Docstoc

Info

Document Sample
Info Powered By Docstoc
					General Information
What courses receive the    All 5-week, 6-week, and 10-week Courses, FirstCourses, and
End of Course               Integrative Projects are targeted for the End of Course Evaluation.
Evaluation?
What learners are           All learners still registered for the course approximately 14 calendar
invited?                    days before the end of the course.
How are learners invited?   Invitations and up to two follow-up messages are sent to learner's
                            preferred email address on file 14 days prior to the end of the course.

How long do learners        Submissions received up to the end of the online Grading Window are
have to evaluate thier      included in regular reporting.
course?                     In the case of learners submitting multiple times, the latest submission
                            received within the timeframe is considered the final submission.




Workbook Contents
Info                        General information on this workbook.
Codebook                    The End of Course Evaluation form including full text of each question,
                            the corresponding response options presented to learners, and the
                            weighting of response options for calculations.
Summary                     Summarized End of Course Evaluation submissions aggregated to
                            various levels.
Submissions                 End of Course Evaluation submissions received with open text
                            comments included.


Who to Contact
Faculty Chair               Contact your faculty chair with questions regarding your specific End of
                            Course Evaluation ratings.
CourseFeedback              Contact CourseFeedback mailbox with questions regarding the End of
                            Course Evaluation process.
Portion         Column              Description                             Notes
 Reporting Base Course Start Date   Course Start Date
                Course End Date     Course End Date
                Course Length       Course duration in weeks                5-week
                                                                            6-week
                                                                            10-week
                  Course Type       Course type                             FC=FirstCourse
                                                                            CRS=Course
                                                                            ING=Integrative Project
  Aggregations    Instructor Name   Instructor Name                         Last, First
                  School            School the course falls under
                  Course Subject    Course subject area
                  Course Number     Course number
                  Section           Course Section
 Administrative   Invited           Number of learners invited
                  Submitted         Number of usable submissions received
                  Response Rate     Response rate                           Submitted / Invited
                  Statistic         Statistic                               Average
                                                                            Standard Deviation
EOCE Section       Item                                         Full Item Text                                                                     Response Options
Instructor Quality Clear course expectations                    The instructor provided clear course expectations (facilitation, assignments,
                                                                availability).

                  Sufficient courseroom presence                The instructor was sufficiently present in the courseroom.


                  Demonstrated content knowledge                The instructor effectively demonstrated knowledge of course content and
                                                                subject matter.
                                                                                                                                                     Strongly Agree (5)
                  Knowledge enhanced applicability              The instructor shared knowledge and expertise that enhanced my ability to                Agree (4)
                                                                apply what I learned in the course.                                                      Neutral (3)
                                                                                                                                                        Disagree (2)
                  Challenged learners to think critically       The instructor challenged learners to think critically.                             Strongly Disagree (1)


                  Sensitive to learners' content familiarity    The instructor demonstrated sensitivity in course discussions to varying levels
                                                                of familiarity with course content.

                  Instructor's tone established trust/respect   The instructor's tone helped establish a courseroom learning community of trust
                                                                and respect.

                  Instructor responded timely                   The instructor responded to learners within a reasonable period of time.


                  Positive feedback for learner                 The instructor provided sufficient specific feedback to help me understand what
                                                                I did well.

                  Constructive feedback for learner             The instructor provided sufficient specific feedback to help me understand how I
                                                                can improve.
                                                                                                                                                     Strongly Agree (5)
                  Graded fairly                                 The instructor graded fairly.                                                            Agree (4)
                                                                                                                                                         Neutral (3)
                                                                                                                                                        Disagree (2)
                  Encouraged learner interactions               The instructor encouraged learner to learner communication (community) and          Strongly Disagree (1)
                                                                dialogue.

                  Helping learners succeed                      The instructor was committed to helping learners succeed.


                  Would recommend instructor                    I would recommend this instructor to other learners.
EOCE Section     Item                                            Full Item Text                                                                         Response Options
Course Quality   Competencies relevant                           The competencies documented in the syllabus are relevant to my goals.


