sos2004_global_job_hunt
Document Sample


Global Job Hunt: Threats and Opportunities in California Polling Questions Which industry is most affected by outsourcing in California ? 1. Telecommunications 2. Accounting and bookkeeping 3. Data processing and related services 4. Computers and related products 5. Apparel design and related services To create jobs in California we need to ? 1. Discourage foreign outsourcing with regulation 2. Cut corporate income taxes 3. Job-creation tax credits 4. Provide incentives to attract new firms 5. Improve education and workforce training How can California be more competitive in global trade? 1. Lower business costs 2. Better export/import assistance for small firms 3. More highly educated/skilled workforce 4. Better state infrastructure 5. More incentives to manufacturing sector Long-term Employment Growth G-7 Countries, 1960 - 2002 Country Canada U.S. Japan Germany France U.K. Italy G-7 Total Percent 1960 2002 Change (Millions) (Millions) 1960-2002 6.0 65.8 43.4 25.7 18.3 23.6 20.1 202.9 15.3 136.5 62.7 36.0 24.3 27.8 21.6 324.2 155.0% 107.4% 44.5% 40.1% 32.8% 17.8% 7.5% 59.8% Current and Projected New Jobs Due to IS Outsourcing, Selected Industries Industry Group Natural Resources & Mining Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transportation & Utilities Publishing, Software & Comm Financial Services Professional & Business Services Education & Health Services Leisure, Hospitality & Other Svcs. Government Total Employment Net New Jobs 2003 2008 1,046 1,182 19,815 75,757 3,078 25,010 20,456 43,359 12,552 30,931 18,895 63,513 -24,860 -50,043 5,604 32,066 14,667 31,623 18,015 47,260 4,389 12,506 -3,393 4,203 90,264 317,367 Projected Offshoring of U.S. Jobs Cumulative Jobs Outsourced Thousands Percent Number of Jobs (L) % of Total US Jobs (R) 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2000 2005 2010 2015 Offshoring Services Market Size 2001, US$ Billions Canada 3.7 Eastern Europe* 0.4 Ireland 8.3 Israel 3.0 Mexico 0.5 India 7.7 Thailand 0.05 South Africa 0.01 Australia 0.4 China 1.1 Philippines 0.3 Russia 0.2 *Includes Poland, Romania, Hungary, and Czech Republic Offshoring Opportunities Across the Organization Common Corporate Functions Knowledge services & decision analysis Research & Development Back office Customer Contact Increasingly complex transactions Increasingly access to highly skilled labor pool • Basic data entry • Transaction management • Customer relations • Telemarketing • Finance and accounting • Procurement • Portfolio analysis • Risk management • Content development • New production design Industries at Risk to Outsourcing United States Employment Percent 2001(Q1) 2003(Q2) Change Industry (Thou.) (Thou.) 2001-2003 Manufacturing 16,932.3 14,757.7 -12.8% Nonmanufacturing 114,141.3 115,757.7 1.4% All Nonfarm 131,073.0 130,515.3 -0.4% Industries at Risk to Outsourcing California Employment Percent 2001(Q1) 2003 (Q2) Change (Thou.) (Thou.) 2001-2003 12,759.2 12,904.6 1.1% 1,849.0 1,587.2 -14.2% 14,608.2 14,491.8 -0.8% Industry Nonmanufacturing Manufacturing All Nonfarm Industries at Risk to Outsourcing United States Employment Industry Nonmanufacturing Sectors Software Publishers (except Internet) Internet Publishing and Broadcasting Telecommunications ISPs, Search Portals and Data Process Data Processing & Rel. Services Accounting, Bookkeeping & Payroll Payroll Services Computer Systems Design & Rel. Business Support Services Telephone Call Centers Telephone Answering Services Telemarketing Bureaus Manufacturing Sectors Computer and Electronic Products Semiconductors and Electronic Total At-Risk Industries 2001(Q1) 2003(Q2) Percent Change (Thou.) (Thou.) 2001-2003 276.1 50.6 1,323.4 516.0 320.9 976.3 158.9 1,341.2 784.4 406.2 54.8 351.4 1,862.1 308.7 6,853.9 247.9 33.7 1,138.9 433.2 292.2 875.7 124.6 1,148.1 