1 KEYNOTE FOR 2005 LANDMARK LUNCH PIEDMONT PARK CONSERVANCY May

Document Sample
1 KEYNOTE FOR 2005 LANDMARK LUNCH PIEDMONT PARK CONSERVANCY May Powered By Docstoc
					                          KEYNOTE FOR 2005 LANDMARK LUNCH

                               PIEDMONT PARK CONSERVANCY

                                             May 2005



       The theme of this year’s Landmark Lunch is “A Picnic in the Park.” I’ve been

grateful for all the suggestions that have come my way on what thoughts to share with

you today. Clearly, as you look at this vista around us today, natural beauty and flowers

and matters botanical would be the order of the day. It is wonderful to be sitting here in

the middle of this vast meadow, looking at a green and thriving Piedmont Park. We are so

lucky to have this emerald jewel in the middle of our fast-growing city. It is truly the

green heart of Atlanta, a central place where we can congregate and relax and feel a

connection with the city and with each other. It is a place that makes us proud to live in

this eminently livable city.

       But some of you sitting in this tent today know that fifteen years ago (or ten or

even five years ago) when you looked around, you didn’t see this. I remember my first

run in Atlanta’s premier park, six years ago. (I ran into Maria Sapporta and she

mentioned the marker for her father and shared with me some personal history so that I

felt that perhaps I must understand and put down some roots here someday.) But after

hearing about Atlanta’s pride, what did I see that day? Dying trees. Bare, packed earth.

A Lake Meer where “brackish” would have been a kind description. Really, Piedmont

Park was where a travesty was made of Olmstead’s vision. Whatthe Piedmont Park

Conservancy has done to turn the park around has been nothing short of remarkable and

not without controversy. Change is never easy, and you were fighting City Hall and local




                                              1
attitudes. Lake Clara Meer. You have breathed life back into historical Piedmont Park

and made it a place of which Atlantans can be proud.

       So what I would like to talk about today is not “Picnic in the Park,” by why “It’s

No Picnic in the Park,” when you decide to take on change. I admit to having thought

some about it, so I’d like to spend a few minutes talking about leadership. Not the

corporate sort, but ours as citizens. I want to talk not about our political leaders, but

about the responsibility we have to better our city.

       Before doing so, let me start which a few observations. They will not seem

connected at the outset, but if you stay with me, then perhaps I can draw these threads

together.

       First, my experience with the contributions of Frederick Law Olmstead. I lived in

Boston earlier in my life and saw the magic of how the fen turned into a riot of beauty

each spring at the Gardens and Common. Like everybody, I’ve spent time in New York

at Central Park. My husband lives during the week in Seattle where, by their own

promotion, the city boasts that “Seattle’s park system is a public resource that makes

Seattle one of the nation’s most liveable cities.” I’m fortunate enough to live in Druid

Hills which is an Olmstead neighborhood. So I’ve been drawn to an appreciation over

the years of Olmstead’s work. He delivered a talk in 1870 in which he said,

       We want a ground to which people may easily go after their day’s
       work is done, and where they may stroll for an hour, seeing, hearing, and feeling
       nothing of the bustle and the jar of the streets, where they shall, in effect, find
       the city put far away from them.

We feel that way about parks today. But let’s think for a moment about what our cities

looked like in 1870 – factories in the city limits, an overflow of immigration and crowded

tenements, dirty air. Despite how we are wont to complain now, surely, our city is far



                                              2
more livable today than it was then. But remember that Olmstead planned the lineal

parks on Ponce so that the street car could co-exist with his natural backdrop. In other

words, he understood that the areas of natural beauty he created had to co-exist with the

industrialized world.

       Second, let me offer my experience with how we deal with controversy. When I

came here, my name – indeed, Atlanta Gas Light’s name – was in the paper all the time

and not in a positive context. We had no choice but to take the controversy head on.

(Matt Quinn formerly of the AJC had a good two year run following AGL. As he says,

“gaffes make the best stories.”) It was a tough time but we faced our problems and

improved our company’s performance. With the support of many people, including a

number of you here today, we are now the largest gas company in the eastern half of the

U.S., doing business from New Jersey to Florida to Texas and Louisiana.

       Here’s the interesting thing. Once you get past the controversy, you tend to live

afterwards in the “safe zone.” In our energy businesses, I see decisions of government all

the time. But if our company isn’t directly affected, we don’t say anything. Who wants

one’s name in the paper needlessly? All the PR professionals counsel against visibility.

But just two weeks ago, we received an unfavorable decision in Georgia on Atlanta Gas

Light’s business which we are currently appealing. I see now it was a culmination of

things about which I didn’t want to make waves along the way and now there is a tipping

point effect. Not to overdramatize, but it goes back to the famous clergyman, Martin

Niemoeller, in Germany. He’s the one who talked about “First they came for the

communists and I wasn’t a communist, so I didn’t speak up.” Eventually, as you recall,

he observed that, “then they came for me and there was no one to speak.” So I think




                                             3
about the validity of the advice that says, “Stay in the safe zone.” Fundamentally, the

contradiction goes to the heart of the issue of social responsibility.

