   towers   and   related    equipment, but   allowed
localities to formulate plans and policies to address issues
associated with their development.      The County and Town hired
Atlantic Technology Consultants to prepare a comprehensive plan
for siting towers including a review and analysis of existing
infrastructure,    carrier   needs,    propagation,  interference,
topography, air navigation facilities, historic features and
places, scenic roadways and parks and recreational uses. It was
determined that existing infrastructure was capable of meeting
most future needs through co-location or sharing of space on
existing structures.      This reduces the need for additional
towers.    The plan identified ten Permitted Commercial Tower
Development Areas (PCTDA) where there was no infrastructure and
tower development would be permitted. Any new tower would have
to conform to County and Town ordinances as well as federal and
state regulations.

     Mr. Stanley commented that the plan enhanced current and
future technological needs while maintaining an aesthetic
environment for residents and visitors through a rational,
logical and equitable process for siting towers and antennae.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended that this plan be
adopted as a component of the County’s Comprehensive Plan.

     Mr. George Condyles, President of Atlantic Technology
Consultants, Inc., gave a power point presentation on the
proposed Commercial Wireless Technology Facilities Plan.      He
noted that he had worked with County staff for approximately one
and a half years on this project.    He noted that the proposed
plan had been circulated to the wireless telecommunication
providers licensed in the area as well as the tower development
community.

     Mr.   Condyles  said   that  his  firm  was   charged  with
identifying all wireless communication facilities in the County.
They identified 55 facilities within the County and Town. They
then identified 39 slots on those towers that could support
additional antennae.   These numbers did not include the AEP or

                               14
Virginia Dominion Power lines on which antennae were already or
could be co-located, which averaged between 30 and 50.      This
project was three-fold.    First, identify the towers, identify
the future of those structures and using propagation modeling to
determine where towers would be needed in the future.

     Mr. Condyles showed the towers with co-location potential
noting areas of growth in the County.        They determined the
coverage of the seven carriers in the County.            Utilizing
existing slots for co-location, he showed that the coverage
would be approximately 70% of the County.     The plan encouraged
the   use  of   existing  structures   prior   to   building   new
telecommunication towers.   The ten PCTDAs were one-mile radius
areas in which towers could be constructed to provide the best
coverage.     He noted that Culpeper had received only two
applications for new towers since adoption of a Wireless
Technology Facilities Plan five years ago.

     Mr. Condyles showed the existing towers within the Town of
Front Royal, most of which were undersized.    Most were at law
enforcement and fire and rescue stations.

     In conclusion Mr. Condyles stated that he felt this plan
would provide the County and Town the control on how its future
was going for wireless coverage.

     Mr. Blanton said that Section I under policies stipulated
that no tower would be located within one half mile of a
Virginia byway unless an acceptable stealth tower design was
utilized.  He said that they were very protective of Route 340
in the South River District.   He asked if the x’s marked along
Route 340 were stealth locations or proposed areas. Mr. Stanley
noted that a silo design tower was recently constructed near
Rocky Lane. Several of the PCTDAs were identified with the need
of stealth technology, e.g. Rockland area.       There was less
concern with the Barnett property from neighbors and a monopole
was used. A silo was true stealth technology and monopole was a
better example of a lattice tower.

     Mr. Condyles said the company that manufactured the silo
tower design actually manufactured silos and one could not be
differentiated from the other.

     Mr. Fox asked if the plan proposed heights for towers that
would be permitted in the PCTDAs.    Mr. Condyles said that the
plan set the height limitation at 195 feet, but a maximum height
and particular design was stipulated for each individual site.

                               15
Each  tower   application  would    come before the   Board  of
Supervisors for approval. Mr. Fox asked if there was a limit on
the height for the silo tower design. Mr. Condyles recommended
that the tallest be about 120 feet.

     Mr. Traczyk opened the public hearing.    No one from the
public spoke. Mr. Traczyk closed the public hearing.

     Mr. Blanton made a motion, seconded by Mr. Fox, that the
Board of Supervisors adopt the Warren County Commercial Wireless
Technology Facilities Plan as a component of the Warren County
Comprehensive Plan.

     Mr. Traczyk said he supported this in an effort to minimize
the number of cell towers and to plan for the future.    He said
he was a strong supporter of planning ahead.

       The motion was approved by the following vote:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Closed Meeting – (Section 2.2-3711.A.7 of the Virginia Freedom
of Information Act) – Consultation with Legal Counsel re:
Actual or Probable Litigation

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn and by the following vote, the
Board of Supervisors went into closed meeting to discuss the
above item pursuant to the code section cited:

Blanton, aye; Carter, aye; Fox, aye; Llewellyn, aye; Traczyk,
aye

     At the conclusion of the closed meeting, Mr. Traczyk called
the meeting back to regular session.

     On a motion by Mr. Llewellyn and by the following vote, the
Board of Supervisors certified to the best of each member's
knowledge only public business matters lawfully exempted from
open meeting requirements under this chapter and only such
public business matters as were identified in the motion by
which the closed meeting was convened were heard, discussed or
considered in the meeting by the public body:

Blanton, aye; Carter, aye; Fox, aye; Llewellyn, aye; Traczyk,
aye


                                 16
     Mr. Llewellyn made a motion that the Board of Supervisors
direct the County Administrator and County Attorney to draft and
send to Mr. Herbert Dunkle a notice to clean up his property
within thirty (30) days to the satisfaction of the County
Administrator or the County will clear the property of all
debris, inoperable vehicles and accumulated rubbish and place a
lien on the property for recovery of the costs for such cleanup.
Mr. Carter seconded the motion. The motion was approved by the
following vote:

Aye:   Blanton, Carter, Fox, Llewellyn, Traczyk


Adjournment

       Mr. Traczyk adjourned the meeting.




                                 17

								
To top