746.2 363.2 50.9 312.3 1,415.9 237.9 5,791.8 -10.2% -33.4% -13.9% -16.0% -8.9% -10.3% -21.6% -14.4% -4.9% -10.6% -7.1% -11.1% -24.0% -22.9% -15.5% Industries at Risk to Outsourcing California Employment Industry Nonmanufacturing Sectors Software Publishers (except Internet) Telecommunications ISPs, Search Portals and Data Process Data Processing & Rel. Services Accounting, Bookkeeping & Payroll Computer Systems Design & Rel. Business Support Services Manufacturing Sectors Computer and Electronic Products Semiconductors and Electronic Total At-Risk Industries Percent 2001(Q1) 2003 (Q2) Change (Thou.) (Thou.) 2001-2003 55.8 150.5 60.2 24.4 108.8 218.2 56.2 443.1 162.1 980.8 47.1 123.5 48.0 18.9 103.1 163.2 57.2 336.8 115.2 774.6 -15.6% -18.0% -20.2% -22.8% -5.2% -25.2% 1.7% -24.0% -29.0% -21.0% Regions at Risk to Outsourcing Percent of Total Employment, 2002 Percent 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 U.S. California San Jose U.S. Jobs Moving Offshore Percent of U.S. Jobs Lost by Offshoring, 2000 - 2015 Occupation Management Legal Occupations Computer & Mathematical Architecture & Engineering Business & Financial Operations Life, Physical, and Social Science Arts, Entertainment & Media Sales & Related Office & Adminstrative Support Annual Wage 2003 $82,790 $78,910 $63,240 $59,230 $55,500 $53,210 $42,620 $31,250 $28,260 % US Offshoring Jobs 2000 2005 2010 2015 0% 6% 7% 9% 2% 2% 2% 2% 26% 19% 17% 14% 3% 5% 5% 6% 11% 10% 10% 10% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 5% 6% 7% 53% 50% 50% 50% Higher Wage Jobs Offshore Faster? Percent of U.S. Jobs Lost by Offshoring, 2000 - 2015 Percent Percent 10 Avg. Annual Wage = $82,790 53 52 8 6 Avg. Annual Wage = $28,260 51 50 49 48 47 Management Occupations (L) 46 Office & Admin. Support Occupations (R) 4 2 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 45 Majority of Jobs Cannot be Offshored California, 2002 Occupations that can be offshored, 11.5% 1.7 million Includes employment in: • Office support (computer operators) • Business and financial support • Computer and math professionals • Paralegals and legal assistants • Diagnostic support services • Medical transcriptions Occupations that cannot be offshored, 88.5% 12.8 million IT Jobs Displaced in the U.S. Including Jobs Lost & Not Created in 2000 - 2003 Thousands of Jobs 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 372,000 Total IT Jobs Lost Due to: •Recession •Dot-com Bubble Burst •Productivity Gains •Over-hiring in 1990s •Offshore ITO IT Jobs Lost or not Created Due to Offshore ITO 104,000 50 Computer Programmers Average Salaries, 2003 Country Poland & Hungary Russian Federation India Philippines Malaysia China Israel Ireland Canada U.S. Percent to U.S. Salary Range Equivalent Salary $4,800 - $8,000 6% - 13 % $5,000 - $7,500 6% - 13% $5,880 - $11,000 7% - 18% $6,564 8% - 11% $7,200 9% - 12% $8,952 11% - 15% $15,000 - $38,000 19% - 63% $23,000 - $34,000 29% - 57% $28,174 35% - 47% $60,000 - $80,000 100% Scientists & Engineers in R&D Top 10 Countries by Per Mil. Population, 2003 Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 50 72 Country Number Japan 648,778 Finland 26,378 Sweden 40,534 Singapore 19,737 Norway 18,811 U.S. 1,201,233 Switzerland 26,762 Russian Federation 501,621 Denmark 18,816 Australia 66,775 China India 705,689 167,414 Per Million Population 5,095 5,059 4,511 4,140 4,112 4,099 3,592 3,481 3,476 3,353 545 157 High Technology Exports Top 10 Countries Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 29 33 Country U.S. Japan Germany U.K. France Singapore China Malaysia Korea (ROK) Netherlands Russian Federation India US$ Millions 178,906 99,389 85,958 67,416 67,191 62,572 49,427 40,939 40,427 38,960 3,257 1,680 US$ per Capita 610.5 780.5 1,042.9 1,118.6 1,112.0 13,123.4 38.2 1,740.4 831.9 2,387.5 0.0 22.6 1.6 Employment