Herbicides and Herbicide Degradation Products in Upper by tii10203

VIEWS: 65 PAGES: 11

									      Herbicides and Herbicide Degradation Products in Upper Midwest Agricultural
                      Streams during August Base-Flow Conditions
           Stephen J. Kalkhoff,* Kathy E. Lee, Stephen D. Porter, Paul J. Terrio, and E. Michael Thurman


                          ABSTRACT                                               of the Midwest generally decrease through summer due
   Herbicide concentrations in streams of the U.S. Midwest have been             to degradation and flushing from the soils. However,
shown to decrease through the growing season due to a variety of                 factors that affect the occurrence of herbicide com-
chemical and physical factors. The occurrence of herbicide degrada-              pounds in small- to medium-sized streams during late
tion products at the end of the growing season is not well known.                summer base-flow conditions in the upper Midwest have
This study was conducted to document the occurrence of commonly                  not been thoroughly documented.
used herbicides and their degradation products in Illinois, Iowa, and               Atrazine degrades through a combination of physical,
Minnesota streams during base-flow conditions in August 1997. Atra-              chemical, and biological processes. The three major
zine, the most frequently detected herbicide (94%), was present at               degradation products of atrazine are deethylatrazine
relatively low concentrations (median 0.17 g L 1). Metolachlor was
                                                                                 (DEA), deisoproplyatrazine (DIA), and hydroxy-atra-
detected in 59% and cyanazine in 37% of the samples. Seven of
nine compounds detected in more than 50% of the samples were
                                                                                 zine (HA). Deisoproplyatrazine and DEA form primar-
degradation products. The total concentration of the degradation                 ily through biological processes in the soil (Kaufman
products (median of 4.4 g L 1) was significantly greater than the                and Kearney, 1970). Adams and Thurman (1991) sug-
total concentration of parent compounds (median of 0.26 g L 1).                  gest that the presence of increased DEA concentrations
Atrazine compounds were present less frequently and in significantly             is primarily due to a large number of microbes, high
smaller concentrations in streams draining watersheds with soils devel-          organic carbon content, and relatively warm soil tem-
oped on less permeable tills than in watersheds with soils developed             peratures. Hydroxy-atrazine forms primarily through
on more permeable loess. The detection and concentration of triazine             chemical hydrolysis (Armstrong et al., 1967) and binds
compounds was negatively correlated with antecedent rainfall (April–             to soils with high organic matter and low pH. Mesocosm
July). In contrast, acetanalide compounds were positively correlated
                                                                                 studies (Lee et al., 1995) indicated that atrazine in the
with antecedant rainfall in late spring and early summer that may
transport the acetanalide degradates into ground water and subse-
                                                                                 aquatic environment degraded more rapidly in the pres-
quently into nearby streams. The distribution of atrazine degradation            ence of emergent vegetation (cattail [Typha spp.]) than
products suggests regional differences in atrazine degradation pro-              in open water.
cesses.                                                                             Substantially less research has been conducted on
                                                                                 the degradation of chloroacetanilide herbicides such as
                                                                                 acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor. Although the ap-
                                                                                 plication of chloroacetanilide herbicides has, at times,
T     he Corn Belt region of the U.S. Midwest is one
     of the most intensive and productive agricultural
regions in the world. Nearly 80% of the USA’s corn
                                                                                 exceeded that of the triazine herbicides in parts of the
                                                                                 Midwest (Meyerfeld et al., 1996), the occurrence of the
(Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is                            chloroacetanilide herbicides has been substantially
grown in the region and more than 100 000 Mg of pesti-                           lower than triazine herbicides in surface water (Burkart
cides are applied to cropland in the Midwest annually                            and Kolpin, 1993; Thurman et al., 1992). Chloroacetani-
(Battaglin and Goolsby, 1999). Intensive use of agricul-                         lide herbicides degrade more rapidly than atrazine
tural chemicals may result in nonpoint-source contami-                           (Buhler et al., 1993; Miller et al., 1997), thus reducing
nation of surface and ground water throughout the Mid-                           their potential transport to ground water or streams.
west. Results of studies conducted during the past                               Complete breakdown for all compounds, however, has
decade indicate that large amounts of herbicides are                             not been established (Stamper et al., 1997; Miller et
washed from cropland and transported into tributary                              al., 1997). Relatively stable and persistent intermediate
streams of major rivers of the Midwest during periods                            herbicide degradation products occur for these chloro-
of rainfall in late spring and early summer (Thurman                             acetanilide herbicides. Research has identified an
et al., 1991, 1992; Coupe et al., 1995; Battaglin and Gool-                      alachlor degradation product, alachlor ethanesulfonic
sby, 1999). Following spring runoff of herbicides, con-                          acid (alachlor ESA), found in both ground water and
centrations of parent compounds in streams and rivers                            surface water (Kolpin et al., 1996, 1997; Thurman et al.,
                                                                                 1996). Field and Thurman (1996) suggest that alachlor
                                                                                 ESA may be the result of a glutathione conjugation
S.J. Kalkhoff, U.S. Geological Survey, 400 S. Clinton St., Rm. 269,              process occurring in plants, algae, and terrestrial micro-
Iowa City, IA 52244. K.E. Lee, U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale              organisms. Additionally, it is hypothesized that mobile
Dr., Mounds View, MN 55112. S.D. Porter, U.S. Geological Survey,
Denver Federal Center, Box 25046, MS 406, Lakewood, CO 80225-
                                                                                 sulfonated and nonsulfonated degradation products of
0046. P.J. Terrio, U.S. Geological Survey, 221 N. Broadway Ave.,                 other chloroacetanilide herbicides may result from this
Suite 101, Urbana, IL 61801. E.M. Thurman, U.S. Geological Survey,               glutathione conjugation pathway (Aga et al., 1994; Field
4821 Quail Crest Pl., Lawrence, KS 66049. Received 12 Feb. 2002.
*Corresponding author (sjkalkho@usgs.gov).
                                                                                 Abbreviations: DEA, deethylatrazine; DIA, deisoproplyatrazine;
Published in J. Environ. Qual. 32:1025–1035 (2003).                              ESA, ethanesulfonic acid; HA, hydroxy-atrazine; OA, oxanilic acid.

