Combinational image watermarking in the spatial and
Document Sample


Combinational image watermarking in the
spatial and frequency domains
Source: Pattern Recognition, Vol. 36, No. 4, April
2003, pp. 969-975
Authors: Frank Y. Shih, Scott Y.T. Wu
Speaker: Yu-An Ho
Date: 2004/2/6
1
Outline
Introduction
Flowchart
The watermarking in the spatial domain
The watermarking in the frequency domain
Experimental results
Random sequence generator
Conclusions
Comments
2
Introduction
There are many aspects to be noticed in
Watermarking design:
Imperceptibility
Security
Robustness
Capacity
3
Flowchart
DCT
+
IDCT
+
4
The watermarking in the spatial
domain
187 191 10111011 10111111
LSB:least significant bits
181 176 10110101 10110000
10111011 10111111
+
10110100 10110001
1 1 187 191
0 1
180 177
5
The watermarking in the
frequency domain (1/2)
2*2 Watermark block 8*8 block
Host Image 256*256
Watermark 64*64 Total blocks = 32*32
Total blocks = 32*32
6
The watermarking in the
frequency domain (2/2)
0 0 502 22
+
1 1 -21 48
2*2 Watermark block
502 22
-21 49
8*8 block
7
Experimental results (1/4)
A 64*64 image is cut from a 128*128 image.
8
Experimental results (2/4)
A 64*64 image is cut from a 256*256 image.
9
Experimental results (3/4)
The extracted watermark.
10
Experimental results (4/4)
Table 1. The comparisons when embedding different
sized watermarks into a Lena image with size 256*256.
64*64 128*128 256*256
PSNR in first step None 56.58 51.14
PSNR in second step 64.57 55.93 50.98
NC 1 0.9813 0.9644
11
A 12-bit random sequence
generator
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
12 11 10 8 7 5 4 3 2 1 9 6
12
Flowchart
DCT
+
+
IDCT
13
Experimental results
Cropping half of a Lena image.
Table 2. Cutting different sizes
Times of 64*64 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
NC 0.92 0.88 0.81 0.73 0.68 0.61 0.58 0.52
14
Conclusions
The capacity is increased.
The degree of protection is double.
15
Comments
Watermark of Gray image.
Design random sequence generator.
16
Related docs
Get documents about "