1 1 Constitutional Interpretation and the Incorporation Function of the 14th  Incorporation Doctrine (2/1)  MODERN Incorporation Doctrine (5/1) Substantive Due Process: Property  B) Economic Due Process (6/2):  “Public Need Theory” (7/2) Substantive Due Process: Right to Privacy  General Privacy Cases (9/3)  Penumbra Right to Privacy (10/3):  General Abortion Regulation Cases (13/3).  B(1) – Cases involving the definition of viability (13/3)  B(2) – General Regulations Intended to discourage but not prohibit abortion (14/3)  B(3) Abortion funding (16/4)  (4) Juvenile Abortion (18/4)  C) Non-Abortion Privacy Cases (19/4)  C(1) Family Rights Cases (19/4)  C(2) Funding Cases (20/4):  C(3) Sexual Freedom (20/4)  C(4) Cohabitation (22/4)  C(5) Harmless Liberties (22/5)  C(6) Non-Sex Cases –Does (23/5)  C(7) Sub due process Right to Die cases (23/5) Procedural Due Process  B) Modern Procedural Due Process/prop interests (25/6)  C) Liberty interests (26/6)  C(1) Classic kind = bodily integrity interest (26/6)  C(2) Prison Cases (26/6)  C(3) Civil Commitment /Indefinite Commitment w/o commiting a crime (27/6  C(4) Reputation Cases (liberty interest) (27/6)  C(5) Family rights cases (28/7  D. State of Mind Req’ment for Liberty or Property Interest Procedural Due Process (28/7)  Due Process Summary (29/7)  What process is Due? (29/7)  F) Relevance of Existing State Remedies (30/7)  G) Do immigrants or non-citizens receive due process? (31/7)  H) Punitive damages (Gey says this is procedural dp, but court likes to call it sub due process) 31/7 o Grading /Academic Cases – can u sue Gey? NO (31/7) EQUAL PROTECTION – Still in 14th, but now EP as opposed to Due Process Clause of 14th  Civil Rights Laws (32/9)  2) Race Cases – How Courts have reduced the statutes (33/9)  Rev incorporation – (35/9)  Limitations on School Busing Decrees (36/10)  Dissolutions Cases (37/10)  Universities (38/10)  VII) Intent Req’ment (38/10) o Overt discrimination based on race (39/10 o Facially neutral statutes premised on racial bigotry (39/10). o Facially neutral stats w/no evidence of bigotry in enacting the stat BUT STAT ADMINISTERED IN A WAY THAT MAKES IT DISCRIMINATORY(39/10  What is intent (40/11)?  The FRAMEWORK FOR THINGS TO LOOK FOR TO FIND AN IMPERMISSIBLE INTENT UNDER (46/11) 2 2 § 5 of 14th and Boerne /Katzenback  Narrative (41/12)  Post-Boerne Cases dealing w/what is congruent and proportional 42/12)  FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (43/12):  B) EP Political Participation Cases (44/12) Affirmative Action  1st Education Case (45/14)  AA Employment and Set-Asides (47/14)  Quota Approved (48/14):  MAIN STANDARD FOR AA IN SET-ASIDE and K CASES (49/14)(cases outside of education  Back to EDUCATION AA (49/14)  MI CASES (50/14  GENDER AA CASES (51/15)  ***LAUNDRY LIST OF THINGS TO DO TO ATTACK OR JUSTIFY AA (51/15)  Rational Basis – Easy for Gvt to Win (51/15)  A WINNER (52/15)  GENDER AA CASES (53/15)  ROMANTIC PATERNALISM CRAP (53/15)  GENDER /REMEDIAL AA RATIONALE (55/16): (see Webster directly above too)  LIMITS ON THE GENDER DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE (OBSTACLES TO Ps) (55/16)  INTENT (55/16)  Single-Sex Education (56/16) First Amendment  THE MODERN ERA ---WHAM (61/17)  TWO TRACK ANALYSIS (62/17)  PIGEONHOLES ways to get around Brandenburg (threats and teaching speech).(62/17)  USSC NONSENSE (63/17)  B) TEACHING SPEECH (63/18)  Another Variation on ADVOCACY Theme (64/18)  OVERBREADTH /FIGHTING WORDS /VAGUENESS DOCTRINES (65/18)  B) Vagueness Doctrine (65/18)  C) FIGHTING WORDS (65/18)  PRIOR RESTRAINTS (66/18)  FLAG BURNING (67/18)  MOTIVE (67/19))