                                                                          1025
1026                                     J. ENVIRON. QUAL., VOL. 32, MAY–JUNE 2003


and Thurman, 1996; Thurman et al., 1996). Outdoor               need to understand how geological and climatological
mesocosm studies (Graham et al., 1999) have shown               factors affect the transport of pesticides to streams and
that alachlor and metolachlor were transformed to etha-         how they affect breakdown of these compounds.
nasulfonic (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OA) degradation                The purpose of this paper is to document the occur-
products. Alachlor OA is the more prominent break-              rence of commonly used triazine and chloroacetanilide
down product of alachlor and OA and ESA degradates              herbicides and their degradates in streams draining ag-
of metolachlor are formed in more equal proportions             ricultural watersheds in southern Minnesota, eastern
in aquatic systems (Graham et al., 1999). Recent studies        Iowa, and central Illinois during base-flow conditions
(Kalkhoff et al., 1998; Phillips et al., 1999) have shown       in August 1997. The occurrence of the pesticides and
that the relatively stable and soluble chloroacetanilide        pesticide degradates are related to differences in soils
ESA and OA degradation products are commonly de-                in the watersheds and to differences in amount of rain-
tected in streams.                                              fall during the growing season. The results presented
   Soils are an important factor in transformation and          in this paper are one part of the U.S. Geological Sur-
transport of triazine and chloroacetanilide herbicides in       vey’s National Water Quality Assessment Program’s
the environment. Physical and chemical characteristics          (NAWQA) Midwest Regional Synoptic Study (Soren-
of soils influence the breakdown of pesticides and their        son et al., 1999).
movement to ground water and nearby streams. Al-                   In Minnesota, the study area selected was the Minne-
though deethylatrazine accounts for only a small part           sota River basin of the Upper Mississippi River basin
of atrazine degradates, it is a significant compound in         NAWQA study unit (Stark, 1994). The study area in
surface water because of its selective removal from soil        Iowa incorporated the entire Eastern Iowa basins
(Thurman et al., 1996). Hydroxy-atrazine is bound more          NAWQA study unit (Kalkhoff, 1994). These basins in-
tightly to the soil (Lerch et al., 1998) and may be trans-      cluded the Wapsipinicon, Cedar, Iowa, and Skunk Riv-
ported to streams by soil erosion due to rainfall runoff.       ers. The study area in Illinois included the Lower Illinois
Fine-grained soils favor the transport of metolachlor           River basin NAWQA study unit (Warner, 1998).
ESA over metolachlor and metolachlor OA (Phillips et
al., 1999).
                                                                            MATERIALS AND METHODS
   Soil permeability may influence the delivery of water
and pesticides to streams and affects runoff and base-             Candidate sites (Fig. 1) were selected on streams at the
flow conditions. Dissolved pesticides may reach streams         mouth of watersheds that ranged from 150 to 2700 km2 and
through runoff or through ground water discharge into           are located in each of three NAWQA study units (Upper
the stream depending on soil texture and slope. Pesti-          Mississippi River basin, Eastern Iowa basins, and Lower Illi-
                                                                nois River basin). In Minnesota, 24 sites were selected in
cides may reach the stream through adsorption to sedi-
                                                                watersheds located in the Minnesota River basin. Twenty-five
ment and subsequent transport to the stream. Areas              subwatersheds were located in the Wapsipinicon, Cedar, Iowa,
with well-drained soils may have a greater potential            and Skunk Rivers in the Eastern Iowa basins. Twenty-one
for herbicide infiltration of more soluble compounds            sites were selected in the Lower Illinois River basin. Water-
(Larson et al., 1997; Burkart et al., 1999) into ground         sheds with more than 75% agricultural land use were targeted
water and subsequent transport to streams through               for selection (Sorenson et al., 1999).
ground water discharge. In contrast, areas with poorly             Soils in the study area generally are moderately to poorly
drained soils have reduced infiltration to ground water         permeable and were formed from glacially derived material.
and subsequently provide more runoff to streams.                Predominant soil parent materials, based on the USDA (1981)
Poorly drained soils may be more vulnerable to erosion,         Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA), are shown in Fig. 1.
however, providing more particulate forms of contami-              The most recent glaciation of Wisconsinan age deposited
                                                                calcareous clay-rich tills from central and southern Minnesota
nants and sediments to enter streams. Areas with poorly
                                                                into central Iowa. These deposits are commonly referred to
drained soils in the Midwest that result from high water        as the Des Moines Lobe. Another glacial lobe moved into
tables due to low relief are typically tile-drained to in-      northeastern Illinois. Soil properties can be extremely variable
crease drainage. Because tile drains facilitate drainage        in a watershed, but these areas contain a large proportion of
from agricultural fields to the stream, they may short-         poorly drained soils that were generally developed on till
circuit the mitigating effects of subsurface flow through       deposits. The Minnesota River basin and the northern part
riparian soils and buffer strips and serve as point sources     of the Eastern Iowa basins are in three MLRAs: Rolling Till
of contaminants (Moorman et al., 1999).                         Prairie (MLRA 102A), Central Iowa and Minnesota Till Prai-
   Although soils may be an important factor in the             ries (MLRA 103), and the Eastern Iowa and Minnesota Till
transformation and transport of triazine and chloroacet-        Prairie (MLRA 104). The eastern part of the Lower Illinois
anilide herbicides, few studies have documented the             River basin is in the Northern Illinois and Indiana Heavy Till
relation between soil characteristics in the watershed          Plain (MLRA 110).
                                                                   Older Pre-Illinoian glacial deposits have been eroded and
and the presence of pesticide degradates in nearby
                                                                leached for a longer period and are generally covered by a
streams. Transport of herbicides to streams is of concern       thicker layer of wind-blown loess in southern Iowa and west-
because these compounds may potentially affect aquatic          ern Illinois (Fehrenbacher et al., 1968; Anderson, 1983). Mod-
communities (Fairchild et al., 1998, Hartgers et al., 1998)     erately permeable soils were developed on these loess depos-
and drinking water supplies. Therefore, there is a need         its. The southern part of the study area in Iowa and a large
to better understand the persistence and transformation         part of the Illinois study area is in the Illinois and Iowa Deep
of heavily used herbicides the Midwest. There is also a         Loess and Drift (MLRA 108). Areas adjacent to the Lower
                               KALKHOFF ET AL.: HERBICIDES IN MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURAL STREAMS                                            1027




Fig. 1. Sampling sites and predominant soil parent materials in the study area.

Illinois River and its major tributaries are in the Central Missis-           Stream discharge at the time of sample collection in August
sippi Valley Wooded Slopes (MLRA 115).                                     reflected the precipitation that fell during late spring and sum-
    Differences between till and loess soil permeability may               mer. Discharge in southern Minnesota streams ranged from
be mitigated to some extent by the presence of tile drains.                near to substantially greater than the long-term average (Mit-
Generally, where tile drains are present, water that has leached           ton et al., 1998) during the sampling period. In contrast,
through the soil moves faster to nearby streams than in areas              streamflow in Iowa and Illinois ranged from less than 10 to
without subsurface drainage.                                               more than 50% of the long-term August monthly mean during
    Rainfall was greatest in the northern part of the study area           the sampling period (May et al., 1998; Wicker et al., 1998).
(Minnesota River basin) and decreased southeast through the                   Abundant rainfall and fertile soils are conducive to row-
Eastern Iowa basins and Lower Illinois River basin during                  crop agriculture in the study area. Corn and soybean are the
the three months before sampling (Sorenson et al., 1999).                  main crops (median of 75% of the watersheds is planted in
Rainfall generally increased in the Minnesota River basin and,             corn and soybean; Sorenson et al., 1999) with corn comprising
in contrast, decreased in the Lower Illinois River basin from              slightly greater than 50% and soybean slightly less than 50%
May through July (Mitton et al., 1998). July rainfall was signifi-         of the cropped area. Although the amount of each watershed
cantly less in the Eastern Iowa basins and the Lower Illinois              planted in corn was not significantly different, the subbasins
River basin than in the Minnesota River basin, with total                  sampled in the Minnesota River basin had a small but statisti-
amounts ranging from less than 130 mm to more than 400 mm                  cally significantly greater amount of soybean acres than in the
during the period of May through July (Sorenson et al., 1999).             sampled Eastern Iowa and Lower Illinois River subbasins.
This rainfall pattern resulted in watersheds with predomi-                    Herbicides used to control competing vegetation in corn
nantly till parent material having significantly greater rain              and soybean vary by state and may vary by soil parent material.
than watersheds with predominantly loess parent material                   Atrazine and cyanazine were used on substantially less crop
(Table 1).                                                                 area and at a substantially lower rate in Minnesota than in

Table 1. Hydrologic conditions at sites on streams draining selected agricultural watersheds in the U.S. Midwest, August 1997.
                                                                                                      Rainfall during the 90 d before sampling†
Predominant
parent soil material           Sites              Drainage area†              Streamflow†            May                June               July
                                                          2                        3      1
                                                       km                         m s                                   mm
Till                             43                    448                         0.93               100               130                120
Loess                            27                    587                         0.28               89                84                 50
† Median values.
1028                                              J. ENVIRON. QUAL., VOL. 32, MAY–JUNE 2003


Table 2. Use of selected triazine and chloroacetanilide herbicides on corn and soybean in Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota, 1997.†
                                                Iowa                                     Illinois                                  Minnesota
                                                       Percent crop                                 Percent crop                           Percent crop
Herbicide         Crop      Application rate           area applied   Application rate              area applied    Application rate       area applied
                                            1                                        1                                             1
                               kg a.i. ha                  %            kg a.i. ha                      %             kg a.i. ha               %
Acetochlor       corn             2.13                     28              2.32                         29               1.28                  29
Alachlor         corn             2.57                       2             2.57                           1              2.23                    1
Alachlor         soybean            –                       –                –                           –               3.06                    4
Atrazine         corn             1.10                     72              1.31                         79               0.68                  35
Cyanazine        corn             2.71                     16              2.52                         15               1.28                    6
Metribuzin       soybean          0.27                       1             0.21                         13               0.39                    2
Metolachlor      corn             2.48                     43              2.40                         31               3.07                  22
Metolachlor      soybean          3.13                       2             2.81                           4              2.29                    5
Simazine         corn               –                       –              1.56                           2                –                    –
† USDA (1998).


