Comment Summation Sheet for Sec 616 Team Leader: Jim Brocksmith - mt Team Members: Vince Imhoff – cm Scott Stotlemeyer-mt Joe Rickman-tr Kirsten Munck-de Dan Smith-rd Kevin Irving-FHWA Jim Andrews-Safety Consultant AGC of Missouri Safety Committee Attachment Commenter and Number Company Name Comment Action Taken If No Action Taken, Explain Why 1 Bryce Gamblin - Looks good none N.A. CCO 2 Section 6184.108.40.206 – this section leaves Changed the first sentence to make Gerald Hitt- a lot to the judgment of the resident the order record optional rather than penzel.com engineer. Most of the time that is mandatory. okay. However, some of the inexperienced residents could readily make themselves a real pain. I believe it should be toned down, or a little better control by more than one person inserted. 3 Chris Jenkins – Section 616.3.3 – I do not see a none For consistency all workers in a work loch-lscc.com reason for an equipment operator zone should have vests on. working on a new concrete highway to wear a safety vest. Wording could be changed to All exposed construction-related personnel… 3 Chris Jenkins – Section 6220.127.116.11 – A letter of See action taken on Gerald Hitt’s loch-lscc.com documentation be sent to the prime comments. contractor specifying a time that the corrections be made and if not that liquidated damages will start. 3 Chris Jenkins – Section 616.5.1 – I assume that the none For consistency all vehicles in a work loch-lscc.com Amber Safety lights on the vehicles zone should have operating amber and equipment is meant for operations lights. in existing traffic and night time operations. I do not see any reason to have this on equipment that is 20, 30, 40 feet off of the existing highway. It would be a good thing to have these lights on the haul trucks! 4 Troy Hughes - de Section 616.4.4 – We should not be We agree and have revised 618.104.22.168 allowing road closures for the to incorporate total lane closures and contractor’s convenience. Although it have deleted 616.4.4. These closures must be approved by the engineer, it are intended to be for a duration of up alludes that we will let them without to several hours only and a public limiting the timeframe or without hearing should not be warranted. An much trouble. I would think if the example would be closing a road to contractor proposed a total road erect a bridge girder for 2 hours closure that it would be covered by versus head to head traffic for 3 622.214.171.124 and we would not need to weeks. have a specific paragraph for road closures. Also to keep in mind, the Proj. Development Manual 2-03.5 requires a public hearing for road closures and 2-03.11 requires commission approval of the design for projects with road closures. 4 Troy Hughes - de 616.7 – Will this cover all 3 of the none This section covers the operation of CMS JSP’s. If not, the team should the CMS regardless of who owns the consider. unit. 4 Troy Hughes - de 616.9.6 – Is this only for required Modified 616.9.6 to include the nighttime work, if so we should phrase “When specified in the specify that it is only for required contract…” Added a 616 pay item night time work. Also there is not a for work zone lighting. pay item in the list. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #1 – 616.3.1. To strike Removed language “manufactured manufactured for traffic control specifically for traffic control purposes. purposes..” 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #2 – 616.3.3 Concerns None Division 100 already states that the requirement for Class 2 apparel. contractor shall know and observe all laws pertaining to contract work including local and national codes. Regardless of OSHA requirements one of the main priorities for MoDOT is to increase safety in work zones. This attire including class 2 will be required for both daytime and nighttime work. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #3 – 6126.96.36.199 Clarified by adding the word permanent. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #4 – 616.4.2 None Already covered by 616.3.1 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #5 – 6188.8.131.52 none Wording provided by CCO. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #6 – 6184.108.40.206 Changed the first sentence to make the order record optional rather than mandatory. See attachment 2 also. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #7 – 616.4.3 none Construction will maintain a list of approved organizations. 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #8 – 616.4.4 Added the phrase “or appurtenances” to clarify we do not pay for any flagger equipment. Moved the payment sentence to basis of payment 5 Luke Coltrane - de Comment #9 – 616.9.4 Added the phrase “or services” to 616.4.2 to clarify that law enforcement services could be added at a later date..
Pages to are hidden for
"Section 1001 Performance Related Specification"Please download to view full document