Integrated Master Plan (IMP) by mzg34842

VIEWS: 265 PAGES: 13

									000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111
111101010101010101001010101010010100000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000010101010101010101001
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011
111111110100101001001010101010100101010010101010100
000000000000000000000000000000111111111111111000000
               Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
000000000000011111111111111111111100000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000011111111111110101010100010100101010
100101010101001010010101111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100000
000000000000111111111111000000000000010100110010101
001010101001000000000000000000000000000000000000000
     Government Roadmap
     Government Roadmap for JLTV Technology Development Phase
             CONCEPT                                     TECHNOLOGY
            REFINEMENT                                   DEVELOPMENT


                          MS A                                                                   MS B


                             ard
                           Aw
                        ct         -1           1            DR           DR        RR      -2
                     tra        RR           R-           -P            -C       -T      RR
                    n         S         IB                            D
                  Co                                T   D         T            TD      S


Big Picture” view of program
     •Shows key events, capabilities evolution, schedule, constraints
     •Supports POM; helps fight budget cuts
     •Shows key schedule interfaces with supporting programs/activities/contracts
     • Provides Metrics

Becomes framework for program IMP/IMS

Review regularly with all the players
     •Communication Tool - Progress, problems, and “heading check”
     •Update government roadmap as required with IMS

   IMP/IMS must be consistent with Government roadmap
IMP & IMS Overview




  Integrated Master Plan   Integrated Master Schedule
            (IMP)                       (IMS)
  • Event Based Plan       • Task and Calendar based Schedule
  •Relatively top level    • Level of detail necessary for
                             day-to-day execution.
  IMP Philosophy – Purpose
• Establishes the baseline execution plan for the program.
• Defines hierarchical, Event-based plan that contains:
   • Events                 (Level 1)
      •Accomplishments      (Level 2)
        –Criteria           (Level 3)
   • But no dates or durations
• Provides
   • Definition for program progress and completion tracking
   • Effective communication – program content agreement
   • “What and How” of program




            Valuable tool for program execution
  IMS Philosophy – Purpose
• Flows directly from IMP, w/added detail (Tasks)
  • Networked, detailed tasks necessary to support the events,
    accomplishments, and criteria of the IMP.
• Displays schedule status and Critical Path – Early Warning
• Enables “what if” schedule exercises
• Defines Dates and durations
• Provides:
   • Cost/Schedule integrity via WBS & SOW traceability
   • Earned Value Management System (EVMS) consistency
   • Ability to sort schedules multiple ways (e.g., Event, Integrated
     Product Team (IPT), or WBS)
• Expands on “how” and provides “when” for execution

      Valuable tool to communicate status and risk
  Events




• Logically sequenced points to
  assess program progress - Level 1 of IMP
 • DoD reviews (e.g., Milestone A)
 • Program reviews (e.g., design, production readiness,
   and supportability reviews)
 • Tests, deliveries, and other key progress
   demonstration or risk mitigation points


        Events are the foundation of the plan
  Accomplishments

 Detailed Design Complete for all
 JLTV Sub-Configurations




• Activities or steps whose completion
  indicates progress toward starting or
  completing an event - Level 2 of IMP


• Might include
  • Deliveries of systems/subsystems
  • Completion of integration activities
  • Completion of readiness reviews
Criteria

• Definitive measures/indicators that verify
  accomplishment completion - Level 3 of IMP
  • Completed work effort
     •e.g., Modeling and Simulation Plan Completed
  • Confirmation of performance compliance
     •e.g., Cross Domain Approach Approved
  • Results of incremental verification
     •e.g., Prototype Vehicle Inspection Record Finalized
  • Completed critical process activities
     •e.g., Risk Management Plan Finalized
    The IMP & IMS is used...


•   Used by Government
    • Communicate program to Stakeholders
    • Primary tools for validating progress
    • During Source Selection to determine proposal confidence
    • To assess earned-value metrics

•   Used by Contractor
    • Tool to help manage program
       • Aids in program planning & re-planning
       • Allows measurement of program progress
       • Helps to manage risk identification/mitigation
    • Allows communication to show
       • What will be delivered
       • When it will be delivered
  Government/Contractor IMP
• JLTV Government IMP
  • Section C of the JLTV contract was the basis.
  • Centered around the Technical Design reviews to drive an Event
    Based program.
  • Cross-functional, foundational document that drives the Program
    Management and IPT actions and deliverables.


• JTLV Contractor IMP
  • A detailed IMP that supports the Government IMP.
     • Government IMP is a minimum set of requirements for each event.
  • Cross-functional, foundational document that drives the Program
    Management and IPT actions and deliverables.
  • Sets directional focus of IPT and tracks it’s progress.
  • A final Integrated Master Plan is due at IBR, and updated as
    applicable at PDR, CDR, and TRR.
   Government IMP Example

                                                   Level 1 of IMP




                                                   Level 2 of IMP




                                                   Level 3 of IMP




  The “Owner” is the IPT within the Government who is
responsible for supporting the completion of that Criteria.
IMP Action Term Definitions

      Verbs                              Verb Description for IMP activity
                The subject parameter has been technically evaluated through one or more of following
    Analyzed    methods: equations, charts, data, models, simulations, physical mock-ups.
              The subject configuration item, data, or document has been submitted to the
   Approved
              appropriate authority, which has notified the team that it is acceptable.
              The subject has been reviewed and approved for technical compliance, using existing
    Certified
              approved procedures, instructions, and checklists.
              The subject configuration item, data, or document has been prepared, reviewed and
   Completed delivered by contractor management and has been deemed acceptable by the
              Government as meeting deliverable requirements in their entirety.
   Conducted The subject parameter has been executed and results generated.
               The subject area has been compiled, edited, put into a preliminary form, and has been
      Drafted
               accepted by the Governement as a draft.
               The subject has been created and set in place in a manner consistent with its intended
   Established
               use (e.g., procedures, baselines established).
               The subject data or document is complete, has contractor management approval, and
    Finalized
               may not be changed without formal revision control.
     Initiated The subject approach or procedure has been started.
        Met    The subject criteria has been accomplished.
               The subject data document has been examined critically and satisfies predefined
   Reviewed
               requirements.
               The configuration item, data, or document has been discussed between the Contractor
   Understood
               and Government and the two parities have a mutual agreement.
               The subject process, data, or document has been reevaluated based on later
    Updated
               information, and adjustments have been incorporated.
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001111
111101010101010101001010101010010100000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000010101010101010101001
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111011
111111110100101001001010101010100101010010101010100
000000000000000000000000000000111111111111111000000
               Integrated Master Plan (IMP)
000000000000011111111111111111111100000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000011111111111110101010100010100101010
100101010101001010010101111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111100000
000000000000111111111111000000000000010100110010101
001010101001000000000000000000000000000000000000000

								
To top