Docstoc

Comparison of forest management by Community Forest User Groups in

Document Sample
Comparison of forest management by Community Forest User Groups in Powered By Docstoc
					 Forest management by Community Forest User Groups in the Mid
                  hill and the Terai zones of eastern Nepal
Buddhi Rejal


Background
In Nepal, the livelihood of the majority of the population is intimately concerned with the
health of forest resources. More than 90 percent the population live in rural areas, relying
on the forests as a major source of fuel, fodder, construction materials, some food and
cash income. In the last few decades, the forest area of Nepal has declined rapidly due to
over exploitation of forest and extension of agricultural lands to meet the food and other
demands of the increasing population. Thus, deforestation and land degradation has a
serious adverse effect on the subsistence farming system in the hills of Nepal (Ives and
Messerli, 1989)


Realising the peoples’ dependence on forests and importance of their involvement in
forest management, the Nepal Government has initiated community forestry programs,
with the ambitious aim of fulfilling the basic needs of rural communities as well as
conserving the forest resources. Community forestry (CF) is a participatory approach to
forest management where a rural community living around a forest organize themselves
to form a “Forest User Group” (FUG) to manage the forest. The CF program has been
recognised as one of the most innovative intervention in promoting local control and
management of the natural resources of Nepal.


Physiographically, Nepal is divided in to three ecological zones, the Terai, the Mid hills
and the High mountains, which occupy 17, 68 and 15 percent of the total area,
respectively. Nepal supports a population of about 22.3 million with a growth rate of 2.5
percent annually. The annual per capita income of Nepalese people is about USD200 per
year, but the majority of the population earn far less than this figure due to high economic
differences between the rich and poor people. About 37 percent of total the landmass of
Nepal is covered by forest (5.5 million hectares) and because of the wide range of
topographical condition, there is high biodiversity, with different forest types ranging
from tropical to alpine being found.


The Mid hill zone of Nepal, is situated between the Terai in the south and the High
mountain zone in the north. Occupying 68 percent of the total area, the Mid hill zone
supports about 50 percent of the total population of the country. Live for people in this
region is difficult because of low land productivity, difficulties in transportation and
communication, and low availability of services like schools, hospitals, electricity and
safe drinking water. In addition, natural hazards such as landslides and floods can
impeded normal activities at certain times and add to environmental dangers and
problems. Deforestation in this region was very high (0.2 percent per year) which
threatened the traditional subsistence farming system and serious environmental
cosequences in this region. CF program was initiated in the hill region since the 1980s as
an appropriate means to mitigate the problems. Presently about 25 percent of its total
forests have been handed over to over 5000 FUGs and rest are also in the process of
handing over rapidly.


The lower plains landscape of Nepal, called the Terai zone, is situated between Indo-
Nepal border in the south and hill region of Nepal in the north, extending from east to
west for about 1000 km, and north to south for about 30 km. The Terai region is attractive
to hill people because of its high agricultural productivity, relatively accessible
transportation and other services (schools, hospitals, electricity etc). There has been a
massive migration of people into the Terai from the hill areas since the 1960s following
the eradication of malaria from this region. The deforestation rate in the Terai is very
high (1.3 percent per annum), which has been lost its half of forest cover over the last 30
years period (Ives and Msserni, 1989). In spite of strict legal provisions to control the
forest by the Government, the Terai forests have yielded to heavy pressure from illegal
felling. High unemployment in this region has also added to this pressure and degradation
of forests.
Community forestry has recently been introduced in the Terai Region, following on from
community forestry extension in the hills. Facing difficulties in protecting the forests
without peoples’ participation, the local government authority (District Forest Officers)
have been compelled to hand over some forests to the local communities as CF, though
there was not any formal government program to extend CF to the Terai districts.


