Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out
Get this document free

His Holiness

VIEWS: 14 PAGES: 4

									                                                                                   His Holiness
                                                                                   Benedict XVI.
                                                                                   Supreme Pontiff

LEGAL ACTION LIBELLUS LITIS (CCEO CAN. 1185) AGAINST CARD. L. HUSAR
Your Holiness,
     we are members of the Eastern Catholic Church who believe and confess that You as the
Roman Pontiff are the successor of St. Peter, the Vicar of Christ on earth and the shepherd of the
whole Church, and therefore by the power of Your office You have the supreme, immediate and
extraordinary power in the Church which You can always exert (see CCEO can. 43).
     Not for the sake of us but for the love to Christ, truth and for the good of the Church and
salvation of immortal souls we are turning to You and on the basis of CCEO can. 1185, 1055 §1,
1059 §1 and 1060 §1 pt. 1-2 we thereby take legal action against the supreme archbishop of
UGCC Card. L. Husar and ask for the service of Your trial.
     Card. L. Husar abuses his supreme Church authority in order to kill life in the Church. The
souls which are being killed are not able to defend themselves against it because he acts in the name
of the Holy Father and claims absolute obedience; however, on the other side he insidiously
endeavours after severance from the Holy Father. His opinions and attitudes are neither Catholic
nor Christian.
     He preaches a different Christ (Christ of the New Age).
     He preaches a different spirit (spirit of liberalism and relativism).
     He preaches a different Gospel (antigospel) (see 2Cor 11:4) and disguises all this by so-called
Eastern spirituality.
     The concrete fruit of his rule in UGCC is spiritual death. HE HAS ON HIS CONSCIENCE A
SPIRITUAL DECAY IN THE RELIGIOUS INSTITUTES, IN THE SEMINARIES, AT THE
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY (UCU). Moreover, he is responsible for MASS SPREAD OF SIMONY
AND FINANCIAL MACHINATIONS IN UGCC. ON ALMOST ALL KEY POSTS IN UGCC HE
APPOINTED PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE SPIRIT OF SCHISM OR THE SPIRIT OF NEW AGE.
He is searching after the remains of spiritual life in UGCC and MERCILESSLY LIQUIDATES
THEM. HE DOES NOT PERMIT ANY TRUE MISSION AND SPIRITUAL AWAKENING IN
UKRAINE.

