RUBRIC RATING FORM Mini Grant Proposals NAME OF PROJECT PROJECT AUTHOR If author has submitted proposal by vbm17056

VIEWS: 15 PAGES: 1

									                                          RUBRIC RATING FORM
                                            Mini-Grant Proposals

NAME OF PROJECT

PROJECT AUTHOR

If author has submitted proposal already this academic year, this proposal is disqualified

RATER NAME:

Rate the proposal on the following 4 point scale: 4=Excellent, 3=Good, 2=Average, 1=Poor.

           Quality of the proposal (Timely, inclusive, interesting, feasible, complimentary)

           Connection to one or more of the PACMWA goals

           Measurable impact on the UW campus

           Quality of letter of endorsement

           Total Points

Fund Decision ____ Yes _____ No

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----FUNDING:

_____ _Funding Recommendation (self)

______ Funding Recommendation (committee)

COMMENTS:




DECISION RULES:

        No proposals should receive funding that have 10 points or less
        Excuse yourself from evaluating any proposal that you have connections to or to any
         proposals which you feel you cannot offer an objective opinion (“more or less”)




Revised September 2005

								
To top