                 Competencies related to program outcomes        I understand the relationship between course competencies and program
                                                                                                                                                          Strongly Agree (5)
                                                                 learning outcomes.
                                                                                                                                                              Agree (4)
                                                                                                                                                              Neutral (3)
                 Activities fit together                         All course activities (e.g., objectives, readings, questions, activities, media) fit
                                                                                                                                                             Disagree (2)
                                                                 together coherently.
                                                                                                                                                         Strongly Disagree (1)
                 Workload appropriately distributed              The workload was appropriately distributed across the course units.


                 Hours per week                                  About how many hours per week did you spend working on activities (i.e.,
                                                                 researching, reading, writing, engaging in online activities) for this course?           Number from 0-168
                                                                 Please enter a single number, not a range.
                 Readings valuable to professional development   The course readings provided valuable information for my professional
                                                                 development.

                 Multimedia supported learning                   The multimedia in this course (e.g., audio, video, animation, illustrations,
                                                                 simulations) supported my learning.

                 No impact of technologht problems               Courseroom technology problems (e.g., up time, speed, errors) did not interfere
                                                                                                                                                          Strongly Agree (5)
                                                                 with my learning.
                                                                                                                                                              Agree (4)
                                                                                                                                                              Neutral (3)
                 Relevant and engaging discussions               The discussion questions were relevant and engaging.
                                                                                                                                                             Disagree (2)
                                                                                                                                                         Strongly Disagree (1)
                 Learner interactions contributed to learning    Interactions with other learners contributed to my learning (e.g., broadened my
                                                                 perspective, helped me see how to approach an activity).

                 Assignments relevant to competencies            The assignments (e.g., case studies, group projects, papers, journals, role-
                                                                 plays) provided relevant ways for me to demonstrate the course competencies.
EOCE Section   Item                                   Full Item Text                                                                   Response Options
Overall        Overall quality of instructor          How would you rate the quality of the instructor's online teaching activities?

                                                                                                                                            Excellent (5)
               Overall quality of course              How would you rate the quality of the course overall?                                Very Good (4)
                                                                                                                                             Good (3)
                                                                                                                                              Fair (2)
               Contribution to learning goals         How would you rate this course's contribution toward achieving your overall             Poor (1)
                                                      learning goals?

               Positive feedback for instructor       Please provide one or two examples of the instructor's strengths.


               Constructive feedback for instructor   Please provide one or two suggestions for ways the instructor could improve.


                                                                                                                                             Open text
               Positive feedback for course           Please comment on the aspects of the course you liked most.
                                                      Please be as specific as possible.

               Constructive feedback for course       Please comment on aspects of the course that could be improved.
                                                      Please be as specific as possible.
                                              Summary


          Course     Course
Course Start Date End Date Length
                               Course Type
                                         Instructor Name, EmplID
                                                     School    Course Subject     Section
                                                                         Course Number
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        [ALL]       [ALL]     [ALL]     [ALL]    [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        [ALL]       [ALL]     [ALL]     [ALL]    [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    [ALL]     [ALL]
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     [ALL]    [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    [ALL]     [ALL]
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     [ALL]    [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    HMSVC CST
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     5003     [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    HMSVC CST
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     5003     [ALL
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    HMSVC CST
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     5003     06
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC                    HMSVC CST
                                         Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)     5003     06




                                               Page 6
                                                Summary


Invited                        Statistic
           Submitted Response Rate                    Sufficient courseroom presence knowledgeapplicability think critica
                                                                  Demonstrated content Challenged learners to
                                           Clear course expectations         Knowledge enhanced
      1864       854      0.46 Average           4.52        4.43       4.51      4.32       4.52
      1864       854      0.46 Std Dev            0.8        0.82       0.75       0.9       0.75
        20        13      0.65 Average           4.62        4.69       4.69      4.46       4.69
        20        13      0.65 Std Dev           0.65        0.48       0.63      0.78       0.48
        20        13      0.65 Average           4.62        4.69       4.69      4.46       4.69
        20        13      0.65 Std Dev           0.65        0.48       0.63      0.78       0.48
        20        13      0.65 Average           4.62        4.69       4.69      4.46       4.69
        20        13      0.65 Std Dev           0.65        0.48       0.63      0.78       0.48