Iowa and Illinois in 1997 (Table 2). Metolachlor is used on                                             Laboratory Analysis
more crop area in Iowa than in Illinois and Minnesota. Data
shown in Table 2 are state-wide averages and probably are                    The U.S. Geological Survey’s Organic Geochemistry Re-
the best available data, but do not necessarily represent the             search Laboratory (OGRL) in Lawrence, Kansas, analyzed
usage rates in each watershed. Several reports suggest that               water samples. The parent compounds (ametryn, atrazine,
                                                                          alachlor, acetochlor, cyanzine, metolachlor, metribuzin, pro-
herbicides are not uniformly applied within each state. Fallon
                                                                          meton, prometryn, propachlor, propazine, simazine, and ter-
et al. (1997) illustrated that atrazine use (on a county level)
                                                                          butryn) and the triazine degradation compounds (cyanazine-
increased from northwest to southeast in the Minnesota River
                                                                          amide, deethylatrazine, and deisoproplyatrazine) (Table 2)
basin. Stoltenberg and Pope (1990) reported that atrazine was
                                                                          were analyzed with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
applied to only 25% of the corn in north-central Iowa in
                                                                          following extraction on C18 cartridges (Meyer et al., 1993;
contrast to 69% of the corn in southeastern Iowa during the
                                                                          Thurman et al., 1990; Zimmerman and Thurman, 1999). The
1980s. Application rates also were less in north-central Iowa in
                                                                          analytical reporting limit for this method was 0.05 g L 1 for
areas with lower-permeability till soils that contained greater
                                                                          all compounds. Six chloroacetanilide herbicide degradation
organic carbon content because of farmers’ concern that “car-
                                                                          products (acetochlor ESA, acetochlor OA, alachlor ESA,
ryover” of atrazine residues in soils may damage soybean.
                                                                          alachlor OA, metolachlor ESA, and metolachlor OA) and the
Although data are not available, the concern for atrazine car-            atrazine degradate (hydroxy-atrazine) (Table 3) were ana-
ryover also may result in reduced application rates by farmers            lyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
in areas of Minnesota and Illinois with till soils. Atrazine use          following solid-phase extraction on C18 cartridges (Ferrer et
data reported in Minnesota (Table 2) appear to reflect this               al., 1998; Zimmerman et al., 2000). Approximately 5% of the
pattern. Also, in response to the detection of atrazine in                samples were verified with HPLC–MS using the method of
ground water, atrazine management areas were established                  Ferrer et al. (1998). This combination of methods was able to
in northeastern Iowa in areas where bedrock aquifers are close            clearly distinguish between alachlor ESA and acetochlor ESA
to landsurface (Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land                   in the samples. The analytical reporting limit for this method
Stewardship, 1999). No more than 1.7 kg of atrazine per hect-             was 0.2 g L 1.
are may be applied per year in these management areas. Pesti-                Although the analytical reporting limits for the parent com-
cide use data suggest that farmers alternatively applied                  pounds and three atrazine degradation products were four
alachlor, metolachlor, and most recently acetochlor to control            times lower (0.05 versus 0.20 g L 1) than the acetanalide
competing vegetation in pesticide-management areas.                       degradation products under investigation, the uncensored data
                                                                          were used when comparing the frequencies of detection among
                     Sample Collection                                    compounds. Loss of a substantial amount of data would occur
                                                                          if a common detection threshold of 0.20 g L 1 were used to
   Sampling for analysis of pesticides and pesticide degradates           compute the frequency of detection for a compound. The
took place concurrently in the three National Water-Quality               result may be an underestimation of the frequency of detection
Assessment Program study units during August 1997. Sam-                   of the acetanalide degradation products in relation to the parent
pling methods are described in detail by Sorenson et al. (1999)           compounds. Although not known, lower analytical detection
and are briefly summarized here. Water was collected with a               limits probably would have increased the frequency of detection
depth-integrated sampler at 5 to 10 verticals equally spaced              for the degradate compounds. Also, because frequency of detec-
across the stream or river (Edwards and Glysson, 1988; Ward               tions of the degradation products generally were greater than
and Harr, 1990; Shelton, 1994) to integrate vertical and hori-            the parent compounds (see Results), the patterns of detection
zontal water quality variability. Samples were then filtered              would not have been changed with lower frequency of detec-
through baked glass-fiber filters with a nominal 0.7- m pore              tions but probably would have been strengthened.
diameter to remove suspended particulate matter (Shelton,
1994). Following field processing, all samples were immedi-
ately chilled (placed in a cooler with wet ice) for shipment to                                               Data Analysis
the analytical laboratories. Sampling and filtering equipment                Data from all 70 sites were used in summarizing the occur-
were decontaminated between samples by washing in a deter-                rence of the herbicide compounds. Because of the nonnormal
gent solution, rinsing with deionized water, and finally rinsing          distribution of the data, comparison between groups of data
with methanol. After air-drying, the equipment was stored in              was made with the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test and
plastic bags or wrapped in aluminum foil in preparation for               correlations between constituents were made with the Spear-
transport to the next sampling site (Shelton, 1994).                      man’s Rho test (Helsel and Hirsch, 1992).
                               KALKHOFF ET AL.: HERBICIDES IN MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURAL STREAMS                                            1029

Table 3. Herbicides and herbicide degradation products analyzed.
Common name                                                    Chemical name                                            Use or origin
Acetochlor                      2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)acetamide                  herbicide
Acetochlor ethanesulfonic       2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(ethoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoethane sulfonic acid      herbicide degradate (acetochlor)
  acid (acetochlor ESA)
Acetochlor oxanilic acid        2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(ethoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoacetic acid               herbicide degradate (acetochlor)
  (acetochlor OA)
Alachlor                        2-chloro-2 -6 -diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)-acetanilide                           herbicide
Alachlor ethanesulfonic acid    2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(methoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoethane sulfonic acid          herbicide degradate (alachlor)
  (alachlor ESA)
Alachlor oxanilic acid          2-[(2,6-diethylphenyl)(methoxymethyl)amino]-2-oxoacetic acid                   herbicide degradate (alachlor)
  (alachlor OA)
Ametryn                         2-(ethylamino)-4-isopropylamino-6-methyl-thio-s-triazine                       herbicide
Atrazine                        2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine                              herbicide
Deethylatrazine (DEA)           2-amino-4-chloro-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine                                 herbicide degradate (atrazine,
                                                                                                                 propazine)
Deisopropylatrazine (DIA)       2-amino-4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazine                                     herbicide degradate (atrazine,
                                                                                                                 cyanazine, simazine)
Hydroxy-atrazine (HA)           2-hydroxy-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine                         herbicide degradate (atrazine)
Cyanazine                       2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methyl propionitrile   herbicide
Cyanazine-amide                 2-chloro-4-(1-carbamoyl-1-methyl-ethylamino)-6-ethylamino-s-triazine           herbicide degradate (cyanazine)
Metolachlor                     2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methyl                      herbicide
                                  ethyl)acetamide
Metolachlor ethanesulfonic      2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)amino]-2- oxoethanesul-    herbicide degradate
  acid (metolachlor ESA)          fonic acid                                                                     (metolachlor)
Metolachlor oxanilic acid       2-[(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)amino]-2- oxoacetic acid   herbicide degradate
  (metolachlor OA)                                                                                               (metolachlor)
Metribuzin                      4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H )-one          herbicide
Prometon                        2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-methyoxy-s-triazine                                  herbicide
Prometryn                       2,4-bis(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine                              herbicide
Propachlor                      2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide                                                herbicide
Propazine                       2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine                                    herbicide
Simazine                        2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine                                        herbicide
Terbutryn                       2-tert-butylamino-4-ethylamino-6-methylthio-s-triazine                         herbicide


