International Civil Aviation Organisation Middle East Office

Document Sample
scope of work template
							   International Civil Aviation Organisation
              Middle East Office
Seminar on Aeronautical Spectrum Management
             Cairo 4-6 June 2006



   Agenda Item 8: HF Planning issues in AFI

          Presented by Mary Obeng
            RO/CNS, ICAO Dakar
                INTRODUCTION

• Due to increase in VHF coverage, there has been
  considerable decrease in the use of HF in AFI.
  However, IFALPA has been complaining of some HF
  congestion in AFI, notably AFI-3 (11300 KHz) and
  AFI-4 (8894 KHz).

• A COM survey was conducted by IFALPA and IATA
  on VHF and HF coverage in the AFI Region to see
  how best the congestion could be eased.
               Objectives of the Survey
• Establish status of implementation of mobile
  communications throughout the region

• Monitor progress in extension of VHF radio coverage

• Identify deficiencies in aeronautical mobile service
  coverage

• Assess problems of congestion on mobile frequencies
  and the extent to which they are used for ground/ground
  coordination

• Provide information to the COM/SG which will be useful
  in planning the improvement of air/ground
  communications
                                  The Survey Form
Call sign:                               Origin:                                   Date:

Aircraft type:                           Destination:                              Signed:


Position:                                          Time:                z    Flight Level:


                                   Communications information

ATS Unit:                                     Strength             Clarity              Congestion

                                                                                 Low – Medium -
             VHF (SEE NOTE 3)               1–2–3–4-5         1–2–3–4-5
   Fre-                                                                          High
 quency:                                                                            Low – Medium -
             HF                             1–2–3–4-5         1–2–3–4-5
                                                                                         High

Was the frequency apparently in use for ground/ground co-ordination?                     Yes   No

Comments:
    IATA Mobile Communications Survey - 2000

 Last Survey made in 1994

 Responding to decision 4/16 of COM SG/4

 Survey conducted in cooperation between IATA &
  IFALPA

 Dates – 20 April – 30 May 2000

 More than 1140 pilot reports received

 Analysis by IATA Regional Office using Access
  database
                     Main Conclusions
• Higher proportion of calls are being made on VHF
  compared to 1994

• HF still the only means available in significant portions of
  the AFI Region en route

• Noticeable improvement in average quality of
  communications, in line with increased availability of VHF

• Some reduction in congestion on AFI-4 family of
  frequencies but severe congestion persists on AFI-3
  (11300Khz)

• Congestion directly associated to lack of VHF cover and
  non availability of ATS/DS
                   Use of VHF 1994 - 2000
               •   1994 - 37% of reports – VHF


               •    2000 – 54% of reports - VHF

        1994                                      2000




   HF      VHF                               HF     VHF




VHF EXTENTIONS IN SOUTHERN
AND EASTERN AFI ALSO ACCRA
LUANDA,N’DJAMENA,KANO,NIAMEY,TUNIS FIRS
Percentage Use of VHF by FIR - 2000
                  Quality of Communications
                      Strength 1994 vs 2000

             40
             35
             30
Percentage




             25
             20
                                                  1994
             15
                                                  2000
             10
             5
             0
                  0    1    2      3   4      5
                            Strength
                  Quality of Communications
                       Clarity 1994 vs 2000
                                                  1994
                                                  2000

             35
             30
             25
Percentage




             20
             15
             10
             5
             0
                   0    1    2      3   4     5
                              Clarity
                        Quality 1994 vs 2000

                • 1994 - 63% of reports 3x3 or better


                • 2000 – 79% or reports 3x3 or better
                 1994                                 2000




3x3 or better                         3x3 or better
Quality by FIR - 2000
        Deficiencies in Mobile Coverage


 The survey identifies those positions where
  mobile communications deficiencies occur

 Following slides show positions where repetitive
  reports indicate difficulties in air/ground
  communication in both HF and VHF

 All reports used in these slides indicate quality of
  communication less than 3x3
       Deficiencies in Mobile coverage

 Abidjan
   • MISLA

 Luanda

 Alger
   • ATAFA; Djanet; MOKAT; NSL; RAZEL; ROFER;

 Khartoum
   • ALVOR; ME; Malakal;
        Deficiencies in Mobile coverage


 Kinshasa
   • Buta Zega; KIBRO; MERON; SOBTO; TALAC;
     USDUP

 N’djamena
   • MERON

 Tripoli
   • Kufra; NALUT; SEB;
                     HF Frequencies – by number of reports
ALG; KAN; NIM;                      ACC; FIH; GBE; KAN;
        AFI-2                       LAD; NDJ; NIM
                                            AFI-4

             90
                                                     ADD; CAI; KRT; MGQ;
             80                                      NBO; TIP
                                                            AFI-3
             70
             60
                                                     FIH      DKR; ROB             ACC; ABJ
             50                                     AFI-4       AFI-1                AFI-4
             40
             30                                                             DAR; MRU; SEZ; TNR
             20                                                                   INO-1

             10
                 0
                      8894

                             8903

                                    11300

                                            13294

                                                       8861

                                                              6586

                                                                     8879

                                                                            6535

                                                                                   11291

                                                                                           8898

                                                                                                  5517
                           Congestion by FIR
•Percentage of Reports indicating HIGH congestion - Top
Five
•Percentage of Reports indicating HIGH and/or MEDIUM
congestion - Top Five



40.0                                 100%
35.0                                 90%
                                     80%
30.0
                                     70%
25.0
                                     60%
20.0                                 50%
15.0                                 40%
                                     30%
10.0
                                     20%
 5.0
                                     10%
 0.0                                  0%
       KRT   NBO   TIP   ADD   KAN          KRT   TIP   NDJ   LAD   NBO
Use of Mobile Frequencies for Coordination

                                     AFI-3

                                      AFI-4

                                     Frequency used
                                     for coordination




                              INADEQUATE ATS/DS IN AFI-3
                              IMPLEMENTATION OF VSAT
                              COM/SG/5 DECISION
                Outcome of the survey

• By improving aeronautical fixed services,
  implementation of the NAFISAT network will reduce the
  use of air-ground frequencies for ATS coordination (e.g.
  reduction of congestion on HF frequency 11300KHz.

• NAFISAT MOU has been signed by Djibouti, Egypt,
  Eritrea, Libya, Kenya (Somalia), Civil Aviation Caretaker
  Authority (CACAS) Seychelles, Sudan, Uganda,
  Tanzania, Yemen, ATNS and IATA hopefully Ethiopia and
  Saudi Arabia will join the network.

• NAFISAT contract already awarded. The network is
  expected to be operational by 2007.

						
Related docs
Other docs by rt3463df
2. Atom History
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
SAMPLE HEADLINE
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
RFCs and White Papers
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Open Economy Macroeconomics
Views: 501  |  Downloads: 2
Chapter 10 Review States of Matter
Views: 128  |  Downloads: 0