                                                 Page 7
                                                   Summary


             learners' content familiarity trust/respect
                         tone established feedback
                                      Positive    Constructive feedback Encouraged learner interactions
                                                             Graded     for                   Would recommend instructor
Sensitive toInstructor's Instructor responded timely for learner fairly learner Helping learners succeed
      4.43        4.49         4.51          4.35      4.29        4.46      4.51       4.48         4.48
      0.82        0.79         0.79          0.96      0.98        0.76      0.78       0.79         0.85
      4.62        4.62         4.77          4.62      4.69        4.54      4.77       4.67         4.69
      0.65        0.65         0.44          0.51      0.48        0.66      0.44       0.49         0.48
      4.62        4.62         4.77          4.62      4.69        4.54      4.77       4.67         4.69
      0.65        0.65         0.44          0.51      0.48        0.66      0.44       0.49         0.48
      4.62        4.62         4.77          4.62      4.69        4.54      4.77       4.67         4.69
      0.65        0.65         0.44          0.51      0.48        0.66      0.44       0.49         0.48




                                                    Page 8
                                                  Summary


         Competencies related Workload outcomes week
                                    together Hours per distributed Multimedia No impact of technologht problems
                                                                                supported Relevant
                                                                                            development
Competencies relevantActivities fitto programappropriatelyReadings valuable to professionallearning and engaging discussions
    4.43        4.43        4.44          4.32    15.08        4.45       4.22        4.28         4.4
    0.69        0.66        0.71          0.82    10.04        0.75       0.85        0.92        0.76
    4.62        4.54        4.58          4.31    13.38        4.62       4.15        4.23        4.69
    0.51        0.52        0.51          0.85       6.4       0.51       0.55          0.6       0.48
    4.62        4.54        4.58          4.31    13.38        4.62       4.15        4.23        4.69
    0.51        0.52        0.51          0.85       6.4       0.51       0.55          0.6       0.48
    4.62        4.54        4.58          4.31    13.38        4.62       4.15        4.23        4.69
    0.51        0.52        0.51          0.85       6.4       0.51       0.55          0.6       0.48




                                                   Page 9
                                                      Summary


            Assignments relevant to competencies
                       Overall quality of instructor
                                    learning Contribution
Learner interactions contributed to Overall quality of course to learning goals
     4.32         4.43        4.29         4.27        4.26
     0.83         0.76           1         0.91        0.95
     4.73         4.62        4.46         4.54        4.54
     0.47         0.51        0.66         0.66        0.66
     4.73         4.62        4.46         4.54        4.54
     0.47         0.51        0.66         0.66        0.66
     4.73         4.62        4.46         4.54        4.54
     0.47         0.51        0.66         0.66        0.66




                                                       Page 10
                                           Submissions


          Course     Course
Course Start Date End Date Length
                               Course Typechool
                                         S                  Course Number
                                                  Course Subject     Section   Inst_Name
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)
11/9/2009 1/15/2010         10 FC        HMSVC    CST       5003     06        Brooke, Stephanie (1043967)




                                             Page 11
                       Submissions


Unique Submission ID
    19726
    19344
    19912
    20053
    19650
    19947
    20330
    20289
    19756
    19792
    19846
    19923
    20136




                        Page 12
                                                  Submissions


Positive feedback for instructor
1. Excellent knowledge of APA style.2. Excellent communication skill.
Responded promptly.Promote use of Capella Library
She gives valuable feedback in order to help succeed. Working with APA was somewhat a struggle at the beginning, but she w
Responing to learner's post timely. Gives direction for improvement

Overall, very organized and explained assignments and discussions clearly.

She was always offering suggestions to make work better
She was prompt in getting back to us and graded fairly and promptly. She challenges me by asking questions.
Professor Brooke's feedback is very simple and straight forward. She pointed out issues that I need to correct or to improve. Sh
The instructor was available for question and answer. I like that she provided example of projects that were required for the cla
The professor engaged with students weekly, gave important reminders, and clarified information when needed.
She responded to each learner's post timely.