                             RESULTS                                         roads, rights-of-way, and industrial sites that may be
                                                                             susceptible to erosion. Although its total use is probably
   Because of their chemical and physical properties,
                                                                             substantially less than other herbicides in the Midwest,
commonly used triazine and chloroacetanilide herbi-
                                                                             prometon is much more persistent (aerobic soil half-life
cides were expected to degrade by biological and chemi-
                                                                             is 932 d) and is commonly applied at substantially greater
cal processes through the growing season. Degradation
                                                                             rates (Capel et al., 1999). Simazine is used for agricul-
should be evident by the presence (or absence) of herbi-
                                                                             tural purposes, but it also commonly occurs in samples
cide compounds in rivers and streams that drain agricul-
                                                                             with prometon (Gilliom et al., 1999), suggesting an ur-
tural areas of the Midwest. Degradation should also
                                                                             ban or nonagricultural source.
be reflected in the amount of the parent compound in
                                                                                Seven of nine compounds detected in greater than
relation to degradation compounds. The concentration
                                                                             50% of the samples were herbicide degradation prod-
of degradate compounds in streams may be influenced                          ucts (Table 4). Metolachlor degradation products were
by conditions in the watershed, such as soil properties                      two of the four most commonly detected degradation
and rainfall, that affect breakdown and transport. Dilu-                     products. Metolachlor ESA was detected in 96% of the
tion by ground water free of pesticides also will influence                  samples and was detected more often than any other
degradate concentrations.                                                    compound. Metolachlor OA was detected in 80% of
   During the study, both triazine and chloracetanalide                      the samples. Surprisingly, alachlor ESA, a degradate of
residues (parent plus degradation products) were de-                         a herbicide that has low use and that was not detected
tected at the 70 sites in the upper Midwest in August                        in the streams, was the second-most commonly detected
1997 (Table 4). Among all sites, 6 parent compounds                          compound. The frequent presence of alachlor ESA in
and 10 degradation products were detected. Ametryn,                          these streams may be the legacy of the heavy historical
alachlor, metribuzin, prometryn, propachlor, propazine,                      use of alachlor (Meyerfeld et al., 1996). The four triazine
and terbutryn were not detected at the 0.05 g L 1 level                      degradation products were detected in 41 to 81% of the
and, with the exception of alachlor, are not discussed                       samples (Table 4).
in the remainder of this report. The frequency of detec-                        Concentrations of parent compounds were generally
tion of the parent compounds was similar to use:                             low, ranging from less than 0.05 to 1.5 g L 1, and did not
atrazine     metolachlor      cyanazine. Atrazine, meto-                     exceed established drinking water standards (USEPA,
lachlor, and cyanazine were the most frequently de-                          2000). Several pesticides analyzed do not have estab-
tected herbicides and were present in 94, 59, and 37%                        lished standards. With two exceptions, atrazine and pro-
of the samples, respectively. Although not listed among                      meton, the parent compounds were present at concen-
the most heavily used herbicides (USDA, 1998), pro-                          trations less than 1.0 g L 1. Median concentrations
meton and simazine were detected in 16 and 7% of the                         were less than the analytical reporting limit for all parent
samples, respectively. Prometon is generally used to                         compounds except atrazine (0.17 g L 1) and meto-
control vegetation in noncrop areas that include paved                       lochlor (0.06 g L 1).
1030                                               J. ENVIRON. QUAL., VOL. 32, MAY–JUNE 2003


Table 4. Statistical summary of herbicide compounds in 70 agricultural streams of the U.S. Midwest, August 1997.
                                              Frequency
Compound                                     of detection         Minimum           25th percentile   Median       75th percentile   Maximum
                                                                                                               1
                                                  %                                                    gL
                                                                  Parent compounds
Acetochlor                                          6               0.05†                 0.05          0.05             0.05          0.21
Alachlor                                            0               0.05                  0.05          0.05             0.05          0.05
Atrazine                                          94                0.05                  0.10          0.17             0.28          1.5
Cyanazine                                         37                0.05                  0.05          0.05             0.09          0.64
Metolachlor                                       59                0.05                  0.05          0.06             0.11          0.42
Prometon                                          16                0.05                  0.05          0.05             0.05          1.4
Simazine                                           7                0.05                  0.05          0.05             0.05          0.20
                                                                 Degradate compounds
Acetochlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA)              67                0.20                  0.20          0.33             0.50          1.6
Acetochlor oxanilic acid (OA)                     40                0.02                  0.20          0.20             0.34          1.4
Alachlor ESA                                      84                0.20                  0.26          0.58             1.2           3.5
Alachlor OA                                       23                0.20                  0.20          0.20             0.2           0.54
Cyanazine-amide                                   41                0.05                  0.05          0.05             0.10          1.2
Deethylatrazine                                   81                0.05                  0.05          0.09             0.12          0.39
Deisopropylatrazine                               74                0.05                  0.05          0.07             0.12          0.36
Hydroxy-atrazine                                  60                0.20                  0.20          0.28             0.69          8.8
Metolachlor ESA                                   96                0.20                  1.0           1.7              3.0           6.7
Metolachlor OA                                    80                0.20                  0.24          0.34             0.66          1.3
† The   symbol indicates values less than analytical reporting limit indicated.

