The Truth About College Rankings Who is Really #1

Shared by: lot16315
Categories
-
Stats
views:
6
posted:
4/5/2010
language:
English
pages:
1
Document Sample
scope of work template
							The Truth About College Rankings: Who is Really #1?
By Kat Cohen

The Huffington Post

Posted January 27, 2009

US News and World Report released their first-ever issue of the World's Best Colleges
and Universities, based on the Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings.
These new rankings are problematic, like the 25 year-old America's Best Colleges issue,
because they create greater confusion for college hopefuls the world over.

Let me break it down: the world rankings focus on an institution's research influence and
consider its external reputation by employers, while also taking into account the
proportion of the university's international faculty and students. This is in sharp contrast
to the America's Best Colleges guide, which focuses on an institution's resources, its
selectivity, and the average standardized test scores of admitted students. These factors
supposedly influence graduation, retention and alumni donations. The only factor that
both surveys have in common is peer review but, for whatever reason, peer review plays
a larger role in the World's Best Colleges list, where 40% of an institution's score is
determined by this factor (compared to only 25% in America's Best Colleges). As a
result, there are significant differences between the two rankings. Check out the chart.

It's bad enough that finding a college based on college rankings ignores a student's
individual needs (and how different one campus is from another,) but now students and
parents will have to consider two competing views from the very same publication!

The disparity between the two surveys is laughable. How can Boston University be
ranked among the top 20 American institutions when compared to its global peers, while
ranked 60 when compared only to its American counterparts? Conversely, why are Notre
Dame and Georgetown so well regarded when compared to other American colleges, but
considerably less so when compared to non-American institutions? As if the college
application process wasn't difficult enough, now we have yet another frustrating college
rankings list to contend with.

During such a stressful time in an applicant's life, a little list can go a long way in
clarifying the applicant's college options. But students need to create their own lists with
their own personal rankings. A student may be especially interested in the faculty
advising, a certain academic department, a research opportunity, the library's resources,
or the career services within a university. The published rankings don't address these
important factors in determining it top colleges because, naturally, they can't. It's
inherently subjective. But, with research, a student can create his or her own personalized
list. There is no real "top 50"; this zero-sum game of rankings renders meaningless.
Students must examine a college's philosophy, environment, and academic offerings first
and foremost, and that's the truth about college rankings.

						
Related docs
Other docs by lot16315
RANKINGS REPORT
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Department Of English Merit Ratings Criteria
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
2010 Rankings
Views: 55  |  Downloads: 0
Ratings Methodology
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
NCAA Player Rankings
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 0
PR Online Top 10
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 2
The DOS top 10
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0