by Foreign Firms in U.S. Top 10 States by Number of Employees, 2003 US Subsidiary State Labor Percent of Employment Force Labor State (Thou.) (Thou.) Force California 713.5 17,569.9 4.1 New York 480.8 9,294.1 5.2 Texas 428.1 10,961.5 3.9 Illinois 320.9 6,391.6 5.0 Florida 303.3 8,301.5 3.7 New Jersey 270.8 4,401.4 6.2 Pennsylvania 267.1 6,212.7 4.3 Michigan 244.2 5,071.2 4.8 Georgia 243.8 4,395.9 5.5 Ohio 242.2 5,871.9 4.1 Chip Design Production Global Share Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 U.S. Asia** Other 1995 2002 *Projected 2008* **Taiwan, Korea, India, China, Singapore, and Malaysia Research Jobs Created Bay Area-Based Companies Percent 100 80 60 5% 11% 13% 16% 9% 9% 33% 37% 40 20 0 Bay Area Rest of U.S. India China Rest of the World 38% 29% Semiconductor Software Globally Distributed Production Functions Hewlett Packard Printer R&D and Design U.S. India Component Manufacturing Hungary Assembly and Testing Distribution Local China Mexico Taiwan Local Local Hourly Wages for Selected Occupations U.S., California, Silicon Valley, and India, 2003 Silicon Occupation U.S California Valley India Telephone Operator $13.48 $14.55 $17.75 Under $1.00 Health Record Techs $11.79 $13.11 $15.85 $1.50 - $2.00 Payroll Clerk $14.22 $16.28 $21.02 $1.50 - $2.00 Legal Assistant $17.15 $19.88 $24.78 $6.00 - $8.00 Accountant $23.59 $25.95 $30.60 $6.00 - $15.00 Financial Analyst $28.87 $31.65 $36.19 $6.00 - $15.00 Programmer $29.49 $34.57 $40.31 $2.65 - $6.00 Offshoring Improves Performance Savings by Offshoring Index: original cost base in U.S. = 100 120 100 80 60 100 45 - 55% Savings 30 - 40% Savings -65 to -65 +5 to +10 +5 45 - 55 -5 to -7 -10 to -15 30 - 35 40 20 0 Factor cost savings Add management cost Task reengineering New cost base Original cost base Add telecom cost Offshoring location cost Process reengineering Task/process migration Task-level Process-level improvement improvement Offshoring’s Value to the U.S. Benefit Per $1 of U.S. Spending Sent Offshoring, 2002 Current Direct Savings to US investors/customers $0.58 Benefit Retained Imports of US goods & services $0.05 in the U.S. Transfer of profits by US providers $0.04 Potential Future Value from US labor reemployed $0.45-0.47 Benefit Net Benefit to the U.S. $1.12-$1.14 Offshoring’s Value to India Benefit Per $1 of U.S. Offshore Spending, 2002 Labor $0.10 Offshoring Sector Profits retained in India $0.10 Suppliers $0.09 Central Government $0.03 Taxes State Government $0.01 Net Benefit to India $0.33 India – Offshoring Takes Off Revenues from Business-Process Offshoring in India US$ Millions 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 GE British Airways Multinational companies entry to India Citygroup HCL Technologies, Speedwing Int., Standard Chartered Convergys, Daksh, HSBC TransWorks India – Outsourcing Jobs Rise IT & Other Service Jobs Thousands 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 IT Workers Other Service Workers 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 IT & Other Service Jobs in India Indexed Growth, 2000 - 2004 Index 2000 = 100 500 400 300 200 100 0 IT Workers Other Service Workers 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004* *Estimated India – The World’s Back Office? India’s IT Industry in 2008 US$ Billions 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Lower Estimate Upper Estimate Exports Domestic Market Technology Remote IT IT Services India – More Services-Oriented India’s GDP by Sector Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 Agriculture Industry Services 1980 1990 2000 2002 India Is Buying More U.S. Services Exports of Private U.S. Services to India, 1992 - 2002 US$ Billions Percent 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 92 Value (L) % of US Exports in Services (R) 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 