Docstoc

Harold Avenue Traffic Analysis Fall 2005 The Biddeford Police

Document Sample
Harold Avenue Traffic Analysis Fall 2005 The Biddeford Police Powered By Docstoc
					                          Harold Avenue Traffic Analysis
                                            Fall 2005



The Biddeford Police Department received a request from the Superintendent of Schools to
complete an analysis of Harold Avenue and environs, and to assess or identify traffic safety
deficiencies as they relate to the picking up or discharging of school children in that area. As a
basis for this request for analysis, the School Department has referred a written complaint from a
member of the community in and around Harold Avenue. The complainant states that because of
the expanding development and construction of new housing in this area, there is an increase in
the volume, speed, and type of motor vehicle traffic. Additionally, the complainant as well as
some of her neighbors has made the observation that there is an increase in foot traffic, especially
school aged children, and that there exists a concern that the sidewalk configuration is
inadequate to accommodate safe travel.

In the written letter to the Superintendent of Schools, the complainant made some suggestions
and recommendations in order to ameliorate these traffic safety issues. Specifically, the
installation of stop signs and speed bumps to act as traffic calming devices. Whereas the
complainant has made a specific request that special consideration be extended to her son by
having him transported to school by a Biddeford School Bus, this report is purposely silent on a
recommendation; as this determination rests entirely within the jurisdiction of the School
Committee and its written policies.

As a result of the Superintendent’s request, I assigned Traffic Specialist Sgt. Rick Doyon and
Patrol Officer Anthony Ciampi to complete a traffic analysis and assessment of the area around
Harold Avenue. The gathering of information for the analysis began on September 29, 2005, and
concluded on October 13, 2005. Please find below an explanation of the review methodology,
and step by step procedures that were used in this analysis, along with the results of their
findings.

Additional comments, observations or specific recommendations that I may have, are included at
the end of this report.



Analysis


Step 1: The assigned officers reviewed the written complaint, and formulated a plan of approach.
Sgt. Doyon met with the complainant in order to have a complete understanding of the traffic
safety issues. A copy of the written complaint is attached.

Step 2: The officers visually surveyed the area, which included: Lisa Lane, Harold Avenue,
Jordan Drive, Marion Avenue, Bernard Avenue, Berube Lane, and Granite Street.

Step 3: The officers met with Audrey LaBrecque, who is the bus dispatch supervisor for
Biddeford School Department, and obtained copies of the bus routes and schedules for bus #3
and bus #19. Both buses are assigned to pick-up and drop-off of students in the area of Harold
Avenue. Additionally, they obtained a copy of the Student Transportation Services guidelines, as
revised on July 12, 2005 by the School Committee. These guidelines are used in the
determination for the busing of “qualified” students. LaBrecque also provided them with the
number of students that ride each of the buses that service the Harold Avenue area. All copies
are attached.

Step 4: The officers previewed the signage in the area and noted that there was no speed limit
sign posted at either end of Harold Avenue. At our request, the Department of Public Works
erected two 25MPH speed limit signs on Harold Avenue, one for each direction of travel, posted
with the words “Strictly Enforced”. We changed the four “Strictly Enforced” signs, which were
posted on either end of Marion and Bernard Avenues, from the smaller lettering design to the
larger lettering

Step 5: This step involved the gathering a traffic data that includes: number of vehicles by date
and time of day, class of vehicle, and speed of vehicle. The measuring device is a TRAXPro™
electronic data analysis monitoring device with recording software that measures the various
components through collection tubes that are laid across the roadway. On September 29th, the
officers set up TRAXPro™ on Harold Avenue, leaving it in position for two-weeks. Review of
the data revealed that the highest percentage (95.1%) of vehicles that utilized this Street area
were Class 02 and 03 vehicles, which are passenger cars, SUVs, and light-duty trucks. Less than
5% of vehicles that traveled through the area were over Class 4. The speed portion of the
analysis shows that the highest percentage (66.4%) of vehicles traveling through the area was
traveling at a speed between 21 and 30 MPH. Further, the study shows that only 44.1% of the
traffic was traveling at a speed which was less than the maximum speed limit, while 55.8% of
motorists were traveling to varying degrees, in excess of the posted speed limit. The mean for
the entire study period is 26 M.P.H., with a posted speed for this area of 25 miles per hour. The
last value that can be derived from the study is that the peak traffic volume times were between
0700 and 0800 and between 1600 and 1700. This information suggests that the highest volumes
of traffic are created during the local residents’ morning and evening commutes. Detailed results
of the traffic analysis/study are available for presentation and explanation. During this review
period, a total of 5,380 trips were made across the traffic tubes.

Step 6: The officers measured the distance from 1 Lisa Lane to JF Kennedy School in response
to a specific concern of the complainant, whose child is required to walk to JFK. Using a
calibrated patrol unit, Officer Ciampi drove from 1 Lisa Lane to Harold Avenue then to Bernard
Avenue and then to West Street and to JFK. The odometer reading on the unit indicated 1.0-
miles. Officer Ciampi then drove this same course in the reverse order and the odometer reading
in the police unit indicated 1.0-miles. This course was chosen simply because it is the shortest
measured route that allows a pedestrian to walk to JF Kennedy School on a raised sidewalk.

Step 7: The officers completed a survey the area of Harold Avenue using the LTI laser transit,
which allows us to take measurements of the area and diagnose or identify problem areas. The
diagrams of the area are attached.

Step 8: Officer Ciampi conducted visual surveillance of the area in order to gather information
on the amount of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. During those times that Officer Ciampi was
there, he observed a moderate amount of vehicular traffic leaving the area, with only a minimal
amount that came into the area. The outcome was expected, as these observations seem to
coincide with and be reflective of, the morning and evening commute times. According to the
officer’s observations, there was minimal pedestrian traffic in the area with very few students
walking and only slightly more waiting at the designated stops for the school bus. On one of the
observation days, for example, five (5) students took bus #3 and no students took bus #19. Few
people walked through the area at other times of the day.

Step 9: The Department established extra proactive traffic patrols in the area of Harold Avenue.
The results of those selective patrols are 3 speeding tickets for 7 miles over, and 4 warnings for 5
miles over the speed limit.

Step 10: Sgt. Doyon and Officer Ciampi met with members of the City of Biddeford Engineering
Department and obtained a copy of aerial photographs of the area, which are attached.

Step 11: Officers took photographs of the area, which are attached.


Conclusion

With the obvious truism that more development will bring with it more traffic, more pedestrians,
more students, and complaints of speeding vehicles that operate in disregard to the safety of
others.
That being said, this newly expanded development has brought with it complaints of speeding
vehicles, and request from a parent for the School Committee to deviate from established policies
that regulate the transportation of students.

The analysis of this area has revealed a need for specific remedial action that we can and should
do something about. It was noted during the officers’ evaluation of the area that speed limit signs
were never erected by the city, thus making our speed enforcement efforts almost impossible. In
response to that weakness, two speed limit signs were properly posted along with a warning that
this speed would be strongly enforced by our police officers. The addition of “slow children”
signs to the area would be helpful, and would not need council action to get them placed
somewhere on Harold Avenue. I will also propose to the City Council that a stop intersection be
enacted on Harold Avenue, at Bernard Avenue to act as a traffic calming measure. This will most
assuredly slow traffic down, and is more readily identifiable by the operator of a motor vehicle.
Finally, Construction of a sidewalk on Harold Avenue falls within the authority of the City
Council, but is not seen as an impediment to the safety of children walking to school, as other
routes have been identified.

				
DOCUMENT INFO