Concrete crimes of Card. L. Husar:
     1a) In 1977 in Rome he let himself be consecrated a bishop without the consent of the Holy
Father for which he was suspended for 19 years. However, Card. A. Sodano, who had his plans
with him aiming at the covert liquidation of UGCC in Ukraine, saw not only about the removal of
suspension but also about his forcible promotion to the post of the head of UGCC.
     1b) In 1996 Fr. L. Husar illegally and by means of intrigues usurped the office of supreme
archbishop. This was protested by three UGCC metropolitans in the memorandum from 25th
November 1996 wherein they expressed the conviction of all UGCC bishops that the so-called
election of Card. L. Husar was lawless and therefore invalid. All this is fully grounded on the
documents in the book by Metropolitan S. Sulyk “How Stephen became Metropolitan” (Lviv 2001).
     2) Card. L. Husar is notoriously repeating in public that there is no difference between the
Catholic and the Orthodox Church. He claims that the Greek-Catholics are “Orthodox”, that means
members of the schismatic Church. (note: This is an intentional verbal and psychological
manipulation: the Greek word ortodoxos used in the holy liturgy to refer to the Catholic believers is
in the Church tradition and even nowadays translated into the Ukrainian language by the word
“pravovirnyj” (orthodox – truly believing); however, Card. L. Husar is purposefully pushing
through the schismatic translation, i.e. the word “pravoslavnyj”. But this word in Ukraine signifies a
member of the Orthodox, i.e. schismatic, Church.) He forces the priests to call the Greek-Catholic
believers in the holy liturgy that they are “Orthodox”. He is thus leading the UGCC believers into
conviction that there is no difference between the Catholic and the Orthodox Church and step by
step he is thus liquidating the Greek-Catholic identity.
      3) Card. L. Husar does not conceal his effort to introduce the celebration of the Eucharist in
common with the Orthodox Church. However, he is not aiming at the true unity in Christ and
preservation of identity but he is abusing ecumenism to erode the true faith and to liquidate UGCC!
      4) On 29th September 2005 in the interview for the Catholic News with a title “Ukrainian
Catholic leader wants single Christian patriarchate”, Card. L. Husar de facto made a challenge to
an apostasy from the Catholic Church when he said: “It is not essential that the patriarch of this
Church should be a Catholic. The single requirement for such a leader is that this patriarch should
be a man capable of uniting everyone…” In spite of a number of notices he has neither withdrawn
nor explained this statement of his up to this time.
      5) Theological and moral heresies in the book “Discussions with His Beatitude Lubomyr
Husar: On Postconfessional Christianity” by Antoine Arzhakovskyi, Lviv 2006, ISBN 966-8197-10-0
(translation from French original). Card. L. Husar:
           a) has a non-Catholic view of the infallibility and primacy of the Pope. By way of
              ambiguous and conflicting statements he obscures the true and clear contents of truth
              about the authority of St. Peter (pg. 57, 58, 59).
           b) the Union of Brest in 1596, when the unification of the Russian Church with Rome –
              that means the renewal of the Eastern Catholic Church – took place, is considered by
              Card. L. Husar a mistake and practically a wrong in the Church. He is thereby very
              much hurting and misorientating the common believers (pg. 45, 46, 25).
           c) his Christian faith is eroded by a gnostic view of some spiritual energies which he is
              identifying with a kind of radio-waves and he also does not believe in the eternal
              condemnation (pg. 61-63).
           d) he himself even admits that he occupies himself with divining by help of pendulum;
              however, he does not regard it as a sin against the first commandment (pg. 63).
           e) by his attitude he permits homosexual partnership and does not consider it a sin! (pg.
              67)
      6) Under the pretext of the Eastern tradition Card. L. Husar publicly ridicules the worship of the
Most Sacred Heart of our Lord and liquidates any living form of manifestation of one’s relationship
with Christ.
      7) The outrageous film “The Da Vinci Code” was prohibited in Russia and Byelorussia due to
the public attitude of the Church. The believers in Ukraine likewise wanted publicly to express their
disagreement. Everyone was aware of the fact that if the UGCC leadership would stand up against
the film, it would not be projected. Unfortunately, the believers were discouraged from any kind of
protest by priests who for fear shared unity with the attitude of Card. L. Husar. Those who in spite
of that protested either through demonstrations in Lviv or through written petitions, were announced
with a scoff: “Cardinal L. Husar approves of the projection of the film.”
      8) The public opinion of both believers and non-believers in Ukraine is that Card. L. Husar is a
Mason. That was also why he expressed himself as to this issue through the massmedia in
November 2003; he claimed that it was true that the name Lubomyr Husar could be found in the
register of the Masonic lodge in Paris; however, that it was not him but his close relative.
      9) In the days 13-20th September 2006 an UGCC synod took place in Lviv. On 19th September
2006 there were new UGCC bishops chosen at this synod by secret ballot out of the list of
candidates which according to CCEO can. 182 §3 was de facto made up by the supreme archbishop,
i.e. by Card. L Husar, and was then approved by “the Holy Father”, in reality by the Congregation
for the Oriental Churches and Card. A. Sodano.
      According to CCEO can. 182 §4 this approval is in force until its explicit revocation.
      Aware that his rule in the Church ends with 15th September 2006, Card. A. Sodano along with
Card. L. Husar saw to it that the list should include not a single converted priest with the Spirit of
Christ! This list of candidates for UGCC bishops is valid until this day and therefore it must be
cancelled. The plan of Card. L. Husar is to promote under his rule mainly these particular liberal
priests to the post of bishops: Fr. B. Gudzyak, Fr. I. Datsko, Fr. J. Milyan, Fr. H. Hrynkiv OSBM, Fr. T.
Senkiv.