The Rationale for this study
The success of community forestry in the Mid hill region of Nepal is reflected in terms of
conservation of forests and restoration of greenery in the hills. However, very few studies
are available to evaluate the effectiveness of forest management by the FUGs in terms of
changes of forest condition and sharing the benefits of forest in an equitable basis. In a
feudal society like that in Nepal, the dominance of elites and the rich in FUG committees
is obvious. It has been realised that the poor, women and marginalised people in rural
areas are more dependent on pubic or community forests than the rich. The domination of
rich people in FUG committees and regulation of forest products collection from
community forests probably has potential to affect the livelihood of the poor. Maharjan
(1998) reported that a significant number of poor households in a FUG in eastern region
of Nepal gave up their membership because of their dis-satisfaction in distribution of
benefits.


In addition, the CF in the Terai region appears to be different to that in the hills because
of its different physiography, size (both users and forest), socio-economic conditions and
the management system of the Terai CF. Although there are some positive changes have
been noticed in the forest condition of the Terai CF after the hand over, yet there are a lot
of enamolies prevailed in its management aspects (Baral and Subedi, 1999). Presently,
some forestry professionals in Nepal have emphasised the need for a different policy of
participatory forestry for the Terai region (Acharya et. al, 1999). However, there is a
strong debate on this view among the professionals and different stakeholders.


Very few studies have described and evaluated the management systems of the Terai and
hill CF and their implications for the national economy, environmental conservation and
social justice. This study describes the management systems of selected CF in the Terai
and the Mid hill region of Nepal, particularly focusing on the maintenance of forest
condition and the distribution of benefits among the people, highlighting the problems
and opportunities of CF development in the two areas of Nepal.


Research aim and objectives
General objective
The aim of the study is to describe forest management systems by forest user groups in
the Mid hill and the Terai zones of Nepal, with a view to identifying problems, and
opportunities for improving the effectiveness of management by FUGs, in terms of
income distribution and maintenance of forest condition.


Specific objectives
•   To describe the physiography and socio-economic features in two study areas in
    general.
•   To describe the process of user group formation in one representative FUG in each
    study area.
•   To define good forest condition in the eyes of the communities.
•   To define effective forest management as perceived by people.
•   To determine the benefits from forest management and their distribution to different
    sectors of the community.
•   To assess peoples views on changes in the forest condition since FUGs were started.
•   To identify problems and opportunities for improving the effectiveness of forest
    management in the two situations.


Hypotheses
•   Forest condition is improved after handing over the forests to local user groups in the
    both Terai and Hill regions.
•   There is inequitable distribution of income between segments of the population in
    communities.
•   Different wealth groups have different perceptions of
       A. Good forest condition
       B. effective CF management.
•   Community perceptions of condition and management will differ from those of forest
    department officials


Research Methods
The overall method adopted in this study is that of case study research, but within the
construct of grounded theory. Case study FUGs were selected to representative to each
study area. The selected FUGs were relatively well established in the district, moderately
large in size, heterogenous in ethnicity and fairly effective in forest management as
perceivedby Forest Department. In selecting the FUGs, the effectiveness of the FUGs
were considered in terms of taking responsibility for forest protection and implementation
of range of development activities through active participation of FUG members.


As community forestry is a participatory approach to management of forests,
participatory methods are appropriate for data collection and analysis. Various rapid rural
appraisals (RRA) techniques were used, and these were supplemented with techniques
from the participatory rural appraisal (PRA) in conducting the data collection and
analysis. Some research questions were also studied through the grounded theory
approach by adapting data collection techniques of social sciences such as informal
interviews.


Outline of thesis
This thesis contains seven chapters. Chapter one describes introduction and research aim
and objectives. Chapter second explains detail about research methods and description
about the study area. Chapter three and four present two case studies that describe socio-
economic feature of the study areas and forest management system adapted by the two
FUGs. Chapter five analyses the data collected from the field, while chapter six presents
result and discussion. Finally chapter seven outlines the problems and opportunities of
CF development in Nepal and suggest some recommendations.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
views:14
posted:4/20/2010
language:English
pages:6
Description: Comparison of forest management by Community Forest User Groups in ...