   Degradate concentrations ranged from less than 0.2                             summed concentrations of the degradation products in
to 8.8 g L 1. The ethanesulfonic acid degradation prod-                           each sample (4.4 g L 1) was almost 17 times greater
ucts were generally present in greater concentration                              than the median value for the summed concentrations
than the triazine degradation products. In addition to                            of the parent pesticides (0.26 g L 1). During the study,
being detected most frequently, metolachlor ESA was                               multiple herbicide compounds were commonly detected
present in the greatest concentration (median of 1.7 g                            in each stream. Multiple parent herbicide compounds
L 1). With the exception of alachlor ESA (0.58 g L 1),                            were detected in 70% of the samples and multiple degra-
median concentrations of the remaining compounds                                  date compounds were detected in all samples. The me-
were less than 0.35 g L 1.                                                        dian number of parent pesticide compounds detected in
   Metolachlor and its degradation products were the                              the samples was two and the median number of pesticide
prevalent pesticide compounds (by mass) in streams in                             degradation products detected in the samples was seven.
the Midwest in August 1997. On average, greater than                                 The composition of the chloroacetanilide residue was
50% of the total pesticide residue (by mass) consisted                            substantially different than the composition of the tri-
of metolachlor compounds (parent and degradation                                  azine residues in August 1997. Chloroacetanilide com-
products). Alachlor and atrazine compounds each con-                              pounds in the streams consisted almost exclusively of
tributed about 14%, acetochlor about 9%, and cyana-                               degradation products. The total acetochlor residue (par-
zine compounds less than 1% of the total pesticide mass.                          ent plus degradation products) contained less than 1%
   Although chemical properties such as solubility and                            parent compound. Alachlor residue consisted entirely
degradation rates are factors, the greater metolachlor                            of the ESA and OA degradation products. Metolachlor
compound mass can also be partially attributed to the                             residue consisted of about 2% parent and about 98%
high rate of metolachlor usage (Table 2). In addition to                          degradation products. In contrast, the triazine com-
being frequently detected, alachlor degradation prod-                             pounds are present as a mixture (25–50%) of parent
ucts were present in surprisingly high concentrations                             and degradation products. Both atrazine and cyanazine
based on the amount of parent compound applied in                                 degrade biologically to DIA. However, it is assumed
1997. The disproportionately high concentration in rela-                          for this study that the DIA originates from atrazine due
tion to use suggests that alachlor degradation products                           to the difficulty in partitioning the source and to the
are persistent and may originate from applications in                             fact that atrazine use was substantially greater than cya-
previous years. Kolpin et al. (1998) have shown that                              nazine. Because of this assumption, atrazine degra-
alachlor ESA is one of the most commonly detected                                 dation products may be slightly overestimated and cy-
pesticide degradation products in shallow ground water.                           anazine degradation products slightly underestimated.
                                                                                  Cyanazine residue consisted of 50% parent and 50%
                 DISCUSSION                                                       cyanazine-amide. Reddy et al. (1997) found that cyana-
                                                                                  zine-amide was more likely to remain in the aqueous
    Relation between Parent Compounds and                                         phase and thus have greater transport potential by water
              Degradation Products                                                than cyanazine. Atrazine residue consisted of about
   In August 1997, after pesticide application, degrada-                          25% parent, 25% DIA plus DEA, and about 50% HA.
tion products were the most frequently detected herbi-                               Although HA was commonly present in streams
cide compounds and were present in significantly                                  throughout the Midwest, it was more prevalent in the
greater concentrations than the parent compounds in                               southern part of the study area. Generally, concentra-
streams of the Midwest. The median value for the                                  tions of HA would be expected to be higher in streams
                             KALKHOFF ET AL.: HERBICIDES IN MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURAL STREAMS                                       1031




Fig. 2. Relation between hydroxy-atrazine to atrazine ratio (HAR)
   and deethylatrazine plus deisoproplyatrazine to atrazine ratio
   (DDAR) and the latitude.

draining basins with higher atrazine application rates,
but increased concentrations also may result from dif-
fering degradation pathways. The ratios of degradation
compound to parent compound were calculated to com-
pensate for the differing application rates (Fig. 2). If
atrazine degraded to HA, deethylatrazine, and deiso-
proprylatrazine uniformly, the degradate to the parent
compound ratios would be uniform across the study
area. These ratios were not uniform. The hydroxy-atra-
zine to atrazine ratio (HAR) increased and the deeth-
ylatrazine plus deisoproprylatrazine to atrazine ratio
(DDAR) decreased from north to south (Fig. 2). An
increasing HAR with a concurrent decreasing DDAR
from southern Minnesota to central Illinois suggests atra-
zine degradation is not consistent across the Midwest.

     Relation between Herbicide Compounds
             and Soil Parent Material
   Pesticide compounds found in streams of the Midwest
during late summer 3 to 4 mo after application were
partially dependent on the predominant soil parent ma-              Fig. 3. Frequency of detection and median concentration of selected
terial in the watershed. The two dominant classes of                   herbicides and herbicide metabolites in streams draining till and
                                                                       windblown loess-derived soils of the upper U.S. Midwest, Au-
herbicides (triazines and acetanalides) considered in this             gust 1997.
study were detected at different rates and at different
concentrations, dependent on whether till- or loess-type            primary degradation products were present more fre-
soils predominated in the watershed. Chemical proper-               quently in streams draining watersheds with predomi-
ties of these herbicides may influence their use and                nantly loess-type soils than in watersheds with predomi-
subsequent detection in basins with different soil types.           nantly till soils (Fig. 3). Although the frequency of
   Atrazine and cyanazine, the two most heavily used                detection for atrazine was not significantly different,
triazine herbicides in the Midwest, and several of their            atrazine degradation products were detected more fre-
1032                                             J. ENVIRON. QUAL., VOL. 32, MAY–JUNE 2003


                                                                           Herbicidal properties, such as degradation rate, may
                                                                        determine application rates, which in turn partially ac-
                                                                        count for the presence of herbicides in streams during
                                                                        late-summer base-flow conditions. Triazine pesticide
                                                                        use rates are apparently less in areas with predominantly
                                                                        till soils (Stoltenberg and Pope, 1990) than in areas of
                                                                        predominantly loess soils. This is due to the relatively
                                                                        high pH and organic carbon content of till soils that
                                                                        hinder the degradation of triazine herbicides, resulting
                                                                        in the “carryover” of atrazine in the soil to the following
                                                                        growing season that may harm soybeans in a corn–
                                                                        soybean crop rotation. Because of lower use on till soils,
                                                                        triazine degradation products would be expected to be
                                                                        lower. Cyanazine sorption has been correlated with fine
                                                                        soil texture and greater organic carbon content (Reddy
                                                                        et al., 1997). Alachlor, metolachlor, and acetochlor pos-
                                                                        sibly were used to offset triazine pesticide reductions
                                                                        in areas with till soils. Acetanalide herbicides also are
                                                                        adsorbed to organic matter (Miller et al., 1997), but
                                                                        because of their generally shorter half-life (Barbash et
                                                                        al., 1999), they are not present in substantial quantities
                                                                        in soils the following growing season.

                                                                             Relation between Herbicide Compounds
                                                                                          and Rainfall
                                                                           Triazine and chloroacetanilide herbicide transport to
                                                                        streams of the Midwest in late summer was influenced
                                                                        by the timing and amount of rainfall during the growing
                                                                        season. Concentrations of metolachlor compounds in
Fig. 4. Concentrations of atrazine and metolachlor compounds in re-     streams (consisting primarily of degradation products)
   lation to rainfall during selected periods in the watershed during   were greatest in streams that received greater amounts
   the growing season.
                                                                        of rainfall early in the growing season (Fig. 4). In con-
                                                                        trast, concentrations of atrazine compounds (consisting
quently in streams draining loess soils than in streams                 of a mixture of parent and degradation products) were
draining till soils.                                                    least in streams draining watersheds that received the
   Field and laboratory studies suggest that soil composi-              most rainfall during the late summer (Fig. 4). The sum
tion and temperature may influence which compound                       of the concentrations of atrazine compounds commonly
is produced through atrazine degradation. Early labora-                 exceeded 2 g L 1 in streams draining watersheds that
tory research (Hance and Segal, 1980) found that greater                received less than 100 mm of rain in June and July, and
concentrations of HA were formed in acidic rather than                  rarely exceeded 1 g L 1 in streams draining watersheds
neutral soils. Although HA leached from soils in small                  that received more than 200 mm of rain in June and July.
amounts in relation to atrazine, Mersie and Seybold                        Although atrazine and metolachlor adsorb to soil ma-
(1996) found that almost twice as much HA desorbed                      terials in similar amounts (Mersie and Seybold, 1996),
from a low clay content, lower pH, and lower organic                    metolachlor has been found to be less susceptible to
carbon content soil similar to loess soils. Hydroxy-atra-               runoff transport than atrazine (Jaynes et al., 1999). Ini-
zine adsorbs readily to soil and may be transported to                  tially, chloroacetanilide pesticides adsorb to soil and
the streambed during summer runoff. Desorption by                       may not be readily available to transport to streams
ground water seeping into streams through contami-                      and leach to ground water. Chloroacetanilide pesticides
nated streambed sediment has been postulated as a                       probably then degrade in the soils within weeks of appli-
source of HA in streams during base-flow conditions                     cation. As the pesticides degrade to the more soluble
(Lerch et al., 1998).                                                   ESA and OA degradation products, summer rains may
   In contrast, two ESA degradation products, alachlor                  transport degradation products to streams and ground
ESA and acetochlor ESA, were detected more fre-                         water. Kolpin et al. (1998) have documented the trans-
quently in samples from streams draining till soils than                port of metolachlor and alachlor degradation products
in streams draining loess soils (Fig. 3). Several chloroac-             to shallow ground water. As a result, degradation prod-
etanilide degradation products (alachlor ESA, meto-                     ucts will be present in ground water and potentially
lachlor ESA, metolachlor OA, and acetochlor ESA)                        available for transport to streams during late summer.
were present in significantly (P 0.05) greater concen-                     Since the triazine pesticides are generally more solu-
trations in samples from streams draining watersheds                    ble than the chloroacetanilide pesticides, excess rainfall
with till soils than watersheds with loess soils.                       may have flushed much of the atrazine from the soil
                          KALKHOFF ET AL.: HERBICIDES IN MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURAL STREAMS                            1033