0.0 Top 10 U.S. Exporting States Ranked by 2003 Value, US$ Billions, 2001 - 2003 Rank State 2001 2002 2003 1 Texas 95.00 95.40 98.85 2 California 106.78 92.21 93.99 3 New York 42.17 36.98 39.18 4 Washington 34.93 34.63 34.17 5 Michigan 32.37 33.78 32.94 6 Ohio 27.09 27.72 29.76 7 Illinois 30.43 25.69 26.47 8 Florida 27.18 24.54 24.95 9 Massachusetts 17.49 16.71 18.66 10 Louisiana 16.59 17.57 18.39 United States 689.5 658.8 688.6 Change 2002-03 3.6% 1.9% 6.0% -1.3% -2.5% 7.4% 3.1% 1.7% 11.7% 4.7% 4.5% Exports - Indexed Growth 1999 - 2004Q2 Index 1999Q1 = 100 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 99 00 01 02 California United States 03 04 California Exports Top 10 Countries by 2003 Value Percent Share 2002 2003 Change CA Exports Rank Country (US$ Bil.) (US$ Bil.) 2002-03 2003 1 Mexico 16.1 14.9 -7.5% 15.8% 2 Japan 11.1 11.8 5.8% 12.5% 3 Canada 10.1 11.2 11.5% 11.9% 4 China 4.5 5.5 21.9% 5.8% 5 Korea (ROK) 4.7 4.8 2.6% 5.1% 6 Taiwan 5.4 4.4 -17.6% 4.7% 7 U.K. 4.3 4.4 0.3% 4.6% 8 Hong Kong 3.7 4.2 13.4% 4.4% 9 Germany 3.5 3.6 2.3% 3.8% 10 Netherlands 3.6 3.4 -4.6% 3.6% All Others 25.3 25.9 2.4% 27.5% California Total 92.2 94.0 1.9% 100.0% California’s Top 10 Exports By Industry, 2003 2003 Share of Share of Value CA Total US Industry Rank Industry (US$ Bil.) Exports Exports 1 Computer & Electronic Products 36.71 39.1% 25.1% 2 Machinery Except Electrical 9.43 10.0% 13.0% 3 Transportation Equipment 8.64 9.2% 6.9% 4 Chemicals 5.96 6.3% 6.6% 5 Misc. Manufactured Commodities 4.88 5.2% 17.3% 6 Agricultural Products 4.78 5.1% 16.3% 7 Food And Kindred Products 4.17 4.4% 15.6% 8 Electrical Equipment & Components 2.94 3.1% 13.1% 9 Fabricated Metal Products 2.30 2.4% 12.1% 10 Plastics & Rubber Products 1.58 1.7% 9.9% Exports - Computer Equipment 1999 - 2004Q2 Index 1999Q1 = 100 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 1999 2000 2001 2002 California United States 2003 2004 Exports - Apparel Products 1999 - 2004Q2 Index 1999Q1 = 100 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 1999 2000 2001 2002 California United States 2003 2004 Exports - Chemicals 1999 - 2004Q2 Index 1999Q1 = 100 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 California United States 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Exports Per Workers California & U.S., 1999 - 2003 US$ Thousands 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 1999 2000 2001 2002 California United States 2003 Exports to NAFTA Members* As Percent of Total Exports Percent 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 1999 2000 2001 2002 California United States 2003 2004 *Canada and Mexico Exports to European Union As Percent of Total Exports Percent 26 California United States 24 22 20 18 16 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Exports to Asia* As Percent of Total Exports Percent 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 California United States 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 *Japan, Taiwan, Korea, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, India California Exports to the World Indexed Growth by Foreign Region, 1999 - 2004Q2 Index 1999Q1 = 100 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 1999 2000 2001 2002 NAFTA South America E.U. Asia Africa 2003 2004 Foreign Direct Investment to U.S. States Top 10 States by Employment, 2001 US$ Billions Thousands Property, Plant & Equipment (L) Employment (R) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 CA NY TX IL FL 800 700 600 500 400 300 NJ PA MI GA OH 200 Foreign Direct Investment to California Property, Plants & Equipment / Employment, 1991 - 2001 US$ Billions Thousands 130 Property, Plant & Equipment (L) Employment (R) 750 700 650 600 550 500 120 110 100 90 80 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 California’s Agricultural Exports Top 10 Commodities