IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION IEEE NEURAL NETWORKS SOCIETY REVIEW FORM Reviewer: Please review this paper within the week so we can get a timely review back to the authors. Please write comments to author on the other side or a separate sheet of paper. Evaluate technical quality, content and, in addition, adequacy of abstract, introduction, organization, figures, and references. PAPER TEC# 000 REVIEWER # PAPER TITLE: Title Here REVIEWER’S NAME (Please Print Clearly) ADDRESS SIGNATURE EMAIL : PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: SHOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED FOR A “BEST PAPER” AWARD? Associate Editor Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Address 4 I. OVERALL EVALUATION (COMMENTS TO AUTHOR ON BACK OF THIS SHEET OR ON SEPARATE PAGE) Contribution Exceptional Significant Minor Questionable None New Results Significant Applications Survey or Tutorial II. OVERALL RECOMMENDATION 1. ACCEPT: Article is acceptable for publication in its present form. 2. REVISE AND ACCEPT: Required changes are minor and may be made by author without further review. 3. REVISE AND RESUBMIT: Article is acceptable for publication provided that significant changes are made as indicated in the reviewer’s comments. Revision will be carefully checked by the editor or associate editor to ascertain whether the changes are acceptable. 4. REJECT: Article is so poorly written that contributions, if any, are obscure. Article is not appropriate for the IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. The results are not correct. Article is not suitable as a tutorial for reasons given below. Other III. CONFIDENTIAL COMMENTS TO EDITORS IEEE policy regarding reviewing submitted papers: (1) IEEE policy requires that referees treat the contents of papers under review as privileged information not to be disclosed to others before publication, and (2) it is expected that no one with access to a paper under review will make any inappropriate use of the special knowledge that access provides.