       Third, let’s talk about vision and change. While “blessed are the peacemakers,”

we also know that nothing worth doing is done easily. The Piedmont Park Conservancy

has a vision that will produce many more improvements and expand the park by 40

percent. The Conservancy wants to add gardens and fountains, even a skate park, in the

North Woods. These projects will make Piedmont Park a world-class park, a “must-visit”

for both Atlantans and visitors. So now we face the issue of great controversy: the

parking deck. But sitting hand in hand with it is transportation policy. We really need to

build the parking deck, take that energy, and move on to the larger issue of public

transportation for our region.

       Last, let me observe something about Atlanta more broadly. As wonderful as the

recovery of Piedmont Park has been, Atlanta is one of the most “under-parked” cities in

the United States. Less than four percent of Atlanta’s acreage is devoted to parks, which

puts us at the bottom of the list of the nation’s top 25 cities. The national average for

urban parkland is 11 percent. New York, that concrete canyon, puts Atlanta to shame

with 18.9 percent. Even Charlotte, a city more sprawling than Atlanta, has more park

space. Atlanta has just 7.8 acres of park per one thousand residents while Charlotte has

23.7 acres! Before coming to Atlanta, I lived in Houston. People rarely think of Texas as

being green, and yet the Bayou City is home to 18,000 acres of parks. And yes, they

drive to their parks, but the parks are oases from urban life.

       Park space has not been a priority for Atlantans for many reasons. We think of

ourselves as living in a forest. The common perception is that we have plenty of green




                                              4
space. Homeowners have large yards with big trees. We can look out from our high-rise

offices and see a canopy of green.

        But there are disquieting signs that that our protective green canopy is

disappearing. American Forests, a conservation group, says that Atlanta has lost 60

percent of its natural tree cover in the past 20 years. A recent satellite survey by the

Georgia Forestry Commission shows that metro Atlanta loses 54 acres of greenspace

every day to development and highway construction. Fifty-four acres a day!

        This loss of Atlanta’s precious tree canopy is why it is more important than ever

that we look ahead and plan for parks now. We need to replace our lost trees. All the

surveys that are done – by the Metro Atlanta Chamber to numerous other economic

development organizations, show that people value parks and want to live in areas where

they have access to parks. In order for Atlanta to be a first-class city with a high quality

of life, we need to make sure that there are places here for future generations to play and

enjoy nature. Think of the world’s great cities … and their parks come to mind. Rome

has the Borghese Gardens and Paris, its public gardens. In London, one thinks of Hyde

Park. San Francisco, a city I called home for many years, is home to the 74,000 acre

Golden Gate Park, the world’s largest urban national park. Atlanta spends just $58 per

resident a year on park operations and maintenance, well behind other cities. Seattle, for

instance, spends $160 per resident, Minneapolis $144 and Chicago $125. When it comes

to investment in parks, Atlanta lags far behind. It’s hard to call ourselves a world-class

city with these statistics.

        So now, I’ve made four observations. Let me see if I can draw them together.

First, Olmstead knew that parks had to co-exist with the modern scheme. Second, we all




                                              5
have a responsibility to speak up for what’s right. Third, change is never easy and while

it’s tempting to deal with one issue, there are many interconnected issues in a complex

world. Fourth, we know our path to greatness involves great public works, greater green

space, and the support for them.

       What does that mean for us today? It means first, we need to get the parking deck

built and get that controversy behind us. But second, as citizens of this metropolitan area,

we must galvanize our political leadership at the state and regional level to pay attention

to public works and particularly transportation. Mayor Franklin has not received the

support she needs nor have we properly addressed the issues with Marta or building

roads. These issues go on and on and we just don’t break the cycle. Moreover, we know

that Atlanta lives the incredible contradiction between gentrification and affordability –

which is a racially divisive issue. But can we afford not to gentrify and create a more

profitable tax base for the greatest city in the south? Shouldn’t we have a more coherent

master plan for an affordable component within a gentrifying city? Can we also continue

to ignore regionalizing government?

       We sometimes ask our political leaders for too much. We ask them to weave

through this complex web of issues where we don’t seek to coalesce our own political

beliefs. In the end, we do what’s right, but it’s all that in-between.

       The Conservancy always wants your money and I would be remiss not to ask you

for more of it. But I would also ask you for your involvement. Call the City Council

members, call your County Commissioners, call your state representatives. Engage our

governor – he is incredibly approachable and is eminently dedicated to all of Georgia, not

just rural Georgia. You are the opinion leaders. I encourage each of you to contact these




                                              6
public officials and let them know that not only do you support the expansion of

Piedmont Park, or that Atlanta needs more parks. Once you have them on the phone or

email, talk to them about breaking the logjam on public transportation, the reduction in

governmental units with overlapping jurisdiction in the metro area, and the commitment

to making Atlanta great in every way. Let’s get the mainstream of political thought back

into the process. Really, this park is a metaphor for building a great city. So let us

rededicate ourselves to our community knowing there’s no picnic in the park until we

fulfill our responsibilities as citizens of this great state and this lovely metro region we

call home.




                                               7

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:73
posted:4/28/2010
language:English
pages:7