by 2002 Value 2002 Share of Percent Value CA Agr. Growth Rank Country (US$ Mil.) Exports 2001-2002 1 Almonds 829.0 15% 20.9% 2 Cotton 513.5 10% -14.8% 3 Wine 485.7 9% 2.3% 4 Table Grapes 367.3 7% -6.9% 5 Oranges 303.0 6% 1.8% 6 Dairy 300.9 6% -11.1% 7 Tomatoes* 215.4 4% 1.7% 8 Walnuts 183.9 3% 2.7% 9 Rice 183.0 3% 10.0% 10 Beef & Products 167.7 3% 8.3% Top 10 Total 3,549 66% 0.5% All Total** 5,374 100% -0.8% *Processed Tomatoes **50 principal commodities California’s Agricultural Export Markets Top 10 Destinations, 2002 China, 7% Mexico, 6% Korea, 5% Taiwan, 4% Japan, 17% Indonesia, 2% India, 2% Malaysia, 1% E.U., 21% Canada, 23% U.S. Trade in Services Exports and Imports, 1983 - 2003 US$ Billions 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 83 84 Exports Imports 86 85 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 U.S. Exports in Services By Category, 2003 Royalties & License Fees, 15.7% Other Transport., 10.4% Passenger Fares, 5.1% Transfers under US Military Contracts, 4.1% US Gov. Misc. Services, 0.3% Travel Services, 21.0% Other Private Services, 43.5% U.S. Exports in Services 1999 and 2003 Percent 1999 2003 Change Category (US$ Bil.) (US$ Bil.) 1999-2002 Other private services 98.2 133.8 36.3% Royalties & license fees 36.9 48.2 30.7% Other transportation 26.9 31.8 18.3% US Government Misc. Services 0.9 0.8 -8.5% Travel services 74.7 64.5 -13.7% Passenger fares 19.8 15.7 -20.7% Transfer under US Military 15.8 12.5 -21.0% Total Exports in Services 273.2 307.4 12.5% Net Legal Immigration Selected Countries, Avg. Annual, 1995 - 2000 Thousands 1500 1000 500 0 -500 U.S. U.K. France Indonesia India China Japan Argentina Philippines Mexico Inflow of Foreign Workers Per 100,000 Residents Number of Foreign Workers 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Germany Austria U.S. New Zealand Australia Canada 0 Japan U.K. Italy France U.S. H-1B Visa Petitions Approved Top 10 Country of Birth, 2002 Country Total Percent India 64,980 33.0% China 18,841 9.6% Canada 11,760 6.0% Philippines 9,295 4.7% U.K. 7,171 3.6% Korea 5,941 3.0% Japan 4,937 2.5% Taiwan 4,025 2.0% Pakistan 3,810 1.9% Columbia 3,320 1.7% U.S. H-1B Visa Petitions Approved Top 5 Occupation Group, 2002 Country Computer-Related Architecture/Engineer/Survey Administrative Specializations Education Medicine &Health Total Percent 75,114 38.3% 25,197 12.8% 21,103 10.8% 20,613 10.5% 12,920 6.6% Domestic Migrants Losses Top 10 States by Net Domestic Migration in 2000 - 2003 1991-1999 Rank State (Thous.) 1 New York -1,836 2 California -2,152 3 Illinois -545 4 Ohio -162 5 New Jersey -365 6 Massachusetts -232 7 Michigan -194 8 Louisiana -129 9 Kansas -14 10 Pennsylvania -248 2000-2003 (Thous.) -673 -306 -285 -129 -112 -108 -90 -89 -44 -44 Immigrant Magnet States Top 10 States by Net Immigration in 2000 - 2003 1991-1999 Rank State (Thous.) 1 California 2,222 2 New York 1,078 3 Texas 700 4 Florida 630 5 Illinois 376 6 New Jersey 369 7 Georgia 104 8 Arizona 104 9 Massachusetts 143 10 North Carolina 57 2000-2003 (Thous.) 1,134 530 514 419 258 228 144 126 125 114 California’s Migration & Immigration Historical Trend Thousands 3000 2000 1000 0 -1000 -2000 -3000 1940's Net Domestic Migration Net Immigration 1950's 1960's 1970's 1980's 1990's 2000-2003 California’s Population Growth Rate By Net Domestic Migration and Net Immigration Percent Growth 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 Net Domestic Migration Net Immigration 1940's 1950's 1960's 1970's 1980's 1990's 2000-2003 Legal Immigrants to California From China & India, 1990 - 2002 Thousands 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 90 India (L) China (R) 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 California’s Imports from China & India 1997 - 2003 US$ Billions US$ Billions India (L) China (R) 2.2 2.0 1.8 70 60 50 1.6 40 1.4 