early in the growing season. Atrazine concentrations          that drain corn- and soybean-producing areas. By late
have been found to be greatest in small (Kalkhoff and         summer of 1997, several months after application, the
Schaap, 1996) and large (Clark et al., 1999) streams and      majority of the herbicide residues in streams of the
rivers of the Midwest during May and June when rainfall       Midwest are degradation compounds. Degradation
runoff is greatest. However, atrazine is persistent (half-    products of the commonly used triazine (atrazine and
life of more than 140 d; Barbash et al., 1999) and any        cyanazine) and chloroacetanilide (acetochlor, alachlor,
remaining after the spring flush, for the most part, has      metolachlor) herbicides comprise the majority of pesti-
not degraded and is available to be transported from          cide compounds found in the streams during base-flow
the soil. Atrazine may be flushed both into nearby            conditions in late summer. Although degradation prod-
streams and transported to ground water because of its        ucts constitute a major part of the residue, the two
relatively high solubility.                                   classes of herbicides have substantially different compo-
   Although water originating from rainfall may require       sitions. The chloroacetanilide residue was comprised
several decades to move through local sand and gravel         almost exclusively of degradate compounds, but the tri-
aquifers to streams (Puckett and Cowdery, 2002), part         azine residue consisted of a mixture of parent and degra-
of the ground water contributing to flow in the streams       date compounds.
studied during this investigation was in aquifers for only       As would be expected, differences in use patterns
a short period of time. The age of ground water entering      contributed to differences in the types of pesticides pres-
these 70 streams is difficult to accurately quantify with-    ent in late summer in streams of the Midwest. Atrazine
out detailed hydrologic studies, but may be a mix of          and to some extent cyanazine compounds are more
old water contributed from deeper regional flow and           prevalent in watersheds with a majority of moderately
younger water from shallower localized flow systems.          permeable loess soils than in watersheds with mostly
Two lines of evidence suggest that at least part of the       poorly permeable till soils. The predominant atrazine
water in the streams of the Midwest in August is rela-        degradates change from the biologically derived DIA
tively young ground water. The presence of acetochlor         and DEA in the north to the chemically and biologically
or acetochlor degradates in 75% of the streams indicates      derived hydroxy-atrazine in the southern part of the
that at least part of the water was three years old or        Midwest study area.
younger. Acetochlor was registered for use beginning             The timing of rainfall during the growing season is
in the 1994 growing season, three years before this inves-    an important factor in transport of pesticide residue to
tigation began. The correlation of metolachlor and met-       streams during late summer. Increased rainfall early
olachlor degradates with late spring and early summer         in the growing season (June) contributed to increased
rains (Fig. 4) also suggests that ground water originating    concentrations of metolachlor degradation products in
as rainfall during the current growing season was part        streams during August, whereas increased rainfall dur-
of the streamflow in the streams of the Midwest. This         ing mid-summer (July) flushed most atrazine com-
correlation would not be expected if water transporting       pounds from the watersheds, resulting in lower concen-
pesticides applied during the 1997 growing season were        trations in August.
not present in the streams.                                      Results of this study indicate that even though con-
   The young ground water that comprises part of the          centrations of commonly used triazine and chloroacet-
streamflow may originate from water infiltrating soil         anilide herbicides are low in streams of the Midwest
relatively close to the stream (Puckett and Cowdery,          during late summer, some of their degradation products
2002) that then moves through the shallow water table         are present in substantial concentrations. Initial studies
to the streams. Crops are commonly grown on the flat          (Heydens et al., 1996) suggested that ESA degradation
flood plain and pesticides are applied in close proximity     products are less toxic than the parent compounds.
to many of the streams of the Midwest. In addition,           However, studies documenting toxicological effects of
young ground water may also originate from consider-          the OA degradation products and effects of chronic
able distance from the stream, being transported to the       exposure on aquatic organisms are sparse.
stream in tile lines. Phillips et al. (1999) have shown          Scarcity of detailed herbicide use information (county
that pesticides and pesticide degradates are rapidly          or watershed level) complicates the interpretation of
transported from the soil to the water table after rain       water quality results from similar geologic areas in the
events. Since tile lines are generally located in or near     Midwest. Most of the degradation products studied were
the top of the water table, recently recharged water          the initial breakdown products and the presence and
containing any dissolved pesticide compounds will be          concentration of degradation products further down the
routed to a nearby stream.                                    breakdown pathway in streams is unknown. Additional
                                                              studies to document and quantify these secondary and
                                                              tertiary degradation products are needed to fully under-
                   CONCLUSIONS                                stand the fate and movement of pesticides through the
   Though the Corn Belt region of the U.S. Midwest is         hydrologic system.
commonly thought of as a relatively homogeneous area
(Omernick, 2000), relatively small differences (in rela-                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
tion to the rest of the United States) in soils and climate     The authors would like to thank the U.S. Geological Sur-
have a substantial influence on the amount and types          vey’s National Water-Quality Assessment Program National
of herbicide compounds that are transported to streams        Leadership Team for providing additional funds for the Mid-
1034                                               J. ENVIRON. QUAL., VOL. 32, MAY–JUNE 2003