    Pages answer to the Ukrainian version



                                                   2
      We also want to inform You that during the time of Your pontificate Card. L. Husar has put
through the appointment and consecration of several unworthy bishops. One is a supporter of the
teaching of Teilhard de Chardin and theology of liberation and the other is publicly known to have
an illegitimate child and to live a scandalous life (business, alcohol, fornication). Others have the
spirit of schism and New Age and all of them call the UGCC faithful “pravoslavnyj” (Orthodox),
i.e. members of the Orthodox schismatic Church.
      10) Abuse of Church authority by Card. L. Husar and his psychological manipulation of
secular power towards liquidation of the faithful:
          a) By the document LV 399/2003 dated 6th August 2004 Card. L. Husar secretly and
     illegally turned to state authorities (Regional Council Lviv and Security Service of Ukraine /SBU –
     secret police/) and transmitted to them personal data of 23 citizens of the Czech and Slovak
     Republics (without their consent), defamed them and required of the state authorities that these
     people (priests and religious) should either be deported or not permitted the entrance in Ukraine.
     This document is still valid. Six innocent persons have by now been afflicted in this way – they
     had their passports stamped with prohibition of entrance in Ukraine.
          b) Card. L. Husar is intentionally endorsing the conflict in the Buchach eparchy against
     Bishop I. Bilyk OSBM. Illegally and in secret he turned to the police by the document Prot. N.
     P 2004/143 dated 2nd March 2004 as well as to the deputy governor of the town of Ternopil by
     the document Prot. N. P 2004/144 dated 2nd March 2004 and to the chief judge of Lviv
     economic court of appeal by the document Prot. N. P 2004/605 dated 29th November 2004, and
     consciously in profound conflict with both the canon and the civil law he transmitted to these
     state authorities false information, demanding of them that on the basis of this false information
     they should unjustly harm Bishop I. Bilyk OSBM. Card. L. Husar was thus acting in complete
     disobedience to the Holy Father whose resolution concerning H.E. I. Bilyk OSBM was
     transmitted to Card. L. Husar by the Apostolic Nuncio in the document N. 4521/04 dated 4th
     February 2004!
              When more than 50 priests from the Buchach eparchy protested against this lawlessness
     of Card. L. Husar towards their bishop I. Bilyk OSBM and demanded a withdrawal of the false
     documents and reparation for the harm, Card. L. Husar called out an antiterroristic police body
     against them. This provoked a big scandal in the wide public.
              Card. L. Husar is acting in this way because Bishop Irynej Bilyk OSBM is the only
      faithful bishop now in Ukraine who is not in unity with the New Age line built up by Card. L.
      Husar.
     YOUR HOLINESS, WE DEMAND THAT FOR THESE CRIMES COMMITTED FROM
THE POSITION OF THE SUPREME CHURCH AND DIVINE AUTHORITY, WITH REGARD
TO THE COMMON GOOD OF THE CHURCH, CARD. L. HUSAR SHOULD BE JUDGED
AND PUNISHED WITH JUSTICE. In accordance with the canon law CCEO can. 1059 You
should either judge him Yourself or You should in person delegate the judges. Card. L. Husar
caused a big scandal among believers as well as non-believers, violated the faith of the little ones
and brought UGCC into a deep crisis and loss of identity! The manner and height of the punishment
is determined by You, Your Holiness. We just propose in humility that Card. L. Husar should be
withdrawn from the function of head of UGCC and deprived of the title of cardinal (viz CCEO can.
1436, 1448, 1460 and 1464). In patristic times it was quite normal that if the bishops or even the
patriarch trespassed against faith or morals and did thus harm to the Church, the Roman Bishop or
the Synod of Bishops withdrew them or deprived them of their title (e.g. Nestorius the Patriarch of
Constantinople /5th cent./).
     Your Holiness, if You keep silent on our accusation and refuse to judge Card. L. Husar, You
will thereby refuse to stand up for the “defenceless widow”! It is not only us who represent that
“widow”, it is first of all those little ones – thousands of nameless defenceless victims that are
spiritually killed through his scandals and through the system installed by him. Within the span of
10 years he has built up a hidden liquidation system in UGCC. If he is punished, this system will be
paralysed, too, and only then a recovery may come to the religious orders, to seminaries, to the
bishops’ synod and to the whole UGCC. If he is punished but his place is given to a person of the
same spiritual orientation, then the intentional decay of UGCC will end up in schism.


                                                   3
   IN THE SAME WAY AS VATICAN THROUGH CARD. A. SODANO FORCIBLY
INSTALLED L. HUSAR AND THUS INTRODUCED A NEW SYSTEM TOWARDS THE
DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCH, IN THE SAME WAY YOU MUST NOW “FORCIBLY”,
BUT TOWARDS THE RECOVERY OF THE CHURCH, INSTALL A PERSONALITY WITH
AN OPPOSITE SPIRIT, ONE THAT WILL BUILD UP A NEW RECOVERY SYSTEM.

    According to CCEO can. 1187 pt. 1 we demand:
       1) Prohibition against calling the faithful in the liturgy “pravoslavnyj” (Orthodox – i.e.
          schismatics).
       2) Cessation of the consecration of bishops chosen by Card. L. Husar.
       3) Revocation made by Card. L. Husar concerning the heretical teaching in the book:
          “Discussions with His Beatitude L. Husar – On Postconfessional Christianity”.
       4) Annulment of the secret and illegal decrees addressed to the state authorities.

    We propose:
       1) Withdrawal of Card. L. Husar from the office of the supreme archbishop of UGCC.
       2) Depriving him of the title of cardinal.

   With hope and deep respect, asking for Your help in the name of the bleeding members of
UGCC,
   in Christ Yours devoted
                Fr. Metoděj R. Špiřík ThD. OSBM
                Fr. Markian V. Hitiuk ThLic. OSBM
                Fr. Eliáš A. Dohnal ThD. OSBM
                                                                               Pidhirsti, 1st November 2006

Address: Monastery OSBM, 80660 Pidhirtsi, Brody district, Lviv region,Ukraine
         www.community.org.ua; community@catholic.org

P.S.: 1) We bring to Your attention that the liquidation activity of Card. L. Husar was and is supported and
           sheltered by the employees of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches as well as by the Apostolic
           Nuncio in Ukraine Mons. I. Yurkovych.
       2) In 1917 there was a promise in Fatima that the world-wide awakening of the Church is tied with the
           awakening in Russia. However, the awakening of Ukraine is a means to the awakening of Russia. Your
           Holiness, start the reform of UGCC in Ukraine and You will thereby open the door to the world-wide
           awakening and spiritual resurrection of the Church.


Copies:
   To all cardinals and bishops of the Catholic Church and to the UGCC faithful

Enclosure:
    1. Memorandum from 25th November 1996
    2. Letter by Card. L. Husar N. 399/2003 dated 6th August 2004
    3. Letter by Card. L. Husar Prot. N. P 2004/143 dated 2nd March 2004
    4. Letter by Card. L. Husar Prot N. P 2004/144 dated 2nd March 2004
    5. Letter by Card. L. Husar Prot N. P 2004/605 dated 29th November 2004
    6. Letter by the Apostolic Nuncio N. Eterovych N. 4521/04 dated 4th February 2004




                                                      4

								
To top