1.2 1.0 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 30 20 California Employment-based Immigrants By Country of Birth, 2002 Rank Country Number Percent 1 India 5,716 27.9 2 China 2,857 13.9 3 Philippines 1,665 8.1 4 Mexico 1,633 8.0 5 Korea 996 4.9 6 Taiwan 753 3.7 7 U.K. 691 3.4 8 Canada 569 2.8 9 Japan 497 2.4 10 Iran 366 1.8 Bush vs. Kerry on Immigration 2004 Presidential Election Bush: (1) Proposes granting legal status to illegal workers. (2) Plan would give temporary legal status for highly skilled foreign workers & farm labor. (3) Opposes giving illegal immigrants an “automatic path to citizenship.” Kerry: (1) People who have been in the U.S. at least five years, paid taxes and “stayed out of trouble ought to be able to translate into an American citizen immediately.” (2) Reward students who study hard and play by the rules Kerry’s International Tax Reform Goal: 2004 Presidential Election • End Tax Breaks that Encourage Companies to Move Jobs Overseas • Close Abusive International Tax Loopholes • Cut the Corporate Tax Rate by 5 Percent Actions: • Fundamental Reforms America’s International Tax System • Eliminates Tax Breaks for Companies that Create Jobs Overseas • Using the Approximately $12 billions in Annual Savings to Cut the Corporate Tax Rate Offshoring is Not New, Rather a Well Established Practice Offshoring by Bay Area Semiconductor & Software Companies (2004) Exploring Offshore Strategies 3% Not Yet Offshoring 3% Using Offshore Resources 94% Comparatively, 66% of U.S. companies were using offshore resources in 2003 Five Key Trends are Impacting Regions and Job Markets Macro Trends Industry Trends Worker Trends Shift From Shift From Manufacturing Manufacturing to Services to Services Globalization Globalization Technology Technology Driven Driven Productivity Productivity Demographic Demographic Change Change Business Business Disintermediation Disintermediation Fundamental Shifts in Global Business Climate • Increased competition and access for workers • Job mobility • High productivity growth • Acceleration of offshoring • New markets To Help Understand How the Job Profile is Changing We Identified Key Capabilities the Region is Competing On… Competitive Bay Area Capabilities 1. Entrepreneurship/new business creation 2. Research in advanced technologies 3. Concept and market development 4. Cross-disciplinary research 5. Global integrated management Challenged Bay Area Capabilities 1. Mass production 2. Back-office operations 3. Product and process enhancement …And Looked at the Region’s Position in Emerging Technologies Bay Area Biotech Firm Concentration, (2004) Industry Cluster Concentration Payroll Concentration Ratio: % of Payroll/% of Employment 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 Other US Bay Area Biotech firms Biotech firms = 657 = 800 Software Computer and Communications Hardware Manufacturing Bay Area Nanotech Firm Concentration, (2004) Biomedical Semiconductor and Semiconductor Equipment Manufacturing Bay Area Employment Concentration Relative to the US 9% 7% 5% 4% 4% 4% Bay Area Germany Japan Canada Switzerland UK Based on Its Capabilities and Lead in New Technologies the Region will Generate Jobs in Innovation and New Businesses Idea Generation/ Conceptualization Startup/ Business launch Scale/ Grow Business Sustain/ Manage Entrepreneurship/ New Business Creation Research in Advanced Technologies Cross-disciplinary Research Concept and Market Development Global Integrated Management Product and Process Enhancement Mass Production Back Office Operations Large Semi and SW Companies Still Plan to Hire Locally Total Employment Distribution (2004) Rest of World Job Listings Distribution (2004) Rest of World 43% 35% Other US Other US 39% 38% Bay Area 18% Bay Area 27% Based on Job Postings, 1 in 4 future hires are targeted for the