                                                     Page 13
                                                    Submissions


            Positive feedback for course course expectations
                          for instructorClear       for course Demonstrated content Challenged Sensitive to learners' content famili
                                                                            Knowledge enhanced learners to
Constructive feedback Constructive feedback Sufficient courseroom presence knowledgeapplicability think critically
            1. The ease of the understanding.2.Should of cross-cultural study especially with Asian.2. The application of
                          1. Should increase the Gives know more of the goal of life.
                                                  5                      3            3          4          3
1. Should know more about different culture.2.number a4clear idea about the great scholars besides Western scholars. the dev
            No test, discussions were line, good  4
Less generic feedback First course onwell liked experience      4        4            4          4          4
             assignment different level don't5 according 5words, but 5 theory. The instructor5asked and 5 can't think of anything e
                          Every have been explained 250 to better, other than that she is excellent discussion questions that pro
                                                                                      5
The project Learning the couldquestion of life,call for a little Erikson'srather relevant response.         I
                                                  5             5        5            5          5          5
                                                  3             5        5            4          5          5
                                                  5             5        5
            I believe the discussion posts helped tremendously . They provided5insight into5other adult5     learners thoughts and re
                                                  4             4        4            3          4          4
            I liked the first poem exercise to 5
                           would have liked have required esp for the weekly post
                                                                4        5                       5           of
in the beginning maybei more examples of what isseen a stronger emphasis on5the young adult phase5 human development
            I liked more instruction on to bringproject taking life experiences I the paper. This was our first class, soassigments
                          Because this was first our personal an online outline would have 5
                                                                5        5            4          liked more 5
                                                                                                            details for the a the con
I would have REALLY liked that we got themy4first time as far as how to class, and look at ourselves while learning aboutlittle guid
None.                     None.                   5
            It is very practical. It's related to my real life. 5        5            5          5          5
            I enjoyed the differenthave special projects 5
                          When we weekly work assignments and interacting a dysfunctional family and in the problems of the im
                                                  5             have do not have the class other class mates5have discussions. It sp
                                                                         5            5          5
Provide alternative assignments for individual who mayto duebeen raised in with the complete two assignments on top relating t
            I liked a wonderful job I were due at different be improved.
                                                  5             5        5                       5          5
The instructor did that assignments don't feel much could times as discussions.5It helped me to manage my time.
            Expectations were set and adhered to early 5
                                                  5             on.
Individualize comments more so that they feel more genuine when 5         praised. 5             4          4




                                                      Page 14
                                                 Submissions


             tone established trust/respect
                          Positive feedback
                                      Constructive feedback Encouraged learner interactions Competencies relevant
                                                 Graded     for                   Would recommend instructor
Instructor's Instructor responded timely for learner fairly learner Helping learners succeed
          5            4            4         4           4         5           4          4       5
          4            4            4         4           4         4                      4       4
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       5
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       5
          5            4            5         5           5         5           5          5       4
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       5
          3            5            5         5           4         4           4          4       4
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       4
          4            5            4         5           5         5           4          5       5
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       5
          5            5            4         4           3         5           5          5       5
          5            5            5         5           5         5           5          5       5
          4            5            4         4           4         4           4          4       4




                                                   Page 15
                                               Submissions


         Activities fit Workload outcomes week
                        together Hours per distributed Multimedia No impact of technologht problems
                                                                  supported Relevant Learner interactions contributed to
                                                                              development
Competencies related to programappropriatelyReadings valuable to professionallearning and engaging discussions
       5            5           4       10          5           4          4          5          5
       4            4           4       20          4           4          4          4          4
       5            5           4       15          5           4          4          5          5
       5            5           5       15          5           4          5          5          5
       4            4           4       10          4           4          4          4          5
       5            5           5       10          5           5          3          5
       4            4           2       15          4           4          4          4
       4                        5        5          4           4          4          5          5
       5            5           5       10          5           3          5          5          4
       5            5           5       30          5           4          5          5          5
       4            4           4       16          5           5          5          5          5
       5            5           5        8          5           5          4          5          5
       4            4           4       10          4           4          4          4          4




                                                 Page 16
                                                Submissions


          Overall quality of instructorof
                      Overall quality
                                   Contribution
Assignments relevant to competencies course to learning goals
        4          4             5          5
        4          4             4          4
        5          5             5          5
        5          5             5          5
        5          4             4          4
        5          5             5          5
        4          4             4          4
        4          5             4          3
        5          4             5          5
        5          5             5          5
        5          5             5          5
        5          5             5          5
        4          3             3          4




                                                  Page 17

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:35
posted:4/29/2010
language:English
pages:17