Communicating Results
Document Sample


Communicating Results
Lecture 11.1
Why APA style?
- Readers know where to find info
- Easy to make sure that necessary info is included
- Manuscript style helpful for editing (e.g. double-spacing & big margins) and typesetting
(e.g. tables, figure captions, and figures separate at the end)
- For formatting, just follow the rules
Order in manuscript
1. Title
2. Abstract
3. Intro
4. Methods
5. Results
6. Discussion/General discussion
7. References
8. Author Note
9. Footnotes (/Endnotes – avoid, if important enough to say, important enough to appear in
text)
10. Tables
11. Figure Captions
12. Figure
Common order for writing
1. Methods
2. Results, figures, f. captions, tables
3. Gen. Discussion
4. Intro (maybe earlier based on proposal)
5. References
6. Author note
7. Abstract
8. Title
Headings follow hierarchical structure of manuscript
- Level one – Title, Methods, Results, Discussion, etc
- Level three – Participants, Materials, Design, etc
Parts of an Article
- Title
o Concise (10-15) words, imply/include IV and DV
- Abstract
o Short summary of the whole article
o Maximum of 120 or 150 words
o Includes purpose, variables, task, results, implications
o Usually written last because that’s when you’ll know what the conclusion is
- Introduction
o Introduces topic
o States the problem to be addressed by research, and the purpose of the research
o Situates the present study with respect to past research
Acknowledge contributions of other researchers understanding the
problem and note controversies
o Outlines their research strategy – what is the relationship between the question
addressed and the method used to address it
o Justifies and states the hypotheses
o Necessary components
Typically in order:
Broad introductions to the problem
Citation of background lit that frames the research
State purpose and rationale of the study with a logical development
of the predictions or hypotheses guiding the research
o Do NOT provide an exhaustive literature review!
Only say as much as needs to be known
o Understanding your reader
The reader is not inside your head, they haven’t read the same literature,
or spent as much time thinking about the problem
Make logical transitions between paragraphs
See chapter 16 for advice on style and citations
Have somebody else read your proposal before turning in
- Methods
o Enough info to repeat study
o Start with first
o Use past tense throughout
o Use informative labels for variables and conditions (NO ABBREVIATIONS)
o When people really know an area well, the will sometimes skip to the Methods
section since they already know what would be in the Intro or can infer it from the
Methods
o Subsections
Participants/Subjects
Who took part: how many, where you found them, criteria for
inclusion/exlclusion, compensation, and excluded participant’s
data that was excluded and why
Apparatus
What equipment did you use? Including brands, models. What
kind of software? Remember other researchers need to be able to
replicate your study.
Materials
Often this is part of what is manipulated. Often mentions variables
that were controlled in some way.
Design
Sometimes included as its own section, sometimes combined with
Materials or Procedure
IVs, DVs, within/between-subjects manipulations,
counterbalancing
Procedure
What is the gist of the instructions? Where did the study take place
and who was present? What did the experimenter (or computer)
and participants do?
Usually an overview of phases of the experiment, then sequence of
events within each trial.
Results
First of all, describe any conditions for including or excluding data
(if not mentioned in participants)
Then, describe the pattern of data
o E.g. differences in average measures or relationships
between variables
Even if info is also present in a table or figure, it needs to be
described in words
When you learn inferential stats, these will supplement these
descriptions, indicating whether they are statistically significant.
Don’t get hung up on numbers and statistics.
Usually write after methods or intro
Discussion
First, restate the results in plain language
Relates the results to predictions and hypotheses
Addresses the real and perceived limitations of the study,
discrepancies
May provide “next steps” for future research and speculation about
unexpected events
Results more generally to past research and/or theories to explain
outcome
At end, provides broad context for study
References
All citations in an article described in full detail, so that any reader
can find the reader themselves
1:1 relationship between citations and references
Alphabetical order
APA format
Get documents about "