SAN FRANCISCO FOR DEMOCRACY�S GUIDE TO THE

Reviews
Shared by: guy25
Stats
views:
3
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
1/10/2009
language:
pages:
0
RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 LOCAL BALLOT INITIATIVES Ballot Initiative A. School Bond and Tax Rate Statement. Bond Measure. Our Rec Yes Why? This $450 M bond raises money for improvements to schools across the district. These repairs are at least partly because of the settlement terms of a disability access lawsuit, which means that if this doesn’t pass, much of the money will have to come out of the school district’s budget. Currently, board members cannot vote by proxy and must be physically in the room to participate in commission meetings. This initiative would allow commission members who are pregnant or on parental leave (following the birth or adoption of a child) can participate in commission meetings via teleconference. This would authorize the Civil Service Commission to conduct a survey of elected officials (mayor, the city attorney, the public defender, the assessor-record, treasurer, and the sheriff) in nearby counties, to determine and average pay as a baseline for salaries in SF. Salaries would increase with the Consumer Price Index for 5 years, when the CCC would conduct another survey. Adds privacy restrictions to Chapter 12 M of the Municipal Code, which regulates the Housing Authority. It further adds wording that prohibits the City and County of San Francisco from disclosing private information to contractors without the person’s approval, unless “by Contract,” or where law or judicial order requires it. Currently, there is a parking tax of 25%. This would raise the tax to 35%. The revenue goes to fund public transit. Would require employers to offered paid sick leave. Employees would accrue up to 9 paid sick days a year (5 days for businesses with fewer that 5 employees). Full Text of Initiative (pdf files on sfgov.org) http://tinyurl.com/oy635 B. Allowing Members of Boards and Commissions to Participate in Meetings by Teleconference due to Pregnancy and Related Conditions; Adoption of Parental Leave Policies. Charter Amendment. C. Setting Salaries of Certain Local Elected Officials. Charter Amendment. Yes http://tinyurl.com/sxgyq Yes http://tinyurl.com/mg4ys D. Disclosure of Private Information. Ordinance. Yes http://tinyurl.com/myhkb E. Parking Tax. Ordinance. F. Paid Sick Leave. Ordinance. No Rec* Yes http://tinyurl.com/s7ppz http://tinyurl.com/qktza RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 LOCAL BALLOT INITIATIVES G. Limitations on Formula Retail Stores. Ordinance. H. Relocation Assistance for No Fault Tenant Removal. Ordinance. Yes Yes Would create a community process to approve or veto the opening of formula retail stores in SF. Currently, renters are entitled to $1,000 in relocation expenses for a legitimate no-fault eviction. This proposition would increase this to $4,500 (per person, up to a cap of $13,500 per household). There is an additional $3,000 for each tenant aged 60 or older, disabled, or living with at least one minor child. The question here is how to facilitate better communication between the executive and the legislative branch. This initiative appears a reaction to the relationship between the Board and the current office holder. This is also a policy statement, and non-binding, so it would not actually create a system to facilitate communication. Apparently the impeachment of Nixon started with local actions. This could create momentum towards removing Bush and Cheney from office. Sets policy, doesn't create any new programs. http://tinyurl.com/lpdnl http://tinyurl.com/nhpfn I. Adopting a Policy that the Mayor Appear Monthly at a Board of Supervisors Meeting. Declaration of Policy. J. Adopting a Policy Calling for the Impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Declaration of Policy. K. Adopting a Policy Relating to the Housing Needs Of Seniors and Disabled Adults. Declaration of Policy. * ** No http://tinyurl.com/q6a3q Yes http://tinyurl.com/pwxdy No End.** http://tinyurl.com/roc53 No Recommendation. The measure or candidate did not get the 60% vote required for endorsement. No Endorsement. SF4D affirmatively declines to make an endorsement on this proposition.

Related docs
San_Francisco
Views: 34  |  Downloads: 0
Guide to Voting in San Francisco (PDF)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
A GUIDE TO SAN FRANCISCO�S
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 1
san francisco hotels
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
san francisco businesses
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
University of San Francisco
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
SAN FRANCISCO BAY
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
mortgage san francisco
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
San Francisco Getaway
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
mortgage san francisco
Views: 18  |  Downloads: 0
Byways Around San Francisco Bay
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
san francisco city jobs
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Other docs by guy25
Let Your Spirit Come
Views: 382  |  Downloads: 1
Whiet v Brown
Views: 158  |  Downloads: 0
Herrin v Sutherland
Views: 305  |  Downloads: 2
Criminal Law -- Levine
Views: 316  |  Downloads: 16
Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Qualifier
Views: 691  |  Downloads: 51
New Medicine Based on ANcient Principles
Views: 326  |  Downloads: 1
Gruen v Gruen
Views: 895  |  Downloads: 6
at175
Views: 90  |  Downloads: 0
Healer of My Soul
Views: 266  |  Downloads: 0
Baker v Weeden
Views: 330  |  Downloads: 3
Perrin_Evidence
Views: 346  |  Downloads: 29
Marshall Lefkowitz Briefs
Views: 278  |  Downloads: 0
dv105
Views: 236  |  Downloads: 1
For rent
Views: 379  |  Downloads: 3
IP Table
Views: 359  |  Downloads: 6