Bay Area Research Job Prospects Remain Strong in the Bay Area… Research Job Listing for Large Bay Area Based Employers • Bay Area is center for cross-disciplinary and advanced research • Most small companies keep research in Bay Area • Medium and large companies keep the bulk of their innovation in the region Rest of the World 5% 11% China 13% India Rest of US 33% 16% 9% 9% 37% Bay Area 38% 29% Semiconductor Software …However, Even in the R&D Value Chain Some Select Activities Are Migrating Offshore Research and Development Value Chain = Expect to be increasingly offshored or outsourced Basic Research Concept Requirements Design Applied Validation Research Development Definition Prototyping and Product Development For research jobs across the local Semiconductor and Software industry, positive job creation is expected Keep In Mind, Offshoring is Also Creating New Types of Occupations Global Integrated Management Position ? Adobe Sample New Job Listing Advanced Technology Group (ATG) Engineering Manager •Based in San Jose, CA and will manage the Digital Imaging Technology Group in India. •The group consists of Senior Computer Scientists who will focus on advanced technology R&D in the Digital Imaging Market. •Will prioritize research activities, evangelizing technologies developed to product groups, plan the transfer of technology, and coordinate research activities within the US technology group. Remote project management capabilities are in high demand and can command a 25% premium Overall, Expect Bay Area Jobs to Change Based on The Competitive Position of the Region’s Capabilities Sample Occupations Aligned with Leading Capabilities • Venture capitalists, lawyers entrepreneurs • IT, biotech and nanotech R&D professionals • Architects, systems level software engineers • Select engineering including electrical, mechanical and electronics • Strategic managers in sales and marketing • Product marketing managers • Managers of global teams and assets (headquarters, product development, IT, HR, etc.) Sample Occupations Aligned with Weaker Capabilities • High tech manufacturing and assembly (except high-end) • Office support (e.g., data entry clerks, etc.) • Business and financial support (e.g., processing staff) • IT support specialists • IT administrators • Legal assistants • Statistical analysts • Entry-level computer and software engineers • Quality assurance and test engineers • Product and process engineers However, net job creation is expected for the Bay Area Economy Key Takeaways n n n Offshoring is not new, but rather a well established business practice Global trends are impacting regions and job markets The regional job profile is complex and requires understanding the business capabilities that drive it The Bay Area’s competitive capabilities and leadership in emerging technologies position it well for innovation and new business creation Overall, expect continued change in types of jobs, but net job creation to the Bay Area economy Policy direction should focus on: • Sustaining the region’s competitive capabilities • Addressing needs of the supporting business environment • Encouraging business leaders to “share the load” of job transitions n n n The Economics of Offshoring Are Compelling 45-55% saving 100 30-40% savings on offshore cost base 6060-65 45-55 5-10 5 5 -7 1010-15 30-35 Original cost base Factor cost savings Additional Additional Offshore telecom manage- location cost ment cost cost Task/process migration Task reengineering Task-level improvements Process reengineering Processlevel improvements New cost base California Has More Costly Labor, Energy, Tax Costs Than Neighboring & Manufacturing States* Index 100 = U.S. average (2002) Total index California Michigan New York Pennsylvania Washington Illinois Nevada Ohio Arizona Texas Utah Oregon North Carolina Unit