west Regional Synoptic Study, and Steve Sorensen and study                     ter by HPLC/MS using negative ion spray. Anal. Chem. 69:4547–
unit biologists Mitch Harris and Linda Roberts, who were                       4553.
able to persevere in the face of many setbacks and obstacles                Field, J.A., and E.M. Thurman. 1996. Glutathione conjugation and
to make the synoptic study a reality. Appreciation is expressed                contaminant transformation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:1413–1417.
                                                                            Gilliom, R.J., J.E. Barbash, D.W. Kolpin, and S.J. Larson. 1999. Test-
to the numerous USGS field personnel in Illinois, Iowa, and
                                                                               ing water quality for pesticide pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol.
Minnesota who spent many hours in the streams collecting                       33:164A–169A.
samples and gathering information, without which this report                Graham, W.H., D.W. Graham, F. Denoyelles, V.H. Smith, C.K. Lar-
would have not been possible. T. Steinheimer of the USDA-                      ive, and E.M. Thurman. 1999. Metolachlor and alachlor breakdown
ARS Soil Tilth Laboratory and S. Larson and D. Dupre of the                    product formation patterns in aquatic field mesocosms. Environ.
U.S. Geological Survey reviewed earlier drafts of the paper.                   Sci. Technol. 33:4471–4476.
Suggestions by three anonymous reviewers greatly improved                   Hance, R.J., and G.M. Segal. 1980. A comparison of the decomposition
the report.                                                                    of atrazine and diuron in soils of different fertilizer content and
                                                                               pH. Agrochimica 24:266–273.
                                                                            Hartgers, E.M., G.H. Aalderink, P.J. Van den Brink, R. Gylstra,
                         REFERENCES                                            J.W.F. Wiegman, and T.C.M. Brock. 1998. Ecotoxicological thresh-
Adams, C.D., and E.M. Thurman. 1991. Formation and transport of                old levels of a mixture of herbicides (atrazine, diuron and meto-
   deethylatrazine in the soil and vadose zone. J. Environ. Qual. 20:          lachlor) in freshwater microcosms. Aquat. Ecol. 32:135–152.
   540–547.                                                                 Helsel, D.R., and R.M. Hirsch. 1992. Statistical methods in water
Aga, D.S., E.M. Thurman, and M.L. Pomes. 1994. Determination of                resources. Studies in Environ. Sci. 49. Elsevier Science, New York.
   alachlor and its sulfonic acid metabolite in water by solid-phase        Heydens, W.F., J.C. Siglin, J.F. Holson, and S.D. Stegeman. 1996.
   extraction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal.                     Subchronic, developmental and genetic toxicology, studies with the
   Chem. 66:1495–1499.                                                         ethane sulfonate degradate of alachlor. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol.
Anderson, W.I. 1983. Geology of Iowa over two billion years of                 33:173–181.
   change. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.                                Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship. 1999. Pesti-
Armstrong, D.E., G. Chesters, and R.F. Harris. 1967. Atrazine hydro-           cide Act of Iowa. The State of Iowa, Des Moines.
   lysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:61–66.                        Jaynes, D.B., J.L. Hatfield, and D.W. Meek. 1999. Water quality in
Barbash, J.E., G.P. Thelin, D.W. Kolpin, and R.J. Gilliom. 1999.               Walnut Creek watershed: Herbicides and nitrate in surface waters.
   Distribution of major herbicides in ground water of the United              J. Environ. Qual. 28:45–59.
   States. Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 98-4245. Available on-         Kalkhoff, S.J. 1994. National Water-Quality Assessment Program—
   line at http://ca.water.usgs.gov/pnsp/rep/wrir984245/ (verified 7 Jan.      Eastern Iowa basins. Factsheet FS 94-031. Available online at
   2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Sacramento, CA.                                   http://iowa.usgs.gov/nawqa/factsheets/factsheet.html (verified 7
Battaglin, W.A., and D.A. Goolsby. 1999. Are shifts in herbicide use           Jan. 2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Iowa City, IA.
   reflected in concentration changes in midwestern rivers. Environ.        Kalkhoff, S.J., D.W. Kolpin, and E.M. Thurman. 1998. Degradation
   Sci. Technol. 33:2917–2925.                                                 of chloroacetanilide herbicides: The prevalence of sulfonic and
Buhler, D.D., G.W. Randall, W.C. Koskinen, and D.L. Wyse. 1993.                oxanilic acid degradation products in Iowa ground and surface
   Atrazine and alachlor losses from subsurface tile drainage of a clay        waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:1738–1740.
   loam soil. J. Environ. Qual. 22:583–588.                                 Kalkhoff, S.J., and B.D. Schaap. 1996. Agricultural chemicals in
Burkart, M.R., and D.W. Kolpin. 1993. Hydrologic and land-use fac-             ground and surface water in a small watershed in Clayton County,
   tors associated with herbicides and nitrate in near-surface aquifers.       Iowa, 1988–91. Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 95-4158. U.S.
   J. Environ. Qual. 22:646–656.                                               Geol. Survey, Iowa City, IA.
Burkart, M.R., D.W. Kolpin, R.J. Jaquis, and K.J. Cole. 1999. Agri-         Kaufman, D.D., and P.C. Kearney. 1970. Microbial degradation of
   chemicals in ground water of the Midwestern USA: Relations to               s-triazine herbicides. Residue Rev. 32:235–265.
   soil characteristics. J. Environ. Qual. 28:1908–1915.                    Kolpin, D.W., S.J. Kalkhoff, D.A. Goolsby, D.A. Sneck-Fahrer, and
Capel, P.D., A.H. Spexet, and S.J. Larson. 1999. Occurrence and                E.M. Thurman. 1997. Occurrence of selected herbicides and herbi-
   behavior of the herbicide prometon in the hydrologic system. Envi-          cide degradation products in Iowa’s ground water, 1995. Ground
   ron. Sci. Technol. 33:674–680.                                              Water 35:679–688.
Clark, G.M., D.A. Goolsby, and W.A. Battaglin. 1999. Seasonal and           Kolpin, D.W., E.M. Thurman, and D.A. Goolsby. 1996. Occurrence
   annual load of herbicides from the Mississippi River basin to the           of selected pesticides and their metabolites in near-surface aquifers
   Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:981–986.                          of the midwestern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:335–340.
Coupe, R.H., D.A. Goolsby, J.L. Iverson, D.J. Markovichick, and             Kolpin, D.W., E.M. Thurman, and S.M. Linhart. 1998. The environ-
   S.D. Zaugg. 1995. Pesticide, nutrient, water-discharge, and physi-          mental occurrence of herbicides: The importance of degradation
   cal-property data for the Mississippi River and some of its tributar-       products in ground water. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35:
   ies, April 1991–September 1992. Open-File Rep. 93-657. U.S. Geol.           385–390.
   Survey, Denver, CO.                                                      Larson, S.J., P.D. Capel, and M.S. Majewski. 1997. Pesticides in surface
Edwards, T.K., and D.G. Glysson. 1988. Field methods for measure-              waters. Distribution, trends, and governing factors. Ann Arbor
   ment of fluvial sediment. Open-File Rep. 86-531. U.S. Geol. Survey,         Press, Chelsea, MI.
   Reston, VA.                                                              Lee, K.E., D.G. Huggins, and E.M. Thurman. 1995. Effects of hydro-
Fairchild, J.F., D.S. Ruessler, and A.R. Carlson. 1998. Comparative            phyte community structure on atrazine and alachlor degradation
  sensitivity of five species of macrophytes and six species of algae to       in wetlands. p. 525–538. In Proc. Versatility of Wetlands in the
  atrazine, metribuzin, alachlor, and metolachlor. Environ. Toxicol.           Agric. Landscape, Orlando, FL. 17–20 Sept. 1995. American Water
  Chem. 17:1830–1834.                                                          Resour. Assoc., Middleburg, VA.
Fallon, J.D., A.L. Fong, and W.J. Andrews. 1997. Water-quality assess-      Lerch, R.N., P.E. Blachard, and E.M. Thurman. 1998. Contribution
  ment of part of the Upper Mississippi River basin, Minnesota and             of hydroxylated atrazine degradation products to the total atrazine
  Wisconsin—Pesticides in streams, streambed sediment, and ground              load in midwestern streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:40–48.
  water, 1974–94. Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 97-4141. U.S.           May, J.E., J.G. Gorman, R.D. Goodrich, and V.E. Miller. 1998. Water
  Geol. Survey, Mounds View, MN.                                               resources data. Iowa Water Year 1997. Vol. 1: Surface water–
Fehrenbacher, J.B., B.W. Ray, and J.D. Alexander. 1968. Illinois soils         Mississippi River basin. Water-Data Rep. IA-97-1. U.S. Geol. Sur-
  and factors in their development. p. 165–175. In R.E. Bergstrom              vey, Iowa City, IA.
  (ed.) The Quaternary of Illinois. Spec. Publ. 14. Univ. of Illinois       Mersie, W., and C. Seybold. 1996. Adsorption and desorption of
  College of Agric., Urbana.                                                   atrazine, deethylatrazine, deisopropylatrazine, and hydroxyatra-
Ferrer, I., E.M. Thurman, and D. Barcelo. 1998. Identification of ionic        zine on Levy wetland soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:1925–1929.
  chloroacetanilide–herbicide metabolites in surface and ground wa-         Meyer, M.T., M.S. Mills, and E.M. Thurman. 1993. Automated solid-
                                KALKHOFF ET AL.: HERBICIDES IN MIDWESTERN AGRICULTURAL STREAMS                                             1035

