ECON 116b 2010 Midterm Exam Solutions by runout


									                ECON 116b: 2010 Midterm Exam Solutions
Section 1: True/False/Uncertain (4 marks each)
Q1: True. Based on the expectation theory of the term structure of interest rates,
the long-term interest rate is equal to the average expected future short-term
interest rate. When the Fed raises the short-term interest rate, people expect
higher short-term interest rate in the future. Hence at the same time long-term
interest rate will rise too.
Q2: False. AD curve is not the sum of all market demand curves in the economy.
It comes from the equilibrium from both the goods market (IS curve) and the
money market (LM curve). It slopes down because when price level goes up, the
demand for money will increase. If we hold the money supply fixed, the increase
of money demand will increase the interest rate, which will further depress
investment. It’s nothing to do with any market for a specific individual good or
with the demands of individuals in the economy.
Q3: True. The low ratio of inventories to sales implies that firms have inventories
close or below their desired or optimal level. This is generally good news. In
contrast, if firms have a high stock of inventories relative to sales this will have a
negative effect on production in the future because there would be less need to
engage in new production to meet future demand. (See text book p309-310)
Q4: False. Fiscal policy and monetary policy are both more effective when AS
curve is fairly flat. Both fiscal policy and monetary policy only shift the AD curve.
When AS curve is flat, the same change of AD curve will result in a larger
increase in output.
Q5: False. Stock prices are mainly determined by two factors: firm’s future profits
and cash flow and the discount rate (because the interest rate is the return on
bonds, an alternative investment to stocks, and because the interest rate affects
firms’ investment decisions and thereby future firm growth). When the
unemployment rate decreased unexpectedly, it was good news for future profits
and cash flow and so stock prices can be expected to rise. However, the Fed
may increase interest rate in response to the better economic conditions. The
increase of benchmark interest will raise discount rate and suppress stock prices.
Hence the net effect is uncertain and so it is false that the result will always be
and increase in stock prices.
Q6: True. It’s the life cycle story. Most Yale students can expect a relatively high
salary after graduating. Therefore, under the theory of consumption smoothing,
they can borrow money now and pay it back in the future, which will improve their
total utility.
Q7: False. When government increases transfer payments, households are now
wealthier, so they can now afford to work less, and therefore, the income effect
will cause a decrease in labor supply.
  Section 2 (9 marks each)
  1. Individuals would adjust their consumption pattern over the 20 years. Because
  they are poorer after the drop in the value of the stocks, they would decrease
  their consumption.

  Each year, consumption would drop by 4000/20 = 200 billion.
  Now we have to consider the multiplier effect of a drop in consumption on the
  total drop in income. Therefore, the annual drop is 200 x 2.0 = 400 billions, which
  is equivalent to 400/14000 = 2.8% drop in the GDP.

  Finally, regarding labor supply, if individuals are poorer, they would work harder
  (an income effect). Therefore, we should observe an increase in the labor supply.

  2. Note that the question asked about cyclical unemployment, and not about
  business cycle. Therefore, the correct answer should explain why firms decide to
  adjust through firing or hiring workers, and therefore changing the level of
  unemployment, and not through changes in wages.

    There are several reasons for the cyclical unemployment, such as:
  I. Sticky wages: The idea is that wages are sticky on the downward side.
      Therefore, firms adjust using the number of workers, instead of decreasing
      wages. There are two main reasons for the existence of sticky wages:
           a. Social, or implicit, contracts: Firms decide to not cut wages, even when
               they can legally do it. This can be related to sociological or
               psychological reasons.
           b. Explicit contracts: Unions and other forms of employees organizations
               can reach deals with the firm, setting the wages for longer periods of
               time, and making the wage not contingent to the economic conditions.
 II. Efficiency wages: Firms pay more than the equilibrium wage in order to
      increase the productivity of the worker. If wages and productivity are related,
      firms can use higher wages to encourage workers to increase their productivity.
III. Imperfect Information: It is possible that firms do not have enough information
      to calculate the equilibrium wage. If that is the case, this lack of information can
      produce a wage that is set too high, and therefore some workers have to be
      turned away, and the result is unemployment.
IV. Minimum wage laws: If the law sets a floor for wage rates, firms cannot
      decrease wages below that floor, and therefore they would make the
      adjustment through decreasing labor demand, and consequently increasing
    Cyclical unemployment might not exist because there is a difference between
    looking for any kind of job, and looking for a job with a specific wage rate. For
    instance, let’s consider a recently laid off worker, who received in her last job a
    wage rate of $10 per hour. She quickly finds another offer, but in the new job the
    wage rate is $8 per hour. She decides to not accept the offer, and wait for a
    better opportunity. Therefore, she would be counted as unemployed, but actually,
    she decided to not be employed. Therefore, a better measure of employment
     should consider the availability of jobs, or the wage in which the workers would
     accept the offer.

     3. Firms invest considering the time and size of the investment. Some investment
     will last for several years, and therefore, a more realistic model of investment
     should consider expectations of the economic conditions in the future, among
     other variables. Other considerations in the investment decisions are the excess
     of capital and long run capital labor substitution.

     Section 3 (10 marks each)
     1. Simple Multiplier Model
     Y CIG
     C  .75Y
     Y  .75Y  I  G
     .25Y  I  G
     Y  4I  4G
     So the govt. multiplier is 4.

   The government multiplier will be smaller when:
        -   Tax payments depend on income (income tax) since as income increases
            so do tax payments. This creates a drag on the economy.
        -   Investment is endogenous. That is, when investment is a function of
            interest rates, an increase in G “crowds out” private investment. The
            increase in r that follows from an increase in G lowers I and lowers the
            increase on Y.
        -   Prices are taken into account. Some parts of economic expansions take
            the form of higher prices rather than increased output.
        -   When imports are allowed, some domestic spending leaks out into foreign
        -   Fed policy follows a rule so that r=f(Y, P). When the fed leans against the
            wind, the open market operations will operate to reduce the money supply
            and increase r, perhaps even beyond the increase in r that comes from
            crowding out alone. This lowers investment.
        -   Other possibilities include:
        -   Income Taxes
        -   Excess capital/labor
        -   Inventories
        -   Future Expectations
        -   Underground economy
2. If the Government increases G or TR, then the AD curve will shift out to the
right increasing both prices and output. Note that the AS curve does not shift at
all in this question. Since the fed rule discussed in class, r=f(P, Y), commits the
Fed to increasing rates when either prices or output increases, the fed will
increase rates in this instance. The Fed does this by selling bonds which lowers
the money supply. Note that the Fed action does not move the AD curve
because M is endogenous in this model, and endogenous changes do not shift
The rule we talked about in class suggests that the Fed leans against the wind.
This means that the Fed tempers the effect of stimulus plans that increase Y and
P, but it doesn’t go so far as to hold rates constant or drive Y and P below their
starting point. We can conclude, then, that Y and P both see a net increase.
Since consumption is a function of Y, consumption increases. Since the fed has
increased r, investment falls.

To top