Volume 1 Issue 12 Truth Is Mighty and Will Prevail
The The Truth is Mighty AndWill Prevail
No Charges Will Be Laid In Land Sale Complaint
In response to the No Charges Will In the News Release from the OPP it sale agreement which the city had
Be Laid in Land Sale Complaint is claimed that development charges used for close to 20 years. and which
announced by the O.P.P. the following are assessed at the time of had protection against speculation and
facts need to be revealed. construction and no construction has forced the buyer to build on the land
I spent 1 ½ hours today (Oct. 27) with begun on the property. This is not true within one year was abandoned by this
Detective Staff Sergeant Andy Karski of this agreement. What the Mayor and council. The new
and Detective Jennifer Robertson. The questionable agreement states is “Any agreement has no protection and this
officers made it clear that they could current Section 221 bylaws as set by land can be flipped any time even
not find criminal activity as they had no council as of this date are included in before closing the deal.???
proof of anyone benefiting financially the purchase price and NO Further Sergeant Karski also stated that the
from this land deal. But upon my DEVELOPMENT CHARGE is payable sale of the land was not final and that
questioning Sergeant Karski stated by the purchaser”. Regardless of when before it was transferred the
that some people would talk to them construction begins NO FURTHER agreement would be changed even
and some people would not. He DEVELOPMENT CHARGE IS though a bylaw accepting the deal was
further stated” that no attempt was PAYABLE. passed and all signatures were
made to get a search warrant for Sargeant Karski also discounted the present. First time I or anyone else I
financial records nor would they ask fact that a earlier deal for the land talked to ever heard of a signed deal
the parties involved to provide any which was more advantageous to the being changed by the lawyers before
financial records”. There for they had city was rescinded and the new one closing.???
no evidence with which to work which gave away over $600,000 was On the subject of this property being
with.?? accepted by the city.??? land locked Sergeant Karski stated that
On the matter of appraised value The investigation also did not he had an opinion from a person with
Sergeant Karski stated that appraisals investigate why a perfectly good land expertise in land connected to jails in
are subjective and not scientific. He Ontario. It is claimed this person stated
discounted the fact that the Home that indeed this property is land locked.
Depot paid $280,000 per acre for their Now the survey clearly shows the land
10 acres and he discounted the fact has road frontage and when I pressed
that 3 acres is currently on the market this point the officer said that was a
for $250,000 per acre. He also matter of opinion.??Even if the
claimed that even though Roger property is land locked (which it is not)
Tudhope stated to them that earlier the question should be who allowed it
appraisals on the property were done to be land locked and for what reason?
for $170,000 per acre by the city no My understanding is that it is illegal to
records were available from the city.? knowingly do that.
Mr. Tudhope in fact provided the name Speaking Out I also asked detective Robertson if it
of the appraiser(Judy Savage) who 13 Creighton St. was true that when Roger Tudhope
according to the sergeant has passed 327-5717 who was co operating fully spoke to
away and her records were not www.speakingout.biz her offering information that she
available to be viewed.?? Can anyone Jim Tolnai intimidated him by saying “how would
help? Editor/Publisher you like us to investigate your
Page 2 Speaking Out
dismissal’? She confirmed that yes
indeed she said that but that it was not Alliance/PC Merger SCARY???
meant as intimidation. Roger on the worked out don’t we?
other hand felt intimidated. Sergeant David Orchard is not a very happy man.
He has been lied to, deceived and made So if Doug Lewis does,t care what the
Karski then asked “Why would we insignificant in the new scheme of things. policies are would he support things like
intimidate our witness”? Yes why? You see during the PC leadership race racism? How about deporting Quebecers
Strange. Peter Mckay who is backed by the old back to France? What about outlawing all
political parties except the PC/Alliance? So
Both officers claimed that Dennis Mulrooney gang was losing. Orchard who
if the new leader was a Red Neck member
Edmonds and Don Foxton did not give came in third was approached and a
contract signed specifically stating that of the former Alliance and a racist would
them a statement. I spoke on a number McKay would not pursue a merger with he support him or her? I believe the PC’s
of occasions to Dennis who confirmed the Alliance. Mistakenly Orchard have lost whatever dignity , ethics and
that indeed he spoke with detective believed that these people’s word or moral fiber they may have had. This
sounds like they would sell their souls for
Robertson for an hour to an hour and a indeed their signature actually meant
half. ?? something. He threw his support behind
McKay and the man won. Even before the I know Doug Lewis and I have not seen
So what is my reaction to the news? I eye to eye but this statement tops anything
ink was dry McKay was already back
am not surprised nor upset. I now have pedalling. Not so secret meetings were else I have heard from him in the past. One
even more questions that need held and now officially a merger has been who’s only passion is POWER for
answering.The battle for truth goes on. announced. So typical of the way POWERS sake is some one with a
Mulrooney and company did business in bankrupt soul.
So how do I feel about the Jim Tolnai
investigation. As I said to both officers I the past.
These people will do and say anything,
don’t believe this is over yet and the to get power. I want to draw attention to
truth will come out if not today, statements made by Doug Lewis as
tomorrow or next year. I reminded reported in the Oct. 20 Packet. “Quite Personal Safety
them that Al Capone was never frankly I don’t care what the policies are,
convicted of murder, prostitution, I don’t care what the constitution says and Over the past week I have had phone
I don’t care who the leader is going to be calls from people concerned that because I
bootlegging, intimidation, bribery or as long as we have a united conservative am bucking the Establishment my personal
corruption. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t party that moves forward. United we safety maybe compromised. Now I have
involved and that it didn’t happen. stand and WIN, divided we fall, that’s all not had any threats personally but I did
So what happens now? Well there is to it”. have one person tell me that one councillor
according to the Municipal Act councils Wow!! What a statement. Why he even he spoke to suggested “that guy better
received a loud applause. watch out”. Why the evening of the Ward
must act in good faith. Is the giving
When I read this my mind went back 2 candidates meeting a chap I had been
away of city assets at fire sale prices to things I have been told by Holocaust talking to told me of his concern actually
and development charges acting in survivors, books I have read and followed me to the City Center parking lot
good faith? I don’t think so. Stay tuned documentaries I have seen about how the concerned for my safety.
for Part 3. We need an independent supporters of the Nazi Party were told Could this be true in Mariposa the
forensic audit. similar tales and they too applauded people actually believe that Speaking Out
following blindly nothing but POWER. would create a violent backlash? I sure
Jim Tolnai They too said let’s unite and win. Don’t hope that these people are wrong and not
worry about our goals and aims just let’s just for my safety. I would hate like hell to
win and trust the party and leaders to do think that anyone would or could use
the right thing. For God’s sake this is physical violence to stop anyone from
2003 not 1923. I can not beleive some Speaking Out.
member present did not challenge Lewis’ I have advised both detective Robertson
statement. You know in the early days of and Sergeant Karski about these concerns.
the Nazi’s even some Jews supported Detective Robertson suggested I should
them, until they made their policies file a report which mistakenly I thought
known. Why Hitler signed a non was doing by passing on this information.
aggression treaty with Russia similar to According to her no by letting them know
McKay signing a no merger deal with did not constitute having reported it.???
Orchard. We know how both deals Boggles the mind.
Speaking Out Page 3
Page 4 Speaking Out
Replace This With Your Headline
se the columns on these
pages to start new stories or
to continue stores from
previous pages. Don't
forget to delete the headline and the
drop cap text frames if you're
continuing a story.
To learn how to add ''Continued on
page xx'' to a column, see page 150 in
Take a memorable quote from this
article (a pull quote) to pique your