   phase extraction of herbicides from water for gas chromatographic–       in rivers and reservoirs of the midwestern United States: The impor-
   mass spectrometric analysis. J. Chromatogr. 629:55–59.                   tance of sulfonation in the transport of chloroacetanilide herbicides.
Meyerfeld, D.B., G.R. Hallberg, G.A. Miller, W.K. Wintersteen, R.G.         Environ. Sci. Technol. 30:569–574.
   Hartzler, S.S. Brown, M.D. Duffy, and J.R. DeWitt. 1996. Pest          Thurman, E.M., D.A. Goolsby, M.T. Meyer, and D.W. Kolpin. 1991.
   management in Iowa planning for the future. Iowa State Univ.             Herbicides in surface waters of the Midwestern United States—The
   Agron. Ext., Ames.                                                       effect of spring flush. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1794–1796.
Miller, J.L., A.G. Wollum, and J.B. Weber. 1997. Degradation of           Thurman, E.M., D.A. Goolsby, M.T. Meyer, M.S. Mills, M.L. Pomes,
   carbon-14-atrazine and carbon-14-metolachlor in soil from four           and D.W. Kolpin. 1992. A reconnaissance study of herbicides and
   depths. J. Environ. Qual. 26:633–638.                                    their metabolites in surface water of the Midwestern United States
Mitton, G.B., K.G. Guttormson, W.W. Larson, G.W. Stratton, and              using immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
   E.S. Wakeman. 1998. Water resources data. Minnesota Water Year           Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:2440–2447.
   1997. Water-Data Rep. MN-97-1. U.S. Geol. Survey, Mounds               Thurman, E.M., M.T. Meyer, M.L. Pomes, C.A. Perry, and A.P.
   View, MN.                                                                Schwab. 1990. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared
Moorman, T.B., D.B. Jaynes, J.L. Cambardella, J.L. Hatfield, R.L.           with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the determination
   Pfeiffer, and A.J. Morrow. 1999. Water quality in Walnut Creek           of triazine herbicides in water. Anal. Chem. 62:2043–2048.
   watershed: Herbicides in soils, subsurface drainage, and groundwa-     USDA. 1981. Land resource regions and major land resource areas
   ter. J. Environ. Qual. 28:35–45.                                         of the United States. Agric. Handb. 296. USDA Soil Conserv.
Omernick, J.A. 2000. Draft aggregations of Level III ecoregions for         Serv., Washington, DC.
   the National Nutrient Strategy. Available online at http://www.epa.    USDA. 1998. Agricultural chemical usage—1997 Field crops sum-
   gov/waterscience/standards/ecomap.html (verified 14 Jan. 2003).          mary. Available online at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/
   USEPA, Washington, DC.                                                   nassr/other/pcu-bb/agch0598.pdf (verified 7 Jan. 2003). USDA
Phillips, P.J., G.R. Wall, E.M. Thurman, D.A. Eckhardt, and J. Van-         Natl. Agric. Statistics Serv., Washington, DC.
   hoesen. 1999. Metolachlor and its degradation products in tile drain   USEPA. 2000. Drinking water regulations and health advisories.
   and stream runoff in the Canajoharie Creek watershed. Environ.           EPA-822-B-00-001. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/ost/
   Sci. Technol. 33:3531–3537.                                              drinking/standards/ (verified 7 Jan. 2003). USEPA, Washington,
Puckett, L.J., and T.K. Cowdery. 2002. Transport and fate of nitrate        DC.
   in a glacial outwash aquifer in relation to ground water age, land     Ward, J.R., and C.A. Harr. (ed.) 1990. Methods for collection and
   use practices, and redox processes. J. Environ. Qual. 31:782–796.        processing of surface-water and bed-material samples for physical
Reddy, K.N., M.A. Locke, and R.M. Zablotowicz. 1997. Soil type and          and chemical analyses. Open-File Rep. 90-140. U.S. Geol. Survey,
   tillage effects on sorption of cyanazine and degradation products.       Reston, VA.
   Weed Sci. 45:727–732.                                                  Warner, K.L. 1998. Water-quality assessment of the Lower Illinois
Shelton, L.R. 1994. Field guide for collection and processing stream-       River basin: Environmental setting. Water-Resour. Investigations
   water samples for the National Water Quality assessment program.         Rep. 97-4165. Available online at http://il.water.usgs.gov/proj/lirb/
   Open-File Rep. 94-455. Available online at http://ca.water.usgs.         pubs/pdfs/envset.pdf (verified 7 Jan. 2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Ur-
   gov/pnsp/pest.rep/sw-t.html (verified 13 Jan. 2003). U.S. Geol. Sur-     bana, IL.
   vey, Sacramento, CA.                                                   Wicker, T.L., J.K. Latour, and J.C. Maurer. 1998. Water resources
Sorenson, S.K., S.D. Porter, K.K.B. Akers, M.A. Harris, S.J. Kalkhoff,      data. Illinois Water Year 1997. Vol. 2: Illinois River basin. Water
   K.E. Lee, L.R. Roberts, and P.J. Terrio. 1999. Water quality and         Data Rep. IL-97-2. U.S. Geol. Survey, Urbana, IL.
   habitat conditions in upper Midwest streams relative to riparian       Zimmerman, L.R., K.A. Hostetler, and E.M. Thurman. 2000. Methods
   vegetation and soil characteristics, August 1997: Study design,          of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey Organic Geochemistry
   methods, and data. Open-File Rep. 99-202. Available online at            Research Group—Determination of chloroacetanilide herbicide
   http://iowa.usgs.gov/nawqa/reports/OFR99-202.pdf (verified 7 Jan.        metabolites in water using high performance liquid chromatogra-
   2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Denver, CO.                                    phy-diode array detection and high-performance liquid chromatog-
Stamper, D.M., S.J. Trainaand, and O.H. Tuovinen. 1997. Anaerobic           raphy/mass spectrometry. Open-File Rep. 00-182. Available online
   transformation of alachlor, propachlor, and metolachlor with sul-        at http://ks.water.usgs.gov/Kansas/pubs/reports/ofr.00-182.html
   fide. J. Environ. Qual. 26:488–494.                                      (verified 7 Jan. 2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Lawrence, KS.
Stark, J.R. 1994. National Water-Quality Assessment Program—The           Zimmerman, L.R., and E.M. Thurman. 1999. Methods of analysis
   Upper Mississippi River basin. Open-File Rep. 94-101. Available          by the U.S. Geological Survey Organic Geochemistry Research
   online at http://mn.water.usgs.gov/umis/bibl.dir/ofr94_101.pdf (ver-     Group—Determination of triazine and chloroacetanilide herbi-
   ified 7 Jan. 2003). U.S. Geol. Survey, Mounds View, MN.                  cides in water by solid-phase extraction and capillary-column gas
Stoltenberg, D., and R. Pope. 1990. Atrazine management rules for           chromatography/mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring.
   Iowa. Pamphlet Pm-1390. Iowa State Univ. Ext., Ames.                     Open-File Rep. 98-634. Available online at http://ks.water.usgs.
Thurman, E.M., D.A. Goolsby, D.S. Aga, M.L. Pomes, and M.T.                 gov/Kansas/pubs/abstracts/ofr98-634.html (verified 7 Jan. 2003).
   Meyer. 1996. Occurrence of alachlor and its sulfonated degradate         U.S. Geol. Survey, Lawrence, KS.

								
To top