labor cost** Energy cost Tax burden 117.0 113.2 105.9 103.4 103.1 103.0 102.2 101.8 99.9 97.1 94.3 91.0 89.7 109.1 116.7 97.8 103.8 107.5 104.5 100.9 101.2 99.6 99.0 96.8 91.1 89.9 102.6 160.9 110.0 103.3 126.8 91.9 107.8 95.0 93.1 110.5 97.9 82.5 108.7 106.4 92.8 132.5 109.3 78.0 101.2 115.0 99.1 102.4 96.8 72.6 80.1 86.4 * Top 8 manufacturing states and 5 neighboring states ** Measured as labor wages per unit output The Real Economics of Offshoring 1.45-1.47 $1.00 0.67 0.45-0.47 0.33 $1 previously spent in U.S., now offshored to India . . . . . . delivers value to India ... . . . brings savings and returns to U.S. . . . . . . creates new value from reemploying U.S. labor* ... . . . and makes the global pie that much bigger • Taxes ($0.04) • Revenues ($0.20) • Cost savings ($0.58) • Goods/ services sold ($0.05) • Profits from Indian ventures ($0.04) • Local suppliers ($0.09) * Estimate based on historical U.S. reemployment trends U.S. Economy Generates Net Additional Value From Every Dollar of Spend Offshored Value potential to the U.S. from $1 of spend offshored to India Dollars; 2002 Further value creation potential through • Increased global competitiveness of U.S. business • Multiplier effect of increased national savings 1.12-1.14 0.45-0.47 0.58 0.67 0.05 0.04 Savings accrued to U.S. investors and/or customers Import of U.S. goods and services by providers in India Transfer of profits by U.S. providers in low-wage country to parent Total direct benefit retained in the U.S. Value from U.S. labor reemployed** (conservative estimate) Potential for total value creation in the U.S. economy (conservative estimate) Current direct benefit* Potential future benefit * Estimated based on historical reemployment trends from job loss through trade in the U.S. Job Creation Will Outpace Offshoring By A Wide Margin Employment, 2000-2010, Millions 22 -2 Services jobs offshored Net new jobs created Foundations of the Offensive Skilled workforce Financial capital Technology access Physical Infrastructure Tax and regulatory Quality of life The California Power Crisis Will Cost The State More Than $56 Billion By 2013 US$ Billions (2000 dollars) 24.8 Including the economic impact of consumer and business confidence and the 2000 blackouts, the actual cost to the state is even higher 56.3 4.3 3.9 10.8 5.8 6.8 PG&E Bankruptcy SCE Bankruptcy 2001 power costs 2002 power costs 2003 power costs California DWR long term contract obligations (2004-2013)** CPUC Bankruptcy settlements California DWR power procurement costs incurred* * CA DWR costs shown are current are through December 2003 and include energy and capacity costs only and do not include bond charges, reserves, administrative and other costs ** Contract costs are estimates as of September 2004 and may vary based on natural gas prices, contract utilization and future contract renegotiations The Risk of Future Shortages is High Projected California state operating reserve margin*, Percent BAEF ESTIMATE Demand 1 in 2 year • 750 MW of new capacity will be needed before 2006 to maintain a 7% operating reserve under a 1-in-5 case** • Given the lead time for new construction, permitting and demand side management needs to begin today 6.5 5.8 3.8 2.7 5.4 1 in 5 year 9.9 8.7 6.9 7% target = Stage One emergency level 5% target = Stage Two emergency level August 2005 August 2006 August 2007 August 2008 * Operating reserve margin calculated as (Available Supply – Peak Demand)/(Peak Demand) ** As much as 2,000 MW would be required to maintain a planning reserve margin of 15% for the 1-in-5 case, which would equate to a 1-in-2 operating reserve of 12.1% and a 1-in-5 operating reserve of 9.1% Doctor’s Degrees Conferred United States Percent 100 80 60 40 20 0 1976-1977 2000-2001 Black White Hispanic Asian Non-Resident Alien American Indian
Get documents about "